RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study describes the development and impact of a social marketing campaign in early 2020 intended to prevent and reduce methamphetamine use in Los Angeles County (LAC). We used social marketing principles and the transtheoretical model to design the campaign, which was intended to avoid stigmatization of methamphetamine users and communicate compassion, empathy, and support. METHODS: To evaluate its impact, we collected cross-sectional online survey data post-campaign (n = 1,873) from LAC residents in population segments considered higher risk for methamphetamine use. We examine associations between campaign exposure and outcomes using bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression models, which control for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on methamphetamine use or likelihood of use. RESULTS: The analyses revealed that campaign exposure was associated with having more negative attitudes toward methamphetamine, calling LAC's substance abuse service helpline, using methamphetamine fewer days, and considering abstaining. Frequency of exposure to campaign advertisements was positively associated with calling the helpline, suggesting a campaign dose effect. COVID-19-related factors were associated with using methamphetamine in the past 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Social marketing campaigns hold promise for impacting methamphetamine prevention and cessation behaviors. This study adds to the limited literature on mass marketing interventions to address this major health issue.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Metanfetamina , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Pandemias , Mercadeo SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) has increased sharply. Office-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine (OBOT) is effective but often underutilized because of physicians' lack of experience prescribing this therapy. Little is known about US residency training programs' provision of OBOT and addiction medicine training. METHODS: The authors conducted a survey of residency program directors (RPDs) at all US residency programs in internal medicine, family medicine, and psychiatry to assess the frequency with which their residents provide care for OUD, presence and features of curricula in OBOT and addiction medicine, RPDs' beliefs about OBOT, and potential barriers to providing OBOT training. RESULTS: The response rate was 49.5% (476 of 962). Although 76.9% of RPDs reported that residents frequently manage patients with OUD, only 23.5% reported that their program dedicates 12 or more hours of curricular time to addiction medicine, 35.9% reported that their program encourages/requires training in OBOT, and 22.6% reported that their program encourages/requires obtaining a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine. Most RPDs believe that OBOT is an important treatment option for OUD (88.1%) and that increased residency training in OBOT would improve access to OBOT (73.7%). The authors also found that programs whose RPD had favorable views of OBOT were more likely to provide OBOT and addiction medicine training. Psychiatry programs were most likely to provide OBOT training and their RPDs most likely to have beliefs about OBOT that were positive. Commonly cited barriers to implementing OBOT training include a lack of waivered preceptors (76.9%), competing curricular priorities (64.1%), and a lack of support (social work and counseling) services (54.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Internal medicine, family medicine, and psychiatry residents often care for patients with OUD, and most RPDs believe that increased residency training in OBOT would increase access to this treatment. Yet, only a minority of programs offer training in OBOT.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de las Adicciones/educación , Atención Ambulatoria , Curriculum , Internado y Residencia , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educación , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Psiquiatría/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Emigración e Inmigración , Prisiones , Privatización , Niño , Femenino , Derechos Humanos , Humanos , Masculino , Justicia Social , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Incarcerated patients often have a high disease burden and poor access to care in the community. In an effort to ensure glycemic control and appropriate initiation of statin therapy for cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction, a pilot program of pharmacist-led diabetes clinic (PLDC) was implemented in a large inner-city jail. A pre-post study was conducted as a quality improvement initiative. Inclusion criteria were inmate-patients (IPs) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, treated with oral antidiabetic medications, managed by PLDC, and with at least 2 glycosylated hemoglobin A1cs (HbA1c). The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c after PLDC. The secondary outcome was the frequency of statin therapy. A total of 240 IPs met the inclusion criteria. Mean HbA1c was 8.2% at baseline and 7.6% at the last follow-up encounter, a change of -0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.41% to -0.93%). The most dramatic change was seen in the group with the highest initial HbA1c (HbA1c ≥ 10%), from a mean baseline HbA1c of 11.6% to 8.5%, a change of -3.1% (95% CI: -2.5% to -3.7%). IPs with an initial HbA1c between 7% and 9.9% showed a change in mean HbA1c from 8.4% to 8.0%, a change of -0.4% (95% CI: -0.1% to -0.7%). Of the 240 included IPs, 141 were not on a statin at baseline. The frequency of statin use increased by 50.4% after PLDC. PLDC significantly improved glycemic control and guideline concordance for CV risk reduction. Adding PLDC to multidisciplinary care teams has the potential to improve population health outcomes for this medically complex, yet underserved patient population.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes , Farmacéuticos , PrisionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the association between child incarceration in the United States and subsequent adult health outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health data from 1727 adult (Wave IV) participants first incarcerated at age <25 years. Using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression models, we compared adult health outcomes (ie, mobility limitations, depressive symptoms, and suicidal thoughts) among those first incarcerated at age ≤14 years, 15 to 17 years, and 18 to 20 years, with those first incarcerated at 21 to 24 years as the reference group. RESULTS: Of the 1727 participants, 105 (6.7%) were first incarcerated at age ≤14 years ("child incarceration category"), 315 (19.3%) were first incarcerated at 15 to 17 years, 696 (38.5%) were first incarcerated at 18 to 20 years, and 611 (35.6%) were first incarcerated at 21 to 24 years. Those first incarcerated as children (age ≤14 years) were disproportionately black or Hispanic compared with those first incarcerated at 15 to 24 years. Compared with first incarceration at age 21 to 24 years, child incarceration independently predicted adult mobility limitations (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.74; P = .001), adult depression (OR, 1.98; P = .034), and adult suicidal thoughts (OR, 4.47; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Child incarceration displays even wider sociodemographic disparities than incarceration generally and is associated with even worse adult physical and mental health outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles , Depresión/epidemiología , Estado de Salud , Limitación de la Movilidad , Prisiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Ideación Suicida , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Niño , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Renta , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Prisioneros , Características de la Residencia , Población Blanca , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
A replication-defective chimeric vector based on the chimpanzee adenovirus serotype C1 was developed and tested as a vaccine carrier in mice. The AdC1 virus is closely related to human adenoviruses of subgroup B2 and uses CD46 for cell attachment. To overcome poor growth of E1-deleted AdC1 vectors on cell lines that provide the E1 of adenovirus of the human serotype 5 (AdHu5) virus in trans, the inverted terminal repeats and some of the early genes of AdC1 were replaced with those from AdC5, a chimpanzee origin adenovirus of subfamily E. The chimeric AdC1/C5 vector efficiently transduces CD46-expressing mouse dendritic cells (DCs) in vitro and initiates their maturation. Transduction of DCs in vivo is inefficient in CD46 transgenic mice. The AdC1/C5 vector induces transgene product-specific B- and CD8(+) T-cell responses in mice. Responses are slightly higher in wild-type mice than in CD46 transgenic mice. Transgene product-specific T-cell responses elicited by the AdC1/C5 vector can be increased by priming or boosting with a heterologous adenovirus vector. Pre-existing immunity to adenovirus of the common human serotype 5 does not affect induction of cell-mediated immune responses by the AdC1/C5 vector. This vector provides an additional tool in a repertoire of adenovirus-based vaccine vectors.
Asunto(s)
Adenoviridae/genética , Vectores Genéticos/genética , Proteína Cofactora de Membrana/metabolismo , Pan troglodytes/metabolismo , Vacunas/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Línea Celular , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Humanos , Proteína Cofactora de Membrana/genética , Ratones , Pan troglodytes/genética , Unión Proteica , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Transgenes/genéticaRESUMEN
Purpose Although incarceration may have life-long negative health effects, little is known about associations between child incarceration and subsequent adult health outcomes. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyzed data from 14,689 adult participants in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) to compare adult health outcomes among those first incarcerated between 7 and 13 years of age (child incarceration); first incarcerated at>or=14 years of age; and never incarcerated. Findings Compared to the other two groups, those with a history of child incarceration were disproportionately black or Hispanic, male, and from lower socio-economic strata. Additionally, individuals incarcerated as children had worse adult health outcomes, including general health, functional limitations (climbing stairs), depressive symptoms, and suicidality, than those first incarcerated at older ages or never incarcerated. Research limitations/implications Despite the limitations of the secondary database analysis, these findings suggest that incarcerated children are an especially medically vulnerable population. Practical implications Programs and policies that address these medically vulnerable children's health needs through comprehensive health and social services in place of, during, and/or after incarceration are needed. Social implications Meeting these unmet health and social service needs offers an important opportunity to achieve necessary health care and justice reform for children. Originality/value No prior studies have examined the longitudinal relationship between child incarceration and adult health outcomes.