[Antibiotic therapy of hospital-acquired pneumonia and its pharmacoeconomics].

BACKGROUND: Important hospital-acquired infections include pneumonia, mainly because of the increasing resistance of bacterial pathogens to antimicrobials and the associated potential failure of antibiotic therapy. The present study aimed at determining the most frequent etiological agents of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and assessing the relationship between 30-day mortality and adequacy of antibiotic therapy. Based on the obtained information, optimal patterns of antibiotic therapy were to be defined, including a pharmacoeconomic perspective. METHODS: In patients with clinically confirmed HAP, bacterial etiological agents were identified, their susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined and statistical methods were used to assess the relationship between adequacy of antibiotic therapy and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The study comprised 68 patients with clinically confirmed HAP. The most common etiological agents were strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.8 %), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.1 %) and Burkholderia cepacia complex (15.4 %). Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 86.5 % of all bacterial pathogens. The overall mortality reached 42.5 %. In the subgroup of patients with inadequate antibiotic therapy, 30-day mortality was significantly higher (83.3 %) than in the subgroup with adequate therapy (30.0 %; p = 0.002). The risk for 30-day mortality was 2.78 times higher in case of inadequate antibiotic therapy (95%CI: 1.52-5.07). The proportion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains was significantly higher in the subgroup of patients with inadequate antibiotic therapy than in those with adequate therapy (67 % vs. 27 %; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Results of the present study suggest a significant relationship between mortality of patients with HAP and ineffective antibiotic therapy due to resistance of the bacterial pathogen. Thus, it is clear that initial antibiotic therapy must be based on qualified assumption of sufficient activity against the most common bacterial pathogens and results of surveillance of bacterial resistance in the relevant epidemiological unit. At the same time, however, it must be stressed that it is impossible to cover all potential variants of the etiological agents and their resistance phenotypes.

[Validity comparison of various biological samples from lower airway and their contribution for the detection of nosocomial pneumonia etiological agents]. / Porovnání validity ruzných vzorku biologického material z dýchacích cest a jejich prínosu v detekci puvodcu nozokomiální pneumonie.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the validity of bronchial secretion sampling and bronchoscopy-assisted protected specimen brushing (PSB) in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In patients with HAP, bronchial secretion samples (aspiration of lower airway secretions from an orotracheal tube with a suctioning catheter) and PSB (bronchoscopy-assisted sampling from the most affected area of the lung, verified by CT scan) were taken at the same time. Both samples were processed by semiquantitative routine microbiological techniques. Identification of microorganisms was performed by standard microbiological techniques using the MALDI-TOF automated system. For similarity or identity determination of bacterial isolates from bronchial secretion sampling and PSB, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was used. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled into the study. Thirty pairs of bronchial secretion samples and PSB samples were obtained and processed. The samples were positive in 23 patients (77 %) and 15 patients (50 %), respectively. In 15 cases, the same pathogen was determined in both samples, and in all those cases, the isolates were genetically identical. CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that bronchial secretion samples analysis enabled identification of all pathogens that were identified by PSB. Given the high sensitivity of the bronchial secretion aspiration technique and genetic identity of isolates in both samples, bronchial secretion sampling may be recommended for determining HAP etiological agents as the samples are much easier to obtain from patients.