Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Parasitol Res ; 118(3): 1031-1038, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734862

RESUMEN

In this study, 100 gastrointestinal tracts of Australian alpacas were examined to assess the worm burden and to identify the species of nematode present. Faecal samples were collected from 97 alpacas and processed for faecal egg counts (FECs). For identification of the species, both molecular (multiplexed-tandem polymerase chain reaction [MT-PCR]) and morphological techniques were used. Total worm counts (TWCs) revealed a mean burden of 1300 worms, with the highest burden of 29,000 worms. The average egg count was 501 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG), with the highest count of 3500 EPG. Nineteen different species of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) were identified, and Graphinema auchenia, Camelostrongylus mentulatus and Trichuris tenuis were recovered from Australian alpacas for the first time. Haemonchus contortus was the most prevalent nematode (81%) followed by C. mentulatus (60%). The majority of the nematodes found are shared with sheep, goats and cattle. Findings of this study provide useful insights into the spectrum of GINs and their burden in Australian alpacas.


Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Nematodos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Animales , Australia/epidemiología , Heces/parasitología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Nematodos/clasificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria
2.
Parasitol Res ; 118(3): 901-911, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737673

RESUMEN

We conducted a longitudinal survey on 13 alpaca farms in four climatic zones of Australia to understand the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) of alpacas. A total of 1688 fresh faecal samples were collected from both sexes of alpacas from May 2015 to April 2016 and processed for faecal egg counts (FEC) and molecular identification of eggs using the multiplexed-tandem PCR assay. Based on egg morphology, the overall prevalence of GINs was 61% while that for strongyles was 53%. The overall mean FEC was 168 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces, with the highest count of 15,540 EPG. Weaners had the highest prevalence (73%) and mean FEC (295 EPG) of GINs followed by tuis, crias and adults. Alpacas in the winter rainfall zone had the highest prevalence (68%) as well as FEC (266 EPG) followed by Mediterranean-type, non-seasonal and summer rainfall zones. Trichostrongylus spp. (83%, 89/107), Haemonchus spp. (71%, 76/107) and Camelostrongylus mentulatus (63%, 67/107) were the three most common GINs of alpacas across all climatic zones. The mixed-effects zero-inflated negative binomial regression model used in this study showed that it could help to design parasite control interventions targeted at both the herd level and the individual alpaca level. The findings of this study showed that the epidemiology of GINs of alpacas is very similar to those of cattle and sheep, and careful attention should be paid when designing control strategies for domestic ruminants co-grazing with alpacas.


Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Animales , Australia/epidemiología , Bovinos , Clima , Granjas , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Haemonchus/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Ostertagia/aislamiento & purificación , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos , Estaciones del Año , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Trichostrongylus/aislamiento & purificación
3.
Parasitol Res ; 118(3): 891-900, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719533

RESUMEN

This study involved a national cross-sectional survey of gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) of alpacas in Australia. A total of 1545 fresh faecal samples were collected from both sexes of alpacas and processed for faecal egg counts (FEC) and molecular identification of nematodes using the multiplexed tandem PCR assay. Based on egg morphology, the overall prevalence of GINs was 66% while that for strongyles was 59%. The overall mean FEC was 276 eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces, with the highest count of 17,415 EPG. Male alpacas had a higher prevalence (68%, 334/490) as well as mean FEC (328 ± 60 EPG) of GINs than females (63%, 602/954; 227 ± 26, respectively). Weaners had the highest prevalence (80%) whereas tuis had the highest FEC (402 EPG) of nematodes. The highest prevalence (77%, 293/383) and FEC (630 EPG) of GINs were observed in the summer rainfall zone followed by the Mediterranean-type rainfall, non-seasonal rainfall and winter rainfall zones. The characterisation of nematode DNA isolated from faeces revealed the occurrence of seven different GINs, including Camelostrongylus mentulatus, Cooperia spp., Haemonchus spp., Oesophagostomum spp., Ostertagia ostertagi, Teladorsagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus spp. Besides, Nematodirus spp. and Trichuris spp. were also found during FECs. The prevalence of Haemonchus spp. was highest in the summer rainfall zone while that of C. mentulatus was highest in the Mediterranean-type rainfall, non-seasonal rainfall and winter rainfall zones. The findings of this study revealed that alpacas harbour many of the same nematodes as sheep and cattle.


Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/parasitología , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Animales , Australia/epidemiología , Bovinos , Estudios Transversales , ADN Protozoario/análisis , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Haemonchus/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa Multiplex , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Ostertagia/aislamiento & purificación , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos , Prevalencia , Estaciones del Año , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/parasitología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trichostrongylus/aislamiento & purificación
4.
Parasitology ; 145(11): 1367-1377, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29866208

RESUMEN

Sarcocystis spp. are intracellular coccidian parasites which infect domestic and wild animals and birds, resulting in considerable economic losses in production animals, and public health concerns worldwide. Sarcocystis spp. have an indirect life cycle where wild and/or domestic canine species primarily serve as definitive hosts and several domestic and wild animals (such as camels) act as intermediate hosts. In Northern Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia and China, camel meat is preferred due to cultural and religious traditions as well as its lower cholesterol/fat content than other red meat. However, camel meat quality could be downgraded by the presence of sarcocysts. To date, two Sarcocystis spp. have been reported from camels, including Sarcocystis ippeni (forms microscopic sarcocysts) and Sarcocystis cameli (forms both macroscopic and microscopic sarcocysts). Sarcocystosis is usually asymptomatic, though significant pathogenic effects have also been reported in camels. Despite the high occurrence of sarcocystosis in camels, little is known about various aspects of the disease in these animals. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the existing knowledge on the taxonomy, pathogenesis, epidemiology and diagnosis of Sarcocystis spp. infecting camels and it also highlights areas for further research that could enhance our understanding about sarcocystosis in camels.


Asunto(s)
Camelus/parasitología , Sarcocystis/aislamiento & purificación , Sarcocistosis/diagnóstico , Sarcocistosis/veterinaria , Animales , Animales Salvajes , Humanos , Carne/parasitología , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Sarcocystis/clasificación , Sarcocistosis/epidemiología
5.
Vet Res Commun ; 48(3): 1563-1572, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38396169

RESUMEN

The adequate transfer of passive immunity is a critical factor in neonatal development and survivability. Although well documented in the dairy and equine industries, the recognition of inadequate immunoglobulin transfer on-farm and its impact on the ability of alpaca cria to thrive is largely unknown. Colostrum samples were collected from female alpaca within 24 h of parturition by the owners and whole blood collected from cria by the investigators between 1 and 7 days of age. Direct IgG concentration of milk and serum was determined using radial immunodiffusion assay (RID) and was indirectly estimated using optical and digital Brix refractometry for total solids and clinical refractometry for total serum protein. There was a strong correlation between optical and digital Brix refractometry, and colostral IgG concentration determined by RID. There was a moderate correlation between serum IgG concentration determined by RID and total serum protein in crias. Optical and digital Brix refractometry for colostral IgG estimation and total serum protein for serum IgG estimation are reliable, accurate and easy-to-use tools that can be used on-farm by trained, competent technicians to assess a failure of passive transfer in alpacas. A pilot study at one property only was performed, due to COVID-19 travel restriction interference. Further research is required to determine the reference intervals for these tools to be practical.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Sanguíneas , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo , Calostro , Inmunoglobulina G , Refractometría , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/sangre , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/inmunología , Animales , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Refractometría/veterinaria , Calostro/química , Calostro/inmunología , Femenino , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Inmunodifusión/veterinaria , Inmunodifusión/métodos , Proyectos Piloto
6.
Theriogenology ; 173: 123-127, 2021 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34371439

RESUMEN

A total of 184 dromedary camel embryos were vitrified using a novel vitrification kit specifically developed for camel embryos. These embryos were vitrified using a 3-step process by exposing them to vitrification solutions (VS) containing 20% foetal calf serum (FCS) with (+) or without (-) the addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA). Embryos were then further divided into two groups (

Asunto(s)
Camelus , Vitrificación , Animales , Criopreservación/veterinaria , Embrión de Mamíferos , Femenino , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo
7.
Vet Parasitol ; 265: 91-100, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30638526

RESUMEN

This study aimed to assess current worm control practices used by Australian alpaca farmers with an online questionnaire survey. The questionnaire contained questions about farm demography and general husbandry practices, farmers' knowledge about gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) and their importance, the use of worm control strategies and anthelmintics, and grazing management. A link for the questionnaire survey was sent to all (n = 954) registered members of the Australian Alpaca Association in July 2015. The response rate for the questionnaire was 25% (239/954). The majority of respondents were from small (≤ 50 alpacas; 64%, 153/239) followed by medium (50-100 alpacas; 24%, 57/239) and large (>100 alpacas; 12%, 29/239) farms. Findings revealed that the majority of respondents kept Huacaya alpacas to produce high-quality fibre and alpacas were usually kept with other domestic ruminants (e.g. cattle and sheep). Although half of alpaca farmers (114/220) perceived that GINs were an important health problem of alpacas, with Haemonchus spp. being the most common nematode, the majority of them (174/220) used anthelmintics for nematode control. Macrocyclic lactones, a commercial combination of four anthelmintics (abamectin, albendazole, closantel and levamisole) and monepantel were the three most commonly used dewormers by Australian alpaca farmers. Although a significant proportion (166/213) of respondents used a quarantine drench for alpacas, very few respondents were aware of strategic deworming and the issue of anthelmintic resistance. Alpaca farmers mostly used anthelmintics at the dose rate recommended for sheep (47%, 79/167) and cattle (9%, 15/167), though some used 1.5 (31%, 51/167) and 2 (13%, 22/167) times the dose rate recommended for sheep. The majority of small herds used anthelmintics at the dose rate recommended for sheep and cattle while medium and large herds used anthelmintics at 1.5 to 2 times the dose rate recommended for sheep. This study provides invaluable insights into the demography of alpaca farms in Australia, husbandry practices used by alpaca farmers and their knowledge about worms and their control, thereby paving the way for developing guidelines for the control of GINs of alpacas.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo , Helmintiasis Animal/prevención & control , Animales , Australia , Recolección de Datos , Agricultores , Helmintiasis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 388, 2018 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal nematodes (GINs) can cause significant economic losses in alpacas due to lowered production of fibre and meat. Although no anthelmintics are registered for use in alpacas, various classes of anthelmintics are frequently used to control parasitic gastroenteritis in alpacas in Australia and other countries. Very little is known about the current worm control practices as well as the efficacy of anthelmintics used against common GINs of alpacas. This study aimed to assess the existing worm control practices used by Australian alpaca farmers and to quantify the efficacy of commonly used anthelmintics against GINs of alpacas. METHODS: An online questionnaire survey was conducted to assess current worm control practices on 97 Australian alpaca farms, with an emphasis on the use of anthelmintics. Of this group of 97 alpaca farms, 20 were selected to assess the efficacy of eight anthelmintics and/or their combinations (closantel, fenbendazole ivermectin, monepantel, moxidectin and a combination of levamisole, closantel, albendazole, abamectin) using the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). A multiplexed-tandem PCR (MT-PCR) was used to identify the prevalent nematode genera/species. RESULTS: The response rate for the questionnaire was 94% (91/97). Almost half of the respondents kept alpacas with sheep and cattle, and 26% of respondents allowed alpacas to co-graze with these ruminants. Although only 63% respondents perceived worms to be an important health concern for alpacas, the majority of respondents (89%) used anthelmintics to control GINs of alpacas. The commonly used anthelmintics were macrocyclic lactones, monepantel, benzimidazoles, levamisole, closantel and their combinations, and they were typically administered at the dose rate recommended for sheep. The FECRT results showed that a combination of levamisole, closantel, albendazole and abamectin was the most effective dewormer followed by single drugs, including monepantel, moxidectin, closantel, fenbendazole and ivermectin. Haemonchus spp. were the most commonly resistant nematodes followed by Trichostrongylus spp., Camelostrongylus mentulatus, Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia spp. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study aimed at assessing worm control practices and efficacy of commonly used anthelmintics in alpacas in Australia. Our findings document the extent of anthelmintics resistance on Australian alpaca farms and identify those anthelmintics that are still effective against GINs of alpacas.


