Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 25(6): 1624-1631, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36792920

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate sleep apnoea prevalence, factors influencing severity, and associations between sleep apnoea severity and micro-/macrovascular complications in a large population of patients with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This French multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted between July 2016 and June 2020. Adults with type 1 diabetes using an insulin pump were eligible. Home care provider nurses collected demographic and clinical data and set up oximetry to determine the oxygen desaturation index (ODI). No, mild-moderate and severe sleep apnoea were defined as ODI <15 events/h, 15 to <30 events/h and ≥30 events/h, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with sleep apnoea, and associations between sleep apnoea severity and micro-/macrovascular complications were determined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 769 participants, 12.4% and 3.4% had mild-to-moderate or severe sleep apnoea, respectively. Factors significantly associated with sleep apnoea on multivariate analysis were age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and hypertension. After adjustment for age, sex and BMI, presence of severe sleep apnoea was significantly associated with macrovascular complications (odds ratio vs. no sleep apnoea: 3.96 [95% confidence interval 1.43-11.11]; P < 0.01), while mild-to-moderate sleep apnoea was significantly associated with presence of diabetic retinopathy (odds ratio 2.09 [95% confidence interval 1.10-3.74]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sleep apnoea is a significant comorbidity in patients with type 1 diabetes, especially with respect to diabetic complications. This highlights the need for sleep apnoea screening and management in these individuals.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/epidemiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia , Comorbilidad
2.
Eur Respir J ; 51(1)2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29326333

RESUMEN

The COPD Patient Management European Trial (COMET) investigated the efficacy and safety of a home-based COPD disease management intervention for severe COPD patients.The study was an international open-design clinical trial in COPD patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s <50% of predicted value) randomised 1:1 to the disease management intervention or to the usual management practices at the study centre. The disease management intervention included a self-management programme, home telemonitoring, care coordination and medical management. The primary end-point was the number of unplanned all-cause hospitalisation days in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary end-points included acute care hospitalisation days, BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnoea and exercise) index and exacerbations. Safety end-points included adverse events and deaths.For the 157 (disease management) and 162 (usual management) patients eligible for ITT analyses, all-cause hospitalisation days per year (mean±sd) were 17.4±35.4 and 22.6±41.8, respectively (mean difference -5.3, 95% CI -13.7 to -3.1; p=0.16). The disease management group had fewer per-protocol acute care hospitalisation days per year (p=0.047), a lower BODE index (p=0.01) and a lower mortality rate (1.9% versus 14.2%; p<0.001), with no difference in exacerbation frequency. Patient profiles and hospitalisation practices varied substantially across countries.The COMET disease management intervention did not significantly reduce unplanned all-cause hospitalisation days, but reduced acute care hospitalisation days and mortality in severe COPD patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/organización & administración , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Autocuidado/métodos , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Regresión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(10): e088496, 2024 Oct 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39366711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Telemonitoring (TM) of home non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to facilitate home/outpatient therapy set-up. However, the impact of long-term TM on therapy dropouts, compliance and leak control has not yet been clearly determined. This study evaluated whether the NIV dropout rate was reduced by TM combined with remote patient support compared with a non-telemonitoring (NTM) pathway. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data were obtained from all agencies of a single home care provider in France. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with chronic respiratory failure (n=659) who started nocturnal NIV between January 2017 and December 2019 and had ≥8 days of NIV therapy (51% male; mean age 68.5±13.8 years; 35.5% on long-term oxygen therapy) were included. The TM group included 275 patients who spent ≥80% of the follow-up using TM, and the NTM group included 384 patients who had 0 to ≤10 days of telemonitoring during follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of NIV dropouts at 1 year (ie, treatment discontinuation, excluding deaths). Secondary outcomes included therapy compliance and leaks. RESULTS: 82 patients died during follow-up. Significantly fewer patients in the TM vs NTM group had dropped out of NIV therapy at 1 year (13% vs 34%; p<0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, NIV usage at 1-month follow-up and the main underlying respiratory disease, TM was significantly associated with a lower risk of dropout (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.49; p<0.001). At 1, 4, 8 and 12 months, a greater proportion of patients in the TM vs NTM group had NIV usage of >4 hours/day and control of leaks. CONCLUSIONS: In patients starting home NIV, TM with home care provider first-line support was associated with a lower therapy dropout rate at 1 year, and better compliance and leak control, compared with standard follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Ventilación no Invasiva , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Telemedicina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Anciano , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Francia , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27418817

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most hospitalizations and costs related to COPD are due to exacerbations and insufficient disease management. The COPD patient Management European Trial (COMET) is investigating a home-based multicomponent COPD self-management program designed to reduce exacerbations and hospital admissions. DESIGN: Multicenter parallel randomized controlled, open-label superiority trial. SETTING: Thirty-three hospitals in four European countries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 345 patients with Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease III/IV COPD. INTERVENTION: The program includes extensive patient coaching by health care professionals to improve self-management (eg, develop skills to better manage their disease), an e-health platform for reporting frequent health status updates, rapid intervention when necessary, and oxygen therapy monitoring. Comparator is the usual management as per the center's routine practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Yearly number of hospital days for acute care, exacerbation number, quality of life, deaths, and costs.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Autocuidado/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente) , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/economía , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Cooperación del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado/economía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Telemedicina , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA