RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is a potential sequela of high-risk breast cancer treatment. Preventive treatment with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has emerged as the standard of care; however, there is relatively little known about factors that may contribute to procedural failure. METHODS: A retrospectively maintained, institutional review board-approved study followed patients who underwent ILR at the time of ALND at our tertiary care center between May 2018 and May 2023. Patients who presented for at least one follow-up visit in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic met the criteria for inclusion. Patients who developed lymphedema despite ILR and potential contributing factors were further explored. RESULTS: 349 patients underwent ILR at our institution between May 2018 and May 2023. 341 of these patients have presented for follow-up in our multidisciplinary lymphedema clinic. 32 (9.4%) patients developed lymphedema despite ILR. This cohort was significantly more likely to be obese (56% vs 35%, P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrates increased odds of procedural failure in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (odds ratio 2.6 [1.2-5.5], P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data comment upon our institutions outcomes following ILR. Patients who develop lymphedema despite ILR tend to have a higher BMI, with a significantly increased risk in patients with a BMI of 30 or greater. Consideration of these data is critical for preprocedural counseling and may support a BMI cutoff when considering candidacy for ILR going forward, as well as when optimizing failures for secondary lymphedema procedures.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Obesidad , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/prevención & control , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/cirugía , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Adulto , Axila/cirugía , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Linfedema/prevención & control , Linfedema/cirugía , Linfedema/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a chronic condition that can negatively affect the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is emerging as a technique for the prevention of BCRL. This study compared the incidence of BRCL in patients who received ILR and those who were not amenable to ILR. METHODS: Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database between 2016 and 2021. Some patients were deemed nonamenable to ILR due to a lack of visualized lymphatics or anatomic variability (eg, spatial relationships or size discrepancies). Descriptive statistics, independent t test, and Pearson χ 2 test were used. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to assess the association between lymphedema and ILR. A loose age-matched subsample was created for subanalysis. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients were included in this study (252 patients who underwent ILR and 29 patients who did not). The patients had a mean age of 53 ± 12 years and body mass index of 28.6 ± 6.8 kg/m 2 . The incidence of developing lymphedema in patients with ILR was 4.8% compared with 24.1% in patients who underwent attempted ILR without lymphatic reconstruction ( P = 0.001). Patients who did not undergo ILR had significantly higher odds of developing lymphedema compared with those who had ILR (odds ratio, 10.7 [3.2-36.3], P < 0.001; matched OR, 14.2 [2.6-77.9], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that ILR was associated with lower rates of BCRL. Further studies are needed to determine which factors place patients at highest risk of developing BCRL.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Axila/cirugía , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/prevención & control , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/prevención & control , Linfedema/patología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most literature regarding traumatic Le Fort or maxillary fractures exists in the adult population, with limited information regarding the epidemiology and management of pediatric fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate fracture mechanism, surgical management, and associated injuries in pediatric patients with Le Fort fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of all pediatric patients age ≤18 years diagnosed with facial fractures at a single level 1 trauma center over a 10-year period (January 2006-December 2015) was performed. Demographics, fracture location, mechanism of injury, and hospital course were abstracted as well as associated injuries and need for operative management. RESULTS: A total of 1274 patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine (5.4%) presented with Le Fort fractures. Factors associated with Le Fort fractures included motor vehicle collisions (Pâ<â0.001), increased age (Pâ<â0.001), and traumatic brain injury (Pâ<â0.04). Patients with Le Fort fractures were more likely to need intensive care unit admission (Pâ<â0.001), surgical management (Pâ<â0.001), transfusions (Pâ<â0.001), secondary fixation surgery (Pâ<â0.001), and have a longer length of stay (Pâ<â0.001). Multivariate showed increased odds for increased age (OR 1.1; 95%CI 1.04-1.17) and concomitant orbit fractures (OR 8.33; 95%CI 4.08-19.34). Decreased odds were associated for all mechanisms of injury other than motor vehicle collisions (Other blunt trauma: OR 0.36; 95%CI 0.2-0.6. Penetrating trauma: OR 0.13; 95%CI 0.01-0.6). CONCLUSION: Maxillary or Le Fort fractures represent a small portion of pediatric facial fractures but require high rates of operative management. The high velocity required to create this fracture type is associated with significant traumatic comorbidities, which can complicate the hospital course.