POT1 tumour predisposition: a broader spectrum of associated malignancies and proposal for additional screening program.

Protection of Telomeres Protein 1 (POT1) protein is an essential subunit of the shelterin telomere binding complex, regulating telomere length. Some POT1 gene pathogenic variants (PV) lead to telomere elongation, genomic instability and higher risk of cancer. POT1 tumour predisposition syndrome (POT1-TPD) has autosomal dominant inheritance and unknown penetrance. It is associated with increased risk of cutaneous melanoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, angiosarcoma and gliomas. In this work, we aim to describe a broader cancer phenotype related to POT1-TPD, in three families (two with a four generation pedigree, one with a five generation pedigree). The three index cases were referred to our oncogenetic centre for genetic counselling due to their personal history of cancer. Two underwent clinical exome sequencing of 4,867 genes associated with Mendelian genetic diseases, and another underwent gene panel sequencing including POT1, which identified three different POT1 PV: NC_000007.14(NM_015450.2):c.349C>T; NC_000007.14(NM_015450.2):c.233T>C and NC_000007.14(NM_015450.2):c.818G>A; already described in the literature. Referenced relatives, did a target genetic test (according to the POT1 PV identified in the family). In total, 37 individuals were tested (51.4% females), median age of 46 (22-81) years, with POT1 PV detected in 22. POT1-TPD was observed, but also a higher incidence of other cancers (other sarcomas, papillary thyroid cancer, early onset prostate cancer and leukaemia). These findings contribute to an increase in our knowledge about POT1 PV, and it can play a role in the definition of future POT1 PV screening criteria, POT1 carrier surveillance protocols (possibly considering screening for all types of sarcomas) and in genetic counselling.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in gBRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment. METHODS: Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status. CONCLUSION: Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.

Prevalence and clinical impact of tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in patients presenting with localized or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate management of localized or metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients harboring tumor BRCA mutations (tBRCAm) is not well-characterized. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients with tBRCAm and localized or de novo metastatic HSPC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort study of localized (cohort 1) and de novo metastatic (cohort 2) HSPC patients who underwent tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing from 2013 to 2019. Primary endpoints included event-free survival (EFS) and metastases-free survival (MFS) for cohort 1, and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (TTCRPC) and overall survival (OS) for cohort 2. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models estimated the association of endpoints with tBRCA status. RESULTS: Of 399 identified patients with localized and de novo metastatic HSPC who underwent tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequencing, 3.1% (8/258) patients of cohort 1 and 10.6% (15/141) patients of cohort 2 harbored tBRCAm. The median follow-up was 33 and 36 months, respectively. In cohort 1, median EFS was 18.1 vs. 57 months (p = 0.28) and MFS was 37 vs. 153.4 months (p = 0.08) for patients with tBRCAm compared to patients with no tBRCAm. In cohort 2, the TTCRPC was 24 vs. 19 months (p = 0.65) and OS was 64 vs. 60 months (p = 0.95) in patients with and without tBRCAm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: While tBRCAm seems to be associated with greater relapse risk in localized disease, tBRCAm did not influence the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with de novo metastatic HSPC treated with conventional therapies. tBRCAm may exert different prognostic effects across the clinical spectrum of prostate cancer.

BRCA gene mutations do not shape the extent and organization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancer.

This study investigated the prevalence of TIL subpopulations, TLS, PD-1 and PD-L1 in tumors from TNBC patients harboring wild-type or mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline genes. This TNBC cohort included 85% TIL-positive (≥10%) tumors with 21% classified as TILhi (≥50%). Interestingly, the BRCAmut group had a significantly higher incidence of TILpos tumors compared to the BRCAwt group (P = 0.037). T cells were dominant in the infiltrate but no statistically significant differences were detected between BRCAwt and BRCAmut for CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells or CD20+ B cells. TLS were detected in 74% of tumors but again no significant differences between the BRCA groups. PD-1 expression was observed in 33% and PD-L1 in 53% (any cell, cut-off ≥1%) tumors for the entire TNBC cohort. PD-1 expression correlated with PD-L1 and both with TIL and TLS but was not associated with BRCA mutational status. Our analyses reveal that BRCAwt and BRCAmut TNBC are similar except for a significant increase of TILpos tumors in the BRCAmut group. While BRCA gene mutations may not directly drive immune infiltration, the greater number of TILpos tumors could signal greater immunogenicity in this group.