RESUMEN
Non-HLA antibodies against heterogeneous targets on endothelial cells have been associated with allograft injuries. The endothelial cell crossmatch (ECXM) is used in the detection of non-HLA antibodies but remains non-discriminatory for specific antibody identification. The primary objective of this study was to delineate the specific non-HLA antibody signatures associated with ECXM positivity and to determine the correlation of ECXM status and non-HLA antibody signatures on allograft health. Serum specimens from 25 lung transplant recipients (LTRs) and 13 renal transplant recipients (RTRs) were collected as part of clinical evaluation, and testing for angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and donor-specific MHC class I chain-related gene A (MICA) antibodies and ECXM was performed. Remnant sera were tested for non-HLA antibodies using the LABScreen™ Autoantibody (LSAUT) Group 1, 2, and 3 kits (One Lambda, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA). In both cohorts, the concordance of AT1R and MICA together or individually with ECXM+ status was poor (<0.7), suggesting the presence of other unaccounted antibodies. Autoantibody profiling revealed three distinct clusters targeting fibrotic products, cytoskeletal proteins, and cell signaling molecules. A comparative analysis of ECXM+ and ECXM- specimens identified nine and five differentially expressed antibodies in the LTR and RTR cohorts, respectively. Employing machine learning techniques (variable importance, feature selection, ROC-AUC), we derived a five-antibody panel (TNFα, collagen V, CXCL11, GDNF, GAPDH) and a two-antibody panel (TNFα, CXCL9) that effectively discriminated between ECXM+ and ECXM- status in the LTR and RTR cohorts, respectively. Distinct antibody signatures were identified in LTR and RTR cohorts that correlated with ECXM+ status and were associated with allograft dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidad Clase I/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Receptor de Angiotensina Tipo 1/inmunología , Células Endoteliales/inmunología , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Anciano , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/sangreRESUMEN
According to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, both transplant volume and survival among lung transplant recipients are improving over time. However, the outcomes of lung transplantation remain challenged by multiple thoracic and extrathoracic complications. With improving lung transplant survival, patients experience prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppressive agents that can lead to multiple infectious and noninfectious complications. This article focuses on most common noninfectious complications with significant clinical impact.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores , Factores de Tiempo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic complications are common post-lung transplant, leading to significant morbidity. We instituted multiple interventions because of an observed 36.8% incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (Incidence rate (IR) 5.74/1000 pt days) in our recipients. METHODS: Our initiative commenced January 2015 with enoxaparin initiation within 6-8 hours of intensive care unit arrival and continuation for 4-6 weeks. We evaluated the IR of VTE in lung transplant recipients within 90 days of transplant. In 2017, the protocol was modified to extend the time to initiation of prophylaxis to within 72 hours of ICU arrival. In 2019, we further amended our intraoperative vascular access strategy. RESULTS: Eighteen of 26 lung transplant recipients (LTR) met inclusion criteria in the 2015 cohort. Six of 18 (33.3%) developed VTE, 50% of which were upper extremity (UE), line associated. Fifty two of 75 LTR were eligible for enoxaparin prophylaxis in the 2017 cohort. Fifteen of 52 subjects (28.8%) developed VTE, 77.8% of which were UE and line associated. Despite improved adherence in 2017, there was little change in VTE IR (3.90/1000 pt days compared with 3.85/1000 pt days). Twenty six of 43 LTR met protocol inclusion criteria in the 2019 cohort. Ten subjects (38.5%) developed VTE, 67% of which were UE and line associated (IR 5.18/1000 pt days). CONCLUSION: Our prospective study found that LTR remain at high risk for VTE despite aggressive prophylaxis with 4-6 weeks of enoxaparin and adjustment of vascular access approach. Alternative interventions should be investigated to minimize VTE development in this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether continuing anti-fibrotic therapy until the time of lung transplant increases the risk of complications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis affects the risk of complications. METHODS: We assessed intra-operative and post-transplant complications among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who underwent lung transplant and had been treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone continuously for ⩾ 90 days at listing. Patients were grouped according to whether they had a shorter (⩽ 5 medication half-lives) or longer (> 5 medication half-lives) time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant. Five half-lives corresponded to 2 days for nintedanib and 1 day for pirfenidone. RESULTS: Among patients taking nintedanib (n = 107) or pirfenidone (n = 190), 211 (71.0%) had discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy ⩽ 5 medication half-lives before transplant. Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence occurred only in this group (anastomotic: 11 patients [5.2%], p = 0.031 vs patients with longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant; sternal: 12 patients [5.7%], p = 0.024). No differences were observed in surgical wound dehiscence, length of hospital stay, or survival to discharge between groups with a shorter versus longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and transplant. CONCLUSION: Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence only occurred in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy < 5 medication half-lives before transplant. The frequency of other intra-operative and post-transplant complications did not appear to differ depending on when anti-fibrotic therapy was discontinued. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04316780: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04316780.
Asunto(s)
Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Fibrosis , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/diagnóstico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Pulmonar Idiopática/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Long-term exposure to immunosuppressive therapy may exacerbate pre-existing medical comorbidities or result in the development of new chronic medical conditions after lung transplantation. This article focuses on common nonallograft complications with the highest impact on short- and long-term outcomes after transplantation. These include diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney disease (acute and chronic), and malignancy. We discuss evidence-based strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of these nonallograft complications in this article.
Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
Importance: Recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT) experience decreased immunogenicity after COVID-19 vaccination. Objective: To summarize current evidence on vaccine responses and identify risk factors for diminished humoral immune response in recipients of SOT. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted from existence of database through December 15, 2021, using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study Selection: Studies reporting humoral immune response of the COVID-19 vaccines in recipients of SOT were reviewed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data from each eligible study. Descriptive statistics and a random-effects model were used. This report was prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The total numbers of positive immune responses and percentage across each vaccine platform were recorded. Pooled odds ratios (pORs) with 95% CIs were used to calculate the pooled effect estimates of risk factors for poor antibody response. Results: A total of 83 studies were included for the systematic review, and 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing 11â¯713 recipients of SOT. The weighted mean (range) of total positive humoral response for antispike antibodies after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was 10.4% (0%-37.9%) for 1 dose, 44.9% (0%-79.1%) for 2 doses, and 63.1% (49.1%-69.1%) for 3 doses. In 2 studies, 50% of recipients of SOT with no or minimal antibody response after 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine mounted an antibody response after a fourth dose. Among the factors associated with poor antibody response were older age (mean [SE] age difference between responders and nonresponders, 3.94 [1.1] years), deceased donor status (pOR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.83]; I2 = 0%), antimetabolite use (pOR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.14-0.29]; I2 = 70%), recent rituximab exposure (pOR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07-0.61]; I2 = 0%), and recent antithymocyte globulin exposure (pOR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.15-0.71]; I2 = 0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the rates of positive antibody response in solid organ transplant recipients remained low despite multiple doses of mRNA vaccines. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to modulate the risk factors associated with reduced humoral responses and to study monoclonal antibody prophylaxis among recipients of SOT who are at high risk of diminished humoral response.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Órganos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Preescolar , Humanos , Inmunidad Humoral , ARN Mensajero , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have a diminished immune response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Risk factors for an impaired immune response are yet to be determined. We aimed to summarize the COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity and to identify factors that influence the humoral immune response in patients with MM. Two reviewers independently conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov from existence until 24 May 24 2022. (PROSPERO: CRD42021277005). A total of 15 studies were included in the systematic review and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. The average rate (range) of positive functional T-lymphocyte response was 44.2% (34.2%-48.5%) after 2 doses of messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines. The average antispike antibody response rates (range) were 42.7% (20.8%-88.5%) and 78.2% (55.8%-94.2%) after 1 and 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. The average neutralizing antibody response rates (range) were 25% (1 study) and 62.7% (53.3%-68.6%) after 1 and 2 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, respectively. Patients with high-risk cytogenetics or receiving anti-CD38 therapy were less likely to have a humoral immune response with pooled odds ratios of 0.36 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.18, 0.69), I2 = 0% and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.22, 0.79), I2 = 14%, respectively. Patients who were not on active MM treatment were more likely to respond with pooled odds ratio of 2.42 (95% CI, 1.10, 5.33), I2 = 7%. Patients with MM had low rates of humoral and cellular immune responses to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal doses of vaccines and evaluate the use of monoclonal antibodies for pre-exposure prophylaxis in this population.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos MonoclonalesRESUMEN
Advanced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis are absolute contraindications to lung transplantation. [ 1] However, whether fatty liver disease with mild-moderate fibrosis contributes to increased adverse outcomes post-lung transplantation remains unknown. We present a retrospective analysis of patients transplanted at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2015 and 2017 to identify whether patients with mild-moderate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) experience increased short-term complications compared to patients with normal liver architecture. Patients with advanced (F3-F4) fibrosis and/or cirrhosis were considered non-suitable transplant candidates, a priori. This study was powered for a difference in index hospital-free days within the first 30â days of 25% (α=0.05, ß=0.8). Secondary outcomes included index intensive care unit (ICU)-free days within the first 10â days post-transplant, perioperative blood product transfusion, incidence of index hospitalisation arrhythmias and delirium, need for insulin on discharge post-transplant, tacrolimus dose required to maintain a trough of 8-12â ng·mL-1 at index hospital discharge, and 1-year post-transplant incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes, acute kidney injury, acute cellular rejection, unplanned hospital readmissions and infection. 150 patients underwent lung transplantation between 2015 and 2017 and were included in the analysis; of these patients 40 (27%) had evidence of NAFLD. Median index hospital-free days for patients with NAFLD were non-inferior to those without (16â days, IQR 10.5-19.5 versus 12â days, IQR 0-18.0, p=0.03). Regarding secondary outcomes, both index hospitalisation and 1-year outcomes were non-inferior between patients with NAFLD and those with normal liver architecture. This study demonstrates that mild-moderate severity NAFLD may not be a contraindication to lung transplantation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) causes mortality rates of 10%-20% despite antiviral therapy. Ribavirin (RBV) has been used to treat RSV-infected LTRs with limited data. METHODS: A retrospective study including all LTRs at Duke Hospital during January 2013-May 2017 with positive RSV polymerase chain reaction respiratory specimens was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 70 patients in the oral RBV group and 29 of 32 in the inhaled RBV group had symptomatic RSV infection. One patient receiving oral RBV had to prematurely stop drug due to significant nausea and vomiting. While unadjusted all-cause 1-year mortality was significantly higher in the inhaled RBV group (24.1% versus 7.1% [oral RBV], P = 0.03), adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death and oral RBV use (compared to inhaled RBV), accounting for oxygen requirement and need for mechanical ventilation, showed the HR for death and oral RBV use was 0.38 ([0.10, 1.46], P = 0.38). The HR for death in patients with supplemental oxygen >2 L/min at diagnosis was 6.18 ([1.33, 26.83], P = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier curves showed patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second decline ≥5% and ≥10% at 90 days post-RSV infection had a higher 1-year mortality (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Oral and inhaled RBV appear to be well tolerated in LTRs, and our data support the use of oral RBV as a safe alternative to inhaled ribavirin in LTRs. Oxygen requirement >2 L/min at diagnosis and forced expiratory volume in 1 second decline ≥5% postinfection may be markers for increased mortality.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/terapia , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inmunología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/virología , ARN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/inmunología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/mortalidad , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/genética , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/inmunología , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD52 that causes lymphocyte apoptosis, is a form of advanced immunosuppression that is currently used as a therapy for refractory acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients (1-3). Side effects of alemtuzumab include bone marrow suppression, infection, and malignancy. Whether alemtuzumab can be safely used in allograft recipients that have an increased propensity for bone marrow suppression due to telomeropathies is unknown. In a retrospective case series, we report outcomes associated with alemtuzumab in three lung allograft recipients with short telomere lengths, comparing endpoints such as leukopenia, transfusion needs, infection, hospitalization and survival to those of 17 patients without known telomeropathies that received alemtuzumab. We show that the use of alemtuzumab in lung transplant recipients with short telomeres is safe, though is associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia requiring packed red blood cell transfusions. Alemtuzumab appears to be an acceptable advanced immunosuppressive therapy in patients with telomeropathies, though given the design and scope of this study, the actual clinical effect needs further evaluation in larger trials.
Asunto(s)
Alemtuzumab/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Acortamiento del Telómero , Alemtuzumab/efectos adversos , Aloinjertos , Antígeno CD52/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Enfermedades Hematológicas/etiología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad , Acortamiento del Telómero/inmunología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The knowledge of airway anatomy is the most fundamental requirement of every bronchoscopist. There are numerous and frequent anatomic variations of the central airways making the examination unique for every individual. It is imperative for every bronchoscopist to be fully cognizant of the common congenital anomalies involving the central airways. Proper identification and reporting of these findings are a matter of the utmost importance, especially when surgical options in a patient with lung cancer or lung transplantation is under consideration. This article focuses on the congenital anomalies of central airway encountered among adults. Each of these anatomic variations has a characteristic appearance, yet requires bronchoscopic acumen for their identification. This review provides a comprehensive description of these anomalies and highlights their clinical implications.