Efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon ablation system: multicentre comparison of 1-year outcome.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the 1-year efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon (NCB) ablation system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with the standard cryoballoon (SCB) system (Arctic Front, Medtronic). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using the NCB and the SCB at two centres were included. We report 1-year efficacy after 12 months, short-term safety and hospitalizations within the blanking period, and predictors for AF recurrence. In case of repeat procedures, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were characterized. Eighty patients (age 66 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 57 ± 10%, left atrial volume index 39 ± 13 mL/m2, paroxysmal AF in 64%) were studied. After a single procedure and a follow-up of 12 months, 68% in the NCB group and 70% in the SCB group showed no recurrence of AF/atrial tachycardias (P = 0.422). One patient in the NCB group suffered a periprocedural stroke with full recovery. There were no differences regarding hospitalizations during follow-up between the groups. PV reconnection observed during 12 repeat procedures (4 NCB, 8 SCB) pattern was comparable between the groups with more reconnections in the right-sided compared with the left-sided PVs. CONCLUSION: In this multicentre study comparing two currently available cryoballoon ablation systems for PVI, no differences were observed in the efficacy and safety during a follow-up of 12 months.

Conventional versus 3-D Echocardiography to Predict Arrhythmia Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains high and requires repeat interventions in a substantial number of patients. We assessed the value of conventional and 3-D echocardiography to predict AF recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation by means of pulmonary vein isolation were included in a prospective registry. Echocardiograms were obtained prior to the ablation procedure, and analyzed offline in a standardized manner, including 3-D left atrial (LA) volumetry and determination of LA function and sphericity. The primary endpoint, AF recurrence (>30 seconds) between 3 to 12 months after AF ablation, was independently adjudicated. We included 276 patients (73% male, mean age 59.9 ± 9.9 years). Paroxysmal and persistent AF were present in 178 (64%) and 98 (36%) patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and indexed LA volume in 3-D (LAVI) were 52 ± 12% and 42 ± 13 mL/m2 , respectively. AF recurrence was observed in 110 (40%) patients after a single procedure. Median (interquartile range) time to AF recurrence was 123 (92; 236) days. In multivariable Cox regression models, the only predictors for AF recurrence were the minimal, maximal, and indexed 3-D LA volumes, P = 0.024, P = 0.016, and P = 0.014, respectively. Quartile specific analysis of 3-D LAVI showed an HR of 1.885 (95%CI 1.066-3.334; P for trend = 0.015) for the highest compared to the lowest quartile. CONCLUSION: Our results show the important role of LA volume for the long-term freedom from arrhythmia after AF ablation. These data also highlight the potential of 3-D echocardiography in this context and may facilitate patient selection for AF ablation.

Biomarkers to predict improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure frequently coexist. Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after catheter ablation (CA) for AF remains difficult. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of biomarkers, alone and in combination with the Antwerp score, to predict LVEF recovery after CA for AF. METHODS: Patients undergoing CA for AF with depressed LVEF (<50%) were included. Plasma levels of 13 biomarkers were measured immediately before CA. Patients were categorized into "responders" and "nonresponders" in a similar fashion to the Antwerp score performance derivation and validation cohorts. The predictive power of the biomarkers alone and combined in outcome prediction was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients with depressed LVEF were included (median age 63 years; 39-19% female; median indexed left atrial volume 42 (33-52) mL/m2; median LVEF 43 (38-46)%). At a median follow-up time of 30 (20-34) months, 161 (77%) were responders and 47 (23%) were nonresponders. Of 13 biomarkers, -4-angiopoietin 2 (ANG2), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), fibroblast growth factor 23, and myosin binding protein C3-were significantly different between responders and nonresponders (P ≤ .001) and their combination could predict the end point with an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.81) overall, 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.78) in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.98) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Only ANG2 and GDF15 remained significantly associated with LVEF recovery after adjustment for age, sex, and Antwerp score and significantly improved the accuracy of the Antwerp score predictions (P < .001). The area under the curve of the Antwerp score in the outcome prediction improved from 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83) to 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.86). CONCLUSION: A biomarker panel (ANG2 and GDF15) significantly improved the accuracy of the Antwerp score.

High-power short-duration ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation protocol using a single catheter.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly performed electrophysiological procedure. To improve healthcare utilization, we aimed to compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of a minimalistic, streamlined single catheter ablation approach using a high-power short-duration ablation index-guided protocol (HPSD) vs. a control single-catheter protocol (SP). METHODS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single transseptal puncture without a multipolar mapping catheter was performed in 91 patients. Left atrial mapping was performed with the ablation catheter, only. Pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. Procedural characteristics and success rates were compared using HPSD (n = 34) vs. a control (n = 57) ablation protocol. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Using the HPSD protocol the median procedure and RF ablation time were significantly shorter compared to the SP, 84 (IQR 76-100) vs. 118 min (IQR 104-141) and 1036 (898-1184) vs. 1949s (IQR 1693-2261), respectively, p < .001 for all. First-pass PVI was achieved using the HPSD protocol in 88% and using the SP in 87% of patients, p = 1.0. No procedural complications were observed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels were significantly higher in patients using the HPSD protocol compared to the SP. At 12 months follow-up, 87% patients remained free from AF with no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A minimalistic, HPSD ablation index-guided PVI with a single-catheter approach is very efficient, safe, and associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.