RESUMEN
SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests used at the point-of-care, such as the Abbott Panbio, have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The Panbio is Health Canada approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset(s). Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Paired nasopharyngeal (NP), throat, and saliva swabs were collected, with one paired swab tested immediately with the Panbio, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We also prospectively evaluated results from assessment centers within the community. For those individuals, an NP swab was collected for Panbio testing and paired with RT-PCR results from parallel NP or throat swabs. One hundred and forty-five individuals were included in the study. Collection of throat and saliva was stopped early due to poorer performance (throat sensitivity 57.7%, n=61, and saliva sensitivity 2.6%, n=41). NP swab sensitivity was 87.7% [n=145, 95% confidence interval (CI) 81.0-92.7%]. There were 1641 symptomatic individuals tested by Panbio in assessment centers with 268/1641 (16.3%) positive for SARS-CoV-2. There were 37 false negatives and 2 false positives, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 86.1% [95% CI 81.3-90.0%] and 99.9% [95% CI 99.5-100.0%], respectively. The Panbio test reliably detects most cases of SARS-CoV-2 from adults in the community setting presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasopharyngeal swabs. Throat and saliva swabs are not reliable specimens for the Panbio.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Nasofaringe/virología , Faringe/virología , Saliva/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de EspecímenesRESUMEN
Although enteric multianalyte syndromic panels are increasingly employed, direct comparisons with traditional methods and the inclusion of host phenotype correlations are limited. Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GPP) and culture results are highly concordant. However, phenotypic and microbiological confirmatory testing raises concerns regarding the accuracy of the GPP, especially for Salmonella spp. A total of 3,089 children with gastroenteritis submitted stool specimens, rectal swab specimens, and clinical data. The primary outcome was bacterial pathogen detection agreement for shared targets between culture and the Luminex xTAG GPP. Secondary analyses included phenotype assessment, additional testing of GPP-negative/culture-positive isolate suspensions with the GPP, and in-house and commercial confirmatory nucleic acid testing of GPP-positive/culture-negative extracts. The overall percent agreement between technologies was >99% for each pathogen. Salmonella spp. were detected in specimens from 64 participants: 12 (19%) by culture only, 9 (14%) by GPP only, and 43 (67%) by both techniques. Positive percent agreement for Salmonella spp. was 78.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.6%, 87.8%). Isolate suspensions from the 12 participants with specimens GPP negative/culture positive for Salmonella tested positive by GPP. Specimens GPP positive/culture negative for Salmonella originated in younger children with less diarrhea and more vomiting. GPP-positive/culture-negative specimen extracts tested positive using additional assays for 0/2 Campylobacter-positive specimens, 0/4 Escherichia coli O157-positive specimens, 0/9 Salmonella-positive specimens, and 2/3 Shigella-positive specimens. For both rectal swab and stool samples, the median cycle threshold (CT ) values, determined using quantitative PCR, were higher for GPP-negative/culture-positive samples than for GPP-positive/culture-positive samples (for rectal swabs, 36.9 [interquartile range {IQR}, 33.7, 37.1] versus 30.0 [IQR, 26.2, 33.2], respectively [P = 0.002]; for stool samples, 36.9 [IQR, 33.7, 37.1] versus 29.0 [IQR, 24.8, 30.8], respectively [P = 0.001]). GPP and culture have excellent overall agreement; however, for specific pathogens, GPP is less sensitive than culture and, notably, identifies samples false positive for Salmonella spp.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Gastroenteritis/diagnóstico , Gastroenteritis/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Enfermedad Aguda , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/normas , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/normas , SerogrupoRESUMEN
Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) can cause outbreaks that have great economic and health impact. Since the implementation of STEC screening in Alberta in 2018, it is also essential to have a molecular serotyping method with faster turnaround time for cluster identification and surveillance purposes. This study sought to perform molecular serotyping of the top six non-O157 (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121 and O145) STEC serotypes directly from stools and enrichment broths compared to conventional methods on isolates. Multiplex, serotyping qPCR assays were used to determine sensitivity and specificity of the top six non-O157 STEC serotypes. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for both singleplex and multiplex qPCR assays for comparison of the top six serotypes. Blinded stool specimens (n = 116) or broth samples (n = 482) submitted from frontline microbiology laboratories for STEC investigation were analyzed by qPCR. Both singleplex and multiplex assays were comparable, and we observed 100% specificity with a limit of detection of 100 colony-forming units per mL. Direct molecular serotyping from stool specimens mostly correlated (88%) with conventional serotyping of the cultured isolate. In cases of discordant serotypes, the top six non-O157 STEC mixed infections were identified and confirmed by culture and conventional serotyping. Detection of non-O157 STEC can be done directly from stool specimens using multiplex PCR assays with the ability to identify mixed infections, which would otherwise remain undetected by conventional serotyping of a single colony. This method can be easily implemented into a frontline diagnostic laboratory to enhance surveillance of non-O157 STEC, as more frontline microbiology laboratories move to culture independent assays.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In the performance of a rapid, antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 test (RAT), our study had 3 main objectives: to determine the accuracy of nasal swabs, the accuracy of using nasopharyngeal swabs for nasal collection (nasalNP), and the effectiveness of using residual extraction buffer for real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmation of positive RAT (rPan). METHODS: Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Nasal samples were collected using either a nasalNP or nasal swab and tested immediately with the RAT in the individual's home by a health care provider. 500 µL of universal transport media was added to the residual extraction buffer after testing and sent to the laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 testing using RT-PCR. Parallel throat swabs tested with RT-PCR were used as the reference comparators. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five individuals were included in the study (99 nasal swabs, 56 nasalNP). Sensitivities of nasal samples tested on the RAT using either nasal or nasalNP were 89.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.7%-94.6%] and 90.2% (95% CI 78.6%-96.7%), respectively. rPan positivity agreement compared to throat RT-PCR was 96.2%. CONCLUSIONS: RAT reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 from symptomatic adults in the community presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasal swabs or nasalNP. High agreement with rPan can avoid the need for collecting a second swab for RT-PCR confirmation or testing of variants of concern from positive RAT in this population.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Pandemias , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2/genéticaRESUMEN
It has long been accepted that Shiga toxin (Stx) only exists in Shigella dysenteriae serotype 1. However, in recent decades, the presence of Shiga toxin genes (stx) in other Shigella spp. have been reported. We screened 366 Shigella flexneri strains from Alberta, Canada (2003 to 2016) for stx and 26 positive strains were identified. These isolates are highly related with the majority originating from the Dominican Republic and three isolates with Haiti origin. Both phylogenetic and spanning tree analysis of the 26 Alberta and 29 stx positive S. flexneri originating from the U.S., France, Canada (Quebec) and Haiti suggests that there are geographic specific distribution patterns (Haiti and Dominican Republic clades). This study provides the first comprehensive whole genome based phylogenetic analysis of stx positive S. flexneri strains as well as their global transmission, which signify the public health risks of global spreading of these strains.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles Importadas/microbiología , Disentería Bacilar/microbiología , Toxina Shiga/genética , Shigella dysenteriae/genética , Alberta , República Dominicana , Haití , Filogenia , Viaje , Secuenciación Completa del GenomaRESUMEN
Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) is a gastrointestinal pathogen and has been recognized as one of the serious problems in public health. Shiga toxin genes (stx) can be grouped into different types according to their differences in sequence and biological activities. The two main groups of stx are stx1 and stx2 with each group containing several subtypes. It is essential to develop rapid stx1/stx2 subtyping assays and accurate stx2 general detection assays to provide a quicker turn-around time to predict disease outcome and also to provide data for surveillance purposes. The stx2 general detection qPCR assay developed in this study showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity with no cross reactivity with stx2 negative STEC and non-STEC isolates. This stx2 general detection assay was able to detect all seven different stx2 subtypes at low level of detection and with good PCR efficiency. In addition, stx1/stx2 subtyping qPCR assays were succesfully developed to detect all stx1 subtypes and stx2 subtypes with the exception of one stx2b subtype carried by one strain. The qPCR stx1/stx2 subtyping assays showed 100% specificity with no cross reactivity on subtypes not targeted by each assay. The rapidity with faster turn-around time along with high throughput volume of the stx1/stx2 subtyping and stx2 general detection qPCR assays will have great value as tools for STEC associated risk assessment, outbreak monitoring, epidemiology studies, and clinical management.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Toxina Shiga I/genética , Toxina Shiga II/genética , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/genética , Humanos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infections are the product of the interaction between bacteria, phages, animals, humans, and the environment. In the late 1980s, Alberta had one of the highest incidences of STEC infections in North America. Herein, we revisit and contextualize the epidemiology of STEC O157 human infections in Alberta for the period 2009-2016. STEC O157 infections were concentrated in large urban centers, but also in rural areas with high cattle density. Hospitalization was often required when the Shiga toxin genotype stx2a stx2c was involved, however, only those aged 60 years or older and infection during spring months (April to June) independently predicted that need. Since the late 1980s, the rate of STEC O157-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in Alberta has remained unchanged at 5.1%, despite a marked drop in the overall incidence of the infection. While Shiga toxin genotypes stx1a stx2c and stx2a stx2c seemed associated with HUS, only those aged under 10 years and infection during spring months were independently predictive of that complication. The complexity of the current epidemiology of STEC O157 in Alberta highlights the need for a One Health approach for further progress to be made in mitigating STEC morbidity.