Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Injuries While Hiking with a Backpack at Philmont Scout Ranch.

INTRODUCTION: Participants at Philmont Scout Ranch embark on 12-d treks with pre-trek physical conditioning and medical clearance by their primary care physician. In this study, we investigated potential contributing factors to self-reported musculoskeletal injuries during a backpack trek. METHODS: This study was a prospective cohort study that used a 3-part survey administered to participants before, during, and after their trek from June through August 2019. Health history and demographic information were retrieved from each hiker's medical record. A logistic regression model was used to assess factors associated with injuries, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. RESULTS: There were 1206 individuals enrolled in this study, and none withdrew from participation. The median age of the participants was 17 y (interquartile range 15-47); 1130 were male, 75 were female, and 1 was of unknown sex. Injuries were reported by 7% (n=88) of participants while in the backcountry, with injuries occurring in various anatomic locations (knee, ankle, leg, foot, hand, arm). Participants without missing data (74%; n=897) were included in the logistical regression analysis to describe factors significantly associated with injury. Factors significantly associated with injury included greater backpack weight to body weight ratio, body mass index greater than 30 kg·m-2, and past injuries that required a doctor visit. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported injuries while hiking at Philmont Scout Ranch are infrequent and do not often require evacuation or advanced medical care. Camp policies to maintain appropriate backpack weight and counseling of obese and previously injured individuals may mitigate injury occurrence.

Blood Pressure Changes While Hiking at Moderate Altitudes: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Recreational hiking in the mountains is a common activity, whether for a single day or for several days in a row. We sought to measure blood pressure (BP) response during a 10-day trek at moderate-altitude elevation (6500-13,000 feet) and observe for uncontrolled hypertension and/or adverse cardiovascular outcomes. A total of 1279 adult participants completed an observational study of resting BP during a 10-day trek in the Sangre de Cristo mountains. Following initial recruitment, participants were issued a trail data card to record BP measurements at day 0 (basecamp), day 3, day 6 and day 9. BP was measured using a sphygmomanometer and auscultation. Demographic data, height, weight, home altitude, daily water and sports drink intake, existence of pre-arrival hypertension and BP medication class were also recorded. We observed a rise in mean blood pressure for the cohort during all exposures to moderate altitudes. The increases were greatest for individuals with pre-existing hypertension and/or obesity. There were no observed life-threatening cardiovascular events for participants. We conclude that for individuals with a modestly controlled blood pressure of 160/95 mmHg, hiking at a moderate altitude is a safe activity.

Appropriate utilisation of cardiac telemetry monitoring: a quality improvement project.

For hospitals located in the United States, appropriate use of cardiac telemetry monitoring can be achieved resulting in cost savings to healthcare systems. Our institution has a limited number of telemetry beds, increasing the need for appropriate use of telemetry monitoring to minimise delays in patient care, reduce alarm fatigue, and decrease interruptions in patient care. This quality improvement project was conducted in a single academic medical centre in Kansas City, Kansas. The aim of the project was to reduce inappropriate cardiac telemetry monitoring on intermediate care units. Using the 2004 American Heart Association guidelines to guide appropriate telemetry utilisation, this project team sought to investigate the effects of two distinct interventions to reduce inappropriate telemetry monitoring, huddle intervention and mandatory order entry. Telemetry utilisation was followed prospectively for 2 years. During our initial intervention, we achieved a sharp decline in the number of patients on telemetry monitoring. However, over time the efficacy of the huddle intervention subsided, resulting in a need for a more sustained approach. By requiring physicians to input indication for telemetry monitoring, the second intervention increased adherence to practice guidelines and sustained reductions in inappropriate telemetry use.