Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(8): 1721-1726, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742322

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests used at the point-of-care, such as the Abbott Panbio, have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The Panbio is Health Canada approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of COVID-19 symptom onset(s). Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Paired nasopharyngeal (NP), throat, and saliva swabs were collected, with one paired swab tested immediately with the Panbio, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested using real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We also prospectively evaluated results from assessment centers within the community. For those individuals, an NP swab was collected for Panbio testing and paired with RT-PCR results from parallel NP or throat swabs. One hundred and forty-five individuals were included in the study. Collection of throat and saliva was stopped early due to poorer performance (throat sensitivity 57.7%, n=61, and saliva sensitivity 2.6%, n=41). NP swab sensitivity was 87.7% [n=145, 95% confidence interval (CI) 81.0-92.7%]. There were 1641 symptomatic individuals tested by Panbio in assessment centers with 268/1641 (16.3%) positive for SARS-CoV-2. There were 37 false negatives and 2 false positives, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of 86.1% [95% CI 81.3-90.0%] and 99.9% [95% CI 99.5-100.0%], respectively. The Panbio test reliably detects most cases of SARS-CoV-2 from adults in the community setting presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasopharyngeal swabs. Throat and saliva swabs are not reliable specimens for the Panbio.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Nasofaringe/virología , Faringe/virología , Saliva/virología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Manejo de Especímenes
4.
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol ; 7(3): 221-229, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841147

RESUMEN

Background: Updated 2016 Helicobacter pylori consensus guidelines recommend treatment for 14 days with concomitant therapy (proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin-metronidazole-clarithromycin (PAMC) or bismuth-based quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline, PBMT)) as first line, PBMT or PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin (PAL) as second or third line, and PPI-amoxicillin-rifabutin (PAR) as fourth line for 10 days. Objectives: This was a retrospective cohort study to describe and compare the efficacy of anti-Helicobacter treatment regimens over the periods 2007-2015 and 2016-2021 as well as antibiotic resistance. Methods: A modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis was used to analyze the success rate of therapies. mITT includes all patients who were prescribed H. pylori treatment and had at least one follow-up test-of-cure. This included patients who could not complete treatment or were non-adherent with treatment. Risk factors for treatment failures were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Resistance testing was done in a small subset of patients. Results: H. pylori-positive patients who received treatment in Edmonton, Alberta were included in a mITT analysis: 334/387(86%) from 2007 to 2015 and 193/199 (97%) from 2016 to 2021. During 2016-2021, 78% (150/193) of patients underwent cumulative guideline-based treatment with a successful cure in 80% (120/150) of patients. In those who were newly diagnosed, the cure rate was 88% (52/59) versus those with previous treatment failure 75% (68/91) (P < 0.05, risk difference [RD] 14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-26.3%). The most effective first-line regimens were PAMC for 14 days (87% [45/52]) in 2016-2021 and sequential therapy in 2007-2015 (83% [66/80]) (P = 0.535, RD 4%, 95% CI -8.5-16.5%). When other treatments failed, success with PAR was 50% (2/4) from 2007 to 2015 and 57% (21/37) from 2016 to 2021. Recent (2016-2021) resistance rates to clarithromycin and metronidazole are high at 78% (50/64) and 56% (29/52), respectively. From 2007 to 2015, clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance rates were 80% (36/45) and 83% (38/46), respectively. Levofloxacin resistance increased significantly from 2007-2015 to 2016-2021 (28% [13/46] to 61% [35/57], P < 0.05, RD 33%, 95% CI 11.6-54.4%). Conclusions: Algorithmic treatment with PAMC first line followed by PBMT, PAL, and PAR cures H. pylori in 88% of newly diagnosed patients. PAR therapy shows suboptimal cure rates (50-57% success) but can be considered as third instead of fourth line given increasing levofloxacin resistance rates. Antibiotic resistance in H. pylori is common to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin and frequently accounts for treatment failures.

5.
Vaccine ; 42(5): 1168-1178, 2024 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38278628

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers (HCWs) from an interprovincial Canadian cohort gave serial blood samples to identify factors associated with anti-receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) IgG response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. METHODS: Members of the HCW cohort donated blood samples four months after their first SARS-CoV-2 immunization and again at 7, 10 and 13 months. Date and type of immunizations and dates of SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected at each of four contacts, together with information on immunologically-compromising conditions and current therapies. Blood samples were analyzed centrally for anti-RBD IgG and anti-nucleocapsid IgG (Abbott Architect, Abbott Diagnostics). Records of immunization and SARS-CoV-2 testing from public health agencies were used to assess the impact of reporting errors on estimates from the random-effects multivariable model fitted to the data. RESULTS: 2752 of 4567 vaccinated cohort participants agreed to donate at least one blood sample. Modelling of anti-RBD IgG titer from 8903 samples showed an increase in IgG with each vaccine dose and with first infection. A decrease in IgG titer was found with the number of months since vaccination or infection, with the sharpest decline after the third dose. An immunization regime that included mRNA1273 (Moderna) resulted in higher anti-RBD IgG. Participants reporting multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis or taking selective immunosuppressants, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors and antineoplastic agents had lower anti-RBD IgG. Supplementary analyses showed higher anti-RBD IgG in those reporting side-effects of vaccination, no relation of anti-RBD IgG to obesity and lower titers in women immunized in early or mid-pregnancy. Sensitivity analysis results suggested no important bias in the self-report data. CONCLUSION: Creation of a prospective cohort was central to the credibility of results presented here. Serial serology assessments, with longitudinal analysis, provided effect estimates with enhanced accuracy and a clearer understanding of medical and other factors affecting response to vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Prueba de COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Personal de Salud , Inmunoglobulina G
7.
Sci Data ; 10(1): 628, 2023 09 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37717051

RESUMEN

The Two Weeks in the World research project has resulted in a dataset of 3087 clinically relevant bacterial genomes with pertaining metadata, collected from 59 diagnostic units in 35 countries around the world during 2020. A relational database is available with metadata and summary data from selected bioinformatic analysis, such as species prediction and identification of acquired resistance genes.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias , Genoma Bacteriano , Bacterias/genética , Biología Computacional , Bases de Datos Factuales , Metadatos
8.
J Appl Lab Med ; 7(4): 834-841, 2022 06 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests have great potential to help combat the COVID-19 pandemic. In the performance of a rapid, antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 test (RAT), our study had 3 main objectives: to determine the accuracy of nasal swabs, the accuracy of using nasopharyngeal swabs for nasal collection (nasalNP), and the effectiveness of using residual extraction buffer for real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmation of positive RAT (rPan). METHODS: Symptomatic adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19 in the community were recruited into the study. Nasal samples were collected using either a nasalNP or nasal swab and tested immediately with the RAT in the individual's home by a health care provider. 500 µL of universal transport media was added to the residual extraction buffer after testing and sent to the laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 testing using RT-PCR. Parallel throat swabs tested with RT-PCR were used as the reference comparators. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five individuals were included in the study (99 nasal swabs, 56 nasalNP). Sensitivities of nasal samples tested on the RAT using either nasal or nasalNP were 89.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80.7%-94.6%] and 90.2% (95% CI 78.6%-96.7%), respectively. rPan positivity agreement compared to throat RT-PCR was 96.2%. CONCLUSIONS: RAT reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 from symptomatic adults in the community presenting within 7 days of symptom onset using nasal swabs or nasalNP. High agreement with rPan can avoid the need for collecting a second swab for RT-PCR confirmation or testing of variants of concern from positive RAT in this population.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Pandemias , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2/genética
9.
J Med Microbiol ; 70(7)2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34309503

RESUMEN

Introduction. The ID NOW is FDA approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of symptom onset for COVID-19 if tested within 1 h of specimen collection.Gap statement. Clinical data on the performance of the ID NOW are limited, with many studies varying in their study design and/or having small sample size.Aim. In this study we aimed to determine the clinical performance of the ID NOW compared to conventional RT-PCR testing.Methodology. Adults with COVID-19 in the community or hospital were recruited into the study. Paired throat swabs were collected, with one throat swab transported immediately in an empty sterile tube to the laboratory for ID NOW testing, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested by an in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay targeting the E gene.Results. In total, 133 individuals were included in the study; 129 samples were positive on either the ID NOW and/or RT-PCR. Assuming any positive result on either assay represents a true positive, positive per cent agreement (PPA) of the ID NOW compared to RT-PCR with 95 % confidence intervals was 89.1 % (82.0-94.1%) and 91.6 % (85.1-95.9%), respectively. When analysing individuals with symptom duration ≤7 days and who had the ID NOW performed within 1 h (n=62), ID NOW PPA increased to 98.2 %.Conclusion. Results from the ID NOW were reliable, especially when adhering to the manufacturer's recommendations for testing.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Adulto , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo
10.
J Clin Virol ; 142: 104933, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 seroprevalence studies use serum/plasma samples to detect SARS-CoV-2 IgG. Data supporting alternate specimen types and freeze-thaw antibody stability is lacking. The stability of IgG and other immunoglobulins in multiple blood sample types stored in differing conditions and multiple freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs) was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum, plasma, and heparinized-plasma samples were collected from COVID-19 recovered individuals. Samples underwent testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies upon collection, after each of 10-12 FTCs, and storage at -70°C, -20°C, 4°C, and room-temperature for 10-12 days using four high-throughput commercial assays, two rapid-test cassettes, a manual ELISA, and a surrogate neutralization assay. RESULTS: All three specimen types were collected from 34 COVID-19 recovered seropositive individuals (≥21 days post-symptoms). Using the Architect and Liaison assays, a positive qualitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG result was detected daily up to 12 FTCs and up to 10 days of storage at different temperatures. An additional 25 plasma samples consistently demonstrated detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies daily after 12 FTCs and storage at -20°C using two rapid test cassette assays (SD Biosensor and Hangzhou All Test), manual (Beijing Wantai) and surrogate neutralization (GenScript) ELISAs, and two high-throughput assays (Roche Elecsys nucleocapsid and spike). IgM antibodies were less frequently detected by one of the rapid test cassette assays. CONCLUSIONS: Serum, plasma, and heparinized-plasma constitute reliable samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. In particular, the IgG response was stable and reliably detected after multiple FTCs and storage at common laboratory conditions. IgM detection was variable due to the labile nature of this antibody class.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Laboratorios , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
11.
Vaccine ; 39(39): 5563-5570, 2021 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34454782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: With rapid approval of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the ability of clinical laboratories to detect vaccine-induced antibodies with available high-throughput commercial assays is unknown. We aimed to determine if commercial serology assays can detect vaccine-induced antibodies (VIAs) and understand the vaccination response. METHODS: This cohort study recruited healthcare workers and residents of long-term care facilities (receiving the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 products, respectively) who underwent serum collection pre-vaccination (BNT162b2 group), 2-weeks post vaccination (both groups), and pre-2nd dose (both groups). Sera were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG using four commercial assays (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, DiaSorin Trimeric S IgG, and GenScript cPASS) to detect VIAs. Secondary outcomes included description of post-vaccination antibody response and correlation with neutralizing titers. RESULTS: 225 participants (177 receiving BNT162b2 and 48 receiving mRNA-1273) were included (median age 41 years; 66-78% female). Nucleocapsid IgG was found in 4.1% and 21.9% of the BNT162b2 (baseline) and mRNA-1273 (2-weeks post first dose). All anti-spike assays detected antibodies post-vaccination, with an average increase of 87.2% (range 73.8-94.3%; BNT162b2), and 25.2% (range 23.8-26.7%; mRNA-1273) between the first and last sampling time points (all p < 0.05). Neutralizing antibodies were detected at all post-vaccine timepoints for both vaccine arms, with increasing titers over time (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-spike vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 IgG are detectable by commercially available high-throughput assays and increases over time. Prior to second dose of vaccination, neutralizing antibodies are detectable in 73-89% of individuals, suggesting most individuals would have some degree of protection from subsequent infection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , ARN Mensajero
12.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(8): 2646-51, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18562580

RESUMEN

The new anaerobe and Corynebacterium (ANC) identification card for Vitek 2 was compared with a 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) reference method for accuracy in the identification of corynebacteria and anaerobic species. Testing was performed on a Vitek 2 XL system with modified software at three clinical trial laboratories. Reproducibility was determined with nine ATCC quality control strains that were tested 20 times over a minimum of 10 days at all three sites. A challenge set of 50 well-characterized strains and 365 recent fresh and frozen clinical isolates were included in the study. The expected positive and negative biochemical well reactions were also evaluated for substrate reproducibility. All strains were tested with the ANC card, and clinical isolates were saved for 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All reproducibility tests yielded expected results within a 95% confidence interval, except for that with Corynebacterium striatum ATCC 6940, for which identification failed at one trial site. For the challenge isolates, there was 98% correct identification, 5% low discrimination, and 2% incorrect identification, and 0% were unidentified. For clinical strains, there was 95.1% correct identification, 4.9% low discrimination, and 4.6% incorrect identification, and 0.3% were unidentified. The 4.6% (17/365) of clinical isolates that were incorrectly identified consisted of 14 isolates that were correct at the genus level and three that were incorrect at the genus level. The new ANC card met all performance criteria within a 95% confidence interval compared to the identification performance by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias Anaerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Corynebacterium/aislamiento & purificación , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
13.
BMJ Open ; 7(7): e016300, 2017 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28698342

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and correlates of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) infection among men and women, determine the prevalence of gene mutations conferring resistance and compare test performance of female specimen types. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on specimens collected for gonorrhoea (NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae) and chlamydia (CT, Chlamydia trachomatis) among male and female Alberta STI clinic attendees using the M. genitalium transcription-mediated amplification-research use only test. Positive specimens were sequenced for 23SrRNA, parC and gyrA genes. Gender-stratified analysis compared test results using χ2 or Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression. Female endocervical and urine specimens were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2254 individuals were tested; 53.8% (n=1212) were male. Male prevalence of MG was 5.3%; CT was 5.9% and NG was 1.8%. Correlates of male infection were a non-gonococcal urethritis diagnosis and NG coinfection. MG prevalence for women was 7.2%; CT was 5.8% and NG was 1.8%. Correlates of female infection were younger age, Indigenous/Other ethnicity and CT/NG coinfection. Nearly two-thirds of eligible specimens had mutations associated with macrolide resistance and 12.2% of specimens had a parC mutation signifying possible moxifloxacin resistance. There was high concordance (98.1%) of results between urine and endocervical swabs. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of MG relative to CT and NG supports the incorporation of MG testing into routine sexually transmissible infection screening. The high rate of resistance to macrolides and moxifloxacin raises concerns about treatment options. The good concordance of results between urine and endocervical swabs supports the use of female urine specimens for testing.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Mycoplasma/epidemiología , Mycoplasma genitalium/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiología , Cuello del Útero/microbiología , Infecciones por Chlamydia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Chlamydia trachomatis/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Gonorrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Gonorrea/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Moxifloxacino , Análisis Multivariante , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/efectos de los fármacos , Factores Sexuales , Orina/microbiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 84(3): 240-5, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26707068

RESUMEN

Limited data are available that verify the performance of commercial susceptibility methods for Streptococcus pneumoniae following the 2008 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revision of the ß-lactam breakpoints. We compared the performance of Etest, M.I.C. Evaluator (M.I.C.E), Vitek, and Sensititre systems to broth microdilution for S. pneumoniae susceptibility testing of penicillin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and amoxicillin. Essential agreement was ≥90% for the majority of the ß-lactams and methods tested, particularly for penicillin and ceftriaxone. Categorical agreements (CAs) for penicillin using meningeal and nonmeningeal breakpoints were ≥90%; CAs using penicillin oral breakpoints were 84-89%. Ceftriaxone CAs using nonmeningeal and meningeal breakpoints were 68-88% for Etest, M.I.C.E., and Vitek2 with 6-12% very major errors (VMEs) using meningeal breakpoints. Sensititre CAs for ceftriaxone, amoxicillin, and meropenem were ≥90% with no VMEs. In the context of the current guidelines, there exists considerable method-dependent variability in the susceptibility of S. pneumoniae to ß-lactams.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamas/farmacología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/normas , Infecciones Neumocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resistencia betalactámica
15.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 85(4): 401-4, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27233427

RESUMEN

The ability to isolate and identify causative agents of urinary tract infections relies primarily on the quality of the urine sample that is submitted to the microbiology. The most important factors are the method of collection, the maintenance of viability of the potential pathogens during transport, and standardization of the culturing of the urine sample. This report is a composite of several investigations comparing collection and transport on urine culture paddles, with a preservative urine sponge (Uriswab), and a comparison of Uriswab with the BD preservative transport tube as methods of preservation of urinary pathogens. Primary studies showed that Uriswab maintained significantly more urinary pathogens than the urine culture paddle with fewer mixed or contaminated cultures. The two preservative transport systems were comparable for maintenance of viability of the pathogens, but there were fewer mixed cultures when samples were collected with Uriswab. This study confirms the importance of a standard volume of 1 µL of urine for culture.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
16.
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 43: 20, 2014 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25001062

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of Ciprodex® has been demonstrated for treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM). However, symptoms fail to resolve in 9-15% of patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on S. aureus, and planktonic and sessile (biofilm forming) P. aeruginosa in vitro using clinical isolates from patients with CSOM. METHODS: 1) Stability was assessed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for each component in a prepared mixture of Ciprodex® and NAC over 15 days. Sterility was assessed by measuring bacterial growth on a blood agar plate. Efficacy was assessed using a disc diffusion method by inoculating plates with S. aureus ATCC 29513 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and measuring the clearance zone.2) Fifteen P. aeruginosa strains were isolated from patients with CSOM and tested in vitro using the bioFILM PA™ antimicrobial susceptibility assay. Treatment solutions included Ciprodex® & ciprofloxacin +/- NAC, and NAC alone (0.25%, 0.5% & 1.25%). RESULTS: 1) NAC combined with Ciprodex® demonstrated stability, sterility, and efficacy over a two-week period2) P. aeruginosa strains in the sessile (33%-40%) and planktonic (13%) state demonstrated resistance to Ciprodex® and ciprofloxacin. When NAC ≥0.5% was used in isolation or as an adjunct to either of these medications, no resistance was found in the sessile or planktonic state among all 15 strains. CONCLUSION: 1) Ciprodex® combined with NAC has a shelf life of at least two weeks given the documented preservation of stability, sterility, and clinical efficacy of the mixed compounds.2) P. aeruginosa strains demonstrated resistance to both Ciprodex® and ciprofloxacin. NAC ≥0.5% overcomes issues with resistance and shows promise in the treatment of CSOM.


Asunto(s)
Acetilcisteína/farmacología , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad Crónica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Depuradores de Radicales Libres , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Otitis Media Supurativa/microbiología
17.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(5): 442-443, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21306797

RESUMEN

At our hospital, health care workers use commercially available wipes to reduce bacterial counts on plastic surfaces. The workers use the wipes in a cursory fashion--swiping objects once for one to two seconds. We sought to measure the ability of wipes to reduce bacterial counts when swiped across plastic surfaces using various routines.


Asunto(s)
Carga Bacteriana/efectos de los fármacos , Descontaminación/métodos , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Plásticos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Fómites , Proyectos Piloto
20.
J Clin Microbiol ; 40(4): 1140-5, 2002 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11923322

RESUMEN

Light yellow-pigmented (strain PQ1) and yellow-pigmented (strain PQ2), gram-positive, non-spore-forming, nonmotile bacteria consisting of pairs or chains of cocci were isolated from the bile of a patient with cholecystitis (PQ1) and the peritoneal dialysate of another patient with peritonitis (PQ2). Morphologically and biochemically, the organisms phenotypically belonged to the genus Eterococcus. Whole-cell protein (WCP) analysis and sequence analysis of a segment of the 16S rRNA gene suggested that they are new species within the genus Enterococcus. PQ1 and PQ2 displayed less than 70% identities to other enterococcal species by WCP analysis. Sequence analysis showed that PQ1 shared the highest level of sequence similarity with Enterococcus raffinosus and E. malodoratus (sequence similarities of 99.8% to these two species). Sequence analysis of PQ2 showed that it had the highest degrees of sequence identity with the group I enterococci E. malodoratus (98.7%), E. raffinosus (98.6%), E. avium (98.6%), and E. pseudoavium (98.6%). PQ1 and PQ2 can be differentiated from the other Enterococcus spp. in groups II, III, IV, and V by their phenotypic characteristics: PQ1 and PQ2 produce acid from mannitol and sorbose and do not hydrolyze arginine, placing them in group I. The yellow pigmentation differentiates these strains from the other group I enterococci. PQ1 and PQ2 can be differentiated from each other since PQ1 does not produce acid from arabinose, whereas PQ2 does. Also, PQ1 is Enterococcus Accuprobe assay positive and pyrrolidonyl-beta-naphthylamide hydrolysis positive, whereas PQ2 is negative by these assays. The name Enterococcus gilvus sp. nov. is proposed for strain PQ1, and the name Enterococcus pallens sp. nov. is proposed for strain PQ2. Type strains have been deposited in culture collections as E. gilvus ATCC BAA-350 (CCUG 45553) and E. pallens ATCC BAA-351 (CCUG 45554).


Asunto(s)
Bilis/microbiología , Colecistitis/microbiología , Enterococcus/clasificación , Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Peritonitis/microbiología , Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , ADN Ribosómico/análisis , Enterococcus/genética , Ácidos Grasos/análisis , Humanos , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Pigmentos Biológicos/metabolismo , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA