3D Printed Materials for Combating Antimicrobial Resistance.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a rapidly growing technology with a significant capacity for translational applications in both biology and medicine. 3D-printed living and non-living materials are being widely tested as a potential replacement for conventional solutions for testing and combating antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The precise control of cells and their microenvironment, while simulating the complexity and dynamics of an in vivo environment, provides an excellent opportunity to advance the modeling and treatment of challenging infections and other health conditions. 3D-printing models the complicated niches of microbes and host-pathogen interactions, and most importantly, how microbes develop resistance to antibiotics. In addition, 3D-printed materials can be applied to testing and delivering antibiotics. Here, we provide an overview of 3D printed materials and biosystems and their biomedical applications, focusing on ever increasing AMR. Recent applications of 3D printing to alleviate the impact of AMR, including developed bioprinted systems, targeted bacterial infections, and tested antibiotics are presented.

Molecular typing of reduced susceptibility of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex to Chlorhexidine in Turkey by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Introduction. The global spread of Acinetobacter spp., particularly the Acinetobacter calcoaceticusbaumannii (ACB) complex, has led to its recognition as a significant pathogen by the World Health Organization (WHO). The increasing resistance of the ACB complex to multiple antibiotics presents a challenge for treatment, necessitating accurate antibiotic susceptibility profiling after isolation.Hypothesis or gap statement. There is limited understanding of the antimicrobial resistance and chlorhexidine, a biocide, susceptibility profiles of ACB complex strains, especially in clinical settings in Turkey.Aim. This study aimed to identify ACB complex strains recovered from various clinical specimens at Hacettepe University Hospitals in Ankara, Turkey, in 2019, and to assess identification, their antibiotic and chlorhexidine susceptibility profiles, and genomic relatedness.Methodology. Eighty-two ACB complex strains were identified using MALDI-TOF MS. Susceptibility testing to 12 antibiotics was conducted using the disc diffusion method, and colistin, chlorhexidine susceptibility was assessed using the broth microdilution technique, following the latest EUCAST and CLSI guidelines. ACB complex members with reduced chlorhexidine sensitivity were further analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for bacterial typing.Results. Among the isolates, 1.2% were multidrug-resistant (MDR), 73.2% were extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and 12.2% were pandrug-resistant (PDR). Carbapenem resistance was found in 86.7% of MDR, PDR, and XDR strains. Colistin resistance was observed in 15.8% of isolates, and 18.2% exhibited decreased susceptibility to chlorhexidine. PFGE revealed seven different clones among strains with reduced chlorhexidine sensitivity, indicating vertical transmission within the hospital.Conclusion. This study highlights the reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in ACB complex members and provides epidemiological insights into their spread. The findings underscore the importance of screening for antimicrobial resistance and biocide susceptibility profiles to effectively manage healthcare-associated infections.

Clinical Validation and Evaluation of a Colorimetric SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Assay Against RT-PCR.

Objective: Reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) is one of the time-saving, accurate, and cost-effective alternative methods to real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This study aimed to identify the robustness of a colorimetric RT-LAMP assay kit that we developed, detecting SARS-COV-2 viral RNA within 30 minutes using a primer set special to the N gene against RT-PCR, the gold standard. Materials and Methods: Both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects were included from a single university hospital and the status of both RT-PCR and RT-LAMP assay results were compared, and the consistency of these two assays was analyzed. Results: We showed that the RT-LAMP and RT-PCR assay results confirmed 90% consistency. When we consider the epidemiologic, clinical, and radiologic evaluation, the consistency reached 97%. Conclusion: The results revealed that the colorimetric RT-LAMP assay was efficient, robust, and rapid to be used as in vitro diagnostic tool to display competitiveness compared with RT-PCR.

A retrospective observational cohort study of the clinical epidemiology of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in an OXA-48 endemic setting.

This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in an OXA-48-predominant environment. This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study including all consecutive patients with CRKP BSIs treated between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. Multivariate analysis, subgroup analysis and propensity-score-matched analysis were employed to analyse 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. Clinical cure at day 14 was also analysed for the whole cohort. In total, 124 patients with unique isolates met all the inclusion criteria. OXA-48 was the most common type of carbapenemase (85.5%). Inappropriate therapy was significantly associated with 30-day mortality [70.6% vs 39.7%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.50-14.40, P=0.008] and 14-day clinical failure (78.5% vs 56.2%, aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.09-9.02, P=0.033) in multivariate analyses. Among those treated appropriately, the 30-day mortality rates were similar in monotherapy and combination therapy arms (OR 2.85, 95% CI 0.68-11.95, P=0.15). INCREMENT CPE mortality score (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33, P=0.029), sepsis at BSI onset (aOR 2.90, 95% CI 1.02-8.27, P=0.046), and inappropriate therapy (aOR 4.65, 95% CI 1.50-14.40, P=0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Colistin resistance in CRKP had no significant impact on 30-day mortality. These results were also confirmed in all propensity-score-matched analyses and sensitivity analyses. Appropriate regimens were associated with better clinical outcomes than inappropriate therapies for BSIs with CRKP predominantly possessing OXA-48.

CRISPR-based tools: Alternative methods for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

The recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread all over the world rapidly and caused a global pandemic. To prevent the virus from spreading to more individuals, it is of great importance to identify and isolate infected individuals through testing. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) worldwide. However, performing RT-qPCR is limited to centralized laboratories because of the need for sophisticated laboratory equipment and skilled personnel. Further, it can sometimes give false negative or uncertain results. Recently, new methods have been developed for nucleic acid detection and pathogen diagnosis using CRISPR-Cas systems. These methods present rapid and cost-effective diagnostic platforms that provide high sensitivity and specificity without the need for complex instrumentation. Using the CRISPR-based SARS-CoV-2 detection methods, it is possible to increase the number of daily tests in existing laboratories, reduce false negative or uncertain result rates obtained with RT-qPCR, and perform testing in resource-limited settings or at points of need where performing RT-qPCR is not feasible. Here, we briefly describe the RT-qPCR method, and discuss its limitations in meeting the current diagnostic needs. We explain how the unique properties of various CRISPR-associated enzymes are utilized for nucleic acid detection and pathogen diagnosis. Then, we highlight the important features of CRISPR-based diagnostic methods developed for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Finally, we examine the advantages and limitations of these methods, and discuss how they can contribute to improving the efficiency of the current testing systems for combating SARS-CoV-2.

CRISPR-Cas13 System as a Promising and Versatile Tool for Cancer Diagnosis, Therapy, and Research.

Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in targeted cancer therapy. In precision oncology, molecular profiling of cancer patients enables the use of targeted cancer therapeutics. However, current diagnostic methods for molecular analysis of cancer are costly and require sophisticated equipment. Moreover, targeted cancer therapeutics such as monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule drugs may cause off-target effects and they are available for only a minority of cancer driver proteins. Therefore, there is still a need for versatile, efficient, and precise tools for cancer diagnostics and targeted cancer treatment. In recent years, the CRISPR-based genome and transcriptome engineering toolbox has expanded rapidly. Particularly, the RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas13 system has unique biochemical properties, making Cas13 a promising tool for cancer diagnosis, therapy, and research. Cas13-based diagnostic methods allow early detection and monitoring of cancer markers from liquid biopsy samples without the need for complex instrumentation. In addition, Cas13 can be used for targeted cancer therapy through degrading and manipulating cancer-associated transcripts with high efficiency and specificity. Moreover, Cas13-mediated programmable RNA manipulation tools offer invaluable opportunities for cancer research, identification of drug-resistance mechanisms, and discovery of novel therapeutic targets. Here, we review and discuss the current use and potential applications of the CRISPR-Cas13 system in cancer diagnosis, therapy, and research. Thus, researchers will gain a deep understanding of CRISPR-Cas13 technologies, which have the potential to be used as next-generation cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.