Multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores for venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality, with large disparities in incidence rates between Black and White Americans. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) limited to variants discovered in genome-wide association studies in European-ancestry samples can identify European-ancestry individuals at high risk of VTE. However, there is limited evidence on whether high-dimensional PRS constructed using more sophisticated methods and more diverse training data can enhance the predictive ability and their utility across diverse populations. We developed PRSs for VTE using summary statistics from the International Network against Venous Thrombosis (INVENT) consortium genome-wide association studies meta-analyses of European- (71 771 cases and 1 059 740 controls) and African-ancestry samples (7482 cases and 129 975 controls). We used LDpred2 and PRS-CSx to construct ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry PRSs and evaluated their performance in an independent European- (6781 cases and 103 016 controls) and African-ancestry sample (1385 cases and 12 569 controls). Multi-ancestry PRSs with weights tuned in European-ancestry samples slightly outperformed ancestry-specific PRSs in European-ancestry test samples (e.g. the area under the receiver operating curve [AUC] was 0.609 for PRS-CSx_combinedEUR and 0.608 for PRS-CSxEUR [P = 0.00029]). Multi-ancestry PRSs with weights tuned in African-ancestry samples also outperformed ancestry-specific PRSs in African-ancestry test samples (PRS-CSxAFR: AUC = 0.58, PRS-CSx_combined AFR: AUC = 0.59), although this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.34). The highest fifth percentile of the best-performing PRS was associated with 1.9-fold and 1.68-fold increased risk for VTE among European- and African-ancestry subjects, respectively, relative to those in the middle stratum. These findings suggest that the multi-ancestry PRS might be used to improve performance across diverse populations to identify individuals at highest risk for VTE.

A genetic association study of circulating coagulation factor VIII and von Willebrand factor levels.

ABSTRACT: Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and its carrier protein von Willebrand factor (VWF) are critical to coagulation and platelet aggregation. We leveraged whole-genome sequence data from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) program along with TOPMed-based imputation of genotypes in additional samples to identify genetic associations with circulating FVIII and VWF levels in a single-variant meta-analysis, including up to 45 289 participants. Gene-based aggregate tests were implemented in TOPMed. We identified 3 candidate causal genes and tested their functional effect on FVIII release from human liver endothelial cells (HLECs) and VWF release from human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Mendelian randomization was also performed to provide evidence for causal associations of FVIII and VWF with thrombotic outcomes. We identified associations (P < 5 × 10-9) at 7 new loci for FVIII (ST3GAL4, CLEC4M, B3GNT2, ASGR1, F12, KNG1, and TREM1/NCR2) and 1 for VWF (B3GNT2). VWF, ABO, and STAB2 were associated with FVIII and VWF in gene-based analyses. Multiphenotype analysis of FVIII and VWF identified another 3 new loci, including PDIA3. Silencing of B3GNT2 and the previously reported CD36 gene decreased release of FVIII by HLECs, whereas silencing of B3GNT2, CD36, and PDIA3 decreased release of VWF by HVECs. Mendelian randomization supports causal association of higher FVIII and VWF with increased risk of thrombotic outcomes. Seven new loci were identified for FVIII and 1 for VWF, with evidence supporting causal associations of FVIII and VWF with thrombotic outcomes. B3GNT2, CD36, and PDIA3 modulate the release of FVIII and/or VWF in vitro.

F2c.*C20209T mutation in patients with a history of thrombosis: A case report, retrospective 2 site-results and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: G20210A (c.*97G>A) prothrombin gene variant, found in white population has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Other rare polymorphisms in F2 gene (C20209T) have been reported, more rare and touching black people, but its potential association with VTE remain uncertain. METHODS: About a 69 years-old Caucasian woman presenting an unprovoked deep venous thrombosis of the leg, we analyzed retrospectively 25.000 thrombophilia tests on a 11-year period of time (2007-2018), at Nice and Marseille University Hospitals, and performed extensive review of the literature. RESULTS: Genetic determination included a similar PCR protocol and sequencing. Twenty-one heterozygous cases out of 25.585 determinations (0.08%) was found. The C20209T mutation detected in our Caucasian patient is rare, with a frequency that differed from what was reported in the previous literature, mainly in non-Caucasian patients (Africans, Africans-Americans, and Caribbeans). One hundred and thirteen patients with this mutation have been described in the literature, of which only one homozygous. CONCLUSION: This study is the most important on C20209T mutation performed at present, allowing to precise its frequency and its potential role in venous thromboembolism.