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Maxilares , Fracturas Orbitales , Fracturas Craneales , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Fracturas Maxilares/epidemiología , Fracturas Maxilares/cirugía , Fracturas Orbitales/epidemiología , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After traumatic arrest, resuscitative thoracotomy is lifesaving in appropriately selected patients, yet data are limited regarding hospital course after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The objective of this study was to describe the natural history of resuscitative thoracotomy survivors admitted to the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review (January 1, 2012-June 30, 2017) of all adult trauma patients who underwent resuscitative thoracotomy after traumatic arrest at two adult level 1 trauma centers. Data evaluated include demographics, injury characteristics, hospital course, and outcome. RESULTS: Over 66 mo, there were 52,624 trauma activations. Two hundred ninety-eight patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy and 96 (32%) survived to ICU admission. At ICU admission, mean age was 35.8 ± 14.5 y, 79 (82%) were male, 36 (38%) sustained blunt trauma, and the mean injury severity score was 32.3 ± 13.7. Eight blunt and 20 penetrating patients (22% and 34% of ICU admissions, respectively) survived to discharge. 67% of deaths in the ICU occurred within the first 24 h, whereas 90% of those alive at day 21 survived to discharge. For the 28 survivors, mean ICU length of stay was 24.1 ± 17.9 d and mean hospital length of stay was 43.9 ± 32.1 d. Survivors averaged 1.9 ± 1.5 complications. Twenty-four patients (86% of hospital survivors) went home or to a rehabilitation center. CONCLUSIONS: After resuscitative thoracotomy and subsequent ICU admission, 29% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Complications and a long hospital stay should be expected, but the functional outcome for survivors is not as bleak as previously reported.
Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas Penetrantes/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resucitación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSI) are uncommon events, but can be devastating injuries. Facial fractures have been associated with injuries to the cervical spine in children, but may be deemed isolated facial fractures and bypass the standard trauma pathway. The objective of this study is to describe the mechanisms, associated injuries and outcomes of pediatric cervical spine injuries in patients with known maxillofacial trauma at a level 1 trauma center. An analysis was performed of all patients under the age of 18 with maxillofacial trauma admissions to a single level 1 trauma center, from 2006 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of a cervical spine injury. Data was abstracted to include demographic, mechanism and clinical outcomes data. There were 1274 patients who were admitted with maxillofacial trauma during the study period. Of these, 72 (5.7%) experienced a cervical spine injury. Factors associated with cervical spine injuries include older age and penetrating mechanism. Cervical spine injuries were associated with concomitant traumatic brain injuries and skull fractures. Patients with spine injuries were more like to experience a longer length of stay and death. On multivariate analysis, only increased age predicted CSI. Our database demonstrated a 5.7% incidence of pediatric cervical spine injuries in patients with maxillofacial trauma. This incidence is higher than previously published reports of smaller cohorts. Clinicians must take care to stabilize the cervical spine in any patient with facial fractures, especially during work up and diagnostic maneuvers performed before spinal injuries are ruled out.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/lesiones , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/cirugía , Traumatismos del Cuello/cirugía , Traumatismos Vertebrales/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Cuello/complicaciones , Traumatismos del Cuello/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/complicaciones , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Traumatismos Vertebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Vertebrales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Pediatric facial fractures present and are managed differently than the adult population. This study describes the pattern and mechanism of facial fractures in children and identifies factors associated with need for surgical management. An IRB-approved retrospective chart analysis of all pediatric patients age ≤ 18 years diagnosed with facial fractures at our level 1 trauma center over a 10-year period (January 2006-December 2015) was performed. Demographics, fracture location, mechanism of injury, concomitant head and neck injuries, and surgical management were reviewed. Statistical analysis was then performed comparing surgical and nonsurgical cohorts using univariate and multivariate analyses. One thousand two hundred seventy-four patients were diagnosed with facial fractures. Five hundred seventeen (40.6%) underwent surgical management. Two thousand one hundred seventy-two total facial fractures were recorded. Orbit fractures (29%) were the most commonly recorded, observed in 49% of patients presenting. Increased age was associated with increased odds of surgical management (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.09-1.16). Mandible (OR 9.28; 95% CI 6.88-12.51) and Le Fort fractures (OR 19.73; 95% CI 9.78-39.77) had increased odds of surgical management. Patients with traumatic brain injury had reduced odds (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.83) of surgical management for their facial fractures. Older pediatric patients may be more likely to require surgical management of their facial fractures, especially those with mandible or Le Fort fractures. Patients with traumatic brain injury are likely to sustain life threatening injuries, deferring repair of their facial fractures. Patient education and counseling, as well as predictive models, can be improved to reflect these data.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Craneales , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Fracturas Craneales/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric facial fractures due to intentionally violent mechanisms represent a unique subset of facial fractures. The objective of our research is to identify how violence affects patterns of facial fractures and their management in pediatric patients. METHODS: An IRB approved, retrospective study of our institution's pediatric patients ≤18 years of age who presented with ≥1 facial fracture due to violence from January 2006 to December 2015 was performed. Violence was defined as trauma intended to hurt another or self. Demographics, fractures, mechanism, concomitant injuries, and management were analyzed. RESULTS: The 1274 patients were diagnosed with facial fractures, with 235 of these due to violence (18%). These patients of violence (POV) had 332 fractures, with an average fracture per patient of 1.4â±â.0.8. The majority (86%) were male, Non-Hispanic African American (35%), and the average age was 15.9â±â2.8 years. The most common fracture was the mandible (50% of patients) and most common mechanism was assault (76%). The POV were older, male, and of minority race/ethnic groups when compared to patients of non-violence (PONV) (Pâ<0.01). The POV presented with fewer concomitant injuries, were less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, and more often surgically managed when compared to the PONV (Pâ<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest US, single institution, Level 1 trauma center study of pediatric facial fractures. Pediatric patients with facial fractures due to a violent mechanism represent a distinct category of trauma patients with a unique profile of injuries.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Craneales/epidemiología , Violencia , Adolescente , Niño , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the factors that influence caregiver-reported completion of nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy for patients with cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: An IRB-approved 30-question survey. SETTING: Outpatient clinic for patients with cleft lip. PATIENTS: Patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip treated with NAM therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Survey of previous experiences. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of noncompletion for patients initiating NAM therapy and identifiable causes. RESULTS: Of 94 patients who underwent NAM, 13 (13.8%) failed to complete NAM therapy. Reasons for incomplete treatment included: obstructive sleep apnea, device intolerance, tape issues, and lack of support. Patients who did not complete NAM therapy were less likely to have primary caregivers >30-year old (P = .045) and more likely to be the first child for the family (P = .021) and have a bilateral cleft (P = .03). Caregivers of NAM patients were less satisfied with the outcome (P < .001) when they did not complete therapy. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a high number of parents fail to complete this therapy for many reasons, personal and medical. More data are needed to elucidate true prevalence of NAM noncompletion and to establish evidence-based guidelines to reduce barriers to care for completing NAM treatment.
Asunto(s)
Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Lactante , Nariz , Cuidados PreoperatoriosRESUMEN
Background: First described by Michal et al in 1972, penile revascularization for vasculogenic impotence and its outcomes has been scarcely reported in plastic surgery literature. Such injuries are often secondary to atherosclerosis of the distal internal pudendal, common penile or proximal cavernosal artery, or locoregional trauma. Various techniques have been described to restore blood flow to the cavernosal body. Methods: In this report, we review 2 cases of penile revascularization for arteriogenic erectile dysfunction at our level 1 trauma center in 2021-2022 completed by the senior author in conjunction with urology. Results: Both patients sustained pelvic crush injuries with resultant arteriogenic impotence minimally responsive to medical management with phosphodiesterase inhibitors and/or injection therapy. After thorough urologic and vascular workup, they underwent microsurgical revascularization of the penis utilizing the deep inferior epigastric arteries with anastomosis to the deep dorsal penile veins. Both patients demonstrated improvement in erectile dysfunction and were able to achieve sustained erection with adequate glans tumescence on minimal pharmacotherapy postoperatively. One patient noted ability to achieve penetration. Patient 1 experienced postoperative retention requiring Foley placement, and both patients experienced glans edema requiring additional urologic procedures (patient 1: dorsal slit, patient 2: completion circumcision). Conclusions: Overall, we have demonstrated improvement of sexual function with the most common complication being prolonged penile edema requiring release of constriction by our urology colleagues. Additional research in the plastic surgery field is warranted to further refine the technique and improve outcomes.