Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ablation Vs Surgery for Pancreatic Cystic Tumors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic cyst ablation (EUS-PCA) is performed as an alternative to surgical resection in selected patients with pancreatic cystic tumors (PCTs). We aimed to directly compare the long-term outcomes between EUS-PCA and surgery for PCTs. METHODS: We reviewed a PCT database to identify patients with unilocular or oligolocular PCTs who underwent EUS-PCA or surgery between January 2004 and July 2019. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching based on potential confounding factors. The primary outcome was long-term morbidities. Secondary outcomes included early (≤14 days) and late (>14 days) major adverse events (MAEs), development of diabetes mellitus, readmission, length of hospital stay, and therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 620 patients (EUS-PCA, n = 310; surgery, n = 310) were selected after propensity score matching. The EUS-PCA group showed a lower 10-year rate of cumulative long-term morbidities (1.6% vs 33.5%; P = .001) as well as lower rates of early MAE (1.0% vs 8.7%; P = .001), late MAE (0.3% vs 5.5%; P = .001), and readmission (1.0% vs 15.2%; P = .001). The EUS-PCA group had a shorter hospital stay (3.5 vs 10.3 d; P = .001) and a lower incidence of diabetes mellitus (2.2% vs 22.8%; P = .001), whereas the surgery group had a higher complete resolution rate (76.5% vs 100%; P = .001) and a lower relapse rate (4.6% vs 0.3%; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: For select patients with PCTs, EUS-PCA showed superior results to surgery in terms of long-term safety profile and preservation of pancreatic function.

Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Impact of the Supra-papilla Method on Patency in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: /aims: Placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) across the duodenal major papilla carries a risk of duodenobiliary reflux (DBR). The supra-papilla method of stenting may reduce DBR and improve stent patency compared to the trans-papilla method. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between the supra-papilla and trans-papilla methods for distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). METHODS: Between January 2021 and January 2023, consecutive patients with DMBO from six centers in Korea were randomly assigned to either the supra-papilla or trans-papilla method arm in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency, and secondary outcomes included the cause of stent dysfunction, adverse events, and overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were equally assigned to each group. The most common cause of DMBO was pancreatic cancer (n=50, 59.5%), followed by bile duct (n=20, 23.8%), gallbladder (n=11, 13.1%), and other cancers (n=3, 3.6%). Stent patency was significantly longer in the supra-papilla group (median [95% confidence interval], 369 [289-497] vs. 154 [78-361] days; P < 0.01). Development of DBR was significantly lower in the supra-papilla group (9.4% vs 40.8%, P < 0.01). Adverse events and overall survival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of SEMS using the supra-papilla method resulted in a significantly longer duration of stent patency. It is advisable to place the SEMS using the supra-papilla method in DMBO. Further studies with a larger number of patients are required to validate the benefits of the supra-papilla method.

Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) using the Hot-Axios device has recently been associated with a significant risk of bleeding. This adverse event (AE) seems to occur less frequently with the use of a different device, the Spaxus stent. The aim of the current study was to compare the rates of bleeding between the two stents. METHODS: Patients admitted for treatment of PFCs by EUS plus lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 endoscopy referral centers between 10 July 2019 and 28 February 2022 were identified and their outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. RESULTS: 363 patients were evaluated. After a 1-to-1 propensity score match, 264 patients were selected (132 per group). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred in the Hot-Axios group than in the Spaxus group (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.03); stent type was a significant predictor of bleeding in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Bleeding necessitating arterial embolization did not however differ significantly between the two groups (3.0% vs. 0%; P = 0.12). In addition, the Hot-Axios was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall AEs compared with the Spaxus stent (9.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that, in patients with PFCs, bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred significantly more frequently with use of the Hot-Axios stent than with the Spaxus stent, although this was not the case for bleeding requiring embolization.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage for right intrahepatic duct dilatation in malignant hilar obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is being increasingly performed as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) to treat malignant hilar obstruction (MHO) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, no study has compared EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy (EUS-HDS) with PTBD for right intrahepatic duct (IHD) obstruction after failed ERCP in patients with unresectable MHO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with right IHD obstruction developed by unresectable MHO who underwent EUS-HDS or PTBD after a previous placement of a stent in the left and/or right IHD between March 2018 and October 2021. Technical success, clinical success, stent or tube-related adverse events, frequency of reintervention, and stent patency were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (18 EUS-HDS, 24 PTBD) were analyzed. Both groups did not show significant differences in technical success (EUS-HDS, 94% vs PTBD, 100%; P = 0.429), clinical success (83% vs 83%; P = 0.999), early adverse events (24% vs 46%; P = 0.144), and stent or tube-related late adverse events (29% vs 54%; P = 0.116). During follow-up, the EUS-HDS group had a longer median duration of patency (131 days vs 58.5 days; P = 0.041), and lower mean frequency of reinterventions per patient (0.35 vs 1.92; P = 0.030) than the PTBD group. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HDS showed comparable efficacy and safety to PTBD for drainage of the right biliary system and produced longer duration of patency and lower frequency of reinterventions in patients with unresectable MHO.

Long-term outcomes of fully covered self-expandable metal stents for refractory biliary strictures after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study at a tertiary center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic multiple plastic stents are an established first-line treatment for anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) management after liver transplantation (LT). Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) have recently been used with favorable outcomes, but long-term treatment outcomes remain an issue for ABS. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS for the management of refractory ABS after LT. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected and maintained endoscopic retrograde cholangiography database at Asan Medical Center to retrieve consecutive post-LT ABS cases that underwent an endoscopic FCSEMS placement between August 2009 and August 2019 after MPS placement failure. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Technical success had been achieved in all subjects (100%). The median stent placement duration was 3.1 months (IQR 2.7-6.1). Stricture resolution was achieved in 26 patients (clinical success 76.5%, 95% confidence interval 62-91). Early adverse events developed in 3 patients (8.8%), including distal stent migration. Late adverse events occurred in 9 patients (26.5%), including cholangitis (n = 7, 20.6%) and asymptomatic distal stent migration (n = 2, 5.9%). The median follow-up period was 57.9 months (IQR 51.9-64.3). Stricture recurrence occurred in 3 of 26 patients who achieved clinical success (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: FCSEMS placement appears to be an effective and advisable intervention for refractory ABS as it can provide persistent stricture improvement over the long-term.

Side-by-side placement of fully covered metal stents versus conventional 7F plastic stents in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metal stents compared with plastic stents when bilateral side-by-side stents were deployed for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). METHODS: Fifty patients with unresectable advanced MHBO were randomly assigned to the metal stent (MS, n = 25) or plastic stent group (PS, n = 25). Fully covered self-expandable metal stents with 6 mm diameter and plastic stents with either 7F straight or double pigtail were used for MS and PS groups, respectively. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was evaluated as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Both groups had 100% technical success rates; 88% and 76% of clinical success rates were obtained in MS and PS, respectively. Although stent migrations were more frequent in MS than PS (48% vs. 16%, P = 0.02), the mean TRBO was significantly longer in MS (190 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 121-260 days vs. 96 days; 95% CI 50-141 days, P = 0.02). The placement of plastic stents (hazard ratio 2.42; 95% CI 1.24-4.73; P = 0.01) was the only significant risk factor associated with TRBO in multivariable analysis. The rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups (difference 0%; 95% CI -25% to 25%; P > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: During bilateral side-by-side deployment in MHBO, the use of metal stents appears to be preferable to plastic stents in terms of TRBO, despite a higher frequency of stent migration.

Consensus statements on endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Guidelines from the Asian Endoscopic Ultrasound Group.

OBJECTIVES: This consensus was developed by the Asian EUS Group (AEG), who aimed to formulate a set of practice guidelines addressing various aspects of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA). METHODS: The AEG initiated the development of consensus statements and formed an expert panel comprising surgeons, gastroenterologists, and pathologists. Three online consensus meetings were conducted to consolidate the statements and votes. The statements were presented and discussed in the first two consensus meetings and revised according to comments. Final voting was conducted at a third consensus meeting. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was adopted to define the strength of the recommendations and quality of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 20 clinical questions and statements regarding EUS-TA were formulated. The committee recommended that fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles be preferred over conventional fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles for EUS-TA of subepithelial lesions. For solid pancreatic masses, rapid on-site evaluation is not routinely recommended when FNB needles are used. For dedicated FNB needles, fork-tip and Franseen-tip needles have essentially equivalent performance. CONCLUSION: This consensus provides guidance for EUS-TA, thereby enhancing the quality of EUS-TA.

