Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 43(2): 803-16, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25552416

RESUMEN

Zinc is essential for biological systems, and aberrant zinc metabolism is implicated in a broad range of human diseases. To maintain homeostasis in response to fluctuating levels of dietary zinc, animals regulate gene expression; however, mechanisms that mediate the transcriptional response to fluctuating levels of zinc have not been fully defined. Here, we identified DNA enhancer elements that mediate intestine-specific transcriptional activation in response to high levels of dietary zinc in C. elegans. Using bioinformatics, we characterized an evolutionarily conserved enhancer element present in multiple zinc-inducible genes, the high zinc activation (HZA) element. The HZA was consistently adjacent to a GATA element that mediates expression in intestinal cells. Functional studies using transgenic animals demonstrated that this modular system of DNA enhancers mediates tissue-specific transcriptional activation in response to high levels of dietary zinc. We used this information to search the genome and successfully identified novel zinc-inducible genes. To characterize the mechanism of enhancer function, we demonstrated that the GATA transcription factor ELT-2 and the mediator subunit MDT-15 are necessary for zinc-responsive transcriptional activation. These findings define new mechanisms of zinc homeostasis and tissue-specific regulation of transcription.


Asunto(s)
Elementos de Facilitación Genéticos , Activación Transcripcional , Zinc/farmacología , Animales , Secuencia de Bases , Cadmio/farmacología , Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolismo , Secuencia Conservada , ADN de Helmintos/química , Factores de Transcripción GATA/metabolismo , Especificidad de Órganos , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Activación Transcripcional/efectos de los fármacos
3.
N Z Med J ; 121(1274): 34-41, 2008 May 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18535644

RESUMEN

AIM: Current treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves the use of various disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic response agents which require ongoing medical supervision. An audit was undertaken to assess the adequacy of outpatient specialist follow-up for supervision of treatment in patients with RA in the Otago region. METHODS: The Rheumatology Service database was used to assess time between follow-up for the penultimate and last visit to rheumatology outpatient clinic for all patients who made at least two visits between 1 October 2001 and 30 September 2006. Other recorded data included demographic information and clinician expectations for the timing of the next outpatient visit. Comparisons were made between actual follow-up intervals, those indicated by specialists and the follow-up intervals recommended by the New Zealand Rheumatology Association Guidelines. Patients were characterised according to four groups specified in the guidelines: Group A: patients newly started on DMARDs; Group B: patients with some change in disease management: Group C: patient stable on potent medications: Group D: patients stable on less severe medication. RESULTS: According to the guidelines only 40% of patients were followed up within the recommended intervals. Groups A and B (76.9% and 70.6% respectively) had a significantly greater proportion of patients with follow-up at variance to guideline recommendations compared to groups C and D (50% and 45.3% respectively) (p<0.001). There were marked discrepancies between the guideline recommended follow-up intervals and those suggested by the clinicians. Compared with guideline recommendations clinicians advised less frequent follow-up for groups A and B but more frequent for patients in Groups C and D. However, an assessment of the quality of life scores amongst the patients suggested that follow-up was still appropriately targeted to those patients with lower quality of life. CONCLUSION: Discrepancies in follow-up were most marked in the patient groups potentially most at risk of medication-related problems in whom guidelines suggested more intensive monitoring. Additional strategies to promote guideline-based follow-up arrangements may be indicated. Further work should examine the relationships between guideline recommended, physician intended and actual follow-up among rheumatology patients in other regions in order to assess whether modifications should occur to clinician behaviour or guideline content.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Deber de Recontacto/ética , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Ética Médica , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
4.
Biotechnol Healthc ; 3(3): 49-53, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23424362

RESUMEN

The promise of start-up biotechnology companies is enormous. So are the risks and the uncertainty of product development. The authors present a checklist for young biotech companies, covering environmental factors, alliances, and strategic planning.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA