Strategies to increase the INGEVITY lead strength during lead extraction procedures based on laboratory bench testing.

BACKGROUND: The INGEVITY lead (Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN, USA) has excellent clinical performance. However, its single filar design results in decreased lead tensile strength and a possible challenging extraction. This study's goal is to evaluate techniques for extracting the INGEVITY lead. METHODS: Two- and three-dimensional models were created to simulate lead extraction from a right atrial appendage lead implant with a left subclavian approach and lead/fibrosis attachment sites. Standard and unique lead extraction preparation strategies were evaluated. Traction forces were measured from a superior approach alone or in combination with a femoral approach. RESULTS: For lead extraction via the superior approach, leaving the terminal on the lead was the only factor influencing maximum tolerated load (p-value = .0007). Scar attachment provided greater lead tensile strength by transferring traction loading forces to the polyurethane outer insulation but dependent on insulation integrity. The strongest extraction rail was seen with a simulated femoral snaring of a locking stylet within the INGEVITY lead. Deployed screw retraction was most successful by rotating a Philips LLD#2 stylet (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands) within the lead. CONCLUSION: Results from in vitro simulations of INGEVITY lead extraction from an atrial location found the lead has low maximum tensile strength resulting in a poor extraction rail with common extraction tools and methods. However, the strength of the INGEVITY Lead extraction rail can be significantly increased by leaving the lead terminal intact and femoral snaring of the locking stylet within the lead. Such techniques may improve extraction of the INGEVITY lead.

Strategies to maximize lead tensile strength during extraction in three families of pacing leads.

BACKGROUND: Traction force that can be applied to an extraction rail is based on lead tensile strength, a product of its construction. A strong rail allows safe advancement of the extraction sheath. This study expands previous work providing strategies to optimize INGEVITY rail strength. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure forces that leads encounter in a simulated extraction procedure, determine lead response, and develop extraction recommendations for INGEVITY, INGEVITY+, and FINELINE II lead families. METHODS: Leads were positioned in a simulated right atrial appendage implant. Subsequent traction forces enabled evaluation of lead tensile strength and effectiveness of preparation/extraction techniques. RESULTS: Significant findings include (1) preserving the lead terminal pin did not decrease lead tensile strength and typically maximized it; (2) the weakest region is between the cathode and anode; (3) mid lead scar increases traction force tolerance until that scar is removed; and (4) optimal rail strength was observed using a multivenous approach with a femoral snare. Unique lead family findings include increased tensile strength of FINELINE II polyurethane vs silicone and INGEVITY active fixation vs passive fixation. CONCLUSION: This study teaches the implanting clinician there are specific extraction techniques available to improve the removal of leads that may be the best option for a patient's clinical needs. Bench testing demonstrates that lead construction drives lead behavior during an extraction. Preserving the lead terminal pin provides consistent and, in most cases, optimal rail strength. If clinically indicated, a multivenous approach using a femoral snare significantly increases rail strength and protects the vulnerable lead tip.

Mechanics of lumenless pacing lead strength during extraction procedures based on laboratory bench testing.

BACKGROUND: With the advent of conduction system pacing, use of the Medtronic SelectSecure Model 3830 lead has increased substantially. However, with this increased use, the potential need for lead extraction also will increase. Lumenless lead construction requires an understanding of both applicable tensile forces as well as lead preparation techniques that can influence consistent extraction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use bench testing methodologies to characterize the physical properties of lumenless leads and to describe related lead preparation methods that support known extraction techniques. METHODS: Multiple 3830 lead preparation techniques, commonly used in extraction practices, were compared on the bench to assess rail strength (RS) in simple traction and use conditions with simulated scar. Retention of the IS1 connector vs severing the lead body preparation techniques were compared. Distal snare and rotational extraction tools were evaluated. RESULTS: The retained connector method provided higher RS compared to the modified cut lead method: mean 11.42 lbf (9.85-12.73 lbf) vs 8.51 lbf (1.66-14.32 lbf), respectively. Snare use distally did not significantly affect RS: mean 11.05 lbf (8.58-13.95 lbf). Lead damage occurred with the TightRail extraction tool at angles ≥90°, which could occur with right-sided implants. CONCLUSIONS: When extracting SelectSecure leads, the retained connector method to maintain cable engagement benefits preservation of the extraction RS. Limiting traction force to <10 lbf (4.5 kgf) and avoiding poor lead preparation methods are critical to consistent extraction. Femoral snaring does not change RS when needed and offers a method to regain lead rail in cases of distal cable fracture.

Prospective Evaluation of the Correlation Between Gated Cardiac Computed Tomography Detected Vascular Fibrosis and Ease of Transvenous Lead Extraction.

BACKGROUND: Difficulty of lead extraction does not track well with procedural complications, but several small retrospective studies have lead fibrosis on computed tomography as an important indicator of difficult lead extraction. The purpose of the present study was to apply a standardized gated cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol to assess fibrosis and study it prospectively to examine the need for powered sheaths and risk outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective, blinded, multicenter, international study at high-volume lead extraction centers and included patients referred for transvenous lead extraction with at least one lead with a dwell time >1 year and ability to receive a cardiac CT. The degree of fibrosis (as measured by amount of lead adherence to vessel wall) was graded on a scale of 1 to 4 by dedicated CT readers in 3 zones (vein entry to superior vena cava, superior vena cava, and right atrium to lead tip). The primary outcome of the study was number of extractions requiring powered sheaths at zone 2 for each fibrosis group. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in the trial with 196 completing full gated CT and lead extraction analysis. The primary endpoint of powered sheath (laser and mechanical) sheath use was significantly higher in patients with higher fibrosis seen on CT (scores 3+4; 67.8%) at the zone 2 compared to patients with lower fibrosis (scores 1+2; 38.6%; P<0.001). There were 5 major complications with 3 vascular lacerations all occurring in zone 2 in the study. CONCLUSIONS: Gated, contrasted CT can predict the need for powered sheaths by identification of fibrosis but did not identify an absolute low-risk cohort who would not need powered sheaths. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03772704.

Implant, performance, and retrieval of an atrial leadless pacemaker in sheep.

BACKGROUND: Medtronic is developing an atrial Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and associated retrieval system. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate chronic atrial Micra retrieval, reimplantation, and chronic pacing performance. METHODS: Sheep were implanted in 2 groups: group 1 (n = 6) for 6 months, a second device implanted, and first retrieved and studied for an additional 6 months; group 2 (n = 6) for 6 months, devices were retrieved, and a second device implanted and observed acutely. Both groups underwent histopathological evaluation. Pacing capture thresholds (PCTs), p wave amplitude, and pacing impedances were measured chronically. Device retrieval times were recorded, and intracardiac echocardiography was used. RESULTS: At 24 weeks, PCTs for group 1 were low and stable for both the first device (0.55 ± 0.14 V) and the second device (0.57 ± 0.09 V), in which the average retrieval time was 17:35 minutes. For group 2, the average retrieval time was 6:12 minutes, chronic PCTs in the first device were 0.53 ± 0.11 V, and acute PCTs for the second device were 0.71 ± 0.19 V. Pathological findings were within an expected range of tissue responses for similar Micra acute and chronic implants and device retrievals. p waves and impedances were stable and within an expected range for implant site and electrode design. Complications included 1 early dislodgment and 1 death attributed to a prototype retrieval tool. CONCLUSION: In an animal model, an atrial Micra can be easily implanted with excellent chronic pacing performance and is easily retrievable at 6 months. A second device can successfully be implanted with low, chronic stable thresholds. A developed prototype retrieval tool was easy to use and, with modifications, complication free.

Algorithm for the analysis of pre-extraction computed tomographic images to evaluate implanted lead-lead interactions and lead-vascular attachments.

BACKGROUND: The number of lead extractions is growing because of the greater population and increasing age of individuals with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Lead extraction procedures can be complex undertakings with risk of significant mortality, and vascular tears in the superior vena cava are of greatest concern. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to study whether a novel algorithm that analyzes pre-extraction computed tomographic (CT) images can determine the likelihood and location of lead-lead interactions and lead-vessel attachment within patients' venous vasculatures. This information can be used to identify potential case challenges in the planning stages. METHODS: We developed an algorithm to estimate the presence and position of lead-lead interactions and lead-vessel adherences by tracking distance between the leads and distance between the lead and superior vena cava in a sample of 12 patients referred to the United Heart and Vascular Clinic for lead extractions due to infection (n = 5), lead failure (n = 5), and tricuspid regurgitation (n = 2). RESULTS: Preliminary results indicate that the developed algorithm successfully identified lead-lead and lead-vascular attachments compared to review of CT images by medical experts. CONCLUSION: With future validation and clinical implementation, this algorithm could aid physician preparedness by minimizing intraprocedural emergencies and may improve patient outcomes.

Lead Extraction Imaging.

Lead extraction procedures have a low but real risk of major complications, such as superior vena cava tear and cardiac tamponade. Complications during lead removal are commonly related to lead binding sites, lead malposition, and lead perforation. Lead extraction imaging may indicate lead vascular binding sites, lead position, and perforation. Several imaging modalities are available, including chest radiograph, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. The information provided by various imaging modalities will help assess the challenges of each lead extraction procedure and allows for better preprocedure planning.

Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.

BACKGROUND: Electrical heterogeneity (EH) during cardiac resynchronization therapy may vary with different left ventricular (LV) pacing sites. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between such changes and acute hemodynamic response (AHR). METHODS: Two EH metrics-standard deviation of activation times and mean left thorax activation times-were computed from isochronal maps based on 53-electrode body surface mapping during baseline AAI pacing and biventricular (BiV) pacing from different pacing sites in coronary veins in 40 cardiac resynchronization therapy-indicated patients. AHR at different sites was evaluated by invasive measurement of LV-dp/dtmax at baseline and BiV pacing, along with right ventricular (RV)-LV sensing delays and QRS duration. RESULTS: The site with the greatest combined reduction in standard deviation of activation times and left thorax activation times from baseline to BiV pacing was hemodynamically optimal (defined by AHR equal to, or within 5% of, the largest dp/dt response) in 35 of 40 patients (88%). Sites with the longest RV-LV and narrowest paced QRS were hemodynamically optimal in 26 of 40 patients (65%) and 28 of 40 patients (70%), respectively. EH metrics from isochronal maps had much better accuracy (sensitivity 90%, specificity 80%) for identifying hemodynamically responsive sites (∆LV dp/dtmax ≥10%) compared with RV-LV delay (69%, 85%) or paced QRS reduction (52%, 76%). Multivariate prediction model based on EH metrics showed significant correlation (R2 = 0.53, P <.001) between predicted and measured AHR. CONCLUSION: Changes in EH from baseline to BiV pacing more accurately identified hemodynamically optimal sites than RV-LV delays or paced QRS shortening. Optimization of LV lead location by minimizing EH during BiV pacing, based on body surface mapping, may improve CRT response.