Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 27(8): 658-662, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35678550

RESUMEN

Cirrhotic patients can develop acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, renal functional evaluation is crucial in cirrhotic patients. However, serum creatinine and urea levels, as well as measured or estimated glomerular filtration rate is not reliable renal functional markers in these patients compared to other patient groups. In the present study, four original equations are designed and tested for screening chronic kidney disease (CKD) and chronic kidney insufficiency (CKI) in stable cirrhotic patients. MATERIAL & METHOD: estimated GFR (CKD-EPI creatinine and cystatin equations) were recorded in 175 adult stable patients suffering from cirrhosis, and these patients were classified as presenting or not CKD and CKI after evaluation by two independent nephrologists. Based on these data, the variables with the significant discriminating capability to identify CKD and CKI (based on creatinine and cystatin) were detected by applying the Student's t-test for two independent groups, later confirmed by the lambda test of Wilks, in order to obtain the renal function equations. RESULTS: CKD equation (creatinine) = 7.094238-0.043104 × CKD-EPI creatinine - 0.057537 × haematocrit. CKD equation (cystatin) = 8.375074-0.117218 × CKD-EPI cystatin. CKI equation (creatinine) = 0.428389-0.043214 × CKD-EPI creatinine +0.183051 × Child-Pugh score + 0.050162 × age (in years). CKI equation (cystatin) = 9.169579-0.139319 × CKD-EPI cystatin. CONCLUSION: Simple and reliable equations have been obtained for screening chronic kidney disease and chronic kidney insufficiency in cirrhotic patients.


Asunto(s)
Cistatina C , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Adulto , Creatinina , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico
2.
Infectio ; 23(4): 307-312, Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1019861

RESUMEN

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the microbiology of severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), in patients with pneumonia compared to those that did not have. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study that included patients with severe COPD exacerbation. We took microbiologic and serologic samples to study the etiology of the exacerbation and chest X-ray to see whether or not it had associated pneumonia. Results: Ninety-one patients were included in the study. 53/91 (58%) had pneumonia. The most prevalent bacteria isolated were H. influenzae (25.3%), Moraxella spp (22%), H. parainfluenza (14.3%), Serratia marcescens (13.2%), mixed flora (9.9%) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (9.9%). A statistically significant difference could not be demonstrated between the two groups. We detected 24.2% of bacterial resistance in both groups, the most frequent being AMPc (13 cases). Discussion: Bacterial pneumonia in COPD patients is higher in comparison with patients with acute exacerbation. Even though we did not find a significant difference in the microbiology of the groups with or without pneumonia, there are variables such as past smoking related to having pneumonia. Patients with pneumonia also had higher severity scores.


Objetivo: Comparar la microbiología de las exacerbaciones graves de EPOC (Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica) que requieren ingreso a la unidad de cuidados intensivos, con y sin neumonía Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal retrospectivo que incluyó pacientes con exacerbación grave de EPOC que requieren ingreso a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI). Tomamos muestras microbiológicas y serológicas para estudiar la etiología de la exacerbación y radiografía de tórax para ver si tenía o no una neumonía asociada. Seguimos a los pacientes durante su ingreso en la UCI y evaluamos el resultado de la hospitalización. Resultados: se incluyeron 91 pacientes en el estudio. 53/91 ( 58%) tuvieron confirmación de neumonía. Las bacterias más prevalentes aisladas fueron H. influenzae (25.3%), Moraxella spp (22%), H. parainfluenza (14.3%), Serratia marcescens (13.2%), flora mixta (9.9%) y S. aureus meticilino sensible. (9.9% ). No se pudo demostrar una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los dos grupos. Detectamos una resistencia bacteriana del 24,2% en ambos grupos, siendo la más frecuente AMPc (13 casos). Discusión: la neumonía bacteriana en pacientes con EPOC es más alta cuando se compara con pacientes con exacerbación aguda. Aunque no encontramos una diferencia significativa en la microbiología de los grupos con o sin neumonía, existen variables como antecedente de cigarrillo asociadas a tener neumonía. Los pacientes con neumonía así mismo tuvieron mayores índices de severidad.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Recurrencia , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Microbiología , Neumonía , Fumar , Estudios Transversales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA