HEMOSTASIS DISORDERS IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 130 PATIENTS.

The laboratory detection of factors that participate in coagulation mechanisms in patients with coronary heart disease may lead to important findings regarding the contribution of endothelial function to atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the role of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity, thrombomodulin (TM), ADAMTS13 activity and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in patients undergoing coronary angiography due to non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable angina (UA) and stable angina pectoris with positive stress testing-induced myocardial ischemia (controls). Furthermore, the measured biomarkers were examined among patients with classical cardiovascular risk factors. 50 NSTEMI patients, 50 UA patients and 30 controls referred to coronary angiography were included in the study. The blood samples were collected before the catheter procedure. MPO, TM and ADAMTS13 activity were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while vWF activity was calculated with INNOVANCE vWF Ac. When the laboratory results were compared between the three study groups, hs-CRP was found to be higher in NSTEMI patients compared to UA patients (p=0.0015) and controls (p<0.0001). ADAMTS13 activity was higher in NSTEMI (p=0.0035) and UA patients (p=0.0102) compared to controls and TM was lower in NSTEMI patients compared to UA patients (p=0.0307) and controls (p=0.0002). Moreover, MPO was higher in UA patients compared to the control group (p=0.0227). Finally, each of the aforementioned biomarkers was compared in the presence of the following cardiovascular risk factors: smoking, diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). The results of this study add more data to the current medical literature concerning the role of coagulation disorders, endothelial damage and immunothrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease and their correlation with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

PURPOSE: The investigation of a semi-quantitative index in the pelvis to assess for diffuse bone marrow (BM) [18F]-FDG uptake and the investigation of PET skeletal patterns in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, in accordance with prognostic markers, clonal plasma cell (cPC) morphology, and response to therapy. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed [18F]-FDG PET/CT in 90 MM patients (newly diagnosed, 60; relapsed/refractory, 30). Among other PET/CT parameters, we calculated the ratio SUVmax pelvis/liver and examined for correlations with known MM prognostic parameters, cPC morphology (good vs. low/intermediate differentiation), and response to therapy. RESULTS: SUVmax pelvis/liver ratio was significantly lower for the group of good differentiation vs. intermediate/low differentiation cPCs (p < 0.001) and showed a positive correlation with BM infiltration rate, ß2 microglobulin, serum ferritin, international staging system (ISS), and revised ISS; no significant correlation was found with hemoglobin. A cutoff value of 1.1 showed an excellent specificity (99%) and high sensitivity (76%) for diffuse BM involvement (AUC 0.94; p < 0.001). Mixed pattern and appendicular involvement correlated with poor prognostic features while normal pattern, found in 30% of patients, correlated with good prognostic features. Presence of ≥ 10 focal lesions negatively predicted for overall response (p < 0.05; OR 4.8). The CT component improved the diagnostic performance of PET. CONCLUSION: This study showed, for the first time, that cPC morphology and markers related with MM biology, correlate with SUVmax pelvis/liver index, which could be used as a surrogate marker for BM assessment and disease prognosis; PET patterns correlate with MM prognostic features and response rates.

Prevention, monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular adverse events in myeloma patients receiving carfilzomib A consensus paper by the European Myeloma Network and the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib alone or in combination with other agents is already one of the standard therapies for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients and produces impressive response rates in newly diagnosed MM as well. However, carfilzomib-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) - including hypertension (all grades: 12.2%; grade ≥3: 4.3%), heart failure (all grades: 4.1%; grade ≥3: 2.5%) and ischemic heart disease (all grades: 1.8%; grade ≥3: 0.8%) - may lead to treatment suspensions. At present, there are neither prospective studies nor expert consensus on the prevention, monitoring and treatment of CVAEs in myeloma patients treated with carfilzomib. METHODS: An expert panel of the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension and with the endorsement of the European Hematology Association aimed to provide recommendations to support health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for patients, considering the impact on outcome and the risk-benefit ratio of diagnostic and therapeutic tools, thereby achieving myeloma response with novel combination approaches whilst preventing CVAEs. RESULTS: Patients scheduled to receive carfilzomib need a careful cardiovascular evaluation before treatment and an accurate follow-up during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed clinical assessment before starting carfilzomib treatment is essential to identify patients at risk for CVAEs, and accurate monitoring of blood pressure and of early signs and symptoms suggestive of cardiac dysfunction remains pivotal to safely administer carfilzomib without treatment interruptions or dose reductions.

The role of sclerostin/dickkopf-1 and receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand/osteoprotegerin signalling pathways in the development of osteoporosis in patients with haemophilia A and B: A cross-sectional study.

AIM: Haemophilia A and B are associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). The aim of this study was to assess circulating sclerostin and dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), (inhibitors of osteoblastic differentiation), as well as the receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) system (the major regulator of osteoclastogenesis), in patients with haemophilia (PWH), their possible correlations with clinical risk factors and the effect of ibandronate on these markers. METHODS: Eighty-nine male PWH (mean age 45.9 ± 15.3 years) and 30 age-matched healthy male controls participated. BMD was assessed by DXA. Sclerostin, Dkk-1, RANKL and OPG were measured in serum of patients, controls, as well as in ten patients receiving oral ibandronate (150 mg/mo), at baseline and after 12 months. RESULTS: Patients with haemophilia had lower circulating sclerostin (median ± IQR: 47.4 ± 26.93 vs 250 ± 250 pmol/L, P < .001), Dkk-1 (21.24 ± 17.18 vs 26.16 ± 15.32pg/mL, P = .04) and higher levels of RANKL (0.23 ± 0.03 vs 0.04 ± 0.03 pmol/L, P = .001), RANKL/OPG ratio (0.063 ± 0.25 vs 0.005 ± 0.11, P = .001) compared with controls. Patients with low BMD had higher OPG concentrations compared to those with normal BMD. Sclerostin and RANKL/OPG correlated positively with BMD. Patients with severe haemophilia had lower sclerostin concentrations compared with those with mild or moderate disease. The degree of arthropathy negatively correlated with sclerostin and Dkk-1 levels. PWH who received ibandronate showed a decrease in serum Dkk-1 without any significant effect on sclerostin and RANKL/OPG. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with haemophilia present increased osteoclastic activity coupled with compensatory increased osteoblastic activity. Ibandronate did not affect RANKL/OPG ratio, but it decreased Dkk-1.

Second primary malignancies in multiple myeloma: an overview and IMWG consensus.

Background: Therapeutic advancements following the introduction of autologous stem cell transplantation and 'novel' agents have significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Increased life expectancy, however, has led to renewed concerns about the long-term risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs). This review outlines the most up-to-date knowledge of possible host-, disease-, and treatment-related risk factors for the development of SPMs in patients with MM, and provides practical recommendations to assist physicians. Design: A Panel of International Myeloma Working Group members reviewed the most relevant data published in the literature as full papers, or presented at meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, or International Myeloma Workshops, up to June 2016. Here, we present the recommendations of the Panel, based on this literature review. Results: Overall, the risk of SPMs in MM is low, multifactorial, and partially related to the length of patients' survival and MM intrinsic susceptibility. Studies suggest a significantly increased incidence of SPMs when lenalidomide is administered either following, or concurrently with, oral melphalan. Increased SPM incidence has also been reported with lenalidomide maintenance following high-dose melphalan, albeit to a lesser degree. In both cases, the risk of death from MM was significantly higher than the risk of death from SPMs, with lenalidomide possibly providing a survival benefit. No increase in SPM incidence was reported with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (without melphalan), or with bortezomib plus oral melphalan, dexamethasone, or thalidomide. Conclusion: In general, the risk of SPMs should not alter the current therapeutic decision-making process in MM. However, regimens such as lenalidomide plus dexamethasone should be preferred to prolonged exposure to lenalidomide plus oral melphalan. SPM risk should be carefully discussed with the patient in the context of benefits and risks of different treatment options.

Mechanisms of bone destruction in multiple myeloma.

