One-Bag 8-Step Ferric Carboxymaltose Desensitization Protocol for Patients with a History of Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iron Preparations.

INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia in both sexes, although it is more common in women. Intravenous (IV) iron replacement is preferred in patients who cannot tolerate oral treatment or when iron stores need to be replenished rapidly. In this study, we wanted to share the ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) desensitization protocol that we self-created and successfully applied. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to IV or oral iron replacement and patients who were planned to receive IV iron replacement but were referred to the allergy clinic because of have risk factors (atopic diseases, history of HSR to other drugs, high serum tryptase levels, etc.) for HSRs. Before desensitization, some of the patients underwent skin tests (skin prick test and intradermal test) with FCM, and the results were recorded. Skin tests were not performed in patients with a history of drug use (antihistamine, systemic steroid, omalizumab, etc.) that affected the results of skin tests. All patients underwent a one-bag 8-step desensitization protocol with 500 mg FCM and were observed for 2 h after desensitization. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (14 females and 1 male) with a mean age of 41.13 ± 11.18 years were included in the study. When the patients were evaluated in terms of the risk of allergic reactions according to their clinical history, 8 patients had a history of anaphylaxis with iron preparations (FCM, n = 4; ferric hydroxide sucrose, n = 2; iron [II] glycine sulfate, n = 1; and iron [III] hydroxide polymaltose, n = 1), and 7 patients had a history of HSR other than anaphylaxis with iron preparations (urticaria, n = 6 [FCM, n = 2; iron (II) glycine sulfate, n = 2; and iron (III) hydroxide polymaltose, n = 2] and urticaria + angioedema [ferric hydroxide sucrose, n = 1]). Desensitization was successfully completed in all patients. No HSR was observed during or after the procedure in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: IV iron replacement is a very effective method, especially in cases where iron stores need to be replenished more rapidly. In patients with a history of iron HSR or at risk of developing HSR, replacement can be safely performed without an allergic reaction with successful desensitization protocols.

Picturing asthma in Turkey: results from the Turkish adult asthma registry.

INTRODUCTION: National data on asthma characteristics and the factors associated with uncontrolled asthma seem to be necessary for every country. For this purpose, we developed the Turkish Adult Asthma Registry for patients with asthma aiming to take a snapshot of our patients, thereby assigning the unmet needs and niche areas of intervention. METHODS: Case entries were performed between March 2018 and March 2022. A web-based application was used to record data. Study outcomes were demographic features, disease characteristics, asthma control levels, and phenotypes. RESULTS: The registry included 2053 patients from 36 study centers in Turkey. Female subjects dominated the group (n = 1535, 74.8%). The majority of the patients had allergic (n = 1158, 65.3%) and eosinophilic (n = 1174, 57.2%) asthma. Six hundred nineteen (32.2%) of the patients had obese asthma. Severe asthma existed in 670 (32.6%) patients. Majority of cases were on step 3-5 treatment (n: 1525; 88.1%). Uncontrolled asthma was associated with low educational level, severe asthma attacks in the last year, low FEV1, existence of chronic rhinosinusitis and living in particular regions. CONCLUSION: The picture of this registry showed a dominancy of middle-aged obese women with moderate-to-severe asthma. We also determined particular strategic targets such as low educational level, severe asthma attacks, low FEV1, and chronic rhinosinusitis to decrease uncontrolled asthma in our country. Moreover, some regional strategies may also be needed as uncontrolled asthma is higher in certain regions. We believe that these data will guide authorities to reestablish national asthma programs to improve asthma service delivery.

Can development of asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity be reduced by subcutaneous immunotherapy in adult patients with allergic rhinitis?