Genome-wide investigation of exogenous female hormones, genetic variation, and venous thromboembolism risk.

BACKGROUND: Increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening side effect for users of oral contraceptives (OCs) or hormone therapy (HT). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential for genetic predisposition to VTE in OC or HT users, we conducted a gene-by-environment case-only meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). METHODS: Use or nonuse of OCs (7 studies) or HT (8 studies) at the time of the VTE event was determined by pharmacy records or self-report. A synergy index (SI) was modeled for each variant in each study and submultiplicative/supramultiplicative gene-by-environment interactions were estimated. The SI parameters were first meta-analyzed across OC and HT studies and subsequently meta-analyzed to obtain an overall estimate. The primary analysis was agnostic GWAS and interrogated all imputed genotypes using a P value threshold of <5.0 × 10-8; secondary analyses were candidate-based. RESULTS: The VTE case-only OC meta-analysis included 2895 OC users and 6607 nonusers; the case-only HT meta-analysis included 2434 HT users and 12 793 nonusers. In primary GWAS meta-analyses, no variant reached genome-wide significance, but the smallest P value approached statistical significance: rs9386463 (P = 5.03 × 10-8). We tested associations for 138 candidate variants and identified 2 that exceeded statistical significance (0.05/138 = 3.62 × 10-4): F5 rs6025 (P = 1.87 × 10-5; SI, 1.29; previously observed) and F11 rs2036914 (P = 2.0 × 10-4; SI, 0.91; new observation). CONCLUSION: The candidate variant approach to identify submultiplictive/supramultiplicative associations between genetic variation and OC and HT use identified a new association with common genetic variation in F11, while the agnostic interrogations did not yield new discoveries.

Multi-ancestry polygenic risk scores for venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality, with large disparities in incidence rates between Black and White Americans. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) limited to variants discovered in genome-wide association studies in European-ancestry samples can identify European-ancestry individuals at high risk of VTE. However, there is limited evidence on whether high-dimensional PRS constructed using more sophisticated methods and more diverse training data can enhance the predictive ability and their utility across diverse populations. We developed PRSs for VTE using summary statistics from the International Network against Venous Thrombosis (INVENT) consortium GWAS meta-analyses of European- (71,771 cases and 1,059,740 controls) and African-ancestry samples (7,482 cases and 129,975 controls). We used LDpred2 and PRSCSx to construct ancestry-specific and multi-ancestry PRSs and evaluated their performance in an independent European- (6,261 cases and 88,238 controls) and African-ancestry sample (1,385 cases and 12,569 controls). Multi-ancestry PRSs with weights tuned in European- and African-ancestry samples, respectively, outperformed ancestry-specific PRSs in European- (PRSCSXEUR: AUC=0.61 (0.60, 0.61), PRSCSX_combinedEUR: AUC=0.61 (0.60, 0.62)) and African-ancestry test samples (PRSCSXAFR: AUC=0.58 (0.57, 0.6), PRSCSX_combined AFR: AUC=0.59 (0.57, 0.60)). The highest fifth percentile of the best-performing PRS was associated with 1.9-fold and 1.68-fold increased risk for VTE among European- and African-ancestry subjects, respectively, relative to those in the middle stratum. These findings suggest that the multi-ancestry PRS may be used to identify individuals at highest risk for VTE and provide guidance for the most effective treatment strategy across diverse populations.