Asunto(s)
Antihelmínticos/efectos adversos , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/parasitología , Parasitosis Intestinales/veterinaria , Nematodos/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Nematodos/veterinaria , Animales , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Granjas , Heces/parasitología , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Parasitosis Intestinales/epidemiología , Masculino , Nematodos/genética , Nematodos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Nematodos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Nematodos/epidemiología , Infecciones por Nematodos/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Rumiantes/parasitología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
9.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 498, 2018 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185227

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eukaryotic pathogens, including Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon, have been implicated in neonatal diarrhoea, leading to marked morbidity and mortality in the alpaca (Vicugna pacos) and llama (Lama glama) around the world. Australia has the largest population of alpacas outside of South America, but very little is known about these pathogens in alpaca populations in this country. Here, we undertook the first molecular epidemiological survey of Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon in V. pacos in Australia. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 81 herds, comprising alpacas of 6 weeks to 26 years of age, were sampled from the six Australian states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia) across the four seasons. PCR-based sequencing was employed, utilising genetic markers in the small subunit of the nuclear ribosomal RNA (SSU) and 60-kilodalton glycoprotein (gp60) genes for Cryptosporidium, triose-phosphate isomerase (tpi) gene for Giardia duodenalis and the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) for Enterocytozoon bieneusi. RESULTS: PCR-based analyses of 81 faecal DNA samples representing 1421 alpaca individuals detected Cryptosporidium, Giardia and/or Enterocytozoon on 15 farms in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia, equating to 18.5% of all samples/herds tested. Cryptosporidium was detected on three (3.7%) farms, G. duodenalis on six (7.4%) and E. bieneusi on eight (9.9%) in two or all of these three states, but not in Queensland, Tasmania or Western Australia. Molecular analyses of selected faecal DNA samples from individual alpacas for Cryptosporidium, Giardia and/or Enterocytozoon consistently showed that alpacas of ≤ 6 months of age harboured these pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: This first molecular investigation of Cryptosporidium, Giardia and Enterocytozoon in alpaca subpopulations in Australia has identified species and genotypes that are of likely importance as primary pathogens of alpacas, particularly young crias, and some genotypes with zoonotic potential. Although the prevalence established here in the alpaca subpopulations studied is low, the present findings suggest that crias are likely reservoirs of infections to susceptible alpacas and/or humans. Future studies should focus on investigating pre-weaned and post-weaned crias, and on exploring transmission patterns to establish what role particular genotypes play in neonatal or perinatal diarrhoea in alpacas and in zoonotic diseases in different states of Australia.


Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/microbiología , Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Criptosporidiosis/epidemiología , Cryptosporidium/genética , Enterocytozoon/genética , Giardia/genética , Giardiasis/veterinaria , Microsporidiosis/veterinaria , Animales , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , ADN de Hongos/genética , ADN Protozoario/genética , Diarrea/parasitología , Heces/microbiología , Heces/parasitología , Genotipo , Giardiasis/epidemiología , Microsporidiosis/epidemiología , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , ARN Ribosómico/genética , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Zoonosis/microbiología , Zoonosis/parasitología
10.
Parasit Vectors ; 11(1): 278, 2018 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29716657

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare the FECPAKG2 and the McMaster techniques for counting of gastrointestinal nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas using two floatation solutions (saturated sodium chloride and sucrose solutions). Faecal eggs counts from both techniques were compared using the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman statistics. Results showed moderate to good agreement between the two methods, with better agreement achieved when saturated sugar is used as a floatation fluid, particularly when faecal egg counts are less than 1000 eggs per gram of faeces. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to assess agreement of measurements between McMaster and FECPAKG2 methods for estimating faecal eggs in South American camelids.


Asunto(s)
Camélidos del Nuevo Mundo/parasitología , Heces/parasitología , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/métodos , Animales , Tracto Gastrointestinal/parasitología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA