Predictive factors of de novo overactive bladder in clinically localized prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the postoperative status of clinically localized prostate cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with a focus on de novo overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: The present study included 156 patients who did not have preoperative OAB and underwent RARP between December 2015 and April 2020 at our institution. Patients were divided into the de novo OAB group and non-OAB group based on the findings of overactive bladder symptoms score (OABSS) 6 months after RARP, and comparative assessments were performed between the two groups. RESULTS: Six months after RARP, de novo OAB was detected in 38 (24.4%) out of 156 patients. Body mass index (BMI) and the proportion of patients with hypertension were significantly higher in the de novo OAB group than in the non-OAB group. No significant differences were observed in the other characteristics examined. Furthermore, the preoperative findings of uroflowmetry and a urodynamic study did not significantly differ between the two groups. Despite the lack of significant differences in preoperative OABSS, total international prostate symptom score, the voiding symptom score, storage symptom score, and quality of life score between the two groups, all of these findings 6 months after RARP were significantly worse in the de novo OAB group than in the non-OAB group. Among the several factors examined, only BMI was independently associated with the development of de novo OAB 6 months after RARP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high BMI may develop de novo OAB after RARP, resulting in the significant deterioration of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Significance of second progression-free survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab.

OBJECTIVES: The present study comprehensively investigated the significance of several factors reflecting the therapeutic effects of anticancer treatment on overall survival (OS) in advanced urothelial cancer (UC) patients receiving sequential systemic therapy. METHODS: This study included 101 consecutive advanced UC patients who received first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by second-line pembrolizumab. The impacts of the following factors on OS in these patients were analyzed: responses to chemotherapy, responses to pembrolizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy, PFS with pembrolizumab, and second PFS (PFS2). RESULTS: The median age of patients was 71 years, and 35 and 66 had UC in the upper urinary tract and bladder, respectively. objective response rate to first-line chemotherapy and second-line pembrolizumab were 37.6% and 19.8%, respectively. Median PFS with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, and PFS2 were 5, 4, and 9 months, respectively. Uni- and multivariate analyses of the five factors examined identified PFS with pembrolizumab and PFS2 as independent surrogates for OS, with PFS2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23) being more closely associated with OS than PFS with pembrolizumab (HR = 0.31). Furthermore, uni- and multivariate analyses of various prognostic parameters showed the independent impacts of baseline performance status (PS) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on PFS2. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest the potential of PFS2 as an optimal surrogate for OS in advanced UC patients receiving standard sequential systemic therapy and indicate that intensive treatment needs to be considered for those with poor PS and/or high NLR prior to the introduction of first-line chemotherapy.

Significant impact of a history of prior or concomitant upper urinary tract cancer on the recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the upper urinary tract cancer status on recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival, and to develop risk stratification systems that include the upper urinary tract cancer status for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 40 (upper urinary tract cancer-non-muscle invasive bladder cancer group) and 285 (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer alone group) patients with and without a history of prior or concomitant upper urinary tract cancer, respectively. Nine clinicopathological findings between the two groups were compared, and risk stratification systems for the recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were developed. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival in the upper urinary tract cancer-non-muscle invasive bladder cancer group were significantly inferior to those in the NMIBC alone group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Multivariate analyses identified the following independent prognosticators: multiplicity and upper urinary tract cancer status for recurrence-free survival, and pT category and upper urinary tract cancer status for progression-free survival. Significant differences were noted by the risk stratification systems based on the positive number of independent predictors of recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively). The concordance indices of recurrence-free survival were 0.627, 0.588 and 0.499 in this study stratification, EORTC risk table and CUETO model, respectively. Those of progression-free survival were 0.752, 0.740 and 0.714, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest the significant impact of a history of prior or concomitant UUTC on recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients, and risk stratification systems that include the upper urinary tract cancer status for the recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer are promising tools for predicting the outcomes of these patients.

Risk factors for recurrence after operation in patients with pT1a renal cell carcinoma: sub-analysis of the multi-institutional national database of the Japanese Urological Association.

BACKGROUND: More patients with renal cell carcinoma are now diagnosed with the disease in its early stages. Although patients with pT1a renal cell carcinoma have a good prognosis and low recurrence rate, a few patients still experience recurrence. Herein, we evaluated the clinicopathological risk factors for postoperative recurrence of pT1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: An renal cell carcinoma survey was conducted by the Japanese Urological Association to register newly diagnosed cases of renal cell carcinoma. A total of 1418 patients diagnosed with pT1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma who underwent surgery as the primary surgical treatment were included. We analyzed the recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and clinicopathological factors for recurrence using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 1418 patients, 58 (4.1%) had recurrences after a median follow-up of 62.8 months. The median time to recurrence was 31.0 months. Metastases to the lungs and the bone were observed in 20 and 10 cases, respectively. Significant differences in sex, tumor size, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and dialysis history, preoperative hemoglobin levels, C-reactive protein levels and creatinine levels were observed between the recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Multivariate analysis identified male sex, high C-reactive protein level and tumor size ≥3 cm as independent risk factors. The 5-year recurrence-free survival of patients with 0, 1, 2 and 3 risk factors was 99.0, 97.2, 93.1 and 80.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, tumor diameter and a high C-reactive protein level were independent recurrence risk factors for pT1a renal cell carcinoma; special attention should be paid to patients with these risk factors during postoperative follow-up.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVES: It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. RESULTS: Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.

Limited impact of erectile function on health-related quality of life in Japanese men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of erectile function on health-related quality of life in Japanese prostate cancer patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Time-dependent changes in erectile function and health-related quality of life were assessed using the erection hardness score and Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short Form Health Survey, respectively, in 229 consecutive Japanese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. In this series, patients with erection hardness score ≥2 were considered to those having a certain erectile function. RESULTS: Among the 229 patients examined, erection hardness score ≥2 was observed in 134 (58.5%) and 34 (14.9%) before and 12 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, respectively. Prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, all eight scale scores of 8-Item Short Form Health Survey were significantly superior in patients with erection hardness score ≥2 than in those with erection hardness score = 0 or 1. However, significant differences were observed in two scale scores between patients with erection hardness score ≥2 and those with erection hardness score = 0 or 1 at 12 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, among patients with erection hardness score ≥2 before robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, no significant differences were noted in any of the eight scale scores between patients with erection hardness score ≥2 and erection hardness score = 0 or 1 at 12 months after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the limited impact of erectile function on postoperative health-related quality of life in Japanese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Efficacy of combined androgen blockade therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer stratified by tumor burden.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen on the prognoses of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients stratified by tumor burden. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients who were treated with androgen deprivation therapy in 2008-2017 at 30 institutions in Japan. To compare the overall survival and progression-free survival rates of the patients treated with castration monotherapy and combined androgen blockade, we carried out a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using both inverse probability of treatment weighting and instrumental variables methods. High-burden disease was defined as the presence of four or more bone metastases and/or visceral metastasis. RESULTS: Of 2048 patients, 702 (34.3%) and 1346 (65.7%) patients were classified as the low- and high-burden groups, respectively. In each group, >80% of the patients were treated with combined androgen blockade. Although there was no significant between-group difference in the overall survival according to the androgen deprivation therapy method, in the high-burden group the progression-free survival of the combined androgen blockade-treated patients was significantly better than that of patients treated with castration monotherapy: inverse probability of treatment weighting method, hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.71; instrumental variables method, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.98. CONCLUSION: In the high-burden group, combined androgen blockade with a first-generation anti-androgen resulted in superior progression-free survival compared with castration monotherapy. For well-selected metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients, the use of combined androgen blockade might still have some suitable scenarios.

Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Penile Cancer 2021 by the Japanese Urological Association.

