RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the assessment of health-related quality of life (QoL) in the care of patients treated with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). However, it is not known whether healthcare professionals (HCPs) have embedded QoL assessment into routine clinical practice in line with current guidelines to favour a more holistic approach to HPN care. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, current practice and the opinions of HCPs regarding QoL in care of patients on HPN. METHODS: An online survey was distributed via email to HCPs working with HPN patients throughout England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Participants were identified using a mailing list for the British Intestinal Failure Alliance, a specialist group within the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 67 professionals comprising 24 dietitians, 17 nurses, 14 gastroenterologists, 6 pharmacists, 5 surgeons and 1 psychologist. Of these, 54 (80%) participants agreed that the measurement of QoL is useful. In contrast, 38 (57%) of all participants, including 27 (50%) of those participants who agreed that the measurement of QoL was useful, never measured QoL. Knowledge of QoL literature was rated as poor or very poor by 27 (40%) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived usefulness and importance of QoL assessment, very few HCPs embed it into clinical practice. Knowledge of QoL literature and QoL tools is variable, and there is significant variability in QoL practice. This is clear in terms of the frequency of QoL assessments and heterogeneity in methodology. In contrast, there was almost unanimous agreement that the complications associated with HPN contribute to poorer QoL. There is a need for specific, evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines detailing how to define and measure QoL in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Inglaterra , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) refers to the intravenous administration of macronutrients, micronutrients and fluid. The aims of treatment are to increase survival and improve quality of life (QoL). However, patients struggle with physiological symptoms, time-consuming invasive therapy and an increased occurrence of depression and social isolation. Our aim is to understand how HPN impacts the QoL of patients, and the contribution played by the complications of treatment, for example, liver disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre, longitudinal, observational study will be conducted using routinely collected clinical data. Participants will also be asked to complete three QoL questionnaires (EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Short Form 36 and HPN-QoL) at baseline and 12 months. The primary outcome is mean change in QoL scores over 12 months. Secondary outcomes include how factors including liver function, gut microbiota, number of infusions of PN per week, nutritional composition of PN and nutritional status impact on QoL scores. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from HRA and Health and Care Research Wales Research Ethics Committee (21/SC/0316). The study was eligible for portfolio adoption, Central Portfolio Management System ID 50506. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international meetings.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Intestinal , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Administración Intravenosa , Comités de Ética en Investigación , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a life-sustaining therapy for individuals with intestinal failure in a community setting. It refers to the intravenous infusion of macronutrients, micronutrients, fluids and electrolytes. Routinely used HPN solutions contain different quantities of these components. Consequently, each HPN solution may have different impacts on metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress. Long-term use of HPN can lead to a number of adverse health outcomes including the development of metabolic bone disease, intestinal failure associated liver disease and poor quality of life but whether, and how, the composition of HPN solutions contributes to these health sequelae is poorly understood. The aim of this study is to systematically review and evaluate the evidence for the differential effects of HPN solutions and to understand what features are associated with differences in clinical endpoints. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted between September and December 2020, and updated in July 2021 using the MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies were selected according to the following criteria (a) adult participants (>18 years old) dependent on HPN; (b) randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort and cross-sectional study designs; (c) primary research comparing two or more HPN solutions and (d) published in English language. Data were extracted and study quality assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's tools: Risk of Bias for Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs); Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions; and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS: Of the 5148 articles identified, seven RCTs, two prospective cohort and one cross-sectional study were included with a total of 295 participants. Studies varied in terms of duration (one to 60 months) and sample size (n = 5 to 88). Ten studies compared lipid emulsions (LE) and one study also compared LE with lipid-free HPN. No studies were found that compared the amino acid, vitamin, trace element or electrolyte components of HPN. In general, LE were well tolerated with no significant adverse effects. LE containing olive +/or fish oil were associated with a lower ω-6:ω-3 fatty acid ratio, positive reductions in markers of liver function, and changes in blood and cell fatty acid profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing use of HPN, there is surprisingly little evidence available to guide the provision of macro and micronutrients in the adult population requiring this therapy. Although LE containing olive +/or fish oil show promise with regards to liver function and blood and cell fatty acid profiles, further studies are needed before drawing definitive conclusions on the clinical value of these emulsions. It is likely that one type of HPN solution alone cannot be uniformly applied to patient care, and each patient should be assessed on an individual basis.
Asunto(s)
Emulsiones Grasas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Intestinales/terapia , Nutrición Parenteral en el Domicilio , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Determinación de Punto Final , Ácidos Grasos/sangre , Femenino , Aceites de Pescado/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Enfermedades Intestinales/sangre , Masculino , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nutrientes/administración & dosificación , Aceite de Oliva/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is a predisposing factor for bone loss and muscle dysfunction, which could lead to osteoporotic fractures and physical disability, respectively. AIM: To assess the effect of 6 months of combined impact and resistance training on bone mineral density (BMD) and muscle function in adults with CD. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, 47 adults with stable CD were assigned to exercise (n = 23) or control (n = 24) groups and followed up for 6 months. The exercise group received usual care plus a 6-month combined impact and resistance training programme, involving three, 60-minute sessions per week and a gradual tapering of supervision to self-management. The control group received usual care alone. The primary outcomes were BMD (via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry) and muscle function (measures of upper and lower limb strength and endurance) at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, BMD values were superior in the exercise group with statistical significance at lumbar spine (adjusted mean difference 0.036 g/cm2, 95% CI 0.024-0.048; P < 0.001), but not at femoral neck (0.018 g/cm2, 0.001-0.035; P = 0.059) or greater trochanter (0.013 g/cm2, -0.019 to 0.045; P = 0.415) after correcting for multiple outcomes. The exercise group also had superior values for all muscle function outcomes (P < 0.001; unadjusted mean differences ranging 22.6â48.2%), and lower fatigue severity (P = 0.005). Three exercise-related adverse events were recorded: two instances of light-headedness and one of nausea. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved BMD and muscle function in adults with CD and appears as a suitable model of exercise for reducing future risk of osteoporotic fractures and disability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11470370.
Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/terapia , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Entrenamiento de Fuerza , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adulto , Anciano , Ejercicio Físico , Fatiga/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The development of a high-output stoma (HOS) is associated with water, electrolyte and nutritional complications. Prompt, careful assessment and management is required to avoid rapid clinical deterioration in this patient population. A multidisciplinary approach to management ensures the best possible outcome and quality of life for patients who experience HOS. This article outlines the important considerations in the identification and pathophysiology of HOS. A systematic approach to the management of the condition is outlined, considering fluid and electrolyte requirements, nutrient deficiencies and manipulation of gastrointestinal absorption, motility and secretions using medical and surgical therapies.