Osteolytic bone disease is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma, resulting in skeletal complications that are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the result of an increased activity of osteoclasts, which is not followed by reactive bone formation by osteoblasts. Recent studies have revealed novel molecules and pathways that are implicated in osteoclast activation and osteoblast inhibition. Among them, the most important include the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand/osteoprotegerin pathway, the macrophage inflammatory proteins and the activin-A that play a crucial role in osteoclast stimulation in myeloma, while the wingless-type (Wnt) signalling inhibitors (sclerostin and dickkopf-1) along with the growth factor independence-1 are considered the most important factors for the osteoblast dysfunction of myeloma patients. Finally, the role of osteocytes, which is the key cell for normal bone remodelling, has also revealed during the last years through their interaction with myeloma cells that leads to their apoptosis and the release of RANKL and sclerostin maintaining bone loss in these patients. This review focuses on the latest available data for the mechanisms of bone destruction in multiple myeloma.

Significant improvement in the survival of patients with multiple myeloma presenting with severe renal impairment after the introduction of novel agents.

BACKGROUND: Renal impairment (RI) is a common presenting complication of multiple myeloma (MM); the availability of new treatments has improved the outcomes of patients with MM; however, their impact on the survival of patients who present with RI has not been extensively studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of 1773 consecutive unselected patients who were treated for symptomatic myeloma since January 1990. RESULTS: Although there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients of advanced age in the more recent periods, the frequency of RI as well as the proportion of patients who presented with severe RI (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) remained unchanged around 18%. Thus, after adjustment for age, there was a decrease in the risk of severe RI at presentation after 2000. Myeloma response rates (≥PR) to frontline therapy have substantially increased, and this was translated in a significant increase in the median survival. Specifically for patients with severe RI, the median OS has improved from 18 and 19.5 months in the 1990-1994 and 1995-1999 to 29 and 32 months for the periods 2000-2004 and after 2005 (P = 0.005). Severe RI was associated with a high risk of early death (12% versus 7% for patients with moderate RI versus 3% for patients with mild or no RI (P < 0.001), especially among older patients, and has remained unchanged over time. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a major improvement in the survival of patients with severe RI in the past decade, despite the increasing numbers of patients of advanced age. However, the risk of early death remains high in patients with severe RI, especially in the elderly.

Circulating periostin levels do not differ between postmenopausal women with normal and low bone mass and are not affected by zoledronic acid treatment.

Periostin is a secreted extracellular matrix protein preferentially expressed in bone by osteocytes and periosteal osteoblasts. Reduced periostin expression may affect osteoblast differentiation and collagen type I synthesis and predispose to osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. We aimed to evaluate circulating periostin levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass, their possible correlations with clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as the 3-month effect of zoledronic acid. Serum samples for periostin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), and total alkaline phosphatase (tALP) were obtained from 46 postmenopausal women with low bone mass at baseline and 3 months after zoledronic acid infusion and from 30 age-matched, postmenopausal controls with normal bone mass at baseline. There was no difference in periostin levels between women with normal and low bone mass (250±15 vs. 272±14 ng/ml, respectively; p=0.279). Periostin remained essentially unchanged after zoledronic acid infusion (262±18 ng/ml; p=0.130). Serum periostin levels at baseline were not affected by previous bisphosphonate treatment, and were correlated only to tALP (rs=0.351; p=0.018). In multiple linear regression analysis, tALP (B=3.17; 95% CI=0.59-5.79; p=0.018) was associated with serum periostin levels at baseline, independently from previous anti-osteoporotic treatment, age, body mass index, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. In conclusion, serum periostin levels do not differ between postmenopausal women with normal and low bone mass and are not affected by zoledronic acid treatment. Women with higher tALP have independently higher periostin levels.

Circulating activin-A is elevated in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: the three-month effect of zoledronic acid treatment.

