Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 20(4): 1040-1043, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29135080

RESUMEN

Limited medication adherence and persistence with treatment are barriers to successful management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Register of Controlled Trials, PsychINFO and CINAHL for observational and interventional studies that compared the adherence or persistence associated with 2 or more glucose-lowering medications in people with T2D. Where 5 or more studies provided the same comparison, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed, reporting mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) for adherence or persistence, depending on the pooled study outcomes. We included a total of 48 studies. Compared with metformin, adherence (%) was better for sulphonylureas (5 studies; MD 10.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-14.7) and thiazolidinediones (TZDs; 6 studies; MD 11.3%, 95% CI 2.7%-20.0%). Adherence to TZDs was marginally better than adherence to sulphonylureas (5 studies; MD 1.5%, 95% CI 0.1-2.9). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors had better adherence than sulphonylureas and TZDs. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists had higher rates of discontinuation than long-acting analogue insulins (6 studies; OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.17-3.27). Long-acting insulin analogues had better persistence than human insulins (5 studies; MD 43.1 days; 95% CI 22.0-64.2). The methods used to define adherence and persistence were highly variable.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Humanos
3.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5935, 2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009593

RESUMEN

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer, but a comprehensive description of its genomic landscape is lacking. We report the whole genome sequencing of 778 ccRCC patients enrolled in the 100,000 Genomes Project, providing for a detailed description of the somatic mutational landscape of ccRCC. We identify candidate driver genes, which as well as emphasising the major role of epigenetic regulation in ccRCC highlight additional biological pathways extending opportunities for therapeutic interventions. Genomic characterisation identified patients with divergent clinical outcome; higher number of structural copy number alterations associated with poorer prognosis, whereas VHL mutations were independently associated with a better prognosis. The observations that higher T-cell infiltration is associated with better overall survival and that genetically predicted immune evasion is not common supports the rationale for immunotherapy. These findings should inform personalised surveillance and treatment strategies for ccRCC patients.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Mutación , Proteína Supresora de Tumores del Síndrome de Von Hippel-Lindau , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Proteína Supresora de Tumores del Síndrome de Von Hippel-Lindau/genética , Pronóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epigénesis Genética , Anciano , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Inmunoterapia/métodos
4.
Res Sq ; 2023 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38106039

RESUMEN

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer, but a comprehensive description of its genomic landscape is lacking. We report the whole genome sequencing of 778 ccRCC patients enrolled in the 100,000 Genomes Project, providing the most detailed somatic mutational landscape to date. We identify new driver genes, which as well as emphasising the major role of epigenetic regulation in ccRCC highlight additional biological pathways extending opportunities for drug repurposing. Genomic characterisation identified patients with divergent clinical outcome; higher number of structural copy number alterations associated with poorer prognosis, whereas VHL mutations were independently associated with a better prognosis. The twin observations that higher T-cell infiltration is associated with better outcome and that genetically predicted immune evasion is not common supports the rationale for immunotherapy. These findings should inform personalised surveillance and treatment strategies for ccRCC patients.

6.
Cancer Discov ; 13(6): 1364-1385, 2023 06 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36977461

RESUMEN

Understanding the evolutionary pathways to metastasis and resistance to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in melanoma is critical for improving outcomes. Here, we present the most comprehensive intrapatient metastatic melanoma dataset assembled to date as part of the Posthumous Evaluation of Advanced Cancer Environment (PEACE) research autopsy program, including 222 exome sequencing, 493 panel-sequenced, 161 RNA sequencing, and 22 single-cell whole-genome sequencing samples from 14 ICI-treated patients. We observed frequent whole-genome doubling and widespread loss of heterozygosity, often involving antigen-presentation machinery. We found KIT extrachromosomal DNA may have contributed to the lack of response to KIT inhibitors of a KIT-driven melanoma. At the lesion-level, MYC amplifications were enriched in ICI nonresponders. Single-cell sequencing revealed polyclonal seeding of metastases originating from clones with different ploidy in one patient. Finally, we observed that brain metastases that diverged early in molecular evolution emerge late in disease. Overall, our study illustrates the diverse evolutionary landscape of advanced melanoma. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite treatment advances, melanoma remains a deadly disease at stage IV. Through research autopsy and dense sampling of metastases combined with extensive multiomic profiling, our study elucidates the many mechanisms that melanomas use to evade treatment and the immune system, whether through mutations, widespread copy-number alterations, or extrachromosomal DNA. See related commentary by Shain, p. 1294. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1275.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Melanoma , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Mutación , Evolución Molecular , ADN
7.
Cell Rep Med ; 3(10): 100781, 2022 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36240755

RESUMEN

Patients with blood cancer continue to have a greater risk of inadequate immune responses following three COVID-19 vaccine doses and risk of severe COVID-19 disease. In the context of the CAPTURE study (NCT03226886), we report immune responses in 80 patients with blood cancer who received a fourth dose of BNT162b2. We measured neutralizing antibody titers (NAbTs) using a live virus microneutralization assay against wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 and T cell responses against WT and Omicron BA.1 using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. The proportion of patients with detectable NAb titers and T cell responses after the fourth vaccine dose increased compared with that after the third vaccine dose. Patients who received B cell-depleting therapies within the 12 months before vaccination have the greatest risk of not having detectable NAbT. In addition, we report immune responses in 57 patients with breakthrough infections after vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , Estudios Clínicos como Asunto , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Inmunidad , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(1): 148-151, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007485

RESUMEN

A diverse range of clinical phenotypes are observed in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with resultant therapeutic implications. Molecular characterisation underpinning the diversity observed has been qualified, where the near ubiquitous loss of the short arm of chromosome 3 precedes distinct evolutionary trajectories involving different sequences and combinations of genetic events. Primary tumours are characterised by varying degrees of intratumoural heterogeneity and chromosomal complexity associated with distinct metastatic phenotypes. An evolutionary understanding reconciles the diverse clinical phenotypes observed in metastatic ccRCC and has the potential to impact patient management. PATIENT SUMMARY: Re-tracing the evolutionary paths taken by clear-cell kidney cancer through analyses at the gene level gives an insight into genetic changes that are correlated to metastatic potential. This may provide a framework to guide therapeutic interventions, especially in identifying candidates for surgical intervention.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Evolución Molecular , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Heterogeneidad Genética , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Filogenia
9.
STAR Protoc ; 2(3): 100624, 2021 09 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223198

RESUMEN

Owing to spatial segregation of tumor subclones, solid tumor sampling using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks is often inadequate to represent the genomic heterogeneity of solid tumors. We present an approach, representative sampling, to dissect and homogenize leftover residual surgical tissue prior to sequencing. We also detail optional tumor cell enrichment and DNA preparation. This method, applicable only to surgically removed tumors with leftover tissue, facilitates robust sampling to avoid missing or over-representing actionable variants. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Litchfield et al. (2020).


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/normas , Neoplasias/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
10.
Nat Cancer ; 2: 1321-1337, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950880

RESUMEN

CAPTURE (NCT03226886) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable neutralizing antibody titers (NAbT) against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) vs wildtype (WT). Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT vs solid cancers against both WT and VOCs. In comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with haematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced NAb responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOCs. Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted NAb response including against VOCs, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected in 80% of patients, and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of cancer patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Inmunidad Adaptativa/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administración & dosificación , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/inmunología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/virología , Vacunación/métodos
11.
Nat Cancer ; 2(12): 1305-1320, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121899

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antiviral response in a pan-tumor immune monitoring (CAPTURE) ( NCT03226886 ) is a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 immunity in patients with cancer. Here we evaluated 585 patients following administration of two doses of BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccines, administered 12 weeks apart. Seroconversion rates after two doses were 85% and 59% in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. A lower proportion of patients had detectable titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbT) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC) versus wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2. Patients with hematological malignancies were more likely to have undetectable NAbT and had lower median NAbT than those with solid cancers against both SARS-CoV-2 WT and VOC. By comparison with individuals without cancer, patients with hematological, but not solid, malignancies had reduced neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses. Seroconversion showed poor concordance with NAbT against VOC. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection boosted the NAb response including against VOC, and anti-CD20 treatment was associated with undetectable NAbT. Vaccine-induced T cell responses were detected in 80% of patients and were comparable between vaccines or cancer types. Our results have implications for the management of patients with cancer during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anciano , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/sangre , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Linfocitos T/inmunología
12.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(2)2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033183

RESUMEN

Indications for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy are increasing. As the population ages, many patients receiving such drugs will be older adults. Such patients are under-represented in clinical trials, and therefore the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population has not been adequately assessed. A retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicities was performed in patients with advanced or metastatic solid cancers receiving anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) and/or anti-CTLA4 antibodies across three age cohorts (<65 years, 65-74 years and ≥75 years) using univariable and multivariable analyzes. Eligible patients (n=448) were divided into age cohorts: <65 years (n=185), 65-74 years (n=154) and ≥75 years (n=109). Fewer patients in the oldest cohort (7.3%) received an anti-CTLA4 antibody containing regimen compared with the younger cohorts (21.1% and 17.5%). There was no significant difference overall in all grade or ≥G3 toxicities between age cohorts. Significantly fewer patients in the older (65-74 years and ≥75 years) age cohorts discontinued treatment because of toxicity (10.1% and 7.4%) compared with in the <65 years cohort (20.5%; p=0.006). Using logistic regression, only treatment type (ipilimumab containing) was significantly associated with all grade toxicity. However, there was a significantly lower incidence of all-grade endocrine toxicity in the oldest cohort (11.0%) compared with the youngest cohort (22.7%, p=0.02; OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87), while all-grade dermatological toxicity showed the reverse trend (28.4% vs 18.9%; OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.30). Results were corroborated in the sensitivity analysis using only data from patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. This multicenter, real-world cohort demonstrates that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is safe and well tolerated regardless of age, with no appreciable increase in adverse events in older adult patients.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Eur J Cancer ; 136: 99-106, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32659475

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, cancer centres in the United Kingdom and Europe re-organised their services at an unprecedented pace, and many patients with cancer have had their treatments severely disrupted. Patients with cancer were considered at high risk on sparse evidence, and despite a small number of emerging observational studies, the true incidence and impact of COVID-19 in the 'at-risk' population of patients with cancer is yet to be defined. METHODS: Epidemiological and clinical data were collected prospectively for patients attending the Royal Marsden Hospital and three network hospitals between March 1st and April 30th 2020 that were confirmed to have Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection. Significance of clinical and pathological characteristics was assessed using the Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, whilst univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to further assess risk. The number of patients attending in March/April 2020 for face-to-face attendances was also extracted. FINDINGS: During the 2-month study period, 867 of 13,489 (6.4%) patients met the criteria leading to swab testing. Of the total at-risk population, only 113 of 13,489 (0.84%) were swab positive, 101 of 13,489 (0.75%) required hospital admission and 29 of 13,489 (0.21%) died of COVID-19. Of the patients that attended the hospital to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy alone or in combination with other therapy, 59 of 2001 (2.9%) were admitted to the hospital for COVID-19-related issues and 20 of 2001 (1%) died. Of the patients that collected targeted treatments, 16 of 1126 (1.4%) were admitted and 1 of 1126 (0.1%) died. Of the 11 patients that had received radiotherapy, 6 of 1042 (0.6%) required inpatient admission and 2 of 1042 (0.2%) died. INTERPRETATIONS: Administration of systemic anticancer therapy appears to be associated with a modest risk of severe COVID-19 infection. Based on this snapshot taken as the first wave of COVID-19 hit our practice, we conclude that continuation of active cancer treatment, even in the palliative setting, is appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Cell Rep ; 31(5): 107550, 2020 05 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32375028

RESUMEN

Although thousands of solid tumors have been sequenced to date, a fundamental under-sampling bias is inherent in current methodologies. This is caused by a tissue sample input of fixed dimensions (e.g., 6 mm biopsy), which becomes grossly under-powered as tumor volume scales. Here, we demonstrate representative sequencing (Rep-Seq) as a new method to achieve unbiased tumor tissue sampling. Rep-Seq uses fixed residual tumor material, which is homogenized and subjected to next-generation sequencing. Analysis of intratumor tumor mutation burden (TMB) variability shows a high level of misclassification using current single-biopsy methods, with 20% of lung and 52% of bladder tumors having at least one biopsy with high TMB but low clonal TMB overall. Misclassification rates by contrast are reduced to 2% (lung) and 4% (bladder) when a more representative sampling methodology is used. Rep-Seq offers an improved sampling protocol for tumor profiling, with significant potential for improved clinical utility and more accurate deconvolution of clonal structure.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Carga Tumoral/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Biopsia/métodos , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Mutación/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
15.
ESMO Open ; 4(Suppl 4): e000540, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31423344

RESUMEN

Neurological adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibition are increasingly recognised, especially with combination anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) and anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) therapies. Their presenting symptoms and signs are often subacute and highly variable, reflecting the numerous components of the nervous system. Given the risk of substantial morbidity and mortality, it is important to inform patients of symptoms that may be of concern, and to assess any suspected toxicity promptly. As with other immune-related adverse events, the cornerstone of management is administration of corticosteroids. Specialist neurology input is vital in this group of patients to guide appropriate investigations and tailor treatment strategies.

16.
J Innov Health Inform ; 23(4): 920, 2017 03 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28346128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ethnicity recording within primary care computerised medical record (CMR) systems is suboptimal, exacerbated by tangled taxonomies within current coding systems.Objective To develop a method for extending ethnicity identification using routinely collected data. METHODS: We used an ontological method to maximise the reliability and prevalence of ethnicity information in the Royal College of General Practitioner's Research and Surveillance database. Clinical codes were either directly mapped to ethnicity group or utilised as proxy markers (such as language spoken) from which ethnicity could be inferred. We compared the performance of our method with the recording rates that would be identified by code lists utilised by the UK pay for the performance system, with the help of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). RESULTS: Data from 2,059,453 patients across 110 practices were included. The overall categorisable ethnicity using QOF codes was 36.26% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36.20%-36.33%). This rose to 48.57% (CI:48.50%-48.64%) using the described ethnicity mapping process. Mapping increased across all ethnic groups. The largest increase was seen in the white ethnicity category (30.61%; CI: 30.55%-30.67% to 40.24%; CI: 40.17%-40.30%). The highest relative increase was in the ethnic group categorised as the other (0.04%; CI: 0.03%-0.04% to 0.92%; CI: 0.91%-0.93%). CONCLUSIONS: This mapping method substantially increases the prevalence of known ethnicity in CMR data and may aid future epidemiological research based on routine data.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Atención Primaria de Salud , Recolección de Datos , Humanos
18.
Cancer Cell ; 40(2): 114-116, 2022 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34968417
19.
BMJ Open ; 6(2): e010469, 2016 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26928029

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for type 2 diabetes are becoming increasingly complex with people often prescribed multiple medications, and may include both oral and injectable therapies. There is ongoing debate about which drug classes provide the optimum second-line and third-line treatment options. In the real world, patient adherence and persistence determines medication effectiveness. A better understanding of adherence may help inform the choice of second-line and third-line drug classes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will compare adherence and persistence rates across the different classes of medication available to people with type 2 diabetes. It will include all identified studies comparing medication adherence or persistence between two or more glucose-lowering medications in people with type 2 diabetes. Research databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, The Register of Controlled Trials, PsychINFO and CINAHL) will be searched for relevant articles, using a comprehensive search strategy. All identified medication trials and observational studies will be included which compare adherence or persistence across classes of diabetes medication. The characteristics and outcomes of all the included studies will be reported along with a study quality grade, assessed using the Cochrane Risk Assessment Tool. The quality of adjustment for confounders of adherence or persistence will be reported for each study. Where multiple (n ≥ 3) studies provide compare adherence or persistence across the same 2 medication classes, a meta-analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required. This review and meta-analysis (where possible) will provide important information on the relative patient adherence and persistence, with the different classes of diabetes therapies. Once complete, the results will be made available by peer-reviewed publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015027865.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA