Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) ; 71(1): 41-51, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36596511

RESUMEN

Globalization of pharmaceutical supply chains has expanded and manufacturers are required to manufacture products in compliance with the pharmacopoeial standards used in all exporting countries/regions to ensure product quality. International harmonization has been facilitated by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group consisting of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia, the United States Pharmacopeia, and the European Pharmacopoeia. However, since the pharmacopoeias have been developed individually under the regulatory framework of each country/region, differences exist between these pharmacopoeias. When using pharmacopoeias, an understanding of common pharmacopoeial rules is essential. Clarifying the similarities and differences in the General Notices of the pharmacopoeias widely referenced worldwide is considered valuable for those already using one or two of them to access the remaining pharmacopoeias. In this study, we compared the existence of items and the contents described in the General Notices of the three pharmacopoeias to clarify the differences. Investigation of the existence of items revealed that more than 70% of the 105 items in General Notices in the three pharmacopoeias were in the entire pharmacopoeias (for Japan, including Japanese laws and notifications). Furthermore, investigating contents revealed that approximately 20% of the 105 items have some differences such as numerical values and test conditions. However, it was shown that most of the items did not have major differences. It is expected that the three pharmacopoeias will be utilized simultaneously by understanding the similarities and differences shown in this study.


Asunto(s)
Cooperación Internacional , Estados Unidos , Japón , Europa (Continente)
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 18(2): 199-206, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22009526

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections have been the most common cause of nosocomial infections in Japan, but their genetic characteristics related to bloodstream infections have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to investigate a comprehensive molecular characterization of MRSA blood isolates during the historical 18-year study period between 1987 and 2004 in a tertiary care university hospital. A total of 137 MRSA isolates recovered from the blood of inpatients at Fukuoka University Hospital were analyzed. Clinical information and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were reviewed, and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec), accessory gene regulator (agr), and a battery of bacterial genes were tested by PCR-based assays. The relatedness of these isolates was determined by the repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Although low numbers of agr type III/SCCmec type IV isolates circulated between 1987 and 1992, agr type II/SCCmec type II isolates started circulating in 1993 and were responsible for the increased MRSA isolates until 2004. The rep-PCR and PFGE identified 104 epidemic and 33 sporadic isolates. Among the 104 epidemic isolates, six major rep-PCR/PFGE types were identified, which occupied 67.3% of epidemic isolates. The SCCmec type II and agr type II isolates were observed in significantly higher proportion in epidemic isolates than in sporadic isolates (P = 0.0318, P = 0.0123, respectively). In contrast, SCCmec type IV strains were observed in significantly higher proportion in sporadic isolates than in epidemic isolates (P = 0.0494). Although isolates with sec were detected in higher rates in epidemic isolates (P = 0.0397), seh was detected in higher rates in sporadic isolates (P = 0.0350). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with forward stepping revealed that SCCmec type II was independently associated with epidemic isolates (P = 0.0067; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.64). These data indicated that SCCmec type II MRSA isolates were responsible for the increased MRSA bloodstream infections for inpatients during the 18-year study period in the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Epidemiología Molecular , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Factores de Virulencia/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA