Preoperative TIPS and in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis undergoing surgery.

Background & Aims: Cirrhosis is associated with an increased surgical morbidity and mortality. Portal hypertension and the surgery type have been established as critical determinants of postoperative outcome. We aim to evaluate the hypothesis that preoperative transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a lower incidence of in-house mortality/liver transplantation (LT) after surgery. Methods: A retrospective database search for the years 2010-2020 was carried out. We identified 64 patients with cirrhosis who underwent surgery within 3 months after TIPS placement and 131 patients with cirrhosis who underwent surgery without it (controls). Operations were categorised into low-risk and high-risk procedures. The primary endpoint was in-house mortality/LT. We analysed the influence of high-risk surgery, preoperative TIPS placement, age, sex, baseline creatinine, presence of ascites, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation (CLIF-C AD), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores on in-house mortality/LT by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: In both the TIPS and the control cohort, most patients presented with a Child-Pugh B stage (37/64, 58% vs. 70/131, 53%) at the time of surgery, but the median MELD score was higher in the TIPS cohort (14 vs. 11 points). Low-risk and high-risk procedures amounted to 47% and 53% in both cohorts. The incidence of in-house mortality/LT was lower in the TIPS cohort (12/64, 19% vs. 52/131, 40%), also when further subdivided into low-risk (0/30, 0% vs. 10/61, 16%) and high-risk surgery (12/34, 35% vs. 42/70, 60%). Preoperative TIPS placement was associated with a lower rate for postoperative in-house mortality/LT (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.00) on multivariable analysis. Conclusions: A preoperative TIPS might be associated with reduced postoperative in-house mortality in selected patients with cirrhosis. Impact and implications: Patients with cirrhosis are at risk for more complications and a higher mortality after surgical procedures. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used to treat complications of cirrhosis, but it is unclear if it also helps to lower the risk of surgery. This study takes a look at complications and mortality of patients undergoing surgery with or without a TIPS, and we found that patients with a TIPS develop less complications and have an improved survival. Therefore, a preoperative TIPS should be considered in selected patients, especially if indicated by ascites.

Corrigendum: PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy demonstrates favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1326078.].

The Multifaceted Roles of Macrophages in NAFLD Pathogenesis.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the liver manifestation of the metabolic syndrome. NAFLD constitutes a spectrum of pathologies ranging from simple hepatic steatosis (nonalcoholic fatty liver) to the more progressive form of steatohepatitis and fibrosis, which can culminate in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Macrophages play multiple roles in the context of NAFLD pathogenesis by regulating inflammatory responses and metabolic homeostasis in the liver and thereby may represent an attractive therapeutic target. Advances in high-resolution methods have highlighted the extraordinary heterogeneity and plasticity of hepatic macrophage populations and activation states thereof. Harmful/disease-promoting as well as beneficial/restorative macrophage phenotypes co-exist and are dynamically regulated, thus this complexity must be taken into consideration in strategies concerning therapeutic targeting. Macrophage heterogeneity in NAFLD includes their distinct ontogeny (embryonic Kupffer cells vs bone marrow-/monocyte-derived macrophages) as well as their functional phenotype, for example, inflammatory phagocytes, lipid- and scar-associated macrophages, or restorative macrophages. Here, we discuss the multifaceted role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of NAFLD in steatosis, steatohepatitis, and transition to fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, focusing on both their beneficial and maladaptive functions at different disease stages. We also highlight the systemic aspect of metabolic dysregulation and illustrate the contribution of macrophages in the reciprocal crosstalk between organs and compartments (eg, the gut-liver axis, adipose tissue, and cardiohepatic metabolic interactions). Furthermore, we discuss the current state of development of pharmacologic treatment options targeting macrophage biology.

PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy demonstrates favorable safety profile in patients with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many malignancies in recent years. However, immune-related adverse events (irAE) are a frequent concern in clinical practice. The safety profile of ICI for the treatment of malignancies in patients diagnosed with autoimmune and cholestatic liver disease (AILD) remains unclear. Due to this uncertainty, these patients were excluded from ICI clinical trials and ICI are withheld from this patient group. In this retrospective multicenter study, we assessed the safety of ICI in patients with AILD. Methods: We contacted tertiary referral hospitals for the identification of AILD patients under ICI treatment in Europe via the European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases (ERN RARE-LIVER). Fourteen centers contributed data on AILD patients with malignancies being treated with ICI, another three centers did not treat these patients with ICI due to fear of irAEs. Results: In this study, 22 AILD patients under ICI treatment could be identified. Among these patients, 12 had primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), five had primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), four had autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and one patient had an AIH-PSC variant syndrome. Eleven patients had hepatobiliary cancers and the other 11 patients presented with non-hepatic tumors. The applied ICIs were atezolizumab (n=7), durvalumab (n=5), pembrolizumab (n=4), nivolumab (n=4), spartalizumab (n=1), and in one case combined immunotherapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Among eight patients who presented with grade 1 or 2 irAEs, three demonstrated liver irAEs. Cases with grades ≥ 3 irAEs were not reported. No significant changes in liver tests were observed during the first year after the start of ICI. Discussion: This European multicenter study demonstrates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors appear to be safe in patients with AILD. Further studies on the safety of more potent dual immune checkpoint therapy are needed. We conclude that immunotherapy should not categorically be withheld from patients with AILD.