Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for second-line and subsequent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Currently, there is a lack of effective second-line and subsequent treatments for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and the establishment of a standardized treatment protocol is still underway. Considering the potential synergistic therapeutic effects of anti-angiogenic drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), combination therapy could be a viable option for treating lung cancer. This research concentrates on assessing the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with ICIs for the treatment of ES-SCLC. We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients with extensive-stage SCLC who received anlotinib in combination with ICIs as second-line and subsequent treatment at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2020 and April 2023. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Among the 43 patients who received combination therapy, there were no cases of complete response (CR), 16 patients who achieved partial response (PR), 21 patients who had stable disease (SD), and 6 patients who experienced disease progression (PD). This resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 37.2% (16/43) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 86.0% (34/43). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.74-5.26), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 10 months (95% CI: 4.8-15.2). Cox multifactorial regression analysis disclosed that the performance score (PS) and the number of metastatic organs were independent factors influencing PFS in ES-SCLC (p<0.001). The combination therapy demonstrated acceptable toxicity, with a total grade 3/4 toxicity rate of 30.2%. The combination therapy showed a notable association with several adverse events, including hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and fatigue, which were the most significant. Combining anlotinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in the treatment of second-line and subsequent extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Myocarditis is a rare immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with high mortality rates, with few reports on its clinical characteristics and prognostic impact. This study designed to explore the associations between cardiac parameters and outcomes of myocarditis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Fourteen patients diagnosed with ICI-associated myocarditis by clinicians were admitted to the study analysis. By Cox univariate and multivariate survival analyses, potential risk factors for the development of severe myocarditis were identified. Survival analysis was also performed to explore the prognosis of patients with myocarditis. Among patients with myocarditis, higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (P = 0.04) and conduction block (P = 0.03) were associated with progression to severe myocarditis. In addition, high lactate dehydrogenase (LHD) levels (P = .04) and myocarditis onset within 2 months (P = 0.02) were prognostic factors of severe myocarditis. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time and median overall survival (OS) time for all patients were 5.9 months and 18.5 months, respectively. However, there were no statistical differences between mild and severe cohorts in terms of PFS and OS (PFS: 4.5 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.17; OS: 21.3 vs. 18.5months, P = 0.36). And we found that the earlier occurrence of myocarditis, worse PFS prognosis (4.5 months vs. 10.5 months, P = 0.008), while no difference in OS (18.5 months vs. 21.3 months, P = 0.35). Compared to mild myocarditis, severe myocarditis presented with higher BNP levels and cardiac conduction abnormalities. In addition, patients with mild and early myocarditis tended to have better survival rates.

Chemoradiotherapy for untreated Masaoka-Koga stage IVB thymic carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare type of a malignant tumor. The optimal treatment for Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients is controversial due to the rarity of the disease. Chemotherapy is still the preferred option, but the outcomes are unsatisfactory. Whether radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy could improve prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: Untreated stage IVB TC patients who have received first-line chemotherapy were included in the present study. The patients who have undergone surgery were excluded. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. A total of 31 patients received chemoradiotherapy (ChemoRT cohort), and the remaining 36 patients only received chemotherapy (Chemo cohort). The median follow-up period was 40.3 months. The ORR for the ChemoRT and Chemo cohorts was 61.3 and 27.8%, respectively (P = 0.006). Furthermore, PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.046) were significantly superior in the ChemoRT cohort. Radiotherapy maintained a significant favorable effect on PFS in multivariate analysis (P = 0.014), but the effect on OS was insignificant (P = 0.249). There was no advantage in PFS (P = 0.302) in the ChemoRT cohort in patients who received < 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In contrast, radiotherapy significantly improved PFS (P = 0.005) in patients who received ≥ 4 cycles of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoradiotherapy used as the first-line treatment improved ORR and PFS in Masaoka-Koga stage IVB TC patients. Patients receiving more cycles of chemotherapy may have a better chance to benefit from chemoradiotherapy.

Development and validation of prognostic nomogram for T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Radical resection plus lymph node dissection is a common treatment for patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few models predicted the survival outcomes of these patients. This study aimed to developed a nomogram for predicting their overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 3002 patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC after curative resection between January 1999 and October 2013. 1525 Patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were randomly allocated to training cohort and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 7:3. 1477 patients from ten institutions were recruited as external validation cohort. A nomogram was constructed based on the training cohort and validated by internal and external validation cohort to predict the OS of these patients. The accuracy and practicability were tested by Harrell's C-indexes, calibration plots and decision curve analyses (DCA). RESULTS: Age, sex, histological classification, pathological T stage, and HI standard were independent factors for OS and were included in our nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for OS estimates were 0.671 (95% CI, 0.637-0.705),0.632 (95% CI, 0.581-0.683), and 0.645 (95% CI, 0.617-0.673) in the training cohorts, internal validation cohorts, and external validation cohort, respectively. The calibration plots and DCA for predictions of OS were in excellent agreement. An online version of the nomogram was built for convenient clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Our nomogram can predict the OS of patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC after curative resection. The online version of our nomogram offer opportunities for fast personalized risk stratification and prognosis prediction in clinical practice.

Baseline C-reactive protein predicts efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study.

AIMS: To investigate the predictive value of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study spanning from January 2016 to December 2020, advanced LSCC patients initially treated with chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and ICI were categorized into normal and elevated CRP subgroups. The relationship between CRP levels and treatment outcomes was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and multivariate logistic regression, focusing primarily on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint, and secondarily on overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) endpoints. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients evaluated, the 105 who received a combination of chemotherapy and ICI with elevated baseline CRP levels exhibited a significant reduction in PFS (median 6.5 months vs. 11.8 months, HR, 1.78; 95% CI: 1.12-2.81; p = 0.013) compared to those with normal CRP levels. Elevated CRP was identified as an independent risk factor for poor PFS through multivariate-adjusted analysis. However, among the 140 patients receiving chemotherapy alone, baseline CRP levels did not significantly influence PFS. Furthermore, within the combination therapy group, there was a notable decrease in the ORR (51% vs. 71%, p = 0.035), coupled with a significantly shorter OS (median 20.9 months vs. 31.5 months, HR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.13-4.44; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced LSCC, elevated baseline CRP levels were identified as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of combination therapy with chemotherapy and ICI, but not in chemotherapy alone. This suggests that CRP may be a valuable biomarker for guiding treatment strategies.

Bcl6 drives stem-like memory macrophages differentiation to foster tumor progression.

Cancer development is a long-lasting process during which macrophages play a pivotal role. However, how macrophages maintain their cellular identity, persistence, expanding and pro-tumor property during malignant progression remains elusive. Inspired by the recent report of the activation of stem cell-like self-renewal mechanism in mature macrophages, we postulate that intra-tumoral macrophages might be trained to assume stem-like properties and memory-like activity favoring cancer development. Herein we demonstrated that tumor infiltrating macrophages rapidly converted into the CD11b+F4/80+Ly6C-Bcl6+ phenotype, and adopted stem cell-like properties involving expression of stemness-related genes, long-term persistence and self-renewing. Importantly, Bcl6+ macrophages stably maintained cell identity, gene signature, metabolic profile, and pro-tumor property even after long-term culture in tumor-free medium, which were hence termed stem cell-like memory macrophages (SMMs). Mechanistically, we showed that transcriptional factor Bcl6 co-opted the demethylase Tet2 and the deacetylase SIRT1 to confer the epigenetic imprinting and mitochondrial metabolic traits to SMMs, bolstering the stability and longevity of trained immunity in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Furthermore, tumor-derived redHMGB1 was identified as the priming signal, which, through TLR4 and mTOR/AKT pathway, induced Bcl6-driven program underpinning SMMs generation. Collectively, our study uncovers a distinct macrophage population with a hybrid of stem cell and memory cell properties, and unveils a regulatory mechanism that integrates transcriptional, epigenetic and metabolic pathways to promote long-lasting pro-tumor immunity.

Predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a machine learning method based on multidimensional data.

Immunotherapy has improved the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but only a small subset of patients achieved clinical benefit. The purpose of our study was to integrate multidimensional data using a machine learning method to predict the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. We retrospectively enrolled 112 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC receiving ICIs monotherapy. The random forest (RF) algorithm was used to establish efficacy prediction models based on five different input datasets, including precontrast computed tomography (CT) radiomic data, postcontrast CT radiomic data, a combination of the two CT radiomic data, clinical data, and a combination of radiomic and clinical data. The 5-fold cross-validation was used to train and test the random forest classifier. The performance of the models was assessed according to the area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic curve. Survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups with the prediction label generated by the combined model. The radiomic model based on the combination of precontrast and postcontrast CT radiomic features and the clinical model produced an AUC of 0.92±0.04 and 0.89±0.03, respectively. By integrating radiomic and clinical features together, the combined model had the best performance with an AUC of 0.94±0.02. The survival analysis showed that the two groups had significantly different PFS times (p<0.0001). The baseline multidimensional data including CT radiomic and multiple clinical features were valuable in predicting the efficacy of ICIs monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the clinical. outcomes of various immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The results predicted the treatment efficacy of these combinations. METHODS: From July 15, 2016 to March 22, 2022, 85 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, enrolled at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, received ICI combinations after resistance to prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). These patients were diagnosed with EGFR mutations using an amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival time between patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy and patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy or ICIs combined with chemotherapy, which was due to the limitation sample size of patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Patients with L858R mutations had a longer PFS and OS than patients with exon 19 deletions. T790M negative patients benefited more from ICI combinations, compared with T790M positive patients. In addition, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with TP53 co-mutations and patients without a TP53 co-mutation. We also found that patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance had longer PFS and OS than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients. There was no new adverse event in this study. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR-mutated patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer PFS and OS than patients with ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Patients with L858R or without T790M mutation benefited more from ICI combinations. Besides, patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance could benefit more from ICIs combinations than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients.

Treatment outcomes and prognosis of patients with primary and acquired BRAF-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

The incidence of primary and acquired BRAF mutations is low in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with limited demographic and treatment outcome data available for this patient population. We evaluated lung cancer samples with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) information extracted from 12 051 cases (cohort A) of lung cancer from OncoPanscan™-based sequencing of tissue (Genetron Health) and conducted retrospective multicenter data analysis using the database of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital and four other centers (cohort B, including 73 primary BRAF mutation and 14 acquired BRAF mutation cases) to compare treatment outcomes of patient groups with primary and acquired BRAF mutations. In cohort A, after propensity score analysis, 165 samples of NSCLC with BRAF mutations were screened along with 165 paired non-BRAF mutation samples. We observed no significant differences in the proportion of samples with ≥1% PD-L1 between BRAF and non-BRAF mutant groups. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) period in 13 patients with primary BRAF mutations receiving BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BRAF-TKIs) was 7.0 months. The group with primary BRAF mutations receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination chemotherapy had better PFS than those administered ICI monotherapy (14.77 months vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.025) and similar results were obtained for OS (unreached vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.013). For acquired BRAF mutations, mPFS of BRAF-TKI, ICI-based, and chemotherapy-based regimens were 3.8, 1.5, and 1.9 months, respectively. Therefore, for patients with the primary BRAF V600E mutation, targeted therapy or immunochemotherapy could serve as effective treatment choices, while for those with acquired BRAF V600E, targeted drug therapy may remain the preferred solution in China.

Targeting KRAS mutant cancers: from druggable therapy to drug resistance.

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene, occurring in a variety of tumor types. Targeting KRAS mutations with drugs is challenging because KRAS is considered undruggable due to the lack of classic drug binding sites. Over the past 40 years, great efforts have been made to explore routes for indirect targeting of KRAS mutant cancers, including KRAS expression, processing, upstream regulators, or downstream effectors. With the advent of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors, KRAS mutations are now druggable. Despite such inhibitors showing remarkable clinical responses, resistance to monotherapy of KRAS inhibitors is eventually developed. Significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of drug resistance to KRAS-mutant inhibitors. Here we review the most recent advances in therapeutic approaches and resistance mechanisms targeting KRAS mutations and discuss opportunities for combination therapy.

The prognostic impact of mild and severe immune-related adverse events in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter retrospective study.

Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) often experience unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the previous studies demonstrated an association between irAEs and better outcomes in patients with ICI treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the correlation between the occurrence of mild and severe irAEs and prognosis remains unclear. Additionally, little is known regarding the association between the timing of mild and severe irAEs and clinical outcomes. We retrospectively conducted a multicenter study of advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICI monotherapy. Of the 222 patients, 79 patients (35.6%) experienced at least one irAE, and most were of grade 1 or 2 (mild) (26.6%). The most common irAEs were pneumonitis (n = 21, 9.5%) and skin-related adverse reactions (n = 19, 8.6%). The median progression-free survival of all patients treated with ICIs was 3.2 months. Patients experiencing irAEs had a better prognosis than those without such events (6.5 vs. 2.6 months, p = 0.004), and mild irAEs were associated with the best prognosis. The difference in overall survival between mild and severe irAEs was significant (34.3 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.021). We further analyzed differences between patients with irAEs occurring at 3 or 6 weeks, and found that the earlier the occurrence of mild irAEs, the better the prognosis; however, the opposite was true for severe irAEs. In summary, patients with early occurring mild irAEs showed better clinical outcomes, whereas those with early severe irAEs tended to show poorer clinical outcomes.

Apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic thymic epithelial tumor: a single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignancies and the treatment options are limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib, an angiogenesis inhibitor, in advanced TETs. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm, phase II trial at three centers in China. Patients with TET who had progressed after failure of at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received apatinib 500 mg orally per day. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. RESULTS: From June 29, 2017, to April 18, 2019, 25 patients were enrolled. At data cut off (September 30, 2021), one patient achieved complete response, nine achieved partial response, and 11 achieved stable disease, with an ORR of 40% (95% CI 21-61%) and DCR of 84% (95% CI 64-95%). The median PFS was 9.0 (95% CI 5.4-12.6) months. The median OS was 24.0 (95% CI 8.2-39.8) months. All patients reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred 26 times in 15 patients. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first trial of apatinib for the treatment of TETs. Apatinib showed promising antitumor activity and the toxicities were tolerable and manageable.

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma with HER2 mutations: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of effective treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring HER2 mutations. We examined the efficacy and safety of, and potential resistance mechanism to, pyrotinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, in advanced NSCLC carrying HER2 mutations. METHODS: In this multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial, stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients harboring HER2 mutations, as determined using next-generation sequencing, were enrolled and treated with pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/day. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The impact of different HER2 mutation types on sensitivity to pyrotinib and the potential of utilizing mutational profile derived from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict disease progression were also explored. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled for efficacy and safety analysis. The 6-month PFS rate was 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.2-60.8). Pyrotinib produced an ORR of 19.2% (95% CI, 11.2-30.0), with median PFS of 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.4), and median OS of 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.7-12.3). The median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI, 6.2-13.6). All treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1-3 (all, 91.0%; grade 3, 20.5%), and the most common TRAE was diarrhea (all, 85.9%; grade 3, 16.7%). Patients with exon 20 and non-exon 20 HER2 mutations had ORRs of 17.7% and 25.0%, respectively. Brain metastases at baseline and prior exposure to afatinib were not associated with ORR, PFS, or OS. Loss of HER2 mutations and appearance of amplification in HER2 and EGFR were detected upon disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib exhibited promising efficacy and acceptable safety in NSCLC patients carrying exon 20 and non-exon 20 HER2 mutations and is worth further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800020262.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without pemetrexed in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients without driver gene mutations are usually treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy after first-line ICIs plus 4-6 cycles of pemetrexed/platinum. Some patients in the real world receive ICIs monotherapy as maintenance therapy. No clinical study has compared the efficacy and safety of ICIs with or without pemetrexed as maintenance therapy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study analyzing clinical data of patients with NS-NSCLC who were diagnosed in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from September 2018 to May 2021 and received maintenance therapy after 4-6 cycles of ICIs plus pemetrexed/platinum. Patients were divided into ICIs plus pemetrexed group and ICIs monotherapy group. Progression Free Survival 1 (PFS1) and PFS2, defined as the interval from the date of initial treatment and maintenance therapy to the date of systemic progression/death or the last follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients received ICIs with or without pemetrexed as maintenance therapy. Eighty-two patients received ICIs plus pemetrexed as maintenance therapy, and 38 patients received ICIs monotherapy. There were no statistically significant difference in median PFS1 between the ICIs monotherapy group and ICIs plus pemetrexed group (12.00 months vs. 12.07 months, P = 0.979). Among patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1%, the median PFS1 was worse with ICIs monotherapy (9.50 months vs. 14.20 months, P = 0.039). Among patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% or 1-49%, the median PFS1 in both groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.866, P = 0.589, respectively). Results for median PFS2 were similar to median PFS1, with statistically significantly different only in patients with PD-L1 TPS < 1% (P = 0.008). The 2-year survival rates of the two groups were similar (66.7% vs. 69.5%, P = 0.812). The incidence of fatigue was significantly higher in the ICIs plus pemetrexed group (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: ICIs with or without pemetrexed can be used as maintenance therapy after first-line ICIs plus 4-6 cycles of pemetrexed/platinum in patients with advanced NS-NSCLC based on PD-L1 expression.

Clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKIs in advanced squamous cell lung cancer.

We aimed to explore the treatment efficacy of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients and identify potential beneficial subgroups of EGFR-mutated lung SCC patients in this study. Between February 1st, 2013 and December 1st, 2021, 657 advanced lung SCC patients were enrolled at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Amplification refractory mutation system PCR or next-generation sequencing were used to detect gene abnormality. Clinicopathological features were analyzed by chi-square test and the clinical results of lung SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Lung SCC patients harboring EGFR mutation accounted for 11.0% in this study. Of 657 lung SCC patients, the median PFS and OS of 116 patients who received targeted therapy were 3.6 months and 16.2 months, patients treated with targeted therapy had similar OS to patients without targeted therapy (p=0.839). Of 110 lung SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI, EGFR-mutated patients had long PFS (p=0.000) but similar OS (p=0.472) than patients with EGFR wide type. EGFR-mutated SCC patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as a first-line benefit are equal to patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI as the second line or beyond according to similar PFS (p=0.311) and OS (p=0.721) between them. In addition, there was also no significant difference in PFS (p=0.376) and OS (p=0.205) between patients with exon 19 deletion and L858R point mutation. Lung SCC patients harboring EGFR mutation received first-generation EGFR-TKI had better clinical survival than patients with EGFR wide type.

The prognostic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study.

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an aggressive and poorly differentiated type of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Because of the rarity of PSC, the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy remain unclear. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of advanced PSC. The study cohort was limited to 33 patients with pathologically confirmed PSC treated with ICIs in four hospitals in China from March 2018 to March 2022. Expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was detected by immunohistochemical analysis. Categorical variables were compared with the Fisher exact test and survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 33 PSC patients, 8 (24.2%) received monotherapy with ICIs and 25 (75.8%) received combination therapy with ICIs. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 36.4% and 78.8%, respectively. The median durations of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.07 and 21.33 months, respectively. PD-L1 status in 16 available samples was assessed, which included 30.3% PD-L1-positive patients. The ORRs for PD-L1-positive vs. -negative patients were 50.0% and 90.0%, the DCR was 33.3% and 83.3%, and the median PFS was 17.50 and 6.07 months, respectively (p=0.812). The median OS was not reached in PD-L1-positive and -negative patients (p=0.655). The incidence of immune-related adverse (irAEs) was 48.5% and mainly included grade 1 or 2 (39.4%), while the incidence of grade 3 or 4 was 9.1%. Pneumonia (9.1%) and skin rash (9.1%) were the most frequent irAEs. Immunotherapy with ICIs was a promising regimen to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced PSC.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib with and without EGFR-TKIs or immunotherapy in the treatment of elder patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in elder patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Elder patients with advanced NSCLC who received anlotinib were enrolled. They were all age ≥ 65 years and with demonstrated records of EGFR gene status. All patients had received treatment with anlotinib or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)/EGFR-TKIs. The efficacy was evaluated according to the efficacy evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST 1.1). Common Adverse Events Evaluation Criteria (CTCAE 4.03) were used to evaluate adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: A total of 91 patients were included in this study. We divided the patients into two groups (EGFR wild type: 60 patients; EGFR mutation: 31 patients). Among EGFR negative patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) for anlotinib monotherapy and anlotinib combination ICI therapy was 3.2 months and 5.0 months, respectively (P = 0.012). The difference in overall survival (OS) between monotherapy and combination therapy was also significant (9.5 vs. 18.4 months, respectively P = 0.010). Interestingly, we further analyzed differences between patients with hypertension and without hypertension, and found that hypertension was associated with better prognosis (5.7 vs. 1.4 months, P < 0.0001). In the EGFR mutation group, the PFS for anlotinib and EGFR-TKI combination treatment indicated better efficacy than that of anlotinib monotherapy (1.83 months vs. 7.03 months, respectively, P = 0.001). The median OS for monotherapy and combination therapy in the EGFR mutation group showed no statistical difference (28.34 months vs. 31.37 months, P = 0.223). The most common adverse reactions were hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome, mainly of grade 1 or 2. No significant increase in adverse reactions was observed in patients ≥ 70 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib treatment and combination regimens resulted in good efficacy and controllable adverse reactions in elder patients with advanced NSCLC.

Baseline anemia predicts a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is relatively common in cancer patients, and baseline anemia is associated with poor survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is a lack of large-sample studies of patients with NSCLC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed anemia­related data for patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations who were admitted to Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2013 to June 2019 and treated with targeted therapy. The patients' clinicopathological features were evaluated by χ2 tests and the relationships between clinical characteristics and prognosis were investigated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 2,029 patients treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were finally enrolled in this study, of whom 24.6% had baseline anemia. Patients without baseline anemia had longer median overall survival (OS) than patients with baseline anemia (36.10 vs. 29.10 months, P = 0.001), and patients with grade < 2 anemia had longer median OS than those with grade ≥ 2 anemia (35.00 vs. 25.10 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified baseline anemia as a factor predicting a poor prognosis in terms of OS in patients with EGFR mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline anemia is a significant factor predicting a poor prognosis in terms of OS in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations treated with targeted therapy. A higher grade of baseline anemia may also be related to shorter OS. And a higher risk of EGFR-mutated patients who had received targeted therapy could also be observed.

EXT1 methylation promotes proliferation and migration and predicts the clinical outcome of non-small cell lung carcinoma via WNT signalling pathway.

DNA methylation is important for lung cancer prognosis. In this work, it is aimed to seek novel biomarkers with DNA methylation-expression-pathway pattern and explore its underlying mechanism. Prognostic DNA methylation sites and mRNAs were screened in NSCLC data set from TCGA, and further validated using the samples retrospectively collected, and EXT1 was identified as a potential target. Gene body methylation of three CpG sites (cg03276982, cg11592677, cg16286281) on EXT1 was significantly associated with clinical outcome, and the EXT1 gene expression also predicted prognosis. The expression level of EXT1 was also correlated with its DNA methylation level. This observation was further validated in a new data set consist of 170 samples. Knocking down of EXT1 resulted in decreased proliferation and migration. EXT1 targets were analysed using GSEA. It is found that the WNT signalling is the potential downstream target of EXT1. Further analyses revealed that the EXT1 targets the beta-catenin and effect migration rate of NSCLC cell lines. The WNT signalling inhibitor, XAV-939, effectively disrupted the migration promotion effect induced by EXT1. In summary, EXT1 methylation regulates the gene expression, effects the proliferation and migration via WNT pathway and predicted a poor prognosis for NSCLC.

Clinical and molecular factors that impact the efficacy of first-line crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a large multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: ROS1-rearranged lung cancers benefit from first-line crizotinib therapy; however, clinical and molecular factors that could affect crizotinib efficacy in ROS1-rearranged lung cancers are not yet well-elucidated. Our retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy and crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ROS1-rearranged advanced lung cancer and evaluate various clinical and molecular factors that might impact crizotinib efficacy in real-world practice. METHODS: Treatment responses, survival outcomes, and patterns of disease progression were analyzed for 235 patients with locally advanced to advanced disease who received first-line chemotherapy (n = 67) or crizotinib (n = 168). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 85.7% (144/168) for first-line crizotinib and 41.8% (28/67) for chemotherapy. Patients treated with first-line crizotinib (n = 168) had significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than chemotherapy (n = 67) (18.0 months vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). Patients harboring single CD74-ROS1 (n = 90) had significantly shorter median PFS with crizotinib than those harboring non-CD74 ROS1 fusions (n = 69) (17.0 months vs. 21.0 months; p = 0.008). Patients with baseline brain metastasis (n = 45) had a significantly shorter PFS on first-line crizotinib than those without brain metastasis (n = 123) (16.0 months vs. 22.0 months; p = 0.03). At progression, intracranial-only progression (n = 40), with or without baseline CNS metastasis, was associated with longer median PFS than those with extracranial-only progression (n = 64) (19.0 months vs. 13.0 months, p < 0.001). TP53 mutations were the most common concomitant mutation, detected in 13.1% (7/54) of patients with CD74-ROS1 fusions, and 18.8% (6/32) with non-CD74 ROS1 fusions. Patients with concomitant TP53 mutations (n=13) had significantly shorter PFS than those who had wild-type TP53 (n = 81) (6.5 months vs. 21.0 months; p < 0.001). PFS was significantly shorter for the patients who harbored concomitant driver mutations (n = 9) (11.0 months vs 24.0 months; p = 0.0167) or concomitant tumor suppressor genes (i.e., TP53, RB1, or PTEN) (n = 25) (9.5 months vs 24.0 months; p < 0.001) as compared to patients without concomitant mutations (n = 58). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that baseline brain metastatic status and various molecular factors could contribute to distinct clinical outcomes from first-line crizotinib therapy of patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: CORE, NCT03646994.