Impact of Genetic Counseling on Patient-Reported Electronic Cancer Family History Collection.

BACKGROUND: Cancer family history is a vital part of cancer genetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT), but increasing indications for germline cancer GT necessitate less labor-intensive models of collection. We evaluated the impact of GC on patient pedigrees generated by an electronic cancer family history questionnaire (eCFHQ). METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved review of pedigrees collected through an eCFHQ was conducted. Paired pre-GC and post-GC pedigrees (n=1,113 each group) were analyzed independently by cancer genetic counselors for changes in patient-reported clinical history and to determine whether the pedigrees met NCCN GT criteria. Discrepancy in meeting NCCN GT criteria between pre-GC and post-GC pedigrees was the outcome variable of logistic regressions, with patient and family history characteristics as covariates. RESULTS: Overall, 780 (70%) patients had cancer (affected), 869 (78%) were female, and the median age was 57 years (interquartile range, 45-66 years; range, 21-91 years). Of the 1,113 pairs of pre-GC and post-GC pedigrees analyzed, 85 (8%) were blank, 933 (84%) were not discrepant, and 95 (9%) were discrepant in meeting any NCCN GT criteria. Of the discrepant pedigrees, n=79 (83%) became eligible for testing by at least one of the NCCN GT criteria after GC. Patients with discrepant pedigrees were more likely to report no or unknown history of GT (odds ratio [OR], 4.54; 95% CI, 1.66-18.70; P=.01, and OR, 18.47; 95% CI, 5.04-88.73; P<.0001, respectively) and belonged to racially and/or ethnically underrepresented groups (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.08-3.25; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: For most patients (84%), a standalone eCFHQ was sufficient to determine whether NCCN GT criteria were met. More research is needed on the performance of the eCFHQ in diverse patient populations.

SDHA secondary findings in germline testing: counseling and surveillance considerations.

This commentary explores the complexities faced by clinicians when encountering a secondary SDHA pathogenic variant (PV) in patients without a personal or family history of SDHA-related tumors. The increasing use of germline multi-gene panel testing has led to a rise in such secondary findings, necessitating a nuanced approach to counseling, surveillance, and decision-making. We aim to discuss the current data surrounding the penetrance of SDHA PVs, the spectrum of screening guidelines, recommendations for educating individuals and families about their secondary findings, and the need for future research to optimize care for these individuals. Practical recommendations for clinicians dealing with patients with secondary SDHA findings include acknowledging the limitations of existing guidelines, fostering shared decision-making, and considering specialist referrals. Overall, the evolving landscape of SDHA penetrance data warrants ongoing reassessment of surveillance approaches.

Succinate Dehydrogenase Mutations as Familial Pheochromocytoma Syndromes.

It is recognized that a large portion of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma cases will have an underlying germline mutation, supporting the recommendation for universal genetic testing in all patients with PPGLs. A mutation in succinate dehydrogenase subunit B is associated with increased rates of developing synchronous and/or metachronous metastatic disease. Patients identified with this mutation require meticulous preoperative evaluation, a personalized surgical plan to minimize the risk of recurrence and tumor spread, and lifelong surveillance.