Rituximab retention rate in systemic sclerosis: a long term real-life multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: to report real-life data on rituximab retention-rate as indicator of safety and efficacy in a multicentric national cohort of systemic sclerosis patients. METHODS: SSc patients treated with rituximab and followed for at least 36 months were included, clinically characterized, and longitudinally monitored. A competing risk analysis with sub-Hazard Ratio(sHR) definition was performed to explore the clinical variables linked to specific cause of rituximab discontinuation. RESULTS: One-hundred-fifty-two SSc-patients (mean age 47.3 ± 12.3 years; females 79.6%; diffuse disease 77.6%; anti-topoisomerase-I positivity 63.2%) were evaluated over a median(IQR) time of 3.3(1.7-5.0) years. The primary indication for rituximab were interstitial lung disease (ILD)(38.8%), worsening skin fibrosis(36.8%), and arthritis(13.8%); 138 patients(90.8%) received more than one rituximab course. The 5-years rituximab retention rate was 59.9%(44.6-64.7%). Clinical response was the most common reason for rituximab discontinuation[5.7(3.7-8.4) per 100 patient-year] and was associated with a shorter disease duration[sHR 0.8(0.7-0.9)], anti-topoisomerase-I negativity[sHR 0.4(0.2-0.9)], previous digital ulcers[sHR 2.6(1.1-6.2] and no history of arthritis[sHR 0.3 (0.1-0.8)]. Treatment failure was the second cause of rituximab discontinuation[3.7(2.2-6.0) per 100 patient-year] and was associated with anti-centromere antibody positivity[sHR 2.8(1.1-7.4)] and anti-topoisomerase-I negativity[sHR 0.2(0.1-0.6)]. Adverse events(AEs) were the less common cause of discontinuation[3.1(1.7-5.2) per 100 patient-year], associated with limited cutaneous subset[sHR 3.4(1.2-9.7)] and previous mycophenolate mofetil treatment[sHR 4.5(1.2-16.3)]. CONCLUSION: rituximab is a safe and effective treatment in SSc: clinical response emerged as the primary reason for rituximab discontinuation, and AEs had a limited impact on treatment persistence. The identification of specific disease features associated with a response to rituximab will be useful in the management of SSc-patients.

Prevalence and management of tuberculosis infection in Apulian rheumatologic patients treated with biologics: An observational cohort 10-year study from the BIOPURE registry.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the 10-year prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among Apulian patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs). Secondary endpoint was to record new cases of active TB disease and LTBI among patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: We analysed the results from the patients included in the BIOPURE registry from 2009 to 2018, who underwent QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) test as screening before bDMARDs treatment. Demographic and clinical data were recorded at the time of the first QFT-GIT test. Administration of preventive therapy and bDMARD treatments were recorded for patients with positive QFT-GIT test. All new tuberculosis infections were recorded during the follow-up. RESULTS: The final study population included 3028 patients (855 rheumatoid arthritis, 1001 psoriatic arthritis, 833 spondyloarthritis, 130 connective tissue diseases, 33 systemic vasculitis and 176 other inflammatory rheumatic conditions), more frequently female (67.2%), with a mean age of 52 ± 18 years. Patients with QFT-GIT-positive test were elderly people, predominantly male with higher prevalence of diabetes as comorbidity. The 10-year prevalence of LTBI was 10.8%. Of note, no cases of TB reactivation were recorded in patients who completed preventive therapy treatment. Three thousand and sixteen patients were followed over time (42.6 ± 30 months), and five (.2%) developed active TB, which corresponds to .47 cases per 1000 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: In the 10-year observation, the use of bDMARDs seems to be safe in rheumatologic patients with positive QFT-GIT test treated according to current recommendations. Nevertheless, cases of primary TB disease did occur during treatment with biologicals.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy for refractory skin thickening in rapidly progressive systemic sclerosis: A case report and literature review.

The use of immunoglobulin is a therapeutic option with increasing evidence of efficacy for different rheumatologic autoimmune systemic diseases. Some studies concerning immunoglobulin use in systemic sclerosis have been published with encouraging results. We present the case of a young woman diagnosed with rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, refractory to therapy with methotrexate and rituximab, which presented a relevant skin improvement after one year of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (2 g/kg cumulative monthly dose, refracted in weekly administrations). Furthermore, a narrative literature review of the evidence for alternative treatments with a focus on immunoglobulin use for systemic sclerosis skin involvement was carried out.

Comparison of Adalimumab to Other Targeted Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Few studies compared adalimumab to other targeted therapies in head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but multiple comparisons are not available. This Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis evaluated which targeted therapy is more likely to achieve ACR50 response with good safety at 24 weeks of treatment in RA. A systematic literature review was conducted for head-to-head phase 3 RCTs that compared adalimumab to other targeted therapies in combination with methotrexate (MTX) or as monotherapy to treat RA patients, and searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrial.gov. The outcomes of interest were ACR50 response and withdrawals due to adverse events at 24 weeks. WinBUGS 1.4 software (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK) was used to perform the analyses, using a random effect model. Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. The most favorable SUCRA for the ACR50 response rate at 24 weeks of treatment in combination with MTX was ranked by upadacitinib, followed by baricitinib, tofacitinib and filgotinib. As monotherapy, the highest probability was ranked by tocilizumab followed by sarilumab. No significant differences in safety profile among treatment options were found. Jak-inhibitors in combination with MTX and interleukin-6 antagonism as monotherapy showed the highest probability to achieve ACR50 response after 24 weeks of treatment. None of assessed targeted therapies were associated to risk of withdrawal due to adverse events. Key messages: Direct and indirect comparison between adalimumab and other targeted therapies demonstrated some differences in terms of efficacy that may help to drive RA treatment. Jak-inhibitors and interleukine-6 antagonists ranked as first in the probability to achieve ACR50 response after 24 weeks of treatment in combination with methotrexate or monotherapy, respectively.