Oncological outcome, postoperative complications, and mammographic changes after intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) as a boost in a large single-institution cohort of breast cancer patients.

Advantages of using intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) as a boosting modality in breast-conserving therapy include the direct visualization of the tumor bed, a reduced skin dose, and patient convenience. We report oncological outcome, postoperative complication rate, and mammographic changes on follow-up imaging in women treated at our institution with IOERT as a boost modality in breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. Between January 2007 and June 2018, 763 consecutive patients were enrolled. During breast-conserving surgery, an IOERT boost of 9 Gy was applied, followed by whole breast irradiation (WBI). At a median follow-up of 62.2 months (range: 0.5-135), 13 in-breast recurrences were observed, yielding a local tumor control rate of 98.4% at 5 years. In multivariable analysis, high tumor grading was predictive for local recurrence (HR = 5.6; 95%CI: 1.19-26.2). A total of 27 (3.5%) patients developed any kind of postoperative complication. None of the tumor characteristics nor any of the IOERT technical parameters were predictive for development of a postoperative complication. On follow-up imaging, 145 patients with mammographic changes BIRADS score ≥3 were found of which 50.3% required a biopsy. Only 17 patients had positive biopsies; none of the IOERT parameters were predictive for false-positive imaging. A 9 Gy IOERT boost combined with postoperative WBI provided outstanding local control rates, was well-tolerated, with limited postoperative complications. However, radiologists must be aware of a presumable higher prevalence of mammographic changes after IORT as a boost.

A dynamic clinical pathway for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer is a tool for better cancer care: implementation and prospective analysis between 2002-2010.

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing the complexity of breast cancer treatment it is of paramount importance to develop structured care in order to avoid a chaotic and non-consistent management of patients. Clinical pathways, a result of the adaptation of the documents used in industrial quality management namely the Standard Operating Procedures, can be used to improve efficiency and quality of care. They also aim to re-centre the focus on the patient's overall journey, rather than the contribution of each specialty or caring function independently. METHODS: The effect of the implementation and prospective systematic evaluation of a clinical care pathway for the management of patients with early breast cancer in a single breast unit is evaluated over a long time interval (between 2002 and 2010). Annual analysis of predefined clinical outcome measures, service indicators, team indicators, process indicators and financial indicators was performed. Pathway quality control meetings were organized at least once a year. Systematic feedback was given to the team members, and if necessary the pathway was adapted according to evidence based literature data and in house pathway related data in order to improve quality. RESULTS: The annual number of patients included in the pathway (289 vs. 390, P <0.01), proportion of patients with Tis-T1 tumors (42% vs. 58%, P <0.01), negative lymph nodes (44% vs. 58%, P <0.01) and no metastases at diagnosis (91.5% vs. 95.9%) has risen significantly between 2002 and 2010. Evolution of mandatory quality indicators defined by EUSOMA shows a significant improvement of quality of cancer care. Particularly, the proportion of patients having anti-hormonal therapy (84.8% vs. 97.4%, P = 0.002) and adjuvant chemotherapy according to the guidelines (72% vs. 95.6%, P = 0.028) increased dramatically. Patient satisfaction improved significantly (P <0.05). Progression free 4-year survival was significantly higher for all patients, for T1 tumors only and for T2-T4 tumors only, treated between 2006 to 2008 compared to between 1999 to 2002 and 2003 to 2005 (P = 0.006, P = 0.05, P = 0.06, respectively). Overall 4-year survival of the entire population treated between 2006 and 2008 was significantly better (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the patient characteristics changed over the years due to better screening, this clinical pathway and regular audit of quality indicators for the treatment of patients with operable breast cancer proved to be important tools to improve the quality of care, patient satisfaction and outcome.

Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures?

The exponential use of robotic surgery is not the result of evidence-based benefits but mainly driven by the manufacturers, patients and enthusiastic surgeons. The present review of the literature shows that robot-assisted surgery is consistently more expensive than video-laparoscopy and in many cases open surgery. The average additional variable cost for gynecological procedures was about 1600 USD, rising to more than 3000 USD when the amortized cost of the robot itself was included. Generally most robotic and laparoscopic procedures have less short-term morbidity, blood loss, intensive care unit, and hospital stay than open surgery. Up to now no major consistent differences have been found between robot-assisted and classic video-assisted procedures for these factors. No comparative data are available on long-term morbidity and oncologic outcome after open, robotic, and laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. It seems that currently only for very complex surgical procedures, such as cardiac surgery, the costs of robotics can be competitive to open surgical procedures. In order to stay viable, robotic programs will need to pay for themselves on a per case basis and the costs of robotic surgery will have to be reduced.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for lobular carcinoma of the breast metastatic to the ovaries.

The first case of robotic-assisted laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for a metastatic malignant ovarian tumor is described. A 65-year-old woman who was treated for breast cancer 13 years earlier presented with a deep venous thrombosis in the right leg and a pelvic mass. Imaging tests showed bilateral solid ovarian tumors and an enlarged lymph node at the level of the right common iliac vessels but no evidence of any other tumor metastases. The patient was offered and accepted to undergo a da Vinci robotic-assisted bilateral adnexectomy with hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node sampling. The surgery took 200 minutes, and the patient was discharged uneventfully on the third postoperative day. Histologic examination showed strongly estrogen receptor-positive metastatic lobular carcinoma of the breast in both ovaries and fallopian tubes. She was further treated with adjuvant exemestane and is currently doing well. It is possible to treat selected patients with malignant ovarian tumors by robotic-assisted laparoscopy.

Sentinel node detection in patients with vaginal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe sentinel ode detection in patients with primary and recurrent vaginal carcinoma. METHOD: Preoperatively 60-mBq technetium-labeled nannocolloid was injected in the mucosa at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o'clock, just adjacent to the vaginal cancer. Sentinel nodes were detected using a laparoscopic or hand-held probe (Navigator) and removed for pathological assessment. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes could be found in two of three patients with primary stage I or II carcinoma of the vagina. In the first patient the sentinel nodes, located in the groin and obturator region, proved to be negative and she was treated with a wide local excision of the tumor, pelvic and groin lymphadenectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy. The second patient had tumor metastases in the sentinel node, which was found just below of the junction of the iliac vessels, and she underwent combined chemo- and radiotherapy. In a third patient no sentinel node could be detected at lymphoscintigraphy. A last patient with stage III carcinoma of the upper vagina was initially treated by combined chemo-radiotherapy but recurred 6 months later. During a staging procedure the sentinel nodes could be detected in the right obturator fossa and were removed laparoscopically. As they were negative, she underwent a posterior pelvic exenteration with complete resection of the tumor. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic detection of sentinel nodes using 99mTc-labeled colloid is feasible in patients with primary and recurrent vaginal cancer and may provide important information to direct further management.

Sentinel node metastasis in the groin detected by technetium-labeled nannocolloid in a patient with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the first sentinel groin node metastasis detected by technetium-labeled nanocolloid in a patient with cervical carcinoma. METHOD: Preoperatively, 60 mBq technetium-labeled nannocolloid was injected at 3 and 9 o'clock in the uterine cervix. Sentinel nodes were detected using a handheld and laparoscopic probe (Navigator) and removed for pathological assessment. RESULTS: A 52-year-old diagnosed with FIGO stage IIA squamous cervical carcinoma was referred to our unit. On physical examination a bulky cervical tumor and a 1.5-cm enlarged left inguinal lymph node were found. No other abnormalities were seen on pelvic MRI scan and CT scan of the abdomen and lower pelvis. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed that a left groin node and three nodes located in the right obturator fossa were the sentinel nodes. They were easily detected using, respectively, a hand-held and a laparoscopic probe and removed. As both the inguinal and the obturator lymph nodes contained metastatic deposits, the patient was treated with the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Inguinal lymph nodes can rarely be the sentinel nodes in patients with cancer of the uterine cervix.