Nurses' communication difficulties when providing end-of-life care in the oncology setting: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: To (1) examine the communication difficulties nurses experience when providing end-of-life (EOL) care, (2) establish the correlation between communication difficulties across various stakeholders and (3) determine the impact sociodemographic factors has on the communication difficulties experienced. METHODS: 124/178 (69.7%) nurses from oncology wards of a tertiary hospital were recruited. Sociodemographic survey and three validated subscales: Communication with Patient and Family (CPF), Explanation to Family (EF) and Reassessment of Current Treatment and Nursing Care (RCTNC) were used to collect the data. Data were analysed with Independent Samples T test, One-Way Analysis of Variance and Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean score was highest for CPF (8.75 ± 2.24) and lowest for RCTNC (6.32 ± 2.26). Positive correlations were found between CPF with EF (r = 0.613, p < 0.001), CPF with RCTNC (r = 0.243, p = 0.007) and EF with RCTNC (r = 0.370, p < 0.001). Age (p = 0.048), years of experience (p = 0.001), religion (p = 0.034) and EOL care training received (p = 0.040) were significant factors for CPF subscale while age (p = 0.011), years of experience (p = 0.001), educational qualification (p = 0.003) and EOL care training received (p = 0.026) were the significant factors for EF subscale. CONCLUSION: Nurses experienced more communication difficulties with patients and families than with the healthcare team. When nurses experience communication difficulties with the healthcare team, they also tend to experience communication difficulties with patients and families and when providing explanations to families. Nurses experienced greater communication difficulties when they are younger, are non-graduates, have less years of experience, adopted a religion or did not receive training in EOL care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: 2019/00680 (Domain Specific Review Board).

Early detection of phlebitis among hematology-oncology patients: a best practice implementation project.

INTRODUCTION: Peripherally-inserted venous catheters (PIVC) are essential for cancer patients to receive treatment. Phlebitis is a major complication of PIVC. Currently, nurses' assessment of phlebitis mainly involves visual inspection. However, the latest literature suggests palpation for tenderness to promote the early detection of phlebitis. OBJECTIVES: This project evaluated the effectiveness of a bundle approach to increase nurses' compliance with PIVC site assessment to promote early detection of phlebitis (grade 2 and above). METHODS: The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to conduct this project in a 28-bed hematology-oncology ward in a Singapore hospital. The bundle approach used in this project consisted of a training presentation, medical mannequin, and phlebitis scale card. The rate of nurses' compliance with best practice for PIVC site assessment was measured at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation. The incidence of phlebitis was monitored up until 12 months post-implementation. RESULTS: Baseline data indicated that only 18.75% (3 out of 16) nurses palpated for tenderness when assessing for phlebitis. Data at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation reported sustained high compliance rates of 85.71% (24 out of 28) and 89.29% (25 out of 28), respectively. Late detection of phlebitis was reduced by 66% (from three cases to one case) at 6 months post-implementation, and no patients required invasive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The bundle approach used in this project facilitated early detection of phlebitis following the inclusion of palpation into nurses' assessment for phlebitis. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204.