A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 Tesla MR: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.

PURPOSE: To prove the feasibility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) to explore brain tumors by comparing dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI to ASL at 3T MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were included presenting 9 gliomas, 10 metastases and 8 meningiomas. All were explored by a pseudo-continuous ASL and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced T2* perfusion sequence. Two neuroradiologists analyzed the cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps to assess feasibility, examination quality and quantitative comparison. The Spearman nonparametric correlation test and the Bland-Altman graphic test were used to analyze our quantitative results. RESULTS: 92% of ASL CBF maps were informative. ASL detected all lesions as well as dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Both sequences provide relative quantitative CBF values closely correlated. CONCLUSION: On a 3T MR unit, ASL is a good alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI when contrast medium is contraindicated or intravenous injection is not possible. Its results on relative CBF parameters are similar to contrast-injected perfusion.

Value of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging for investigation of cerebral hydrodynamics.

OBJECTIVE: Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PCMRI) is a noninvasive technique that can be used to quantify variations of flow during the cardiac cycle. PCMRI allows investigations of blood flow dynamics in the main arteries and veins of the brain but also the dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid. These cerebral flow investigations provide a description of the regulation mechanisms of intracranial pressure during the cardiac cycle. The objective of this paper is to describe the contribution of this technique in diseases related to disorders of cerebral hydrodynamics in the light of 5 clinical cases. METHOD: Flow measurements were performed using PCMRI sequences on a 1.5 Tesla MR imager in 4 patients with symptomatic ventricular dilation and 1 patient with a syringomyelic cavity. RESULTS: Flow quantification in these 5 patients, representative of the diseases mainly concerned by cerebral hydrodynamics, is useful to guide the indication for ventricular shunting in patients with hydrocephalus, to demonstrate obstruction of the cerebral aqueduct, to demonstrate recirculation of ventricular CSF after ventriculostomy and to characterize the dynamic features of CSF inside a spinal cavity. CONCLUSION: PCMRI, now available to neurosurgeons, is complementary to morphological MR and provides quantitative information on cerebral hydrodynamics. This information is mainly used to confirm alteration of CSF flow in the cerebral and spinal compartments. PCMRI is also a functional tool to better understand the pathophysiology of hydrocephalus and syringomyelia.