Penile cancer is a rare cancer for which no medical guidelines have been established before in Japan. These guidelines aim to standardize, as much as possible, the therapeutic modality for penile cancer, for which empirical evidence is limited on a global scale, thereby bolstering therapeutic outcomes for patients with penile cancer. The new guidelines conform to the Minds Guide for Developing Clinical Practice Guidelines (2017) as much as possible. However, virtually no randomized comparative studies and meta-analyses based on such randomized studies have been conducted. Therefore, only the findings available at present were listed after conducting an exhaustive literature review of items with extremely low evidence levels and for which bodies of evidence and grades of recommendation were not evaluated. Clinical questions were set for items with a relatively large number of studies, including retrospective studies. However, since it is virtually impracticable to summarize bodies of evidence by systematic reviews, recommendation grades and evidence levels were discussed and determined by the consensus panel of the Preparatory Committee. The following were outlined: epidemiological, pathological, diagnostic, therapeutic, follow-up, and quality of life-related findings. Additionally, seven clinical questions were established to determine recommendation grades and evidence levels. We hope that these guidelines will prove to be useful to medical professionals engaged in clinical practice related to penile cancer in Japan and anticipate that critical reviews of the guidelines will lead to further refinement of the next edition.

Novel metastatic burden-stratified risk model in de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

The metastatic burden is a critical factor for decision-making in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). This study aimed to develop and validate a novel risk model for survival in patients with de novo low- and high-burden metastatic HSPC. The retrospective observational study included men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer who were treated with primary androgen-deprivation therapy at 30 institutions across Japan between 2008 and 2017. We created a risk model for overall survival (OS) in the discovery cohort (n = 1449) stratified by the metastatic burden (low vs high) and validated its predictive ability in a separate cohort (n = 951). Based on multivariate analyses, lower hemoglobin levels, higher Gleason grades, and higher clinical T-stage were associated with poor OS in low-burden disease. Meanwhile, lower hemoglobin levels, higher Gleason grade group, liver metastasis, and higher extent of disease scores in bone were associated with poor OS in patients with high-burden disease. In the discovery and validation cohorts, the risk model using the aforementioned parameters exhibited excellent discriminatory ability for progression-free survival and OS. The predictive ability of this risk model was superior to that of previous risk models. Our novel metastatic burden-stratified risk model exhibited excellent predictive ability for OS, and it is expected to have several clinical uses, such as precise prognostic estimation.

Differential prognostic factors in low- and high-burden de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients.

Metastatic burden is a critical factor for therapy decision-making in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The present study aimed to identify prognostic factors in men with high- or low-metastatic burden treated with primary androgen-deprivation therapy. The study included 2450 men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer who were treated with primary androgen-deprivation therapy at 30 institutions across Japan between 2008 and 2017. We investigated the prognostic value of various clinicopathological parameters for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients stratified by low- or high-metastatic burden. Among the 2450 men, 841 (34.3%) and 1609 (65.7%) were classified as having low- and high-metastatic burden, respectively. Median PFS of the low- and high-burden groups were 44.5 and 16.1 months, respectively, and the median OS was 103.2 and 62.7 months, respectively. Percentage of biopsy-positive core, biopsy Gleason grade group, T-stage, and N-stage were identified to be differentially prognostic. M1a was associated with worse PFS than was M1b in the low-burden group, whereas lung metastasis was associated with better PFS and OS than was M1b in the high-burden group. Differential prognostic factors were identified for patients with low- and high-burden metastatic prostate cancer. These results may assist in decision-making to select the optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with different metastatic burdens.

Prognostic significance of third-line treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: comparative assessments between cabazitaxel and other agents.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel has played an important role in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, several types of sequential therapy against mCRPC have been performed in routine clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of third-line treatment on prognostic outcomes of mCRPC patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 166 patients who received 3 agents following the diagnosis of mCRPC, consisting of 81 sequentially treated with either abiraterone or enzalutamide and then docetaxel, followed by third-line cabazitaxel (group A) and 85 treated with 3 agents, including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and docetaxel (group B). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in major characteristics at the introduction of the third-line agent between these 2 groups. The proportion of patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction > 50% by cabazitaxel in group A was significantly greater than that by either third-line agent in group B. Both PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following third-line therapy in group A were significantly longer than those in group B. Furthermore, OS after the diagnosis of mCRPC in group A was significantly longer than that in group B. Multivariate analysis identified independent predictors of favorable prognostic outcomes after third-line therapy as follows: high-performance status (PS), low PSA level and third-line cabazitaxel for PSA PFS, and high PS, low lactate dehydrogenase level and third-line cabazitaxel for OS. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of cabazitaxel as a third-line agent could markedly improve the prognostic outcomes of mCRPC patients.

Second transurethral resection for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Second transurethral resection is recommended for patients diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; however, there have been several studies showing conflicting findings regarding the advantage of second transurethral resection. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of second transurethral resection using propensity score matched analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively included 164 consecutive patients who underwent initial transurethral resection and were diagnosed with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Of these, 56 subsequently received second transurethral resection, and the remaining 108 underwent initial transurethral resection alone. RESULTS: After adjusting patient variables by propensity score matching, 44 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free, progression-free or overall survival between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested no significant impact of second transurethral resection on the prognosis of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer patients; therefore, it may be necessary to perform a reassessment focusing on the indication for second transurethral resection by conducting a large-scale prospective study.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma: analysis of Japanese patients in CheckMate 214 with extended follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) demonstrated superior efficacy over sunitinib (SUN) for previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in CheckMate 214, with a manageable safety profile. We report efficacy and safety with extended follow-up amongst Japanese patients. METHODS: CheckMate 214 patients received NIVO (3 mg/kg) plus IPI (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for four doses, then NIVO (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks; or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). This subgroup analysis assessed overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator in International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate/poor-risk and intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and safety (ITT patients). RESULTS: Of 550 and 546 patients randomized to NIVO+IPI and SUN, 38 and 34, respectively, were Japanese. Of these, 31 (NIVO+IPI) and 29 (SUN) patients were IMDC intermediate/poor-risk. In IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients with 30 months' minimum follow-up, there was a delayed trend in OS benefit with NIVO+IPI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.59; P = 0.2670), and 24-month OS probability favoured NIVO+IPI (84%) versus SUN (76%). The ORR was 39% with NIVO+IPI and 31% with SUN (P = 0.6968). PFS was similar in both treatment arms (HR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.62-2.20; P = 0.6220). Efficacy in ITT patients was similar to IMDC intermediate/poor-risk patients. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event incidence was lower with NIVO+IPI versus SUN (58 versus 91%). CONCLUSIONS: Japanese patients with untreated aRCC in the NIVO+IPI arm had a numerically higher ORR and improved safety profile versus patients in the SUN arm. A delayed OS benefit appears to be emerging with NIVO+IPI. Longer follow-up is needed. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231749?term=NCT02231749&rank=1 identifier: NCT02231749.

Factors contributing to the ceiling effect of the EQ-5D-5L: an analysis of patients with prostate cancer judged "no-problems".

PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to determine factors related to a ceiling effect (CE) on the EQ-5D-5L among Japanese patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: An existent cross-sectional observational study dataset was used. Patients were ≥ 20 years of age and diagnosed with PC. For CE determinants on the EQ-5D-5L, we excluded possible "full-health" patients flagged by the EQ-VAS (score = 100) and/or FACT-P (score = 156) instruments. We then divided them into binary variables: A CE group (EQ-5D-5L score = 1) and others (< 1). The associations between CE, sociodemographic and medical characteristics, and FACT-P subscale scores were examined using a multivariate LASSO selection followed by a binomial logistic regression analysis performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were analyzed. The LASSO selection variables, including all obtained variables, were as follows: age, palliative treatment, FACT-P physical well-being, and PC subscale score. Statistically significant variables predicting CE were palliative treatment (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.09-0.60), physical well-being (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.34-1.76), and PC subscale (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that palliative treatment and two FACT-P physical well-being and PC subscale scores were positively related to CE on the EQ-5D-5L. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine predictors of CE on the EQ-5D-5L. The present results may be helpful for facilitating the consideration of "bolt-on" studies from the standpoint of PC patients.

Perinephric invasion as a prognostic factor in non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma: analysis of a nation-wide registry program.

OBJECTIVES: Perinephric fat invasion (PFI) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is known to be associated with adverse pathological features and poor prognosis. We analyzed these associations using a sub-group of the RCC registry of The Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association. METHODS: The study cohort of 2998 non-metastatic cases was retrieved from RCC registry (3648 in total). We compared clinicopathological characteristics of cases with PFI (n = 256) and without PFI (n = 2742), and investigated the impact of PFI on cancer-specific survival using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Compared with non-PFI cases, PFI cases were older (P = 0.003), and more likely to be hypertensive (P = 0.034) and symptomatic at presentation (P < 0.001). PFI tumors were larger (P < 0.001), and more often have sarcomatoid component (P < 0.001) and tumor thrombus (P < 0.001). Cancer-specific survival was significantly shorter in cases with PFI than without (P < 0.001). The difference in survival tended to be greater in cases with large tumors but was significant in small tumor sub-groups. Cancer-specific survival was significantly shorter in cases with both PFI and renal vein involvement (RVI) in comparison to those with PFI or RVI alone (P = 0.011, P = 0.007, respectively). On multivariate analysis PFI with and without sinus fat invasion remained as an independent risk factor along with symptom at presentation, low body mass index, hypertension, multiple tumors, large tumor size (>7.0 cm), sarcomatoid component and RVI. CONCLUSIONS: PFI was associated with advanced age and aggressive pathological features. PFI is an independent prognostic factor in non-metastatic RCC.

Health utility and health-related quality of life of Japanese prostate cancer patients according to progression status measured using EQ-5D-5L and FACT-P.

PURPOSE: To obtain health utility data to allow for cost-effectiveness analysis in groups stratified by disease progression along with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) information in Japanese prostate cancer (PC) patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, EuroQol-5 Dimension- 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) measures were used to examine utility, VAS scores, and disease-specific HRQoL, respectively. Scores obtained were statistically examined for the correlation among measures and domains. Parameter estimates of statistically significant factors were assessed using generalized linear models (GLM). RESULTS: A total of 380 patients stratified by their disease progression status were analyzed. The numbers (%) of patients in groups stratified as having localized (L), localized progression (LP), distant metastatic (DM), and DM-castration-resistant PC (CRPC) were 275 (72.4), 40 (10.5), 27 (7.1), and 38 (10.0), respectively. EQ-5D-5L mean (standard deviation, SD) scores of L, LP, DM, and DM-CRPC in study participants were 0.87 (0.15), 0.86 (0.15), 0.85 (0.18), and 0.84 (0.17), respectively. The mean (SD) scores assessed by EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and FACT-P instruments were 0.86 (0.16), 74.6 (16.8), and 110.8 (19.6), respectively. Utility scores correlated well with FACT-P scores. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status had significant influences on all instruments' scores. CONCLUSIONS: We obtained health utility and HRQoL scores of Japanese PC patients stratified by disease progression in detail. Our results will be useful for establishing cost-effectiveness analyses in Japanese PC settings.

Significant impact of three-dimensional volumetry of perinephric fat on the console time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of volumetry of perinephric fat (PNF) on the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS: Between 2016 and 2019, a single surgeon performed RAPN for 128 patients with clinical T1a-b renal tumors at our institution, and the 70 most recent patients were included in this study to minimize the effects of surgical experience. PNF was defined as a fatty area around the kidney within the anatomical structures, including the lateroconal fascia, fusion fascia, psoas muscle, lumbar quadrate muscle and diaphragm, and its volume was calculated based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images using the SYNAPSE VINCENT system. RESULTS: In this series, the trifecta and MIC (margin, ischemia and complications) score system outcomes were achieved in 69 (98.6%) and 64 patients (91.4%), respectively. The median PNF volume in the 70 patients was 166.05 cm3, which was significantly correlated with both the body mass index (BMI) and Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score (correlation coefficient = 0.68 and 0.74, respectively). There was no significant difference in the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, PNF volume or console time during RAPN among 5 groups consisting of 14 consecutive patients. Of several factors examined, the console time was significantly affected by the sex, MAP score and PNF volume, and only the PNF volume was independently associated with the console time. CONCLUSION: Even if performed by an experienced robotic surgeon beyond the initial learning curve, the PNF volume may influence the console time during RAPN.

Comparative assessment of prognostic outcomes between first-generation antiandrogens and novel androgen-receptor-axis-targeted agents in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the prognostic outcomes between first-generation antiandrogen (FGA) and novel androgen-receptor-axis-targeted agent (ARATA) as first-line therapy in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). METHODS: This study retrospectively included a total of 103 consecutive nmCRPC patients consisting of 47 (45.6%) and 56 (54.4%) who received FGA (bicalutamide or flutamide) and ARATA (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide), respectively, as the first-line agent after the failure of primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the major clinicopathological parameters and previous therapeutic histories between the FGA and ARATA groups. During the observation period, 31 (66.0%) and 29 (51.8%) discontinued first-line therapy in the FGA and ARATA groups, respectively, and of these, 27 (87.1%) and 23 (79.3%) in the FGA and ARATA groups, respectively, were subsequently treated with approved agents as second-line therapy. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in the FGA group was significantly lower than that in the ARATA group. Although no significant difference in overall survival was noted between the FGA and ARATA groups, there were significant differences in the PSA progression-free survival on first-line therapy and metastasis-free survival between the two groups, favoring the ARATA group compared with FGA group. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings suggest that among nmCRPC patients who progressed following treatment with the primary ADT, the introduction of ARATA may result in the delay of disease progression compared with FGA.

Three-year follow-up of a phase II study of radium-223 dichloride in Japanese patients with symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: Radium-223 is a first-in-class targeted alpha therapy to prolong overall survival (OS) in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases (mCRPC). The aim of the present analysis was to assess the long-term safety with radium-223 in Japanese patients with mCRPC. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic mCRPC, ≥ 2 bone metastases and no known visceral metastases received up to 6 injections of radium-223 (55 kBq/kg), one every 4 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) considered to be related to radium-223 were reported until 3 years after the first injection. Pre-specified conditions, such as acute myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, primary bone cancer, or other primary malignancies, were reported regardless of causality. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients enrolled in the study, 44 (89.8%) entered the survival follow-up period and 33 (67.3%) died. Throughout the entire study, there were no reports of second primary malignancy or other pre-specified conditions. Eight patients (16.3%) experienced post-treatment drug-related AEs, which were all hematological (anemia and decreased lymphocyte, platelet, and white blood cell counts). No serious post-treatment drug-related AEs were reported. Updated median OS was 19.3 months (95% CI: 14.2, 28.5). CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients with symptomatic mCRPC and bone metastases, radium-223 had a favorable long-term safety profile with no second primary malignancies reported. Taken together with median OS, which was comparable to that in the pivotal phase III ALSYMPCA study, these results support continued benefit from radium-223 in Japanese patients with mCRPC.

No significant impact of response to prior androgen receptor-axis-targeted agents on the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the response to an androgen receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agent is associated with the efficacy of subsequent docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS: This study included 114 consecutive mCRPC patients, comprising 54 and 60 patients who progressed with abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (Enz), respectively, before the introduction of docetaxel. The impact of the response to either ARAT agent on the activity of docetaxel was assessed. RESULTS: Following ARAT therapy, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was observed in 73 of the 114 patients, of whom 33 and 40 received AA and Enz, respectively. In the 114 patients, PSA response to docetaxel was achieved in 48 (42.1%) patients, and median PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with docetaxel were 7.2 and 17.5 months, respectively. No significant difference was noted in PSA response rate, PSA PFS or OS with docetaxel between responders and non-responders to a prior ARAT agent in the overall 114 patients, 54 receiving AA and 60 receiving Enz. Despite the absence of a significant impact of the response to a prior ARAT agent on PSA PFS or OS by univariate analysis, independent prognostic predictors were identified by multivariate analysis, as performance status (PS) for PSA PFS, and PS and visceral metastasis for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Disease control by docetaxel may not be affected by the response to a prior ARAT agent. Therefore, a prior response to an ARAT agent should not influence the decision on the subsequent introduction of docetaxel for mCRPC patients.