Expanded indication for EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation: management of adrenal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has been performed as an alternative to surgery for the treatment of pancreatic tumors. The promising results obtained using this procedure suggest that the indication for EUS-RFA could be expanded to the management of extrapancreatic tumors. Here, we evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-RFA in the treatment of left adrenal tumors. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study was conducted at Asan Medical Center between January 2016 and November 2021. A total of 11 patients with left adrenal tumors were enrolled in the study. The technical success rate, treatment response, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: EUS-RFA was performed successfully in all patients (technical success rate, 100%). The indications for the procedure were an increase in tumor size (n = 8), and adrenal tumor with adrenal hormone excess (n = 3). After a median of 2 EUS-RFA sessions (range, 1-2), 73% of patients had a complete response, and 27% had a partial response. During follow-up, 5 patients experienced self-limiting mild abdominal pain; no moderate or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-RFA showed high technical feasibility, clinical success, and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of left adrenal tumors. In patients at high surgical risk, EUS-RFA can be considered as an alternative therapeutic modality to surgery for the treatment of left adrenal tumors.

Long-term clinical outcomes of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent for refractory pancreatic strictures in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis: An 11-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) has recently been applied in the management of chronic pancreatitis patients with pancreatic strictures. However, related long-term effects remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of FCSEMS placement in chronic pancreatitis patients with refractory strictures. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing FCSEMS placement for refractory pancreatic strictures between September 2008 and December 2010. The main outcomes were technical, radiological, and clinical success, as well as recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The median FCSEMS indwelling time was 3.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.0-4.9 months). Radiological success was achieved in all patients (complete, n = 2; partial, n = 33). Clinical success was achieved in 29 patients (82.9%; complete analgesic cessation, n = 19; analgesic reduction >50%, n = 11). During the median follow-up of 136 months, (IQR, 85.8-145.5 months), eight patients (22.9%) experienced recurrence. The median interval from stent removal to recurrence was 24.9 months (IQR, 11.3-30.3 months). Biliary obstruction, an early adverse event, occurred in two patients (5.7%); the late adverse event stent-induced de novo stricture was observed in 17 patients (48.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an FCSEMS is effective for relieving refractory strictures in chronic pancreatitis. However, FCSEMSs were associated with stent-induced de novo strictures in nearly half of the patients. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of FCSEMSs in chronic pancreatitis.

Comparison of the long-term outcomes between proximal and distal IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) is considered a biliary manifestation of IgG4-related diseases. However, there has been a controversy on the clinical outcomes according to the location of the involved bile duct. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes and long-term prognosis of IgG4-SC with proximal bile duct involvement (proximal IgG4-SC) and IgG4-SC with distal bile duct involvement (distal IgG4-SC). METHODS: We reviewed the data of patients with IgG4-SC that were prospectively collected at 10 tertiary centers between March 2002 and October 2020. Clinical manifestations, outcomes, association with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), steroid-responsiveness, and relapse of IgG4-SC were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients (proximal IgG4-SC, n = 59; distal IgG4-SC, n = 89) were analyzed. The median age was 65 years (IQR, 56.25-71), and 86% were male. The two groups were similar in terms of jaundice at initial presentation (51% vs 65%; P = 0.082) and presence of elevated serum IgG4 (66% vs 70%; P = 0.649). The two groups showed significant differences in terms of steroid-responsiveness (91% vs 100%; P = 0.008), association with AIP (75% vs 99%; P = 0.001), and occurrence of liver cirrhosis (9% vs 1%; P = 0.034). During a median follow-up of 64 months (IQR, 21.9-84.7), the cumulative relapse-free survival was significantly different between the two groups (67% vs 79% at 5 years; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Relapse of IgG4-SC frequently occurred during follow-up. Proximal IgG4-SC and distal IgG4-SC had different long-term outcomes in terms of steroid-responsiveness, occurrence of liver cirrhosis, and recurrence. It may be advantageous to determine the therapeutic and follow-up strategies according to the location of bile duct involvement.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage versus in situ or ex situ percutaneous gallbladder drainage in real-world practice.

OBJECTIVES: Many studies showed better outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) when compared with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (P-GBD) in which most tubes were left in situ. However, no studies have directly compared EUS-GBD with P-GBD after tube removal (ex situ). We compared the long-term outcomes of EUS-GBD and ex situ or in situ P-GBD in high surgical risk patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 182 patients (EUS-GBD, n = 75; P-GBD, n = 107) who underwent gallbladder drainage. The procedural outcomes, long-term outcomes, and adverse events were compared. RESULTS: The EUS-GBD group and the P-GBD group had similar rates of technical and clinical success. Early adverse events were less common in the EUS-GBD group (5.5% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.010). The long-term outcomes were evaluated in 168 patients (EUS-GBD, n = 67; P-GBD ex situ, n = 84; P-GBD in situ, n = 17). The rate of cholecystitis recurrence in the EUS-GBD group (6.0%) was similar to that in the P-GBD ex situ group (9.6%, P = 0.422), but significantly lower than that in the P-GBD in situ group (23.5%, P = 0.049). P-GBD in situ was a significant predictor of recurrent cholecystitis (hazard ratio 14.6; 95% confidence interval 2.9-72.8). CONCLUSION: The long-term recurrence rate of acute cholecystitis in patients who underwent EUS-GBD was comparable to that in patients whose P-GBD could be removed. However, patients in whom P-GBD could not be removed showed higher rates of recurrent cholecystitis than patients with EUS-GBD.

Double Ki-67 and synaptophysin labeling in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are frequently detected on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) specimens. The conventional methods for evaluating the Ki-67 labeling index (Ki67LI) in EUS-FNAB specimens are laborious, and their results are difficult to interpret. More practical and easy methods for evaluating the Ki67LI in PanNETs from EUS-FNAB specimens is increasing in need. METHODS: We used double Ki-67 and synaptophysin (double Ki-Syn) antibody cocktail; Ki67LI, total Ki-67 positive cells, and total tumor cells were counted and compared with those detected on conventional single Ki-67 immunostaining (single Ki-67) of 96 PanNETs [Grade 1 (G1), 68 cases (71%); G2, 26 (27%); G3, 2 (2%)] from EUS-FNAB specimens. RESULTS: The tumor grading between double Ki-Syn and single Ki-67 immunolabeling was highly concordant (correlation, 0.95; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). Seven EUS-FNAB specimens (7%) had discrepant results, of which 2 were removed through surgical resection and showed the same tumor grade as that detected on double Ki-Syn immunolabeling. Fifty-four specimens (56%) had higher Ki-67 positive tumor cell counts on single Ki-67 immunolabeling. Sixty-two specimens (65%) had higher total tumor cell counts on double Ki-Syn immunolabeling. The number of specimens with less than 500 total counted tumor cells were significantly reduced when double Ki-Syn immunolabeling was applied [P = 0.046; single Ki-67, 17 specimens (18%); double Ki-Syn, 9 specimens (9%)]. CONCLUSION: Double Ki-Syn immunolabeling enables the accurate counting of the number of proliferating tumor cells without including inflammatory and contaminant epithelial cells compared with single Ki-67 immunolabeling in PanNETs from EUS-FNAB specimens.

Clinical utility of directional eFLOW compared with contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for assessing the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) can be used for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by evaluating microvascular circulation and patterns of contrast enhancement. However, routine use of CEH-EUS is limited by its high cost, the lack of contrast agent availability and the absence of expertise with this technique. Directional eFLOW (D-eFLOW) (Aloka Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was introduced as a new high-definition modality that detects blood flow in microvessels. Because it uses built-in functions, it entails no additional cost and reduces time for examination. The present study compared the usefulness of D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 130 patients who underwent EUS and D-eFLOW examinations from January 2016 to March 2020 to evaluate pancreatic and peripancreatic masses. RESULTS: All 130 patients underwent D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS examinations. Histological diagnoses were confirmed in 130 patients by EUS-FNA and/or surgery. D-eFLOW and CEH-EUS showed good correlation in evaluating the vascularity of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors (Fisher's exact test, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating the characteristics of tumorous lesions, vascularity detected by D-eFLOW showed good correlation with enhancement patterns of CEH-EUS. D-eFLOW can be considered a good alternative to CEH-EUS in diagnosing pancreatic and peripancreatic masses.

Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy sampling in categorizing the type of pancreatic cystic lesions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided through-the-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-TTNB) using microbiopsy forceps is performed for the accurate diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). However, there are no standardized protocols for this procedure, and the amount of data on its efficacy is limited. Here, we evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EUS-TTNB in categorizing the types of PCLs and identified the factors associated with diagnostic failure. METHODS: The prospectively collected and maintained EUS-TTNB database at Asan Medical Center was reviewed to identify patients with PCLs who underwent EUS-TTNB between January 2019 and January 2021. The primary outcomes were technical success, diagnostic yield, and adverse events. Factors contributing to diagnostic failure and the discrepancies in the diagnosis made by conventional modalities (ie, EUS morphology, cross-sectional imaging, and cystic fluid analysis) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were analyzed. EUS-TTNB was successfully performed in all patients (technical success, 100%). Histologic diagnosis of PCLs was made in 37 patients (diagnostic yield, 82%). When comparing EUS-TTNB with a presumptive diagnosis, EUS-TTNB changed the diagnosis in 10 patients in terms of the categorization of the types of PCLs. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher in those who had 4 or more visible biopsy specimens per session (93%) than in those with fewer than 4 visible biopsy specimens per session (67%; P = .045). During follow-up, 3 patients (7%) experienced adverse events (2 acute pancreatitis, 1 intracystic bleeding), and no life-threatening adverse event occurred. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TTNB showed high technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and good safety profile. EUS-TTNB may improve the categorization of the types of PCLs. Studies with standardized procedure protocols are needed to reduce the diagnostic failure for the types of PCLs.

Clinical outcomes of EUS-guided transluminal drainage with a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for postoperative pancreatic fluid collection after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided transluminal drainage (EUS-TD) is increasingly used for the treatment of postoperative pancreatic fluid collections (POPFCs). A novel lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was recently developed and used for the drainage of POPFCs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel LAMS in patients with POPFCs. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with symptomatic POPFCs who underwent EUS-TD with a novel LAMS (Niti-S SPAXUS; Taewoong Medical Co, Ltd, Ilsan, South Korea) between April 2019 and July 2020 were included in this study. Clinical outcomes, including technical success, clinical success, and adverse events, were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: EUS-TD was technically successful in 41 of 47 patients (87.2%). Clinical success was achieved in 37 of 41 patients (90.2%). The mean procedure time was 13.7 ± 3.5 minutes. The mean POPFC size was 59 ± 18.9 mm. The mean time interval from surgery to EUS-TD was 24.2 ± 37.6 days. Five patients experienced 6 procedural adverse events (12.8%): 4 (8.5%) POPFC infections and 2 (4.3%) distal stent migrations. The 4 patients with POPFC infection underwent additional endoscopic interventions. Of the 2 patients with stent migration, 1 underwent laparoscopic exploration and surgical extraction of the stent and 1 (2.1%) experienced POPFC recurrence, which was managed with percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-TD for symptomatic POPFCs with a novel LAMS is technically feasible and effective, with an acceptable adverse event rate. Further larger-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the findings of this study.

Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clipping for prevention of delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND : Endoscopic clip placement is technically challenging using a duodenoscope, limiting their application for treatment of bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy. This study evaluated the efficacy of newly designed clips to prevent bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy. METHODS : Patients (n = 80) with suspected benign adenomas on the major papilla who were scheduled for endoscopic papillectomy with or without clipping were randomized. A new duodenoscope-compatible clip capable of being rotated, reopened, and repeatedly repositioned was used. The primary end point was incidence of delayed bleeding. RESULTS : The clipping procedure was successful in all patients. The incidence of delayed bleeding was nonsignificantly higher in the no-clipping group than in the clipping group (31.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.1-47.5] vs. 15.0 % [95 %CI 7.1-29.1]). The incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis did not differ significantly between the groups (clipping vs. no-clipping: 17.5 % [95 %CI 8.7-31.9] vs. 5.3 % [95 %CI 1.5-17.3]), and all cases were mild. CONCLUSIONS : Placement of the newly designed rotatable clip was technically feasible and tended to have a protective effect by preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic papillectomy, although statistical significance was not reached.

