Variation of Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment Practices for Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome Among Pediatric Subspecialists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic and treatment practices among a variety of subspecialists at pediatric institutions in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Using a web-based survey, we assessed the consultation, diagnostic, and treatment preferences of providers from the different pediatric subspecialties who care for pediatric patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activating syndrome (MAS). Domains included demographics, provider training level and specialty, experience and comfort level with the diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS, and institutional approaches toward the diagnosis and management of HLH/MAS. Participants also were given 2 case scenarios: one describing Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH and another describing an underlying rheumatologic condition with MAS. RESULTS: Of 263 respondents, 23%, 29%, 39%, and 7% identified as hematology/oncology, rheumatology, general pediatrics/critical care/hospitalist, and allergy/immunology, respectively. For Epstein-Barr virus/HLH, hematology/oncology was the preferred first consultant by most respondents other than rheumatologists, of whom only 47% agreed. For MAS, 92% of respondents from all specialties favored a rheumatology consultation. Preferred diagnostic tests varied by subspecialty, with hematology/oncology more likely than rheumatology to order an infectious workup, natural killer cell function, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, bone marrow biopsy, and genetic testing. First-line therapy also varied, with hematology/oncology preferring dexamethasone and etoposide and rheumatology more often preferring methylprednisolone and anakinra. One-half of respondents were unaware of institutional algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of HLH/MAS. Most (85.6%) favored the development of treatment algorithms for HLH/MAS, and 90% supported a multidisciplinary approach. CONCLUSIONS: Current consulting patterns, diagnostic workup, and treatment approaches of HLH/MAS vary by specialty, highlighting the need for standardized management algorithms and institutional multidisciplinary HLH/MAS teams.

Development and Validation of a Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Flare Measure: Ascertaining Flare in Patients With Inactive Disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop and validate a composite disease flare definition for juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA) that would closely approximate the clinical decision made to reinitiate or not reinitiate systemic therapy after therapy de-escalation. METHODS: Retrospective chart reviews of children with SpA who underwent systemic therapy de-escalation of biologic or conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were used to develop and validate the flare outcome. Data on independent cohorts for development (1 center) and validation (4 centers) were collected from large tertiary health care systems. Core measure thresholds and candidate disease flare outcomes were assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), with physician assessment of active disease plus re-initiation of standard dose of systemic therapy as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of the candidate definitions, clinically meaningful worsening in ≥3 of the following 5 core measures performed best: caregiver/patient assessment of well-being; physician assessment of disease activity; caregiver/patient assessment of pain, physical function, and active joint count. The ROC AUC was 0.91, PPV 87.5%, NPV 98.1%, sensitivity 82.4%, and specificity 98.7%. Cronbach's α was 0.81, signifying internal consistency, and factor analysis demonstrated that the outcome measured 1 construct. The Juvenile SpA Flare measure had face validity according to 21 surveyed pediatric rheumatologists. Juvenile SpA Flare had an ROC AUC of 0.85, a PPV of 92.3%, and an NPV of 96.8% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: There is initial support for the validity of the Juvenile SpA Flare measure as a tool to identify disease flare in juvenile SpA patients de-escalating therapy, and the measure is potentially applicable in clinical practice, observational studies, and therapeutic trials.