[Urethroplasties for male urethral strictures: Success rates and predictive factors]. / Urétroplasties pour sténoses de l'urètre masculin : taux de succès et facteurs prédictifs.

INTRODUCTION: Urethroplasty has reported success rates ranging from 60 to 98%. Predictive factors for recurrence are rarely studied, postoperative urinary drainage modalities are not investigated. The primary objective was to evaluate the success rate of urethroplasty in our center. Secondary objectives were to identify recurrence predictive factors. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort including men treated with urethroplasty for stricture between 2007-2017, followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Recurrence was defined as the necessity of a new procedure (endo-urethral or surgical). Data from penile urethra (SUP) and bulbo-membranous urethra (SUBM) stenosis were analyzed separately. Recurrence-free survival (success) was analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier model. The characteristics of the patients, the stenosis, the surgical technique, the modalities of postoperative urinary drainage were analyzed in subgroups for the bulbo-membranous urethra looking for a correlation with recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients included: 25 with SUP, 78 with SUBM. The overall success rate was 69%, CI95% [60-79] with a mean follow-up of 62.85 months. The success was 68%, CI95%[46-82] for SUP, 69.23%, CI95% [58-78] for SUBM. Recurrences occurred during the first 12 months. Only postoperative suprapubic urinary drainage was a predictive factor (HR=0.947, CI95% [0.905-0.992]). A period longer than 14 days reduced recurrence by 37%. CONCLUSION: Urethroplasty had a success rate of 69%, comparable to published series. Suprapubic urinary drainage improved the surgery outcomes. LEVEL OF PROOF: 2, Grade B.

Predictive factors of postoperative septic complications after flexible ureteroscopy for urinary stones.

BACKGROUND: Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is one of the recommended treatments for urinary stones. Urosepsis is one of the most frequent complications of fURS however its predictive factors remain uncertain. Our objective was to assess the septic complications rates of fURS and to determinate predictive factors of these complications in patients undergoing fURS. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included all patients admitted for any fURS for stone disease in our center from December 2009 to April 2013. Patients' medical history, urine culture, stone composition, surgical and anesthetic characteristics were collected. The primary endpoint was defined by the presence of any septic complication (i.e. postoperative fever, urosepsis, septic shock or death). We used multivariate logistic regression to assess predictive factors of septic complication related to fURS. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients were included in this study. Urosepsis rate was 9.8% while 18.9% developed postoperative hyperthermia (>37.5°C). In multivariate analysis, the predictive risk factors of septic complication were: a neurologic disorder (OR=6.1; CI95%: 2.9-17.1), a history of urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR=19.6; CI95%: 7.3-52.1), exposure to peroperative nitrous oxide (OR=3.2; CI95%: 1.5-6.8) and intraoperative use of a laser (OR=8.0; CI95%: 13.0-30.3). CONCLUSION: The use of fURS is associated with relatively frequent septic complications. Patients with neurologic disorders or a history of UTI carry an increased risk of postoperative complications. Limitations should be drawn with the use of peroperative nitrous oxide. These results should be further validated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. Retrospective cohort study.

Should we perform systematic biopsies in case of suspicious MRI for prostate cancer in 2020? A review of literature.

CONTEXT: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now recommended before performing prostate biopsies, looking for suspicious lesions to perform targeted biopsies (TB). However, the association or exclusive performance of systematic biopsies (SB), criticized for its morbidity and for the detection of insignificant cancers, remains debated. OBJECTIVE: To perform a literature review to answer three questions: (1) In the presence of a suspicious MRI lesion, should we always perform SB in addition to TB? (2) Can we avoid SB when considering focal treatment? (3) Is there an increase in adverse events when associating SB with TB? SOURCES: A non-systematic literature review was carried out on Medline in April 2020 using the keywords "MRI", "PROSTATE CANCER", "SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY", "TARGETED BIOPSY", "ADVERSE EVENTS". The references of the selected articles were analyzed for additional articles. Selection of Studies published in the last five years were analyzed and retained if the available data made it possible to answer one of the three questions asked. RESULTS: In biopsy-naive patients, the added value of SB to TB for detection of significative cancer varied from +5 to+7% and was reduced to +1 to +3% in the case of a previous series of negative biopsies. For patients under active surveillance, this added value was higher, ranging from +8% to +17%. MRI has a negative predictive value of 85 to 95%, but this value drops to 55% for the detection of secondary or tertiary foci. The use of SB is necessary if focal treatment is considered. Serious complications from biopsies requiring hospitalization range from 1.4 to 6.9% and are increased by the number of previous biopsy series performed more than by the number of biopsies per series. CONCLUSION: In the presence of a suspicious MRI lesion, SB is indicated in addition to TB but can be discussed in patients with previous negative biopsies. They are necessary if focal treatment is considered to aid surgical planning. Severe complications from biopsies do not seem to increase when SB are associated to TB, but rather with the number of biopsy series performed.

Predictive Factors of Missed Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers in Men with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We systematically reviewed the literature on predictive factors for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis after prebiopsy negative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer naïve patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE® and Scopus® databases were searched up to March 2019. The review protocol was published in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019125549). The clinical factors and markers studied were age, prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen isoforms, prostate specific antigen density, PCA3, prostate volume, family history, ethnicity and risk calculators. The primary objective was to determine their predictive ability for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis. Secondary objectives included meta-analysis of the negative predictive value of prebiopsy negative magnetic resonance imaging when combined with these predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. Few studies reported negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with a marker. Prostate specific antigen density was the best studied and the strongest predictor of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with prebiopsy negative magnetic resonance imaging. There were 8 studies (1,015 patients) eligible for meta-analysis of the added value of prostate specific antigen density less than 0.15 ng/ml/ml to magnetic resonance imaging in reducing the risk of missing clinically significant prostate cancer. When combined with prostate specific antigen density, overall magnetic resonance imaging negative predictive value increased from 84.4% to 90.4% in cancer naïve patients. The increase was from 82.7% to 88.7% in biopsy naïve and from 88.2% to 94.1% in previous negative biopsy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of prostate specific antigen density less than 0.15 ng/ml/ml in the presence of prebiopsy negative magnetic resonance imaging was the most useful factor to identify men without clinically significant prostate cancer who could avoid biopsy.

Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

INTRODUCTION: European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) mortality results were reported for 7 European countries (excluding France) and showed a significant reduction in Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. As those results have not been part of the global ERSPC results, it is of interest to report PCa mortality at a median follow-up of 9 years for French section of ERSPC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two administrative departments were involved in the study. Only men after randomization in the screening group were invited by mail to be screened by PSA testing with two rounds at 4-6 year intervals. Biopsy was recommended if PSA>=3.0 ng/mL. No information other that the French Association of Urology recommandations on the use of PSA was offered to the control group (own decision of physicians and patients). Follow up was based on cancer registry database. Contamination defined as the receipt of PSA testing in control arm was measured. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the Rate Ratio (RR) of PCa mortality and incidence in the screening vs. control arm. RESULTS: Starting from 2003, 80,696 men aged 55-69 years were included. The percentage of men in the screening arm with at least one PSA test (compliance) was 31%. Compared to the control arm, PCa incidence increased by 10% in the screening arm (RR=1.10; 95% CI=[1.04-1.16], P=0.001), but PCa mortality did not differ (0.222 and 0.215 deaths/1000 person-years; RR=1.03[0.75-1.42], P=0.9). DISCUSSION: Limitations include low participation rate. PSA testing in the control arm was observed in 32% of men (contamination). CONCLUSIONS: Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Fine-scale genetic structure in a high dispersal capacity raptor, the Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus), revealed by a set of novel microsatellite loci.

The Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus) is a semi-colonial raptor species widely but patchily distributed across the Palearctic region with recorded cases of philopatry and presence of extra-pair copulation. In order to assess Montagu's harrier spatial genetic structure and contemporary gene flow, we developed 16 new microsatellite markers using 454 pyrosequencing. Genotypes of 117 chicks sampled in a 200 × 300 km farmland area in Central Western France were analyzed to characterize genetic polymorphism at each locus and regional and fine-scale genetic structure. Fourteen markers were found polymorphic, with a number of alleles ranging from 3 to 11. The expected and observed heterozygosities ranged from 0.36 to 0.856 and from 0.35 to 0.868, respectively. A single genetic unit was found at the regional scale with higher genetic similarity observed at a small spatial scale (up to 10 km). Our results are consistent with overall large-scale juvenile and adult dispersal together with small-scale male philopatry. Cross-species amplification of this set of microsatellites makers has been successful in two closely related harrier species: the marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) and the Hen harrier (Circus cyaneus) for which 14 and 12 markers were polymorphic, respectively. These new microsatellite markers could be used to study the population genetic structure, contemporary gene flow and parentage analyses in these three species and to conduct microsatellite-based demographic inferences on the Montagu's harrier.

Extra-target low-risk prostate cancer: implications for focal high-intensity focused ultrasound of clinically significant prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyse the impact of the presence of extra-target non-clinically significant cancer (NCSC) after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation on oncological results. To analyse radical treatment free survival (RTFS) rates at 2-3 years follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective single-centre study of 55 patients treated by primary HIFU hemiablation from 2010 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were unilateral MRI detected CSC, stage ≤ T2b, Gleason score (GS) ≤ 7, at least 6 mm distant from prostate apex. MRI with systematic and targeted biopsies was performed at diagnosis. Follow-up included clinical examination, PSA every 6 month, MRI and biopsies at 1 year and in case of PSA elevation. HIFU retreatment was possible. Whole-gland treatment was indicated in case of positive biopsies with GS ≥ 7 or maximum cancer core length > 5 mm, any GS. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 33 months (SD: 17-49 months). Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS at univariate analysis (p = 0.29). 10 (18%) patients had a salvage whole-gland treatment after a median follow-up of 26 months (IQR 17-28). RTFS at 2 and 3 years were 92% and 80%. CONCLUSION: Presence or not of an extra-target NCSC in the untreated part of the gland had no impact on RTFS. NCSC lesion can be left untreated and actively monitored. RTFS was 80% at 3 years which support the concept of focal/partial treatment as a treatment option of CSC prostate cancer.

Focal laser ablation as clinical treatment of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.

PURPOSE: To define the role of focal laser ablation (FLA) as clinical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) using the Delphi consensus method. METHODS: A panel of international experts in the field of focal therapy (FT) in PCa conducted a collaborative consensus project using the Delphi method. Experts were invited to online questionnaires focusing on patient selection and treatment of PCa with FLA during four subsequent rounds. After each round, outcomes were displayed, and questionnaires were modified based on the comments provided by panelists. Results were finalized and discussed during face-to-face meetings. RESULTS: Thirty-seven experts agreed to participate, and consensus was achieved on 39/43 topics. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as any volume Grade Group 2 [Gleason score (GS) 3+4]. Focal therapy was specified as treatment of all csPCa and can be considered primary treatment as an alternative to radical treatment in carefully selected patients. In patients with intermediate-risk PCa (GS 3+4) as well as patients with MRI-visible and biopsy-confirmed local recurrence, FLA is optimal for targeted ablation of a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible focus. However, FLA should not be applied to candidates for active surveillance and close follow-up is required. Suitability for FLA is based on tumor volume, location to vital structures, GS, MRI-visibility, and biopsy confirmation. CONCLUSION: Focal laser ablation is a promising technique for treatment of clinically localized PCa and should ideally be performed within approved clinical trials. So far, only few studies have reported on FLA and further validation with longer follow-up is mandatory before widespread clinical implementation is justified.

[Learning curve for inflatable penile prosthesis]. / Courbe d'apprentissage d'implantation de prothèse pénienne.

INTRODUCTION: Inflatable penile prosthesis surgery is relatively rare in France, and around ten surgeons perform most of this surgery. The objective of this study was to define the learning curve concerning this surgery. METHODS: This study is a retrospective monocentric cohort of first time implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis between 2008 and 2016 in a university hospital. 68 consecutive patients underwent this procedure performed by a single surgeon. These patients were dispatched into two groups: a group of the first 20 patients and a group of the 48 last patients. For each patient, multiple parameters were measured including: duration of surgery, per operative complications, post operative morbidity according to Clavien classification, length of stay, and functional satisfaction. Parameters were compared using Fisher or Wilcoxon tests. RESULTS: Patients were on average 58.2 year old and average operating time was 87.7minutes. The average complication rate was 16.2%. Five patients from the first group and 3 patients from the second group presented a grade 3 post operative complication according to Clavien classification. The complications included 5 infections, one erosion, one irreductible paraphimosis and a prosthesis dysfunction. This difference was statistically significative (P=0.043). The average duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the second group (P=0.004). There was no significative difference concerning the satisfaction using the EDITS score (P=0.52) or a Likert scale (P=0.72). CONCLUSION: In this monocentric and retrospective study, the learning curve for first time implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis is acquired after 20 surgeries. Specific training could lower this number, but needs further evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Arterial embolization of polycystic kidneys as an alternative to ergonomic nephrectomy in renal pre-transplantation. Monocentric retrospective study]. / Embolisation artérielle des reins polykystiques en alternative à la néphrectomie ergonomique en pré greffe rénale. Étude monocentrique rétrospective sur 15 cas.

PURPOSE: This study aims at providing a retrospective assessment of the decrease in renal volume after renal artery embolization (RAE) among a group of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic renal disease and for whom transplantation, for ergonomic reasons was temporarily advised against. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2014 and March 2017, as part of pre-transplantory procedure 15 patients, including 11 men and 4 women benfited from renal embolization (RAE) in a context of preparation for transplant in Lille University Hospital. All of the patients were suffering from autosomal dominant polycystic renal disease (ADPKD) at a severe or terminal stage of renal disease. RESULTS: The original mean total kidney volume (TKV) was 2550.6 cm3±1771 (1102 cm3; 7310 cm3), the average TKV at 3 months was 1684 cm3±1539 (648 cm3; 6930 cm3) with an average decrease of 33% in the volume (5.2%; 83.9%) (95% confidence interval [0.229-0.436]) (P<0.01) and 1632±1743 (599 cm3; 6758 cm3) at 6 months with an average decrease of 40.7% (7.6%; 64.1%) (IC95% 0.306-0.508) (P<0.01). Among the 15 patients, 13 had their contraindication removed and to date 7 have had successful transplants. One failure due to a very high initial volume (7310cm3) required a secondary nephrectomy. No post-embolization syndrome has been noticed, 2 minor complications occurred (13%) involving a difficult resumption of transit and there was one case of hematuria. CONCLUSION: ERA procedures must have a place in the ergonomic transplant strategy of patients with ADPKD with a low complication rate and a high efficiency. Nephrectomy indications before transplantation must therefore be reconsidered due to a major postoperative risk. Our results are in line with larger scale studies. Nevertheless, these results need to be confirmed by a large-scale randomized prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Evolution of the number of incident cases, stage and first treatments for prostate cancer in France between 2001 and 2016]. / Évolution du nombre de cas incidents, du stade et des premiers traitements des cancers de la prostate en France entre 2001 et 2016. À partir de données hospitalières de 3 centres.

INTRODUCTION: No studies of French hospital registries for prostate cancer (PCa) have been published since the 2012 USPSTF recommendations. MATERIAL: This is a multicenter cohort study based on hospital data of prostate biopsies (PB) in 3 health centers between 2001 and 2016. The main objective is to describe the evolution of incident cases of PCa. The secondary objectives are to describe the number of cases per stage of PCa and the distribution of the first treatments. RESULTS: In total, 11,491 PB series diagnosed 5927 cases of PCa. The median age was 67 [61-73] years and the median PSA was 7.8 [5.5-13] ng/mL. The number of cases increased until 2006 before decreasing from 2006 to 2013 and then stabilizing from 2013 to 2016. The proportion of incident cases was: (1) for the stable metastatic stage around 8 [7-10]%, (2) for cases with PSA<10 ng/mL increasing from 46% to 75% in 2010 down to 64% in 2016, (3) for the grade 1 group decreasing from 59% to 33 % between 2011 and 2016. The proportion of active surveillance treatment for low-risk cancers increased from 5 to 60% and surgery decreased from 73 to 33%. CONCLUSION: The evolution of the incident cases showed a decrease from 2006 to 2013 and a stability until 2016. The number of cases with PSA<10 ng/mL decreased since 2010 and the proportion of the options of treatment by surveillance increased strongly to the detriment of the surgery for low risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Comprehensive molecular classification of localized prostate adenocarcinoma reveals a tumour subtype predictive of non-aggressive disease.

Background: Management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) is a major clinical challenge since most of these cancers would not evolve but a majority of patients will still undergo a life-changing radical surgery. Molecular studies have shown that PCa can be classified according to their genomic alterations but none of the published PCa molecular classifications could identify a subtype corresponding to non-evolutive tumours. Materials and methods: Multi-omics molecular profiling was carried out on post-radical prostatectomy material from a cohort of 130 patients with localized PCa. We used unsupervised classification techniques to build a comprehensive classification of prostate tumours based on three molecular levels: DNA copy number, DNA methylation, and mRNA expression. Merged data from our cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort were used to characterize the resulting tumour subtypes. We measured subtype-associated risks of biochemical relapse using Cox regression models and survival data from five cohorts including the two aforementioned. Results: We describe three PCa molecular subtypes associated with specific molecular characteristics and different clinical outcomes. Particularly, one subtype was strongly associated with the absence of biochemical recurrence. We validated this finding on 746 samples from 5 distinct cohorts (P = 3.41 × 10-8, N = 746 tumour samples), and showed that our subtyping approach outperformed the most popular prognostic molecular signatures to accurately identify a subset of patients with a non-evolutive disease. We provide a set of 36 transcriptomic biomarkers to robustly identify this subtype of non-evolutive cases whose prevalence was estimated to 22% of all localized PCa tumours. Conclusion: At least 20% of patients with localized PCa can be accurately predicted to have a non-evolutive disease on the basis of their molecular subtype. Those patients should not undergo immediate surgery and rather be placed under active surveillance.

[Active surveillance in prostate cancer: Assessment of MRI in the selection and follow-up of patients]. / Surveillance active dans le cancer de prostate : évaluation de l'IRM dans la sélection et le suivi des patients.

AIM: To evaluate the contribution of multiparametric MRI (MRI) and targeted biopsies (TB) in the selection and follow-up of patients under active surveillance (AS). METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study on 131 patients in AS, with following criteria:≤cT2 stage, PSA≤15ng/mL, Gleason score≤6,≤3 positive biopsies and maximum tumor length≤5mm. Patients' selection and follow-up was performed by the combination of systemic biopsies (SB) and mpMRI±TB. Reclassification was defined by a Gleason score>6 and/or a maximum tumor length>5mm. RESULTS: Overall, 29 patients (22.1 %) were reclassified. Reclassification free survival rate was 93 % and 70 % at 1 year and 4 years respectively. Reclassification independent risk factors were: PSA density>0.15ng/mL/cm3 (RR=2.75), PSA doubling time<3 years (RR=9.28), suspicious lesion on MRI diagnosis (RR=2.79) and occurrence of MRI progression during follow-up (RR=2). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MRI to assess progression for reclassification were 61 %, 69 %, 45 % and 81 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients under AS, mpMRI decreases reclassification rates over time through better initial detection of significant cancers. Its high NPV makes it an efficient monitoring tool to distinguish patients with low risk of reclassification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Pathology findings after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in patients eligible for active surveillance: Contribution of multiparametric MRI to treatment decision]. / Résultats anatomopathologiques après prostatectomie totale pour cancer chez des patients éligibles à une surveillance active : apport de l'IRM multiparamétrique dans la décision de traitement.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze, in patients with prostate cancer (PC) potentially eligible for active surveillance (AS), whether multiparametric-MRI (mp-MRI) predicts presence of clinically significant cancer on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. METHODS: We identified 77 men with PC eligible for AS (PSA≤15ng/mL, stage≤T2a, Gleason score≤6, up to 3 positive cores, maximal cancer core length≤5mm) who underwent RP between 01/2008 and 08/2015. All patients had prebiopsy mp-MRI followed by systematic±targeted biopsies. For each patient, the likelihood of the presence of cancer on mp-MRI was assigned using Likert scale (1 to 5). The predictive factors for the presence of significant cancer on RP specimen (Gleason score≥7 and/or tumoral maximal diameter>10mm) were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Median age was 61 and median PSA was 6.7ng/mL. Overall, 49 (64%) patients had a positive mp-MRI (score≥3). Clinically significant cancer on RP specimen was found in 45 (58%) patients (69% in MRI-positive patients vs 39% in MRI-negative patients). In multivariate analysis, a positive MRI was a predictive factor for the presence of significant cancer on the surgical specimen (OR=3.0; CI95% [1.01-8.88]; P=0.04), as was age (OR=1.17; CI95% [1.05-1.31]; P=0.004) and PSAD (OR=1.10; CI95% [1.01-1.20]; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Mp-MRI is a useful exam for selecting patients eligible for AS even if the situation remains unclear after prostate biopsies including targeted biopsies. Upon confirmation by further studies, mp-MRI should be considered as an independent criterion before entering an AS program. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: A collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended as first-line treatment for cT1 stage kidney tumors because of a better renal function and probably a better overall survival than radical nephrectomy (RN). For larger tumors, PN has a controversial position due to lack of evidence showing good cancer control. The aim of this study was to compare the results of PN and RN in cT2a stage on overall survival and oncological results. METHOD: A retrospective international multicenter study was conducted in the frame of the French kidney cancer research network (UroCCR). We considered all patients aged≥18 years who underwent surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage cT2a (7.1-10cm) between 2000 and 2014. Cox and Fine-Gray models were performed to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS) and cancer-free survival (CFS). Comparison between PN and RN was realized after an adjustment by propensity score considering predefined confounding factors: age, sex, tumor size, pT stage of the TNM classification, histological type, ISUP grade, ASA score. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included. OS at 3 and 5 years was 93.6% and 78.7% after PN and 88.0% and 76.2% after RN, respectively. CSS at 3 and 5 years was 95.4% and 80.2% after PN and 91.0% and 85.0% after RN. No significant difference between groups was found after propensity score adjustment for OS (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.05, P=0.75), CSS (HR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18-1.54, P=0.24) and CFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.50-2.09, P=0.96). CONCLUSION: PN seems equivalent to RN for OS, CSS and CFS in cT2a stage kidney tumors. The risk of recurrence is probably more related to prognostic factors than the surgical technique. The decision to perform a PN should depend on technical feasibility rather than tumor size, both to imperative and elective situation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Utilization of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice and focal therapy: report from a Delphi consensus project.

PURPOSE: To codify the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the interrogation of prostate neoplasia (PCa) in clinical practice and focal therapy (FT). METHODS: An international collaborative consensus project was undertaken using the Delphi method among experts in the field of PCa. An online questionnaire was presented in three consecutive rounds and modified each round based on the comments provided by the experts. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to discuss and finalize the consensus results. RESULTS: mpMRI should be performed in patients with prior negative biopsies if clinical suspicion remains, but not instead of the PSA test, nor as a stand-alone diagnostic tool or mpMRI-targeted biopsies only. It is not recommended to use a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner without an endorectal or pelvic phased-array coil. mpMRI should be performed following standard biopsy-based PCa diagnosis in both the planning and follow-up of FT. If a lesion is seen, MRI-TRUS fusion biopsies should be performed for FT planning. Systematic biopsies are still required for FT planning in biopsy-naïve patients and for patients with residual PCa after FT. Standard repeat biopsies should be taken during the follow-up of FT. The final decision to perform FT should be based on histopathology. However, these consensus statements may differ for expert centers versus non-expert centers. CONCLUSIONS: The mpMRI is an important tool for characterizing and targeting PCa in clinical practice and FT. Standardization of acquisition and reading should be the main priority to guarantee consistent mpMRI quality throughout the urological community.

[Interest using 3D ultrasound and MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection]. / Quel est l'intérêt de l'échographie 3D et fusion d'image IRM pour la détection du cancer de la prostate ?

INTRODUCTION: The strategic therapy for prostate cancer depends on histo-pronostics data, which could be upgraded by obtaining targeted biopsies (TB) with MRI (magnetic resonance imagery) fusion 3D ultrasound. OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic yield of image fusion guided prostate biopsy using image fusion of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) with 3D-TRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and April 2013, 179 consecutive patients underwent outpatient TRUS biopsy using the real-time 3D TRUS tracking system (Urostation™). These patients underwent MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsies (TB) with 3D volume data of the MRI elastically fused with 3D TRUS at the time of biopsy. RESULTS: A hundred and seventy-three patients had TBs with fusion. Mean biopsy core per patient were 11.1 (6-14) for SB and 2.4 (1-6) for TB. SBs were positive in 11% compared to 56% for TB (P<0.001). TB outperformed systematic biopsy(SB) in overall any cancer detection rate, detection of clinically significant cancer (58% vs. 36%), cancer core length (6.8mm vs. 2.8mm), and cancer rate per core (P<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, with TB we have more chance to find a clinically significant cancer (OR:3.72 [2-6.95]). When both TRUS and MRI are positive, there is 2.73 more chance to find a clinically significant cancer. CONCLUSION: MR/TRUS elastic fusion-guided biopsies outperform systematic random biopsies in diagnosing clinically significant cancer. Ability of interpretation of real-time TRUS is essential to perform the higher level of MR/US fusion and should be use for active surveillance. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer. Morbidity, oncological and functional results]. / Prostatectomie totale de rattrapage après échec de traitement local pour cancer de prostate : morbidité, résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels.

INTRODUCTION: Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) for radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is a challenging procedure. To report our experience with sRP for selected patients with local recurrence after primary treatment for localised PCa. METHODS: From 2005 to 2015, 24 patients underwent sRP for recurrent PCa in our center and were included in this retrospective study. Local recurrence was suspected by PSA increase>nadir+2ng/mL and was confirmed by biopsy. Perioperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification, oncological and functional results were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 24 patients with a median age of 59 years (IQR: 55-60) were included. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR: 9-26). Procedures were performed with open-retropubic approach in 50 % and robot-assisted laparoscopic approach in 50 %. Overall, 5 (21 %) and 2 (8 %) patients experienced grade≤IIIa and grade≥IIIb postoperative complication, respectively. Surgical margins were positive in 46 % of cases. Three out of 4 patients with postoperatively detectable PSA (>0.2ng/mL) had positive surgical margins. Seven patients experienced biochemical recurrence in a median delay of 19 months (9-62). Seventy-one percent (5) of these patients experienced clinical recurrence in a median delay of 24 months (10-113). Severe urinary incontinence (≥3 pads/day) and erectile dysfunction were reported in 25 % and 63 %, respectively. CONCLUSION: sRP for patients is a feasible procedure with encouraging local control rate and acceptable morbidity. This technique should be discussed as a treatment option for locally recurrent PCa in well-selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.

PURPOSE: To reach standardized terminology in focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A four-stage modified Delphi consensus project was undertaken among a panel of international experts in the field of FT for PCa. Data on terminology in FT was collected from the panel by three rounds of online questionnaires. During a face-to-face meeting on June 21, 2015, attended by 38 experts, all data from the online rounds were reviewed and recommendations for definitions were formulated. RESULTS: Consensus was attained on 23 of 27 topics; Targeted FT was defined as a lesion-based treatment strategy, treating all identified significant cancer foci; FT was generically defined as an anatomy-based (zonal) treatment strategy. Treatment failure due to the ablative energy inadequately destroying treated tissue is defined as ablation failure. In targeting failure the energy is not adequately applied to the tumor spatially and selection failure occurs when a patient was wrongfully selected for FT. No definition of biochemical recurrence can be recommended based on the current data. Important definitions for outcome measures are potency (minimum IIEF-5 score of 21), incontinence (new need for pads or leakage) and deterioration in urinary function (increase in IPSS >5 points). No agreement on the best quality of life tool was established, but UCLA-EPIC and EORTC-QLQ-30 were most commonly supported by the experts. A complete overview of statements is presented in the text. CONCLUSION: Focal therapy is an emerging field of PCa therapeutics. Standardization of definitions helps to create comparable research results and facilitate clear communication in clinical practice.

[Factors influencing the choice of nondonor families in a French organ-harvesting center]. / Analyse des raisons motivant le refus du don d'organes par les familles de patients en état de mort encéphalique dans un centre régional de prélèvement.

OBJECTIVES: Report the reasons that lead families to refuse organ donation during their close solicitation by hospital coordination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted between 2012 and 2015, including 148 (34%) refusal of organ donation among 426 patients identified in a state of brain death. A questionnaire of the family was completed for each interview. Collected data concerned patient characteristics, cause of death, description of the interview and reasons for refusal. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 50 years with a sex ratio of 1.4 men to 1 woman. The most common reason for non-donor family was the desire to maintain the integrity of the body of the patient (28%) followed by a religious order pattern (11%), brutality and suddenness of death (9%), the denial of death (6%) and early age of the donor (5%). In 39% of cases, the family said that the donor had expressed a written or oral refusal in his lifetime. CONCLUSION: A better understanding of the reasons leading to the refusal of non-donor family could provide assistance to the medical team on actions to general public with the aim to reduce the refusal rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.