The usefulness of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation before metal stent placement in unresectable malignant hilar obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: EB-RFA with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) may improve the stent patency and patient survival in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction. However, there are few studies on the role of EB-RFA for malignant hilar obstruction (MHO). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EB-RFA for MHO. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the stent patency and survival among 79 consecutive patients with MHO who underwent bilateral uncovered SEMS placement without and with EB-RFA between April 2016 and January 2020. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (64.6%) underwent SEMS placement alone (stent alone group), whereas 28 (35.4%) underwent SEMS placement after EB-RFA (RFA-stent group). All procedures were successful (100%). During follow-up, stent occlusion occurred in 59 patients (74.7%), of which 40 (78.4%) and 19 (67.9%) were in the stent alone and RFA-stent groups, respectively. There was no difference in stent patency (192 ± 39.2 days vs 140 ± 53.7 days, P = 0.41) and survival (311 ± 24.7 days vs 311 ± 46.9 days, P = 0.73) between the stent alone and RFA-stent groups. Multivariate cox analysis showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.892 (1.579-5.294, P = 0.001) for stent occlusion in patients who did not receive chemotherapy. EB-RFA had no significant effect on stent occlusion (HR, 1.150, 0.644-2.053, P = 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: SEMS placement after EB-RFA in MHO was not associated with improvement in the stent patency or patient survival. Further prospective randomized studies are necessary to establish the effectiveness of EB-RFA with stents in MHO.

Effectiveness of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for postoperative fluid collection.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative abdominal fluid collections (PAFCs) are a potentially fatal complication of pancreatobiliary surgery. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has recently been shown to be effective in treating PAFCs of more than 4 weeks old. Little is currently known, however, regarding the EUS-guided drainage of PAFCs of less than 4 weeks. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the early drainage (< 4 weeks) of PAFCs via EUS guidance. METHODS: The data of patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage between July 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data of EUS-guided PAFC drainage were obtained from prospectively collected EUS database of our institute and reviewed of patients' clinical parameters based on electrical medical record. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients who had undergone EUS-guided PAFC drainage within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery were enrolled. The indications of procedure included abdominal pain (n = 27), fever (n = 18), leukocytosis (n = 2), and increased size of PAFC during external tube drainage (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all cases, and the clinical success rate was 95.8% (46/48). Four patients underwent secondary procedures. The median period from surgery to EUS-guide drainage was 14 days (Interquartile range [IQR] 10-16), and median time to resolution was 23.5 days (IQR 8.5-33.8). Adverse events occurred in two cases that were developed intracystic bleeding and were successfully resolved by arterial coil embolization. CONCLUSIONS: Early EUS-guided drainage is a technically feasible, effective, and safe method in patients who have developing PAFCs within 4 weeks of pancreatobiliary surgery.

The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used for the preoperative histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, debate continues regarding the clinical merits of preoperative EUS-FNA for the management of resectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and safety of preoperative EUS-FNA for resectable distal pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The medical records of 304 consecutive patients with suspected distal pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-FNA were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical benefits of preoperative EUS-FNA. We also reviewed the medical records of 528 patients diagnosed with distal pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without EUS-FNA. The recurrence rates and cancer-free survival periods of patients who did or did not undergo preoperative EUS-FNA were compared. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative EUS-FNA was high (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value 100%; accuracy, 90.7%; negative predictive value, 73.8%). Among patients, 26.7% (79/304) avoided surgery based on the preoperative EUS-FNA findings. Of the 528 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, 193 patients received EUS-FNA and 335 did not. During follow-up (median 21.7 months), the recurrence rate was similar in the two groups (EUS-FNA, 72.7%; non-EUS-FNA, 75%; P = 0.58). The median cancer-free survival was also similar (P = 0.58); however, gastric wall recurrence was only encountered in the patients with EUS-FNA (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with increased risks of cancer-specific or overall survival. However, clinicians must consider the potential risks of needle tract seeding, and care should be taken when selecting patients.