The Cultural Influence of Familismo in Prompting Vaccination Against COVID-19 Among U.S. Latina/o/x Border Residents.

This study centers on familismo as a relevant cultural construct that adds a U.S. Latina/o/x perspective to the Health Belief Model. Employing a qualitative lens, we use in-depth semi-structured focus groups and interviews with participants living, working, and attending school in a mid-size city on the U.S./Mexico border on the decision to take the COVID-19 vaccine. We find that, for many members of these communities, getting vaccinated is seen as a way to protect not only oneself but also one's family, especially those with chronic health conditions, reflecting an obligation to prioritize the collective over the individual. We highlight various approaches that families take to discuss COVID-19 vaccines, ranging from women coordinating vaccination to a non-confrontational approach to the unvaccinated. The borderlands as a place also showcase the diversity of the U.S. Latina/o/x experience during the pandemic, since the perceived disparities of vaccine access in Mexico also seemed to cue the decision to get vaccinated. We propose this helps explain the exceptionally high vaccination rate in the city under study and seen in several other border communities. By illuminating how familial ties impact health communication surrounding this important issue, this study adds an expanded Latina/o/x cultural context for aspects of the Health Belief Model such as perceived severity and susceptibility.

Addressing Insulin Injection Technique: A Follow-up Study of Canadian Patients with Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Proper insulin injection technique is important for optimal glycaemic control, yet patients with diabetes often inject insulin incorrectly. Previous studies identified common errors in insulin injection in Canada, and this article seeks to evaluate the current insulin injection technique practices among patients and explore the effectiveness of feedback and education in improving their technique. METHODS: The study recruited 147 patients and 16 physicians across Canada to gather insights into current insulin injection practices and education gaps. Eligible patients were people living with diabetes who inject insulin using an insulin pen and pen needles. Eligible physicians, who were unsupported by diabetes educators, completed a practice assessment survey and selected 10 eligible patients to complete a baseline assessment survey. During the patient visit, if an error in the patient's technique was identified, a pop-up knowledge transfer (KT) prompt would appear, providing feedback and information on best practices at the point of care. Follow-up surveys were completed 1-3 months later. RESULTS: Physicians reported facing barriers to providing education and feedback, including lack of time and personnel, and lack of effective educational material. Patients demonstrated modest improvements in some injection technique domains at their follow-up visit, including injection force factors, time the needle was held in the skin, pen needle reuse, injection area size, and injection angle. The most common initial mistakes by patients were selecting an area smaller than recommended and not paying attention to the injection force. At the second visit, patients reduced an average of one error in their injection technique. CONCLUSION: Results showed that basic feedback by their physician during one visit could exert moderate improvements on patients' injection technique. Proper injection technique is critical for diabetes management, and incorporating targeted ongoing education and support can significantly enhance physician practices, ultimately reducing risks and improving outcomes.

Geospatial vaccine misinformation risk on social media: Online insights from an English/Spanish natural language processing (NLP) analysis of vaccine-related tweets.

BACKGROUND: Misinformation is known to affect norms, attitudes, and intentions to engage with healthy behaviors. Evidence strongly supports that Spanish speakers may be particularly affected by misinformation and its outcomes, yet current insights into the scope and scale of misinformation is primarily ethnocentric, with greater emphasis on English-language design. OBJECTIVE: This study applies Natural Language Processing (NLP) to analyze a corpus of English/Spanish tweets about vaccines, broadly defined, for misinformation indicators. METHODS: We analyzed NEnglish = 247,140 and NSpanish = 104,445 tweets using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic models with Coherence score calculation (model fit) with a Mallet adjustment (topic optimization). We used informal coding to name computer-identified topics and compare misinformation scope and scale between languages. RESULTS: The LDA analysis yielded a 12-topic solution for English and a 14-topic solution for Spanish. Both corpora contained overlapping misinformation, including uncertainty of research guiding policy recommendations or standing in support of antivax movements. However, the Spanish data were positioned in a global context, where misinformation was directed at government equity and disparate vaccine distribution. CONCLUSION: Our findings support that misinformation is a global issue. However, misinformation may vary depending on culture and language. As such, tailored strategies to combat misinformation in digital planes are strongly encouraged.

Insulin Injection Practices in a Population of Canadians with Diabetes: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Proper insulin injection technique has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. A Canadian-based practice reflective was undertaken to evaluate the current state of understanding of injection technique practices by patients administering insulin, and the importance physicians place on proper injection technique. METHODS: Twenty-four sites across Canada completed a practice profile survey and enrolled adult non-pregnant patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes injecting insulin using an insulin pen. Seven areas of proper injection technique to be evaluated were identified by the study steering committee: size of injection site, use of a skin lift, needle reuse, length of the needle, duration of the needle in the skin, injection into lipohypertrophic tissue, and applied injection force. During a scheduled visit, each patient filled out the Injection Technique Survey and the physician documented the answers via an electronic database. RESULTS: Almost all physicians surveyed agreed (96%) that proper insulin injection technique is important or very important and 80% indicated they were either completely confident or fairly confident in discussing overall insulin injection technique. All patients surveyed were making at least one insulin injection technique error within the following categories: applied injection force (76%), area size of injection site (64%), duration of pen needle in skin (61%), pen needle reuse (39%), performs a skin lift with a 4 or 5 mm needle (38%), uses a longer pen needle than required (34%), and injection of insulin into lipohypertrophic tissue (37%). CONCLUSION: Patients commonly make insulin injection errors. Patient and physician education on optimal insulin injection technique continues to be an unmet medical need for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Prospective trials examining the impact of new technology, diabetes educational teams, and e-learning as educational interventions are potential avenues to explore in future studies to support improved insulin injection technique.

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of basiliximab in heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The role and pharmacokinetics of interleukin-2 (IL-2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in heart transplantation remain unclear. This 1-year double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the IL-2 mAb basiliximab with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids in adult de novo heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifty-six patients received either basiliximab (20 mg) or placebo on Days 0 and 4 post-transplantation. Safety assessments included adverse events, serious adverse events, and infections. The time to and severity of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) were also assessed. RESULTS: Basiliximab was generally well tolerated. There were no significant differences between treatment groups with respect to adverse event profiles, serious adverse events (84.0% vs 61.3%), or infections (84% vs 74.2%). The mean number of days to first BPAR was longer with basiliximab (73.7 +/- 59.68) than placebo (40.6 +/- 53.30) at 6 months, but not statistically significant (trend). The duration that basiliximab concentrations exceeded the CD25 saturation threshold averaged 38 +/- 13 days. Patients with rejection did not clear basiliximab faster or have shorter durations of saturation than rejection-free patients. None of the patients screened had detectable anti-idiotype antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot results describe the pharmacokinetics of basiliximab and show that basiliximab appears to be tolerated with a similar safety profile to placebo in adult de novo heart transplant recipients. Larger scale clinical trials are feasible and warranted.