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis can be associated with bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and create an increased risk for allergic asthma development. We aimed to investigate the effects of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) on BHR and asthma development in adult patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: The retrospective case-control study was carried out between November 2018 and May 2019 in Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital. In this study, data was recorded for patients with a mite and/or grasses/cereals pollen allergy who were tested for BHR before planned SCIT, and who had allergic rhinitis, with or without asthma. The SCIT group was selected as those who received SCIT for at least one year. The control group was selected from those who were scheduled to receive SCIT but were waived and still receiving medication. Symptom scores, prick test results, PC20 levels (methacholine challenge that is a provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1), and the presence of asthma were recorded and compared with data from at least one year after treatment. RESULTS: A total of sixty-eight subjects (22 males, 46 females; mean age 40.54 ± 12.27 years; SCIT: 40, Control: 28) were enrolled.Although the changes in log PC20 levels were not statistically significant in both SCIT and control groups after an average of 30-35 months of treatment, it was found to be significant in favor of the SCIT group when two groups were compared in terms of the change in log PC20 (p = 0.026). The development and improvement of asthma were not significantly different between the SCIT and control group but tended to increase in the control group. The percentage of patients with progressed/BHR was significantly higher in the controls (70.6% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.046). DISCUSSION: In our real life study we have demonstrated the preventative effect of SCIT on BHR, but not on asthma developmen.

Modified successful desensitization protocol of infliximab in a patient with sarcoidosis unable to tolerate corticosteroids and refractory to alternative therapeutics.

Glucocorticoids are the primary treatment choices for sarcoidosis. However, some patients are resistant to corticosteroids or have side effects and may not respond to alternative treatments added to reduce corticosteroid therapy. Evidence has demonstrated the critical role of Infliximab [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α] which is a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody in the pathogenesis of granulomatous inflammation. In this paper, we present a patient who improved clinically and radiologically with infliximab treatment, which was initiated due to the development of serious side effects associated with corticosteroids; however, following unresponsiveness to other therapeutic drugs initiated due to relapse, restarted infliximab, and developed an early hypersensitivity reaction. With infliximab, the frequency of early-type hypersensitivity reactions is 2-3%. In such cases, drug desensitization is an effective and safe treatment option. Different desensitization protocols have been defined with infliximab, and the frequency of reactions during desensitization has been reported as 29%, especially in the last step. With the desensitization protocol we have modified, patients with a history of early-type hypersensitivity reaction with infliximab will have the chance to take this effective drug more safely and effortlessly.

Does vitamin D deficiency in asthma affect clinical and functional parameters? A Turkish multicenter study.

Background: In recent years, interest in the effects of vitamin D on human health and the immune system has increased. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship of vitamin D with asthma severity, attacks, and clinical and functional parameters in adult patients with asthma who were living in different geographic regions in Turkey. Methods: A total of 384 patients with stable asthma and 87 control subjects were included. A physical examination and a pulmonary function test were performed, and routine blood analyses and vitamin D levels were evaluated. Asthma Control Test was applied. The number of exacerbations in the previous year, asthma therapy, and medication adherence were recorded. Results: In our study, vitamin D levels were below the target values in both patients with asthma (median [minimum-maximum] 16.0 ng/mL [3.5-48 ng/ml]) and control subjects (median [minimum-maximum] 20.0 ng/mL [5.8-58.79 ng/mL]). However, it was lower in the patients with asthma than in the control subjects (p = 0.001). There was a negative relationship between the levels of vitamin D and the severity of asthma (Kendall τ = -0.146; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the patients with severe asthma were received The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step 5 treatment showed significantly lower vitamin D compared with the patients who received GINA step 4 treatment (p = 0.037). Vitamin D levels correlated with forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (r, 0.221-0.236; p ≤ 0.001). In addition, a positive relationship was found between Asthma Control Test and vitamin D (r = 0.229; p = 0.001). However, body mass index (BMI), asthma exacerbation, and hospitalization were inversely related to vitamin D (r, 0.198-0.233; p = 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that FVC (p = 0.002), FEV1 (p = 0.033), and BMI (p = 0.037) were independent determinants associated with vitamin D. Conclusion: This study suggested a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adults with asthma living in different geographic areas in Turkey. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with asthma severity, poor control, and lower lung function.

The significance of eosinophil and eosinophil lymphocyte ratio (ELR) in predicting response to omalizumab treatment in patients with severe allergic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Th2/Th1 mix pathological pathway may be seen as a common set of low eosinophilic phenotype in severe allergic asthma. This may affect omalizumab treatment response. In our study, we aimed to investigate whether eosinophil count (EOS) and percentage (EOS%), eosinophil lymphocyte ratio (ELR) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may predict omalizumab treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received omalizumab treatment at least for one year in our allergy clinic were screened retrospectively. Baseline hemogram parameters, pre- and post-treatment emergency admissions, annual attacks requiring steroid use, hospitalizations, spirometric changes, and asthma control tests (ACT) were recorded. According the global efficacy assessment (phisician's GETE) scale patients was recorded as responder and nonresponder. By looking at EOS, EOS%, ELR and NLR distributions in these groups, the role of these parameters in representation of the treatment efficacy was investigated. RESULT: The study was carried out with 83 patients, 77.1% of whom were women with an average age of 50.03 ± 10.7. While ACT scores and FEV1, FEF25-75 was significantly increased, the number of emergency admissions, annual attacks and hospitalizations decreased significantly (p<0.05). The rate of patients signed as responder was 75.9%, while the rate of nonresponder was %24.1. When the two groups were compared, it was found that the EOS, EOS% and ELR were significantly higher in the responder group. The cut-off values according to the ROC curve were determined as 0.12, 310/ml and 3.1% respectively. Considering the sensitivity (58.73%); specificity (85.00%); positive predictive value (92.50%), it was determined that ELR was a more valuable test. CONCLUSIONS: Instead of expensive and invasive methods for predicting the response of omalizumab therapy in severe allergic asthma, the ELR is correlated with treatment response and giving hope to be easier way to reach.

Fractalkine in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common sleep disorder affecting 2-4 % of the adult population. In addition to several potential mechanisms, inflammation is one of the suggested etiological factors in OSA. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 which is detected in activated or stressed endothelium, smooth muscle cells, skeletal muscle cells, macrophages, neurons, and hepatocytes is an inflammatory marker and attracts attention of sleep specialists in OSA pathogenesis. In this study, we had two goals. The first one was to investigate the role of fractalkine in OSA pathogenesis while the second one was to detect the impact of OSA treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP) on serum fractalkine levels. METHOD: This study included 34 patients (6 females, 28 males) diagnosed as OSA and 20 healthy controls (4 females, 16 males). Initial serum fractalkine levels of both groups were first evaluated in order to demonstrate any potential relation of OSA with fractalkine. Subsequently, serum fractalkine levels of the OSA patients were evaluated following 1 week of PAP treatment to demonstrate the impact of PAP treatment on serum fractalkine levels. RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference between OSA patients and healthy controls by means of plasma fractalkine levels (p, 0.67) statistically, plasma fractalkine levels significantly decreased in OSA patients after 1 week of PAP treatment (p, 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that fractalkine, a potential mediator of chronic inflammation, was not sensitive in diagnosing OSA but might be an indicator of the success of OSA treatment.

Does eosinophilia and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio affect hospital re-admission in cases of COPD exacerbation?

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the relationship between peripheral eosinophilia and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with hospital admissions and re-admissions with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out in a tertiary teaching hospital. Subjects with previously diagnosed COPD and who were admitted as outpatients with acute exacerbations were included. The subjects' characteristics, complete blood count (CBC) parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte rate (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), mean platelet volume (MPV) on admission and re-admission within the first 28 days. Patients were grouped according to their peripheral blood eosinophilia levels; group 1, > 2% (eosinophilic), group 2, ≤ 2% (non-eosinophilic or neutrophilic). The recorded data from the two groups were compared. RESULT: 1490 eligible COPD subjects were enrolled. Approximately 42% were classified as eosinophilic. The non-eosinophilic group had a significantly higher leukocyte count, neutrophil percentage, and NLR than the eosinophilic group. The NLR value in patients with repeat re-admissions was higher than the average, i.e., 4.50 (p= 0.001). MPV and CRP measured on admission and re-admission were similar in both groups. The rate of hospital re-admission within 28 days was significantly higher in patients with a non-eosinophilic attack. CONCLUSIONS: When a patient is admitted to outpatients with a NLR greater than 4.50 and with a non-eosinophilic exacerbation they have an increased risk of re-admission in the first month. Higher NLR values and non-eosinophilic exacerbations may be helpful for the early detection of potential acute attacks in COPD patients, and may be indicators for antibiotic management.

Should patients with risk factors be tested for hypersensitivity to contrast media: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Previous hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media (CM), atopy, atopic disease, drug allergy, and age (20-29 or >55) are risk factors for CM hypersensitivity reactions. Our aim was to evaluate whether these risk factors should prompt skin testing for diagnosing CM allergy. METHODS: The study was conducted among patients referred for allergy testing with CM. Skin tests were performed with non ionic or gadolinium CM, recommended by a radiologist. After completion of tests patients were telephonically queried on their symptoms of reactions. RESULTS: 151 risk patients (53 men, 98 women; mean age 55.2) were included in the study. Only 13 (9 %) had a history of hypersensitivity reaction to CM. Compared with the other patients, atopy was significantly more common in patients with a history of CM hypersensitivity reactions. Female gender and mean age were also higher, but not significant. All of the tests with CMs were negative. Only one patient reported urticaria within 1-2 min after administration of CM (telephonically). CONCLUSIONS: Atopy can increase the risk of CM allergy. However, skin tests with CMs may be inefficient, unnecessary, and time-consuming, except in cases with a history of CM allergy. Premedication protocols appear to be beneficial in patients with a history of CM allergy and cannot be recommended for patients with well-controlled asthma, rhinitis, atopic dermatitis or history of drug allergy.

A patient with mushroom allergy; a new etiological agent of Kounis syndrome.

Kounis syndrome (KS) is a rarely diagnosed condition which should always be kept in mind when an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) happens in the context of anaphylactic reactions. We report a case of a 31-year old female; 2 hours after the ingestion of the mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus); she experienced nausea, stomachache, vomiting, dyspnea and chest pain. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed an ST segment elevation in D1, AVL, precordial leads V1-V4. The blood analysis revealed high levels of CK-MB fraction and troponin T values. The diagnosis of Kounis syndrome was made in the catheterization laboratory via the complete resolution of angina, along with electrocardiographic changes that took place after intracoronary nitrate therapy and skin prick to prick test positivism with the mushroom. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a type I variant of Kounis syndrome due to Pleurotus ostreatus allergy reported so far.

[A case of Takayasu's arteritis with endobronchial involvement]. / Endobronsiyal tutulum gösteren Takayasu arteriti olgusu.

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a large vessel vasculitis especially seen in young women. Because of nonspecific symptoms diagnois is difficult and confused with other diseases. Delayed treatment increase morbidity and mortality. It effects primarly pulmonary artery in lung involvement. To our knowledge endobronchial involvement has not been reported previously in the literature. Due to rarity we present our patient whom we observed with the diagnosis of endobronchial tuberculosis and confirmed the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis after 9 months.

Erratum to "Does NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) accompanying severe asthma affect biological treatment response? Efficacy of omalizumab and mepolizumab in N-ERD" [World Allergy Organ (2023) 100817].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100817.].

[Vaccination approach in patients with an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccines or at risk of developing allergic reactions]. / COVID-19 asilarina alerjik reaksiyon gösteren veya alerjik reaksiyon gelisme riski olan hastalarda asilama yaklasimi.

Introduction: There is consensus that patients at risk of developing an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccines should be evaluated by an immunologist-allergist to determine whether vaccination should be recommended. We wanted to share our experiences in the management of these high-risk patients, from diagnostic tests in allergological evaluation to the vaccination process. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who had previously developed an allergic reaction to COVID-19 vaccines or drugs and therefore were referred to our allergy and immunology clinic. Prick and intradermal tests were performed on all patients with methylprednisolone acetate (Depo-Medrol®, Pfizer) 40 mg/mL containing polyethylene Glycol (PEG) and triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort®, Deva) 40 mg/mL containing polysorbate 80. While vaccination with desensitization was recommended for all patients with positive skin tests, split-dose vaccination was recommended for patients with negative skin tests. After explaining the risks and benefits, the choice of the vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech or Sinovac/ CoronoVac) was left to the patients' discretion. Result: A total of 41 patients, 10 males, and 31 females, with a mean age of 42.37 ± 14.177 years were included. Eighteen patients with a history of allergy after COVID-19 vaccines were analyzed according to the type of reaction and type of vaccine administered (Pfizer/BioNTech/Coronovac; Anaphylaxis: 4/1, Urticaria: 11/2). Moreover, there was a history of drug allergy in 23 patients who had not been vaccinated before. Skin tests with PEG were positive in a total of seven patients while skin tests with polysorbate 80 were negative in all patients. No allergic reaction developed in seven patients who underwent desensitization and in 34 patients who received a split dose. Conclusions: Considering the potentially life-saving benefits of vaccination in a global pandemic environment, it is a safe and effective method to administer vaccines to at-risk patients using desensitization or split dosing techniques, based on their sensitivity status determined through a PEG skin test. This approach allows for the avoidance of preventing access to vaccines, while still ensuring the safety of patients.

The phenotypic heterogeneity of obese and nonobese patients with severe asthma and comparison of omalizumab-mepolizumab treatment efficiency in these patients.

In obese severe asthmatics, the degree of type 2 inflammation may vary according to their atopic status and past smoking history. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical and physiopathological features of obese and nonobese severe asthmatics treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab treatment. In addition we aimed to compare the clinical, spirometric outcomes and total peripheral eosinophilic count (TEC) changes after treatment with these 2 biologic agents in obese and nonobese groups. In this retrospective, cross sectional study, 121 severe asthmatic treated with biologic agents (omalizumab = 88 or mepolizumab = 33) for at least 16 weeks were included. Obese (n: 44) and nonobese severe asthmatics (n: 77) were analyzed according to whether they provided a ≥ 10 pack/years (p/y) or <10 p/y smoking history and were found to be atopic. Obese and nonobese groups were compared in terms of the change in the asthma control test, asthma attacks, TEC, and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after treatment. In patients with ≥10 p/y smoking history, nonobese group had a significantly higher TEC compared to obese group [median (min-max) 660 cells/µL (200-1500) vs 300 cells/µL (110-770); p: 0.013]. Within the nonobese group, nonatopic patients had a significantly higher TEC compared to atopic patients [median (min-max) 1200 cells/µL (100-2100) vs 310 cells/µL (0-2730); p: 0.021]. Both biologic agents had similar effects on improving asthma control test and in reducing asthma attacks; however, mepolizumab was more effective in suppressing TEC. The improvement in FEV1 in obese group following biologic 2 agents was very similar but in nonobese group, mepolizumab was found to be superior (510 mL vs. 295 mL; p: 0.034). In our real-life study, nonobese severe asthmatics with ≥10 p/y smoking history and those that were nonatopic had higher TEC. Compared to omalizumab, mepolizumab was superior at reducing TEC in all asthmatics and in improving FEV1 in nonobese group.

Delayed anaphylaxis due to Alpha-gal allergy: A modified desensitization protocol with red meat in an adult patient.

Alpha-gal allergy is the sensitization to Alpha-gal present in saliva when a tick bites and the development of an IgE-mediated reaction to Alpha-gal also present in red meat by cross-reactivity. In contrast to other food allergies, symptoms occur as late as 2-6 hours after a meal. Prick to prick testing with nonmammalian meat in combination with cooked mammalian meat is recommended for diagnosis. However, the main diagnostic test is Alpha-gal sIgE> 0.1 IU/mL. The primary recommendation in patients with Alpha-gal syndrome is to prevent new tick bites and avoid all mammalian meats. Since most of the dishes in our country's food culture contain red meat, elimination diet may adversely affect patients quality of life. In the management of these patients, the option of desensitization with red meat can be considered by evaluating the benefit-risk ratio together with the patient. Our patient with a history of tick bites and a reaction pattern ranging from urticaria to anaphylaxis two hours after meat consumption was evaluated for Alpha gal allergy. The patient was found to be positive by prick-to-prick with cooked red meat. In addition, the high level of Alpha-gal specific IgE (27.3 Ku/L) confirmed the Alpha-gal allergy, and the decision to apply desensitization with red meat was taken. There are only two literatures on this subject, one of which includes two adult cases and the other a single pediatric case. Since a reaction developed in the fifth step of the 27-step desensitization scheme (Ünal et al.), which we took as a reference, which led to a dose increase of more than 100 times, we modified the protocol by using an intermediate steps. We repeated the prick-to-prick test with red meat after desensitization in our case who successfully completed the modified desensitization protocol. Observation of more than half reduction in test edema diameter concretely supports the success of our modified desensitization protocol.

Does NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) accompanying severe asthma affect biological treatment response? Efficacy of omalizumab and mepolizumab in N-ERD.

Introduction: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) accompanies severe asthma in about 15% of the patients and may adversely affect the prognosis. Omalizumab and mepolizumab are biologics used in patients with severe asthma. The objective of this study is to assess the respiratory improvements, after these biologics in severe asthmatic patients stratifed by the presence of concomitant Non-erosive reflux disease (N-ERD) and the effect of omalizumab and mepolizumab in severe asthmatics with N-ERD. Material & method: The population of this three-center, retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study comprised patients using omalizumab or mepolizumab for severe asthma. Patients administered these biologics for severe asthma were comparatively analyzed for the presence of N-ERD; asthma control test (ACT) scores, number of attacks, and the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were assessed. Subsequently, patients who were found to have N-ERD were analyzed using visual analog scale (VAS) in terms of the changes in their nasal parameters (ie, nasal obstruction, facial pain, anterior-posterior rhinitis, and hyposmia), according to whether they use omalizumab or mepolizumab. Results: The use of biologics resulted in a significant improvement in ACT and FEV1 and reduction in attacks in 28 severe asthmatics with N-ERD and 125 without N-ERD. Although both biologics resulted in a significant improvement in the respiratory parameters, omalizumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement in nasal parameters except hyposmia, mepolizumab treatment resulted in a significant improvement only in posterior rhinitis, and nasal obstruction among the nasal parameters. Conclusion: This study is the first to address both omalizumab and mepolizumab treatments in severe asthmatics with N-ERD. The improvement in nasal parameters was more pronounced in patients who were administered omalizumab. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to corroborate the findings of this study.

Comparison of omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment efficacy in patients with atopic and eosinophilic "Overlap" severe asthma: Biological agent preference in atopic-eosinophilic severe asthma.

Approximately 1-third of patients with severe asthma are candidates for both omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment. We aimed to compare the clinical, spirometric and inflammatory efficacy of these 2 biologics in atopic and eosinophilic "overlap" severe asthma patients. In our 3-center retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the data of patients who received omalizumab or mepolizumab for at least 16 weeks to treat severe asthma were examined. Atopic (perennial allergen sensitivity and total IgE level 30-1500 IU/mL) and eosinophilic (blood eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/µL in admission; or ≥300 cells/µL in the previous year) patients with asthma suitable for both biologics were included in the study. Post-treatment changes in the asthma control test (ACT) score, number of attacks, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and eosinophil count were compared. The rates of any biological responder patient were compared according to whether they had high eosinophil counts (≥500 cells/µL vs <500 cells/µL). Total of 181 patients data were evaluated, of the 74 atopic and eosinophilic overlap patients included in the study, 56 were receiving omalizumab and 18 were receiving mepolizumab. When omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment efficacies were compared, there was no difference in terms of the reduction in attacks and improvement in ACT. The decrease in eosinophil levels in patients in the mepolizumab arm was significantly higher than that in patients in the omalizumab arm (46.3% vs 87.8%; P < .001). The improvement in FEV1 was greater with mepolizumab treatment, although the difference was not significant (215 mL vs 380 mL; P = .053). It has been shown that having high eosinophil counts does not affect the clinical and spirometric responder patient rates for either biological condition. The success of omalizumab and mepolizumab treatment is similar in patients with atopic and eosinophilic overlap with severe asthma. However, because the baseline patient inclusion criteria are not compatible, head-to-head studies comparing both biological agents are required.

Clinical and immunological outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inborn errors of immunity receiving different brands and doses of COVID-19 vaccines.

Introduction: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) provide successful control of the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The safety and immunogenicity studies are encouraging in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI); however, data about mortality outcomes and severe disease after vaccination still need to be fully addressed. Therefore, we aimed to determine the clinical and immunological outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IEI who have received vaccination. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight patients with a broad range of molecular etiologies were studied; 45 experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection outcomes were analyzed in terms of genetic etiology, background clinical characteristics, and immunization history, including the type and number of doses received and the time elapsed since vaccination. In addition, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were quantified using electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. Results: Patients were immunized using one of the three regimens: inactivated (Sinovac, Coronavac®), mRNA (BNT162b2, Comirnaty®, Pfizer-Biontech), and a combination. All three regimens induced comparable anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels, with no differences in the adverse events. Among 45 patients with COVID-19, 26 received a full course of vaccination, while 19 were vaccine-naive or received incomplete dosing. No patients died due to COVID-19 infection. The fully immunized group had a lower hospitalization rate (23% vs. 31.5%) and a shorter symptomatic phase than the others. Among the fully vaccinated patients, serum IgM and E levels were significantly lower in hospitalized patients than non-hospitalized patients. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccines were well-tolerated by the IEI patients, and a full course of immunization was associated with lower hospitalization rates and a shorter duration of COVID-19 symptoms.

Drug hypersensitivity in drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Objective: To evaluate drug resistant tuberculosis patients who developed drug hypersensitivity to antituberculosis drug. Methods: This was a retrospective study. The primary aim of the study is to determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who develop drug hypersensitivity in drug resistant tuberculosis patients. The secondary aim of the study is to examine the treatment results. Demographic features, tuberculosis diagnostic indicator, clinical signs of developing hypersensitivity reaction, reaction time, and treatment were evaluated. Results: A total of 25 patients were included in the study. The prevalence of hypersensitivity in drug resistance patients was 11.9%. Twelve (48%) of the cases were women. Mean age (mean ± SD) was 37.24 ± 14.44 years; early type hypersensitivity reaction in 13 (52%). Three patients were isoniazid resistant; 19 patients were multidrug-resistant (MDR); 2 patients were pre-extensive drug resistant (Pre-XDR), 1 patient was extensive drug resistance (XDR) tuberculosis. The most common skin findings were maculopapular eruption and urticaria. But also we had seen isole angiodema, urticaria and angioedema, erythema multiforme, lichenoid drug eruption and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. In patients who developed a hypersensitivity reaction, the responsible agent was identified in 14 cases in total. Among the drugs, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, moxifloxacin, amikacin, para amino salicylic, prothionamide, and cycloserine are the responsible agents. When evaluated in terms of treatment results, 15 (60%) patients successfully completed the treatment. Conclusion: Our study is the first study in the literature that evaluated the drug hypersensitivity in drug resistance tuberculosis patients. Drug hypersensitivity that develops with tuberculosis treatment may lead to discontinuation or change in treatment. It can cause treatment failure, drug resistance, relapse, and even death. In resistant tuberculosis, the already existing resistance pattern may become more difficult to treat. Success can be achieved with the right management in these patients who have few treatment options, more drug side effects, and high treatment failure rates. The established regimen should be curative and prevent recurrence.

Are Lymphocytes and Eosinophils Associated with the COVID-19 Severity: A Large, Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 is an ongoing disease with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate the relationship between demographics, lymphocytes, eosinophils, and the coronavirus disease 2019 severity at hospital admission. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational cross-sectional study was carried out with 5828 coronavirus disease 2019 patients between March 11, 2020, and November 30, 2020. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to where they were followed up as an indicator of disease severity, namely outpatients, inpatients, and critically ill patients. The patients' demographics and hemogram values on admission were recorded. The predictive accuracies of lymphocyte count, lymphocyte percentage, eosinophil count, and eosinophil percentage for predicting severity were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict intensive care unit demand according to lymphocyte and eosinophil values. RESULTS: Of the 5828 coronavirus disease 2019 patients, 4050 were followed up as outpatients, 1581 were hospitalized in a ward, and 197 were hospitalized in the intensive care unit. Lymphocyte count and lymphocyte percentage were significantly different between the groups, but the difference for eosinophil count and eosinophil percentage was not significant as it was for lymphocytes. Cutoff values for lymphocyte count (1.0 × 109 /L), lymphocyte percentage (22%), eosinophil count (0.052 × 109 /L), and eosinophil percentage (0.08%) were found to indicate a high risk for intensive care unit admission. Coronavirus disease 2019 patients >55 years of age, with a lymphocyte count <1.0 × 109 /L, a lymphocyte percentage <22%, and an eosinophil percentage <0.08% had a 2-fold higher risk of requiring intensive care unit management. CONCLUSION: Lymphocyte counts and percentages are quick and reliable biomarkers for predicting coronavirus disease 2019 severity and may guide physicians for proper management earlier.