Does the freeze-all strategy improve the cumulative live birth rate and the time to become pregnant in IVF cycles?

PURPOSE: The freeze-all strategy is widely used for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) prevention. Indeed, it increases live birth rates among high responders and prevents preterm birth and small for gestational age. Why should not we extend it to all? METHODS: A retrospective and monocentric study was conducted between January 2008 and January 2018 comparing the cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) between patients having undergone FAS and a control group using fresh embryo transfer (FET) and having at least one frozen embryo available. Analyses were made for the entire cohort (population 1) and for different subgroups according to confounding factors selected by a logistic regression (population 3), and to the BELRAP (Belgian Register for Assisted Procreation) criteria (population 2). RESULTS: 2216 patients were divided into two groups: Freeze all (FA), 233 patients and control (C), 1983 patients. The CLBR was 50.2% vs 58.1% P = 0.021 for population 1 and 53.2% vs 63.3% P = 0.023 for population 2, including 124 cases and 1241 controls. The CLBR stayed in favour of the C group: 70.1% vs 55.9% P = 0.03 even when confounding variables were excluded (FA and C group, respectively, 109 and 770 patients). The median time to become pregnant was equally in favour of the C group with a median of 5 days against 61 days. CONCLUSION: CLBR is significantly lower in the FA group compared to the C group with a longer time to become pregnant. Nevertheless, the CLBR in the FA group remains superior to that observed in previous studies.

[La ménopause et le traitement hormonal de la ménopause : une actualisation]. / Menopause and menopause hormonal treatment : an update.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is mainly used for the relief of menopausal symptoms. It can also be prescribed for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, but nowadays, other medications are given to older patients for this indication. Current, available data, demonstrates that MHT is beneficial as well as safe for postmenopausal, symptomatic women. Modern regimens of MHT comprise lower dosages of estrogens than in the past, either safer progestins or SERMs. These regimens should be the preferred option for women with a uterus. Non-androgenic progestin may present reduced thrombotic and breast cancer risks, and transdermal oestrogen could have a reduced thrombotic risk. Oestrogen-only therapy is the preferred option for women who underwent a hysterectomy. Vaginal oestrogen therapy is indicated for women with atrophic vaginitis and recurrent urinary tract infections.

Le traitement des symptômes vasomoteurs constitue l'indication principale du traitement hormonal de la ménopause (THM). La seconde indication est le traitement de l'ostéoporose après la ménopause. Toutefois, d'autres produits sont utilisés pour traiter des femmes plus âgées à cette même fin. La balance bénéfice-risque est en faveur du THM pour les femmes postménopausées et symptomatiques, mais les doses d'oestrogène ont été réduites dans les schémas de traitement actualisés. Par ailleurs, ces schémas préconisent l'utilisation soit de progestatifs moins androgéniques et ayant une moindre innocuité que les progestatifs anciens, soit des SERMs. Ces schémas constituent les premiers choix de traitement pour les femmes non-hystérectomisées. Les progestatifs nonandrogéniques sont associés à un risque diminué de thrombose veineuse et de cancer du sein alors que les oestrogènes par voie transdermique présentent un moindre risque de thrombose veineuse. Chez les femmes qui n'ont plus d'utérus, il convient de prescrire des oestrogènes sans progestatifs. Le traitement local par voie vaginale à base d'oestrogènes est indiqué chez les femmes souffrant de vaginite atrophique, entrainant des difficultés sexuelles ou des infections urinaires récidivantes.

Should we abstain from treating women with endometriosis using menopausal hormone therapy, for fear of an increased ovarian cancer risk?

Women suffering from endometriosis often have an early menopause, resulting in severe menopausal symptoms and an increased risk of osteoporosis. They are therefore candidates for menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Unfortunately, MHT may increase the risk of endometriosis recurrence. Moreover, endometriosis patients are at increased risk of ovarian cancer, which may be further enhanced by MHT use. It is unknown, however, whether MHT more frequently increases type I (low-grade serous tumors), which seem to be increased when endometriosis is present, or type II (the more aggressive high-grade serous) tumors. We propose the following decision-making algorithm for endometriosis patients considering MHT. Those who have been treated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and in whom there is no residual endometriotic disease, can probably be treated using MHT without risk of endometriosis recurrence or fear of ovarian cancer. For women with significant, residual endometriosis lesions, the benefit may outweigh the risks, when menopause is reached before the age of 45 years or when severe symptoms are present.

[Menopausal hormone treatment in 2011]. / Réactualisation du traitement hormonal a la ménopause en 2011.

In this review article an update of the menopause hormone therapy is presented (MHT). MHT is the most efficient therapy for climacteric symptoms. It prevents also osteoporosis. Nevertheless, since prolonged use is associated with increased health risks, other therapies, combined with calcium and vitamin D, are preferred for women who suffer from osteoporosis without climacteric symptoms. Increased breast cancer risk has been reported, after 5 years of use, in women treated with a fixed combined regimen of oestrogen and progestin (0,625 mg conjugated estrogens (CEE) + 5 mg de medroxyprogesteron acetate (MPA) (WHI-EP), while a reduced risk has been reported in women using oestrogen only (0,625 mg conjugated estrogens) (WHI-E). In women without risk factors, the attributable risk of suffering from a stroke or thromboembolism, following using MHT, is slow in women younger than 60 years of age. While, MHT (WHI-EP), was associated with an increased risk of coronary disease, in women who started their treatment around the age of 67 years, oestrogen only treatment (WHI-E), has been associated with a reduced coronary risk in women who initiated the therapy at a younger age (between 50-60 years), suggesting that the risks vary in relation to the used regimen and the treated population.

A survey among breast cancer survivors: treatment of the climacteric after breast cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and type of menopausal treatments used by breast cancer survivors. To assess factors that impaired the quality of life of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire assessing quality of life was sent to 325 breast cancer patients. A 66% valid response rate was obtained. Among these responses, 169 women were postmenopausal. The following results concern these patients only. RESULTS: Forty-five women were using some treatment to alleviate certain menopausal symptoms (26.6%). More than half of the patients used no therapy to alleviate menopausal symptoms, either because they had no symptoms (n = 43; 25.4%), they feared breast cancer recurrence (n = 24; 14.2%), they were advised not to use a treatment (n = 27; 16%), it had been shown to be inefficient (n = 5; 3%), or because of contraindication (n = 3; 1.8%). In this survey, 62.3% of postmenopausal women affected by breast cancer suffered from hot flushes (n = 94), of which half were severe (n = 46). Among women suffering from hot flushes, a third used various products to alleviate their symptoms (n = 30). Younger women suffered more often from vasomotor symptoms than did older women (p < 0.000). Current users of aromatase inhibitors suffered more from sexual disorders than did non-users (p < 0.001). They had more often an unsatisfactory sexual life (p < 0.01), more vaginal dryness (p = 0.01) and a decreased libido (p < 0.02) compared to non-users. CONCLUSION: More than 50% of postmenopausal women suffered from climacteric symptoms such as hot flushes, but few were taking a treatment to alleviate these symptoms.

Desire for a child and breast cancer.

About 10% of breast cancers occur in women who are younger than 40 years of age. For many of them, the breast cancer diagnosis will occur when they are still planning pregnancy. Most breast cancers are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease, i.e. stage I or II, which is associated with a high survival rate (5 years-survival ranging between 97% and 79% respectively) (1). Many of these patients will use adjuvant endocrine therapy. This treatment has no direct impact on their fertility, but postpones a possible pregnancy, since pregnancy is contra-indicated during Tamoxifen treatment. On the other hand, chemotherapy increases the risk of premature ovarian failure, of early menopause, and of definitive sterility. This may result in an increased risk of depression and impaired quality of life. Furthermore, those women who remain fertile will often be advised to avoid pregnancy in the near future, in order to ensure the absence of breast cancer recurrence. Nevertheless, fertility decreases with age. Possible strategies, which permit optimal treatment of breast cancer and maintain the possibility of pregnancy, should be systematically discussed with the patient as soon as possible during treatment planning (2). Gynecologists and surgeons should encourage such patients to participate in multi-center studies evaluating strategies to preserve their fertility. Life continues after cancer; the prospect of pregnancy and child birth are part of a positive project.

Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients.

BACKGROUND: Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic attempts to provide technological solutions to the inherent limitations of traditional laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to report the first experience of two teams concerning telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and malignant pathologies. METHODS: This study included 14 patients at the University Hospital Saint Pierre of Brussels (Belgium) and 16 patients at the Cancer Center of Nancy (France) from September 1999 to July 2003. RESULTS: The indications for surgery were uterine malignant diseases in 12 cases (stade I) (41%), and benign pathologies of the uterus in 18 cases (59%). Five postoperative complications (17%) occurred, none related to the robotic system. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery can be safely performed in gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic surgery with no increase in complication rates. A significant advance is represented by the surgeon's ergonomic improvement.

Fertility-sparing management of gynecological cancers.

Fifteen to 21% of women diagnosed with genital tract tumors are younger than 40. Adequate counseling of these patients must be conducted to decide whether fertility-sparing treatment is allowed and what would be the oncological, fertility and obstetrical outcomes. We performed a comprehensive PubMed literature search using the terms "Uterine Cervical Neoplasms"[Mesh], "Trachelectomy", "Endometrial Neoplasms"[Mesh], "Ovarian Neoplasms"[Mesh] and "Fertility"[Mesh]. The following review reports available evidence for the conservative management of cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer. Data regarding the selection of patients, surgical techniques, obstetrical issues and cancer prognosis are summarized. The level of evidence is low in most of the available reports. The therapeutic options presented in this paper should not therefore be considered as a standard of care. Nevertheless, fertility-sparing treatments of gynecological malignancies should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team and suggested to eligible patients who are younger than 40 and wish to become pregnant further.

Factors influencing the prescription of hormone replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of age, bone mineral density, risk of cardiovascular disease, and of breast cancer on the prevalence of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prescriptions. METHODS: Seventeen charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. For each chart, we constructed 36 different cases by modifying the age (two levels), the bone mineral density (three levels), the cardiovascular risk (three levels), and the breast cancer risk (two levels). Twelve cases of these 612 files were sent to each Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). RESULTS: Overall, HRT was prescribed in 67% of the cases. It was prescribed in 54.6% of women who had a normal bone mass, 67.9% of women with a low bone mass, and 79.0% of those with osteoporosis (P < .001). The prescription rate was higher in younger women (mean +/- standard deviation 55 +/- 4 years) than in their peers who were 10 years older (79.3% versus 55.2%; p < .001). No significant variation was observed in relation to the cardiovascular risk profile or to breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis is associated with an increased rate and older age with a decreased rate of HRT prescription, whereas no difference is observed in association with cardiovascular or breast cancer risk.

Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis using a remote-controlled robot. DESIGN: Descriptive case study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Eight patients with previous laparoscopic tubal sterilization who requested tubal reanastomosis. INTERVENTION(S): Systematization of the operative steps for laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis using a remote-controlled robot. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures were feasibility and reproducibility; secondary measures were tubal patency, operative time, complications, and ergonomic qualities. RESULT(S): The 16 tubes were successfully reanastomosed and patency was confirmed. The mean time that the robotic system was in use was 140 minutes, and mean surgical time was 52 minutes per tube. CONCLUSION(S): Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis after tubal sterilization can be performed using a remote-controlled robotic system. The robot, which has three-dimensional vision, allows the surgeon to perform ultraprecise manipulations with intraabdominal articulated instruments while providing the necessary degrees of freedom. Systematization of the operative steps allowed performance of the operation at a speed that compares favorably with the time needed for open microsurgical techniques. Larger series are needed to assess postoperative pregnancy rates.

Educating patients about the benefits and drawbacks of hormone replacement therapy.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) influences many aspects of health: climacteric symptoms, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, breast and endometrial cancer, thrombosis and emboli, and Alzheimer's disease. A decision to use HRT may depend on a woman's individual views of the menopausal transition, the postmenopause and its consequences. It is therefore useful that the health provider inquiries about and discusses these issues in a cultural and family context. Health providers and patients should be thoroughly informed about the symptoms associated with hormonal deprivation, the associated risks of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, and the potential of HRT to prevent these afflictions. Recent studies suggest that HRT might be particularly beneficial in women who have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (because of left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hypercholesterolaemia, or because they smoke) or osteoporosis. In women who are undecided about HRT, a low bone mineral density measurement might help convince them to start using, or to continue using, HRT. There is also a need to discuss with the patient the effect of HRT on cancer risk. In most instances, women can be reassured about the risk of endometrial cancer. The risk of breast cancer should be carefully considered and discussed with each patient before beginning HRT. In most cases, HRT should not be withheld because of fears about breast cancer, because the protective effects of HRT against cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis outweigh the possible increased risk of breast cancer. When HRT is prescribed, individual regiments should be discussed with the patient, who must be warned of the possible adverse effects. In older women, HRT can be started at half the normal dosage and tolerability assessed before increasing the dosage further.

Effect of bone density evaluation on hormone replacement therapy prescription.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates whether Bone Mineral Density (BMD) results influence HRT prescription. METHODS: Successive charts of 29 postmenopausal women were summarised. For each chart, 3 'simulated cases' were created by modifying the BMD result (based on the Z-score) in order to have 4 groups with the same clinical story but a wide range of BMD values (Group I = Z-score > 0, Group II = Z-score between 0 and -1, Group III = Z-score between -1 and -2 and Group IV = Z-score < -2). The obtained cases were presented to 10 gynaecologists who were asked whether HRT should be prescribed. The gynaecologists were not aware of the above-mentioned manipulation. RESULTS: The overall treatment rate was 74.2%, ranging from 65% for women with the highest BMD (Group I), 73% for Group II, 79% for Group III and 80% for Group IV, i.e. women with the lowest BMD (Friedman analysis of variance; chi-square 17.2; P < 0.001). In approximately a third of the patients (11/29), there was agreement for initiation of therapy, regardless of the BMD. Most of these women presented other indications and no contra-indications for therapy. The prescription frequency of the 10 gynaecologists varied between 63% and 87%; Cochran Q Statistic 39.2; P < 0.0001). For some physicians, a trend to increase prescription was observed in relation to the BMD result, but a statistical difference could only be reached for one physician (P < 0.05). Furthermore, for some physicians no modification whatsoever could be observed. CONCLUSIONS: BMD appears to be a determinant factor for HRT prescription in only a limited proportion of the patients and a small number of the physicians. From an epidemiological point of view, BMD measurements may be useful in order to help deciding women to start HRT, especially those who are reluctant or to those who present relative contra-indications, provided that their physicians are aware of the usefulness of these investigations.

Clinical significance of heterogeneity of vertebral mineral density.

Important variations in Z-score per vertebra, which is a common expression of bone mineral density (BMD), are sometimes observed. The present study evaluates the clinical significance of this heterogeneity. Normal and osteoporotic subjects were defined by using strict criteria. For every scan, the minimal Z-score (the vertebra with the lowest Z-score) and the delta Z (highest Z-score--lowest Z-score) was calculated. Of the investigated subjects, 30% presented a delta Z > or = 1. No significant correlation could be found between delta Z and age, BMD, height and weight. There was no difference in delta Z between scans of good, average or poor quality. Osteoporotic subjects had significantly lowered BMD values, whether evaluated through Z-scores for the L2-L4 site (P < 0.001; t = 3.71) or by minimal Z-score (P < 0.001; t = 3.97). Reproducibility calculated for the L2-L4 site on phantoms as well as on patients was excellent (C.V. < 1%). When reproducibility was calculated on each vertebra in vitro or in vivo, an increase in variability was observed. These data show that marked heterogeneity in BMD per vertebra is not infrequent. In some subjects low BMD may be measured at certain vertebrae but not at the total site. Our data suggest that in those cases the lowest BMD should be considered. In follow-up studies however, the BMD should be calculated on the L2-L4 segment, since a loss of precision is observed when only one vertebra is measured.

Decrease of bone mineral density during estrogen substitution therapy.

A decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients treated with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is sometimes observed in clinical practice. In order to assess the frequency and the characteristics of these cases, we reviewed the data of 102 women treated with HRT for more than 2 years, and who had undergone at least 3 lumbar BMD measurements during that period. For each patient, a linear function was fitted to the BMD data in relation to time. The slope was calculated. There was an overall gain in BMD during treatment, mean (+/- S.E.M.) values of slope 0.007 g/cm2/year (+/- 0.002). Fifty-three patients had a slope higher than 0.005, 28 a slope close to 0 (between 0.005 and -0.005) and 21 a slope lower than -0.005. By dividing the patients in tertiles of slopes (tertile I: slope < 0; tertile II: 0 < slope < 0.011; tertile III: slope > 0.011), significant differences were observed between the three groups of slope for the initial BMD (P < 0.001), hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio (P < 0.01), weight, DHEAS and alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.05). Only 1 of the 15 patients with a low bone mass (lower than mean +/- 1 S.D.) had a negative slope, while 9 of the 16 with a high-bone mass (higher than mean +/- 1 S.D.), had a negative slope. Under HRT, about 21% of postmenopausal women have a slight decrease in BMD as assessed by DPA. Because of the DPA coefficient of variation, however, the exact number of bone losers cannot be determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prescription attitudes among gynecologists towards two particular risk factors of osteoporosis: the patient's age and her bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE: The present report assesses, among Belgian gynecologists, the effect of age and bone mineral density on osteoporosis prescription strategy in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. We constructed cases by modifying some parameters. Ten years of age were added or subtracted to the real age of the patient. The bone mineral density (BMD) result was also modified (three levels: normal BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis). A total of 612 cases were constructed. Twelve cases were sent out of these 612 files to every Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). For each chart the gynecologists were asked whether they would treat the patient with HRT. They were also asked whether they would prescribe other therapies than HRT and if so, which ones. RESULTS: The chance to have an osteoporosis prevention or treatment prescribed increased when BMD decreased (respectively 57.4% for normal BMD, 73.1% for osteopenia cases and 89.4% for osteoporosis cases; P < 0.001). HRT was the most frequently prescribed medication (67% of the cases), but its prescription rate does not reflect only osteoporosis prevention. Nevertheless, for similar cases with osteopenia, the HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.25 and for similar cases with osteoporosis, HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.39. Calcium was the 2nd most frequent prescribed regimen. It was prescribed in 17% of the cases. A 3.4-fold increase for osteopenia cases and 7.6-fold increase for osteoporosis cases was observed, compared to women with normal BMD. When calcium was prescribed, it was in association with HRT in 64% of the osteopenia cases and in 76% of osteoporosis cases. Other drugs were less often prescribed. For the "younger age group", that is, with a mean age of 55 years, a prescription rate of 82.9% for any osteoporosis regimen was reached, whereas in the age group that was 10 years older a 20% lower prescription rate was reached (62.6%, P < 0.001). This was mostly due to a decrease in HRT prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of medication known to reduce osteoporosis occurred more often in cases with low BMD. In the older patients with osteoporosis, gynecologists prescribed HRT less frequently. This was not compensated by a higher prescription rate of other medication.

Bone mineral density measured by dual photon and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a problem of accuracy.

Dual photon absorptiometers (DPA) are currently being replaced by dual energy X-ray absorptiometers (DXA) for measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). In order to evaluate how to use the previously obtained BMD results by DPA (BMDo) in the follow-up of patients, the following study was performed. Ninety-five women who had had BMDo during the last 12 months were selected. L2-L4 BMD was measured twice on the same day using both DPA (BMDp) and by DXA (BMDx). BMDp was highly correlated to BMDx (R = 0.95; P < 0.001) but a wide variation of the ratio BMDp:BMDx was observed which ranged between 0.65 and 1.09 (mean 0.90, S.D. 0.05). There was no significant relationship between the ratio BDMp:BMDx and age or height but there was a significant relationship between this ratio and the weight of the patient (R = 0.31; P < 0.001). The results also indicated that the correlation between DXA and DPA was lower than that observed between the two DPA measurements (R = 0.98; P < 0.001) which, moreover, were not performed on the same day. These observations contrast with the relatively high precision of both instruments and have to be attributed to relative inaccuracy of one or probably both techniques.

Osteoporosis prevention and treatment with sex hormone replacement therapy.

Oestrogen deficiency is by far the major factor contributing to the high rate of osteoporotic fractures in women. The anti-osteoporotic effect of estrogen may be explained by its property to regulate cytokine secretion and thus balance bone remodeling. In oestrogen deficiency, increased resorption and remodeling will occur leading to osteoporosis. It has been extensively shown that oestrogen replacement therapy (ERT) prevents postmenopausal bone loss and reduces fracture risk by half, provided that an appropriate dose is used. In order to optimize osteoporosis prevention, ERT should be started a early as possible in menopause and be maintained as long as possible. ERT may also be effective in elderly osteoporotic patients in preventing bone loss and, reducing fracture risk. The acceptance of ERT, however, at an older age has not been thoroughly evaluated. A reduction of cardiovascular disease and of climateric symptoms are among other benefits of ERT. So far, only few postmenopausal women are treated with ERT. ERT without progestins has been repeatedly found associated with an increased risk of developing endometrial cancer, but the cyclic addition of progestins protects from endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Combined oestrogen-progestin therapy is as efficient as estrogen therapy alone, but not more so. Since progestins may oppose some of the beneficial effects of estrogens, the lowest dose with the least metabolic impact should be prescribed. Women who have had a hysterectomy, should probably be treated by estrogen replacement therapy only. Meta-analyses concerning breast cancer associated with ERT found a very moderately increased risk (RR = 1.06). Therefore ERT prescription should be discussed openly with women considering all risks and benefits. In women who have suffered from breast cancer, a bone sparing effect of tamoxifen has been shown.

Unpredictable cases of complicated ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize a subpopulation of complicated cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHOD: Descriptive retrospective study. RESULTS: 0.75% of our IVF-ET population suffered from OHSS. Among this group, 33% did not exhibit any recognized risk criteria of OHSS in terms of infertility characteristics and ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophins. Only severe (ascites) OHSS cases were considered (n = 5) in this study. Previous IVF-ET attempts had been uneventful and during the complicated trial, estradiol peak levels and numbers of oocytes retrieved remained below 2,500 pg/mL (conversion factor to SI unit, 3.671) and 10, respectively. In all cases, the luteal phase was supplemented by hCG and all patients became pregnant. A threshold level of exogenous and/or endogenous hCG seems to be responsible for the occurrence of OHSS. CONCLUSION: One-third of the patients developing an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after IVF-ET had not previously shown risk criteria. A causal role of exogenous and/or endogenous hCG is suggested.

The menopause in Europe.

Most women in developed countries will live a third of their lives after the menopause. Vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes, night sweats, irritability, sleep disturbances, mood swings), and urogenital complications (atrophic vaginal irritation and dryness, dyspareunia) occur frequently during this period of life, but their severity and duration may vary widely between individuals. The menopause also induces accelerated bone loss and is the principal risk factor for osteoporosis. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT; estrogen or estrogen plus progestogen) alleviates these symptoms and can be administered orally, transdermally, topically, intranasally, or as subcutaneous implants. HRT is also effective for prevention and treatment of postmenosausal osteoporosis throughout the time that it is used. It is not surprising that HRT use has increased substantially during the past decade. Nevertheless, there are still considerable variations in use between different countries within the European community. This presentation will analyze: the frequency of menopausal symptoms among women in different European countries and the factors that influence them; the frequency of other postmenopausal women's health issues in Europe; the use of HRT in Europe as well as the type of HRT and its evolution during the last decade; and possible reasons explaining heterogeneity between countries.

Managing the climacteric.

HRT taken for a sufficient duration may reduce the occurrence of osteoporosis and of cardiovascular disease by up to 50% and possibly also reduce incidence and lessen severity of Alzheimer's disease. Nevertheless, it is often only prescribed when women request it to relieve climacteric symptoms. Furthermore, many physicians prescribe it for only limited periods of time and few are willing to prescribe it to women in their sixties. As with any long-term prevention strategy, the uptake of HRT is much lower than the prescription rate, since the medication is often abandoned due to side effects or due to lack of motivation. But HRT is often abandoned also due to fear of cancer. While physicians may be aware of some beneficial effects of HRT, they often have no time to inform their patients of them. Alternatively, some of the beneficial effects such as cardioprotection or a reduced incidence of Alzheimer's may be less known. Likewise, HRT-related side effects or risks such as breast cancer or thromboembolic diseases should be discussed prior to HRT prescription. Women need to be informed about these potential risks, and this should be done by their physician. Surveys have shown that many women feel that they receive insufficient information from their physician. The quality of the relationship between physician and patient probably has a large influence on HRT acceptance, but very few studies have been conducted to assess specifically factors influencing the prescription and the continuation rate of HRT. Simple strategies may be among the most effective ones; these include listening to patients' fears, complaints and questions, and taking the time to answer them. The role of a practice nurse in such a setting may be also very important.