UNLABELLED: Activin-A is expressed in bone and seems to regulate osteoclastogenesis. In this study, serum activin-A was increased in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and was positively correlated to age and negatively to lumbar spinal bone mineral density (BMD). Serum activin-A levels did not change 3 months after zoledronic acid infusion. INTRODUCTION: The aims of the study were to evaluate prospectively the circulating activin-A levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass and explore possible correlations with clinical and laboratory data, as well as the 3-month effect of zoledronic acid infusion. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with low bone mass assigned to receive zoledronic acid infusion (Patients, n = 47) and age-matched, postmenopausal women with normal bone mass (Controls, n = 27) were recruited on an outpatient basis. Main outcome measurement was serum activin-A levels. RESULTS: Serum activin-A was higher in patients at baseline compared to controls (p < 0.001) and activin-A in the serum of patients and controls was positively correlated with age (Spearman's coefficient of correlation [rs] = 0.325; p = 0.005) and negatively with lumbar spinal (LS) BMD (rs = -0.425; p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, only age (B = 8.93; 95 % CI = 4.39-13.46; p < 0.001) was associated with serum activin-A levels at baseline, independent from group (patients or controls), previous anti-osteoporotic treatment, LS BMD and follicle-stimulating hormone. Circulating activin-A levels were not affected 3 months after zoledronic acid infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Serum activin-A is increased in postmenopausal women with low bone mass compared with postmenopausal women with normal bone mass and is positively correlated to age and negatively to LS BMD.

Report of consensus panel 5 from the 11th international workshop on Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia on COVID-19 prophylaxis and management.

Consensus Panel 5 (CP5) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11; held in October 2022) was tasked with reviewing the current data on the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) prophylaxis and management in patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM). The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP5 included the following: Booster vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 should be recommended to all patients with WM. Variant-specific booster vaccines, such as the bivalent vaccine for the ancestral Wuhan strain and the Omicron BA.4.5 strain, are important as novel mutants emerge and become dominant in the community. A temporary interruption in Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase-inhibitor (BTKi) or chemoimmunotherapy before vaccination might be considered. Patients under treatment with rituximab or BTK-inhibitors have lower antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2; thus, they should continue to follow preventive measures, including mask wearing and avoiding crowded places. Patients with WM are candidates for preexposure prophylaxis, if available and relevant to the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strains in a specific area. Oral antivirals should be offered to all symptomatic WM patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 regardless of vaccination, disease status or treatment, as soon as possible after the positive test and within 5 days of COVID-19-related symptom onset. Coadministration of ibrutinib or venetoclax with ritonavir should be avoided. In these patients, remdesivir offers an effective alternative. Patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic COVID-19 should not interrupt treatment with a BTK inhibitor. Infection prophylaxis is essential in patients with WM and include general preventive measures, prophylaxis with antivirals and vaccination against common pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and S. pneumoniae.

VEGF directly suppresses activation of T cells from ascites secondary to ovarian cancer via VEGF receptor type 2.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor action in tumour angiogenesis is well characterised; nevertheless, it functions as a key element in the promotion of the immune system's evasion by tumours. We sought to investigate the possible direct effect of VEGF on T-cell activation and through which type of VEGF receptor it exerts this effect on cells isolated from ovarian cancer patients' ascites. METHODS: T cells isolated from the ascites of ovarian cancer patients were cultured with anti-CD3 and IL-2, with or without VEGF for 14 days and the number of viable T cells was counted. Cytotoxic activity of cultured T cells and expression of VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), was assayed. RESULTS: The addition of VEGF in cultures significantly reduced the number and proliferation rate of T cells in a dose-dependent manner and CD3(+) T cells expressed VEGFR-2 on their surface upon activation. Experiments with specific anti-VEGFR-2 antibodies revealed that the direct suppressive effect of VEGF on T-cell proliferation is mediated by VEGFR-2. We also showed that VEGF significantly reduced the cytotoxic activity of T cells. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that ascites-derived T cells secrete VEGF and express VEGFR-2 upon activation. Vascular endothelial growth factor directly suppresses T-cell activation via VEGFR-2.

Circulating activin-A is elevated in patients with advanced multiple myeloma and correlates with extensive bone involvement and inferior survival; no alterations post-lenalidomide and dexamethasone therapy.

BACKGROUND: Activin-A is a transforming growth factor -ß superfamily member, which seems to be implicated in the biology of osteolytic disease in multiple myeloma. DESIGN AND METHODS: Circulating activin-A was evaluated in 98 newly diagnosed myeloma patients (85 with symptomatic disease), in 40 patients with relapsed myeloma before and after four cycles of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD), in 27 healthy controls and in 10 monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. RESULTS: Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma had increased circulating activin-A compared with controls (P < 0.001), while patients with relapsed disease had elevated activin-A even compared with symptomatic patients at diagnosis (P < 0.001). High activin-A correlated with advanced International Staging System stage (P = 0.002), increased bone resorption (P < 0.001) and extensive bone disease (P = 0.03). Low levels of activin-A (<442 pg/ml) were associated with superior median overall survival: not reached versus 59 months (P = 0.04), while activin-A inversely correlated with survival as a continuous variable (P < 0.001). RD did not alter circulating activin-A after four cycles of treatment, even in responders. CONCLUSIONS: High circulating activin-A correlates with advanced features of myeloma, supporting the rationale for the use of activin-A antagonists, such as sotatercept in myeloma. The inability of RD to reduce activin-A reveals RD as a good candidate for combination therapies with activin-A antagonists in myeloma.

The International Scoring System (ISS) for multiple myeloma remains a robust prognostic tool independently of patients' renal function.

BACKGROUND: The International Staging System (ISS) is the most widely used staging system for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, serum ß2-microglobulin increases in renal impairment (RI) and there have been concerns that ISS-3 stage may include 'up-staged' MM patients in whom elevated ß2-microglobulin reflects the degree of renal dysfunction rather than tumor load. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to assess the impact of RI on the prognostic value of ISS, we analyzed 1516 patients with symptomatic MM and the degree of RI was classified according to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative-Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) criteria. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent patients had stages 3-5 CKD while 29% of patients had ISS-1, 38% had ISS-2 and 33% ISS-3. The frequency and severity of RI were more common in ISS-3 patients. RI was associated with inferior survival in univariate but not in multivariate analysis. When analyzed separately, ISS-1 and ISS-2 patients with RI had inferior survival in univariate but not in multivariate analysis. In ISS-3 MM patients, RI had no prognostic impact either in univariate or multivariate analysis. Results were similar, when we analyzed only patients with Bence-Jones >200 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: ISS remains unaffected by the degree of RI, even in patients with ISS-3, which includes most patients with renal dysfunction.

Serum sclerostin levels positively correlate with lumbar spinal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women--the six-month effect of risedronate and teriparatide.

UNLABELLED: Sclerostin is expressed by osteocytes and inhibits bone formation by osteoblasts. In this study, serum sclerostin was positively correlated with either lumbar spinal bone mineral density or T-score. Furthermore, serum sclerostin was increased after 6 months treatment with risedronate, whereas remained unchanged after 6 months teriparatide treatment. INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was the evaluation of serum sclerostin levels in postmenopausal women and their association with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. The secondary aim was the evaluation of treatment with either teriparatide (TPTD) or risedronate (RIS) on serum sclerostin levels in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: Women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, assigned to receive either TPTD (TPTD group, n = 13) or RIS (RIS group, n = 36) for 6 months, and non-osteoporotic early postmenopausal women (NOEP group, n = 13) were recruited. Main outcome measure was serum sclerostin levels. RESULTS: Serum sclerostin was higher in the NOEP group at baseline compared with either TPTD group (p = 0.007) or RIS group (p = 0.049). Sclerostin was positively correlated with both lumbar spinal (LS) BMD (r = 0.353; p = 0.005) and T-score (r = 0.501; p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with intact parathyroid hormone (r = -0.343; p = 0.024) at baseline. Multiple regression analysis showed that either LS BMD (Beta = 0.653; p = 0.018) or T-score (Beta = 0.711; p = 0.005) were independent predictors of serum sclerostin levels. No significant correlation was observed between serum sclerostin and bone turnover markers or estradiol at baseline. Sclerostin was significantly increased 6 months post-treatment in RIS group (p = 0.002), whereas remained statistically unaffected in the TPTD group. CONCLUSIONS: Serum sclerostin is decreased in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis compared with non-osteoporotic early postmenopausal women and is positively correlated to either LS BMD or LS T-score. Furthermore, serum sclerostin was increased after 6 months treatment with RIS, whereas remained essentially unchanged after 6 months TPTD treatment.