Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 34(1): 284-289, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30923902

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has historically been associated with significant morbidity and mortality such that elective repair is only offered to symptomatic patients. Recent reports suggest modern era outcomes have improved such that elective repair may now be safer than historically thought. Furthermore, the morbidity of emergency surgery may still be significant. These changes may have important implications for patient selection for elective repair. The objectives of this study were to determine and compare modern era surgical outcomes after elective and emergency repair of giant PEHs at a high-volume tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for all Type II-IV giant PEH repairs performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. Type 1 hiatal hernias, fundoplication for reflux, and any co-surgery other than cholecystectomy were excluded from the final analysis. Baseline patient demographics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days and in-hospital or 30-day mortality were tabulated from the electronic medical record. Data were reported as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified. RESULTS: A total of 352 cases were reviewed, of which 204 met inclusion criteria (18 emergency, 186 elective). Eight had Type II PEH, 146 had Type III, and 50 had Type IV. Median length of stay was shorter in the elective group [1 (1) day elective vs. 5 (7) days emergency, p < 0.0001], and emergency patients were less likely to return directly to their original residence at discharge (13, 72% emergency vs 185, 99.4% elective, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more major complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3) in the emergency group (5, 28% emergency vs. 10, 5% elective, p = 0.005). There were no perioperative deaths in either group. Morbidity and mortality in both groups were less than historically reported. CONCLUSIONS: Informed consent discussions and patient selection for repair of giant PEHs should reflect modern era and institution-specific outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Hernia Hiatal , Herniorrafia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fundoplicación/efectos adversos , Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/prevención & control , Hernia Hiatal/patología , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA