The relationship between bone strain index, bone mass, microarchitecture and mechanical behavior in human vertebrae: an ex vivo study.

The aim of this study was to determine whether the Bone Strain Index (BSI), a recent DXA-based bone index, is related to bone mechanical behavior, microarchitecture and finally, to determine whether BSI improves the prediction of bone strength and the predictive role of BMD in clinical practice. PURPOSE: Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new DXA-based bone index that represents the finite element analysis of the bone deformation under load. The current study aimed to assess whether the BSI is associated with 3D microarchitecture and the mechanical behavior of human lumbar vertebrae. METHODS: Lumbar vertebrae (L3) were harvested fresh from 31 human donors. The anteroposterior BMC (g) and aBMD (g/cm2) of the vertebral body were measured using DXA, and then the BSI was automatically derived. The trabecular bone volume (Tb.BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), degree of anisotropy (DA), and structure model index (SMI) were measured using µCT with a 35-µm isotropic voxel size. Quasi-static uniaxial compressive testing was performed on L3 vertebral bodies under displacement control to assess failure load and stiffness. RESULTS: The BSI was significantly correlated with failure load and stiffness (r = -0.60 and -0.59; p < 0.0001), aBMD and BMC (r = -0.93 and -0.86; p < 0.0001); Tb.BV/TV and SMI (r = -0.58 and 0.51; p = 0.001 and 0.004 respectively). After adjustment for aBMD, the association between BSI and stiffness, BSI and SMI remained significant (r = -0.51; p = 0.004 and r = -0.39; p = 0.03 respectively, partial correlations) and the relation between BSI and failure load was close to significance (r = -0.35; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The BSI was significantly correlated with the microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of L3 vertebrae, and these associations remained statistically significant regardless of aBMD.

DXA-based bone strain index in normocalcemic primary hyperparathyroidism.

The trabecular and cortical bone assessed by bone strain index seems not to be significantly affected in NHPT. INTRODUCTION: The natural history and bone involvement of normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) are not fully clarified yet. The bone strain index (BSI) is a deformation index based on the finite element method and can be applied to DXA scans. In this study, we aim to assess BSI in subjects with NHPT. METHOD: A case-control study included 170 subjects: 40 subjects with NHPT, 50 subjects with primary hypercalcemic hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), and 80 controls (age- and sex-matched with the NPTH group). RESULTS: Lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck (FN) BMD, total hip (TH) BMD, and TBS were similar between NHPT and both PHPT and controls. FN-BSI was lower in NHPT compared to PHPT (1.52 ± 0.31 vs 1.72 ± 0.42 p = 0.031) while there were no differences between NHPT and controls. TH-BSI was lower in NHPT compared to PHPT (1.36 ± 0.23 vs 1.52 ± 0.34, p = 0.030), while there were no differences between NHPT and controls. LS-BSI was not different between NHPT and both PHPT and controls. CONCLUSION: The trabecular and cortical bones assessed by BSI seem not to be significantly impaired in NHPT. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to give an insight into the natural history of NHPT to improve knowledge and management of this condition.

Vitamin D status and supplementation before and after Bariatric Surgery: Recommendations based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bariatric surgery is associated with a postoperative reduction of 25(OH) vitamin D levels (25(OH)D) and with skeletal complications. Currently, guidelines for 25(OH)D assessment and vitamin D supplementation in bariatric patients, pre- and post-surgery, are still lacking. The aim of this work is to analyse systematically the published experience on 25(OH)D status and vitamin D supplementation, pre- and post-surgery, and to propose, on this basis, recommendations for management. Preoperatively, 18 studies including 2,869 patients were evaluated. Prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency as defined by 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) was 85%, whereas when defined by 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) was 57%. The median preoperative 25(OH)D level was 19.75 ng/mL. After surgery, 39 studies including 5,296 patients were analysed and among those undergoing either malabsorptive or restrictive procedures, a lower rate of vitamin D insufficiency and higher 25(OH)D levels postoperatively were observed in patients treated with high-dose oral vitamin D supplementation, defined as ≥ 2,000 IU/daily (mostly D3-formulation), compared with low-doses (< 2,000 IU/daily). Our recommendations based on this systematic review and meta-analysis should help clinical practice in the assessment and management of vitamin D status before and after bariatric surgery. Assessment of vitamin D should be performed pre- and postoperatively in all patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Regardless of the type of procedure, high-dose supplementation is recommended in patients after bariatric surgery.

Bone Strain Index: preliminary distributional characteristics in a population of women with normal bone mass, osteopenia and osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a recently developed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) software, applying a finite element analysis on lumbar spine and femoral DXA scans. BSI is a parameter of bone deformation, providing information on bone resistance to applied loads. BSI values indicate the average bone strain in the explored site, where a higher strain (higher BSI values) suggests a higher fracture risk. This study reports the distributional characteristics of lumbar BSI (L-BSI) in women with normal bone mass, osteopenia or osteoporosis and their relationships with BMD, weight, height and BMI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two-hundred-fifty-nine consecutive unfractured women who performed DXA were divided into three groups based on BMD T-score: normal bone mass (n = 43, 16.6%), osteopenia (n = 82, 31.7%) and osteoporosis (n = 134, 51.7%). The distribution of L-BSI was evaluated with conventional statistical methods, histograms and by calculating parametric and nonparametric 95% confidence intervals, together with the 90%, 95% and 99% bilateral tolerance limits with a 95% confidence. RESULTS: Ninety percent bilateral tolerance limits with 95% confidence for L-BSI distribution are 1.0-2.40, 0.95-2.63 and 0.84-3.15 in the group of patients with normal bone mass, 1.34-2.78, 1.24-2.95 and 1.05-3.32 in the osteopenic group and 1.68-3.79, 1.58-4.15 and 1.40-4.96 in the osteoporotic group. CONCLUSION: In women without vertebral fractures at baseline, L-BSI values from 1.68 (osteoporotic group) and 2.40 (upper of the normal bone mass group) can be tentatively chosen as a lower and upper threshold to stratify postmenopausal women according to their bone resistance to loads.

Short-Term Precision Error of Bone Strain Index, a New DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Software for Assessing Hip Strength.

Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new finite element analysis tool applied to hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term precision error of BSI on the proximal femur, both on a phantom and patients. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines were followed for short-term precision error assessment. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements were performed on an anthropomorphic femur phantom that was scanned twice for 30 times, for a total of 60 scans. For the in vivo part, 30 subjects were scanned twice. BSI precision error was compared to that of bone mineral density (BMD). Both for the phantom and the in vivo study BSI reproducibility was lower compared to that of BMD, as the precision error of BSI resulted 3 times higher compared to that BMD. For phantom measurements, the highest precision value was that of total femur (TF) BMD (coefficient of variation [CoV] = 0.63%, reproducibility = 98.24%), while the lowest precision was the femoral neck (FN) BSI (CoV = 3.08%, reproducibility = 91.48%). Similarly, for the in vivo study, the highest precision was found at TF BMD (CoV = 1.36%, reproducibility = 96.22%), while the lowest value of precision was found for FN BSI (CoV = 4.17%, reproducibility = 88.46%). Reproducibility at TF was always better compared to that of the FN. BSI precision error was about 3 times higher compared to BMD, confirming previous results of lumbar spine BSI. The main source of variability of this new software is related to patient positioning.

Usefulness of Dual X-ray Absorptiometry-Derived Bone Geometry and Structural Indexes in Mastocytosis.

Reduced bone mass with or without fragility fractures is a common feature of mastocytosis, particularly in adult males. However, bone mineral density does not account for all the fragility fractures, being a part of them attributable to impairment in bone quality. Aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of DXA-derived geometry and structural indexes in the assessment of bone status in mastocytosis. Ninety-six consecutive patients (46 women and 50 men) affected by cutaneous (CM) or systemic (SM) mastocytosis were studied. Mean age (± SD) was 53.3 ± 14.23. Spine lateral X-rays for Genant's scale, DXA for lumbar (L) and femoral (F) bone mineral density (BMD), bone strain index (BSI), lumbar trabecular bone score (TBS), and hip structural analysis (HSA) were performed. Among the laboratory variables, data of serum tryptase were reported. Tryptase was higher in SM (p = 0.035), inversely correlated with LBMD (r = - 0.232; p = 0.022) and TBS (r = - 0.280; p = 0.005), and directly with L-BSI (r = 0.276; p = 0.006). L-BSI remained statistically significant (p = 0.006; adjusted R2 = 0.101) together with mastocytosis (SM or CM: p = 0.034) in the multivariate regression model with tryptase as dependent variable, being LBMD and TBS not statistically significant (p = 0.887, and p = 0.245, respectively). Tryptase increased about 22 units for each unit increase of L-BSI and about 18 units for SM against CM. L-BSI was lower (p = 0.012), while FN-BSI and FT-BSI were higher in women (p < 0.001) than in men. HSA indexes were significantly higher in men, particularly with SM. SM is a risk factor for reduced bone mass, texture and strength. Since mean L-BSI and Z-modulus of all the femoral sites are statistically higher in men than in female, it could be argued that men have a better femoral bone resistance to bending forces than women, but a worse lumbar bone resistance to compressive loads. DXA indexes of bone quality are useful in mastocytosis' bone assessment and its clinical management.

Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: Bone strain index (BSI) is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived index of bone strength obtained from lumbar densitometric scan. We estimated the reproducibility of BSI in healthy women with different body mass index. METHODS: We enrolled postmenopausal women (mean age ± SD: 66 ± 10 years) divided into three groups (A, B and C) according to body mass index (BMI: < 25; 25-29.9; ≥ 30 kg/m2) and two groups (D and E) according to waist circumference (WC: ≤ 88; > 88 cm), each of 30 subjects. They underwent two DXA examinations with in-between repositioning, according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines for precision estimation. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI were expressed as g/cm2 and absolute value, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between root-mean-square standard deviation and mean; least significant change percentage (LSC%) as 2.77 × CoV; reproducibility as the complement to 100% LSC. RESULTS: BSI increased proportionally to BMI and WC and significantly in group C compared to B and A (p = 0.032 and 0.006, respectively). BSI was significantly higher in E compared to D (p = 0.017), whereas no differences were observed in BMD. Although BSI reproducibility was slightly lower in group C (89%), the differences were not significant between all groups. BMD reproducibility did not significantly differ between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: BSI reproducibility was significantly lower than that of BMD and decreased proportionally to BMI and WC increase. This reduction of BSI reproducibility was more pronounced in patients with BMI ≥ 30 and WC > 88, as expected, being BSI a parameter sensible to weight.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) and Bone Metabolism in Patients Affected with Type 1 Neurofibromatosis (NF1).

In patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and low levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 (25OHD) have been reported. Recently, the trabecular bone score (TBS) measurement has been proposed as index of bone microarchitecture and fracture risk. In 74 NF1 patients (48 females, 26 males, age 41 ± 12), we measured TBS and investigated clinical stage, lifestyle, vitamin D, serum bone turnover markers, vertebral and femoral BMD. A homogenous cohort of 61 healthy subjects was used as control group. TBS was lower in NF1 patients (1.266 ± 0.113 vs. 1.346 ± 0.105) without differences between sexes. No correlations with 25OHD, low exercise, low calcium intake, reduced sun exposure, and number of skin neurofibromas were observed. As expected, hypovitaminosis D was common (98.6%), as well as BMD reduction in hip and spine sites: In NF1 patients, bone texture evaluated by TBS was low in both sexes without any correlation with clinical or metabolic parameters, suggesting a direct role of the fibromin mutation.

A case report of systemic mastocytosis associated with multiple hematologic non-mast cell lineage diseases.

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by extracutaneous infiltration by atypical mast cells. Together with indolent SM, aggressive SM, and mast cell leukemia, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes another major disease subgroup: SM with an associated hematological neoplasm, which is characterized by the presence of a concurrent neoplasm, more commonly, a chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. While KIT D816V is commonly regarded as the driver mutation, the clinical presentation of SM is extremely varied. Treatment of SM might not be simple, but now more specific therapies tailored toward prognostic subgroups of patients have been developed. Here, we report a detailed description of clinical management and biological features of a systemic mastocytocis case associated with multiple hematologic non-mast cell lineage diseases.

Fat Mass Does Not Increase the Precision Error of Trabecular Bone Score Measurements.

INTRODUCTION: Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an indirect index of trabecular microarchitecture derived from lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Previous phantom study showed that an increase in soft tissue thickness does not affect TBS reproducibility. We investigated the effect of increasing body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference on TBS precision error on patients, compared to bone mineral density (BMD). METHODOLOGY: A population of postmenopausal Caucasian women was distributed in 3 different BMI (normal, overweight, and class I obesity), plus 2 further groups based on waist circumference diameter (≤88 cm and >88 cm, respectively). In vivo precision error was calculated on 30 consecutive subjects that were scanned 2 times, with patient repositioning, using the Hologic QDR-Discovery W densitometer. Coefficient of variation, percent least significant change, and reproducibility were calculated according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines. RESULTS: Ninety-five women aged 66 ± 10 (mean ± standard deviation) were included. No significant differences were found both for BMD and TBS precision errors, respectively, when comparing BMI groups and waist circumference groups. BMD reproducibility ranged from 95.9% (BMI > 30 kg/m2) to 97.5% (BMI < 25 kg/m2). TBS reproducibility ranged between 95.8% (BMI = 25-29.9 kg/m2, waist circumference > 88 cm) and 96.6% (BMI < 25 kg/m2). With the exception of obese group, a significant difference was found between BMD and TBS reproducibility, being that of TBS slightly lower than BMD. A significant decrease of TBS values was found between normal and obese subjects, as well as between waist circumference groups. CONCLUSIONS: TBS precision error is not affected by BMI and waist circumference differences. TBS reproducibility showed to be slightly lower than that of BMD, but this difference was mitigated in obese patients. A negative association was found between the amount of fat mass and TBS mean values.

Usefulness of bone microarchitectural and geometric DXA-derived parameters in haemophilic patients.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia is a recessive X-linked inherited bleeding disorder, whose typical symptom is spontaneous intra-articular haemorrhage leading to joint damage, which can be quantified by the Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Arthropathy and other characteristics of haemophilic patients may reduce bone mineral density (BMD), increasing the risk for fragility fractures, which also may occur due to bone quality impairment. AIM: To evaluate bone quantity by BMD and bone quality by Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), bone strain (BS) and hip structural analysis (HSA) in a haemophilic population, and to relate these parameters to general and specific risk factors for osteoporosis and to HJHS. METHODS: Seventy haemophilic patients ≥18 years were enrolled. Densitometric derived lumbar spine and femoral BMD with TBS, BS and HSA were performed. Data regarding risk factors for osteoporosis, presence of arthroprosthesis or arthrodesis were collected, and HJHS was calculated. A Z-score ≤-2.0 defined a low bone mass. RESULTS: Overall, a reduced bone mass was present in 52 patients at the femur and in 38 at the lumbar spine. Lumbar spine BMD, TBS and BS did not correlate with HJHS. HSA bone geometric parameters correlated negatively with HJHS. BMD and HSA correlated with some risk factors for osteoporosis, namely HIV and its therapy, hepatitis C and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Haemophilic patients showed a reduced BMD at lumbar spine and/or femur. Femoral bone density and geometry correlated with HJHS. The microarchitecture of the trabecular vertebral bone seemed to be not influenced by the haemophilic joint damage.

Comparison of trabecular bone score and hip structural analysis with FRAX® in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PURPOSE: To evaluate (a) the performance in predicting the presence of bone fractures of trabecular bone score (TBS) and hip structural analysis (HSA) in type 2 diabetic postmenopausal women compared to a control group and (b) the fracture prediction ability of TBS versus Fracture Risk Calculator (FRAX®) as well as whether TBS can improve the fracture prediction ability of FRAX® in diabetic women. METHODS: Eighty diabetic postmenopausal women were matched with 88 controls without major diseases for age and body mass index. The individual 10-year fracture risk was assessed by FRAX® tool for Europe-Italy; bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip was evaluated through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; TBS measurements were taken using the same region of interest as the BMD measurements; HSA was performed at proximal femur with the HSA software. RESULTS: Regarding variables of interest, the only significant difference between diabetic and control groups was observed for the value of TBS (median value: 1.215; IQR 1.138-1.285 in controls vs. 1.173; IQR 1.082-1.217 in diabetic; p = 0.002). The prevalence of fractures in diabetic women was almost tripled than in controls (13.8 vs. 3.4 %; p = 0.02). The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that TBS alone (AUC = 0.71) had no significantly lower discriminative power for fracture prediction in diabetic women than FRAX major adjusted for TBS (AUC = 0.74; p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: In diabetic postmenopausal women TBS is an excellent tool in identifying fragility fractures.

Adult Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice: How I Report it.

Several imaging methods for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis exist. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely available and commonly used for measuring bone mineral density (BMD). Central DXA has several advantages: It has very good reproducibility, administers a negligible radiation dose to the patient, and BMD values obtained by DXA relate to fracture risk. Nevertheless, DXA has some technical limitations that should be recognized by those physicians who interpret and report this examination. We provide recommendations for optimal DXA scan reporting in adults, including indications, skeletal sites to be measured, serial BMD measurements, and fracture risk assessment. In conclusion, DXA is the standard of reference in evaluating BMD and is effective in following up patients over time. Adequate reporting and analysis of previous DXA examinations is crucial to manage patients correctly.

Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

OBJECTIVES: Pitfalls in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are common. Our aim was to assess rate and type of errors in DXA examinations/reports, evaluating a consecutive series of DXA images of patients examined elsewhere and later presenting to our institution for a follow-up DXA. METHODS: After ethics committee approval, a radiologist retrospectively reviewed all DXA images provided by patients presenting at our institution for a new DXA. Errors were categorized as patient positioning (PP), data analysis (DA), artefacts and/or demographics. RESULTS: Of 2,476 patients, 1,198 had no previous DXA, while 793 had a previous DXA performed in our institution. The remaining 485 (20 %) patients entered the study (38 men and 447 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 68 ± 9 years). Previous DXA examinations were performed at a total of 37 centres. Of 485 reports, 451 (93 %) had at least one error out of a total of 558 errors distributed as follows: 441 (79 %) were DA, 66 (12 %) PP, 39 (7 %) artefacts and 12 (2 %) demographics. CONCLUSIONS: About 20 % of patients did not undergo DXA at the same institution as previously. More than 90 % of DXA presented at least one error, mainly of DA. International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines are very poorly adopted. KEY POINTS: • More than 90 % of DXA examinations/reports presented one or more errors. • About 80 % of errors are related to image data analysis. • Errors in DXA examinations may have potential implications for patients' management.

Short-term precision assessment of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with different scan modes: an in vivo study.

OBJECTIVES: We estimated the in vivo reproducibility of trabecular bone score (TBS) from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using different imaging modes to be compared to that of bone mineral density (BMD). METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients for each imaging mode: fast-array, array, high definition. Each patient underwent two DXA examinations with in-between repositioning. BMD and TBS were obtained according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between root mean square standard deviation and mean, percent least significant change (LSC) as 2.77 × CoV, reproducibility as the complement to 100% LSC. RESULTS: Fast-array imaging mode resulted in 0.8% CoV and 2.1% LSC for BMD, 1.9% and 5.3% for TBS, respectively; array imaging mode resulted in 0.7% and 2.0% for BMD, 1.9% and 5.2%, for TBS; high-definition imaging mode resulted in 0.7% and 2.0%, for BMD; 2.0% and 5.4% for TBS, respectively. Reproducibility of TBS (95%) was significantly lower than that of BMD (98%) (p < 0.012). Difference in reproducibility among the imaging modes was not significant for either BMD or TBS (p = 0.942). CONCLUSION: While TBS reproducibility was significantly lower than that of BMD, differences among imaging modes were not significant for both TBS and BMD. KEY POINTS: • TBS is an emerging tool for assessing BMD. • TBS reproducibility is lower than that of BMD. • Differences between imaging modes are not significant for either TBS or BMD.

A new diagnostic score to detect osteoporosis in patients undergoing lumbar spine MRI.

OBJECTIVES: Signal intensity of lumbar-spine at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates to bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to define a quantitative MRI-based score to detect osteoporosis on lumbar-spine MRI. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, we selected female patients who underwent both lumbar-spine MRI and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and a reference group of 131 healthy females (20-29 years) who underwent lumbar-spine MRI. We measured the intra-vertebral signal-to-noise ratio in L1-L4. We introduced an MRI-based score (M-score), on the model of T-score. M-score diagnostic performance in diagnosing osteoporosis was estimated against DXA using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: We included 226 patients (median age 65 years), 70 (31%) being osteoporotic at DXA. MRI signal-to-noise ratio correlated to BMD (r = -0.677, P < 0.001). M-score negatively correlated to T-score (r = -0.682, P < 0.001). Setting a 90%-specificity, an M-score threshold of 5.5 was found, distinguishing osteoporosis from non-osteoporosis (sensitivity 54%; ROC AUC 0.844). Thirty-one (14%) patients had a fragility fracture, with osteoporosis detected in 15 (48%) according to M-score and eight (26%) according to T-score (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: M-score obtained on lumbar spine MRI is a quantitative method correlating with osteoporosis. Its diagnostic value remains to be demonstrated on a large prospective cohort of patients. KEY POINTS: • M-score is a quantitative score potentially screening osteoporosis on lumbar-spine MRI; • This method showed good intra- and inter-reader reproducibility; • M-score may be used for identifying patients who should undergo DXA.

Use of vitamin D with anti-osteoporotic drugs: are available clinical trials telling us the whole story?

There is a strong rationale for using vitamin D in combination with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Still, available trials do not give clear indications in this setting, presenting a suboptimal and heavily inhomogeneous experimental design. Health authorities should revise requirements for using vitamin D in anti-osteoporotic drug trials to maximise their effect and produce reliable indications for clinical practice in this setting.

Usefulness of DXA-based bone strain index in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based index. We retrospectively evaluated data from 153 postmenopausal women with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Lumbar spine and femoral Bone Strain Index (BSI) were sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM. PURPOSE: Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based measurement. We evaluated the performance of BSI in predicting the presence of fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) postmenopausal women. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from a case-control study of 153 postmenopausal women with a history of at least 5 years of T2DM (age from 40 to 90 years). For each subject, we assessed the personal or familiar history of previous fragility fractures and menopause age, and we collected data about bone mineral density (BMD), BSI, and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) measurements. Statistical analysis was performed having as outcome the history of fragility fractures. RESULTS: Out of a total of 153 subjects, n = 22 (14.4%) presented at least one major fragility fracture. A negative correlation was found between lumbar BSI and lumbar BMD (r = - 0.49, p < 0.001) and between total femur BSI and total femur BMD (r = - 0.49, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was found between femoral neck BSI and femoral neck BMD (r = - 0.22, p < 0.001). Most DXA-based variables were individually able to discriminate between fractured and non-fractured subjects (p < 0.05), and lumbar BSI was the index with the most relative difference between the two populations, followed by femoral BSI. CONCLUSION: Lumbar spine and femoral BSI are sensitive to skeletal impairment in postmenopausal women suffering from T2DM. The use of BSI in conjunction with BMD and TBS can improve fracture risk assessment.

Generation and Validation of Normative, Age-Specific Reference Curves for Bone Strain Index in Women.

Bone Strain Index (BSI), based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is a densitometric index of bone strength of the femur and lumbar spine. Higher BSI values indicate a higher strain applied to bone, predisposing to higher fracture risk. This retrospective, multicentric study on Italian women reports the BSI normative age-specific reference curves. A cohort of Caucasian Italian women aged 20 to 90 years was selected from three different clinical centres. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI measurements were obtained for the lumbar spine vertebrae (L1-L4) and for the femur (neck, trochanter and intertrochanter) using Hologic densitometers scans. The data were compared with BMD normative values provided by the densitometer manufacturer. Then, the age-specific BSI curve for the femur and lumbar spine was generated. No significant difference was found between the BMD of the subjects in this study and BMD reference data provided by Hologic (p = 0.68 for femur and p = 0.90 for lumbar spine). Spine BSI values (L1-L4) increase by 84% between 20 and 90 years of age. The mean BSI of the total femur increases about 38% in the same age range. The BSI age-specific reference curve could help clinicians improve osteoporosis patient management, allowing an appropriate patient classification according to the bone resistance to the applied loads and fragility fracture risk assessment.