RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of the first 24 months of a postprescription review with feedback-based antimicrobial stewardship program in a European referral children's hospital. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pre-post study comparing antimicrobial use between the control (2015-2016) and the intervention periods (2017-2018) expressed in days of therapy/100 days present. Quality of prescriptions was evaluated by quarterly cross-sectional point-prevalence surveys. Length of stay, readmission rates, in-hospital mortality rates, cost of systemic antimicrobial agents, and antimicrobial resistance rates were included as complementary outcomes. RESULTS: Total antimicrobial use and antibacterial use significantly decreased during the intervention period (P = .002 and P = .001 respectively), and total antifungal use remained stable. A significant decline in parenteral antimicrobial use was also observed (P < .001). In 8 quarterly point-prevalence surveys (938 prescriptions evaluated), the mean prevalence of use of any antimicrobial among inpatients was 39%. An increasing trend in the rate of optimal prescriptions was observed after the first point-prevalence survey (P = .0898). Nonoptimal prescriptions were more common in surgical than in medical departments, in antibacterial prescriptions with prophylactic intention, and in empirical more than in targeted treatments. No significant differences were observed in terms of mortality or readmission rates. Only minor changes in antimicrobial resistance rates were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our antimicrobial stewardship program safely decreased antimicrobial use and expenditure, and a trend toward improvement in quality of prescription was also observed.
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , EspañaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The routine use of a single aerobic bottle for blood culture in pediatric patients has become commonplace, as anaerobic bacteria are not frequently involved in clinically significant infections. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of routinely performing anaerobic blood cultures in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on pediatric (<18 years) patients affected with febrile syndrome after receiving chemotherapy for hematological or solid malignancies. Samples were inoculated into pediatric aerobic and standard anaerobic bottles (BacT/Alert automatic system). Strains were considered clinically significant, or deemed as contaminants, depending on isolation circumstances and clinical criteria. RESULTS: A total of 876 blood cultures from 228 patients were processed during the 21-month study period (January 2014 to September 2015). Baseline diagnosis included 143 solid tumors and 67/18 cases of leukemia/lymphoma. Bacterial growth was detected in 90 (10.2%) blood cultures for 95 different isolates, of which 62 (7.1%)/63 isolates were considered clinically significant. Among the latter, 38 (60.3%) microorganisms grew in both aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 18 (28.6%) only in aerobic bottles, and 7 (11.1%) only in anaerobic bottles. Gram-negative bacilli (33; 52.4%), mainly from the Enterobacteriaceae family, were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. Overall, only 3 out of 90 isolates (3.3%) were strict anaerobes (Propionibacterium acnes), and all of them were deemed contaminants. CONCLUSION: Strict anaerobes did not cause significant infections in febrile pediatric oncology patients, and anaerobic blood culture bottles offered no additional advantages over aerobic media. Our results suggest that routine blood cultures should be solely processed in aerobic media in this group of patients.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias Anaerobias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Cultivo de Sangre , Neoplasias/microbiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Around 12-20% of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) require critical care. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the second cause of nosocomial infection in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). As far as we know, there are no studies comparing both types of pneumonia in children, thus it remains unclear if there are differences between them in terms of severity and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare clinical and microbiological characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe CAP and VAP. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study, including patients diagnosed of VAP and CAP, with a positive respiratory culture and under mechanical ventilation, admitted to the PICU from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: 238 patients were included; 163 (68.4%) with CAP, and 75 (31.5%) with VAP. Patients with VAP needed longer mechanical ventilation (14 vs. 7 days, p<0.001) and more inotropic support (49.3 vs. 30.7%, p = 0.006). Patients with VAP had higher mortality (12 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.005). Enterobacterales were more involved with VAP than with CAP (48 vs. 9%, p<0.001). Taking into account only the non-drug sensitive microorganisms, patients with VAP tended to have more multidrug-resistant bacteria (30 vs. 10.8%, p = 0.141) than patients with CAP. CONCLUSION: Patients with VAP had worse prognosis than patients with CAP, needing longer mechanical ventilation, more inotropic support and had higher mortality. Patients with VAP were mainly infected by Enterobacterales and had more multidrug resistant microorganisms than patients with CAP.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía Bacteriana , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Niño , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/terapia , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/terapia , Pronóstico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in reducing antimicrobial use (AU) in children has been proved. Many interventions have been described suitable for different institution sizes, priorities, and patients, with surgical wards being one of the areas that may benefit the most. We aimed to describe the results on AU and length of stay (LOS) in a pre-post study during the three years before (2014-2016) and the three years after (2017-2019) implementation of an ASP based on postprescription review with feedback in children and adolescents admitted for appendix-related intraabdominal infections (AR-IAI) in a European Referral Paediatric University Hospital. In the postintervention period, the quality of prescriptions (QP) was also evaluated. Overall, 2021 AR-IAIs admissions were included. Global AU, measured both as days of therapy/100 patient days (DOT/100PD) and length of therapy (LOT), and global LOS remained unchanged in the postintervention period. Phlegmonous appendicitis LOS (p = 0.003) and LOT (p < 0.001) significantly decreased, but not those of other AR-IAI diagnoses. The use of piperacillin-tazobactam decreased by 96% (p = 0.044), with no rebound in the use of other Gram-negative broad-spectrum antimicrobials. A quasisignificant (p = 0.052) increase in QP was observed upon ASP implementation. Readmission and case fatality rates remained stable. ASP interventions were safe, and they reduced LOS and LOT of phlegmonous appendicitis and the use of selected broad-spectrum antimicrobials, while increasing QP in children with AR-IAI.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The routine use of a single aerobic bottle for blood culture in pediatric patients has become commonplace, as anaerobic bacteria are not frequently involved in clinically significant infections. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of routinely performing anaerobic blood cultures in pediatric oncology patients. METHODS: Prospective study was conducted on pediatric (<18 years) patients affected with febrile syndrome after receiving chemotherapy for hematological or solid malignancies. Samples were inoculated into pediatric aerobic and standard anaerobic bottles (BacT/Alert automatic system). Strains were considered clinically significant, or deemed as contaminants, depending on isolation circumstances and clinical criteria. RESULTS: A total of 876 blood cultures from 228 patients were processed during the 21-month study period (January 2014 to September 2015). Baseline diagnosis included 143 solid tumors and 67/18 cases of leukemia/lymphoma. Bacterial growth was detected in 90 (10.2%) blood cultures for 95 different isolates, of which 62 (7.1%)/63 isolates were considered clinically significant. Among the latter, 38 (60.3%) microorganisms grew in both aerobic and anaerobic bottles, 18 (28.6%) only in aerobic bottles, and 7 (11.1%) only in anaerobic bottles. Gram-negative bacilli (33; 52.4%), mainly from the Enterobacteriaceae family, were the most frequently isolated microorganisms. Overall, only 3 out of 90 isolates (3.3%) were strict anaerobes (Propionibacterium acnes), and all of them were deemed contaminants. CONCLUSION: Strict anaerobes did not cause significant infections in febrile pediatric oncology patients, and anaerobic blood culture bottles offered no additional advantages over aerobic media. Our results suggest that routine blood cultures should be solely processed in aerobic media in this group of patients
INTRODUCCIÓN: En pacientes pediátricos es habitual el procesamiento de hemocultivos únicamente en medio aerobio, debido a la escasa relevancia de los microorganismos anaerobios en la etiología infecciosa habitual. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar la utilidad del uso rutinario del medio de cultivo anaerobio en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo en pacientes pediátricos (<18años) en tratamiento quimioterápico de procesos oncológicos con síndrome febril. Las muestras se inocularon en botellas aerobias pediátricas y anaerobias estándar (sistema automático BacT/Alert). Las cepas aisladas fueron consideradas clínicamente significativas o contaminantes en función de las circunstancias de aislamiento y la clínica del paciente. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio (enero 2015-septiembre 2016) se procesaron 876 hemocultivos procedentes de 228 pacientes diagnosticados de tumores sólidos (143) y leucemia/linfoma (67/18). Se detectó crecimiento en 90 (10,2%) hemocultivos y se aislaron 95 cepas, de los cuales 62 (7,1%), correspondientes a 63 cepas, se consideraron clínicamente significativos. Entre estos últimos, 38 (60,3%) microorganismos crecieron en ambas botellas, 18 (28,6%) únicamente en aerobiosis y 7 (11,1%) únicamente en anaerobiosis. Bacilos gram negativos (33; 52,4%), mayoritariamente enterobacterias, fueron los más frecuentemente aislados. Solo 3 (3,3%) de los microorganismos aislados eran anaerobios estrictos (Propionibacterium acnes), y todos ellos fueron considerados contaminantes. CONCLUSIÓN: Microorganismos anaerobios están raramente involucrados en infecciones en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos, y la utilización de botellas anaerobias no ofrece ninguna ventaja adicional. Según nuestros resultados es suficiente el uso de medio aerobio en el procesamiento de los hemocultivos en este tipo de pacientes