Coping with glioblastoma: prognostic communication and prognostic understanding among patients with recurrent glioblastoma, caregivers, and oncologists.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating neuro-oncologic disease with invariably poor prognosis. Despite this, research shows patients have unrealistic perceptions of their prognosis, which may relate in part to communication patterns between patients, caregivers and oncologists. The purpose of this study was to examine communication processes and goals among patients, caregivers, and oncologists to elucidate drivers of prognostic understanding (PU) in the context of recurrent GBM. METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-center study enrolling adult patients with GBM, caregivers, and oncologists, who independently reported the content of a specific discussion involving the disclosure of GBM recurrence. Communication processes and goals were characterized for each participant, and concordance between all dyads and patient-caregiver-oncologist triads were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen patient, caregiver, and oncologist triads were analyzed. At the individual level, three (17.6%) patients and 8 (47.1%) caregivers reported having discussed prognosis during the clinical encounter, as compared to ten oncologists (58.8%). Seven patients (41.2%) and 5 caregivers (29.4%), versus thirteen oncologists (76.5%) reported ever discussing prognosis or life expectancy at previous appointments. Generally, patient-caregiver concordance (i.e., both answered the same) regarding communication goals and processes was low. Triads showed limited concordant responses in discussing curability (n = 5), prognosis (n = 4), end-of-life treatment goals (n = 4), and ever discussing prognosis (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Patients, caregivers and oncologists had discordant views regarding communication processes and prognostic goals, even when recalling a single discussion. This study highlights the importance of clear and frequent communication about prognosis, and the need for further research on communication and PU in the neuro-oncology setting.

Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist.

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and their families. Despite numerous treatment advances, malignant brain tumors are universally incurable and long-term survival is limited. Treatment response, prognosis, and survival depend on underlying histopathology and recently defined molecular features. Patients suffer from a disproportionately high symptom burden throughout the disease trajectory and at the end of life. Pronounced neurologic decline and psychological distress significantly impair quality of life (QoL) and impose high supportive care needs relative to other systemic cancers. Palliative interventions addressing brain tumor-specific symptoms, such as seizures, cognitive dysfunction, and headaches, are paramount to maintaining QoL. In the terminal phase of illness, most brain tumor patients lose the ability to communicate and participate in end-of-life decision-making. The benefits of advance care planning and early integration of specialized palliative care are well-established in other systemic cancers and have received wider recognition in neuro-oncology. We review how to approach neurological symptoms in brain tumor patients, as well as address prognosis and advance care planning with the goal of improving QoL for patients and caregivers.

Impaired neurocognitive function in glioma patients: from pathophysiology to novel intervention strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review succinctly summarizes the recent literature regarding etiological contributors to impaired neurocognitive function (NCF) in adult patients with glioma. A brief overview of intervention and prevention strategies is also provided. RECENT FINDINGS: A majority of patients with glioma exhibit NCF deficits, most frequently in memory and executive functioning. Impairments are often disabling and associated with reduced quality of life and survival. Cause is multifactorial and includes the tumour itself, treatments received and associated comorbidities. Although modern techniques such as brain mapping, dosing modifications and prophylactic medication aim to improve the NCF outcomes following neurosurgical resection and radiation therapy, a sizeable proportion of patients continue to evidence treatment-related NCF declines related to adverse effects to both local and distributed cerebral networks. Numerous patient and tumour characteristics, including genetic markers and sociodemographic factors, influence the pattern and severity of NCF impairment. Some rehabilitative and pharmacologic approaches show promise in mitigating NCF impairment in this population, though benefits are somewhat modest and larger scale intervention studies are needed. SUMMARY: Research regarding NCF in patients with glioma has dramatically proliferated, providing insights into the mechanisms underlying impaired NCF and pointing to potential interventions, though further work is needed.

Randomized prospective trial of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for bevacizumab-resistant high-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: Outcomes for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) progressing on bevacizumab (BEV) are dismal. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) has been shown to be feasible and safe when delivered in this setting, but prospective evidence is lacking. This single-institution randomized trial compared FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy versus BEV-based chemotherapy alone for BEV-resistant recurrent malignant glioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HGG patients on BEV with tumor progression after 2 previous treatments were randomized to 1) FSRS plus BEV-based chemotherapy or 2) BEV-based chemotherapy with irinotecan, etoposide, temozolomide, or carboplatin. FSRS was delivered as 32 Gy (8 Gy × 4 fractions within 2 weeks) to the gross target volume and 24 Gy (6 Gy × 4 fractions) to the clinical target volume (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery abnormality). The primary endpoints were local control (LC) at 2 months and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 29 had glioblastoma (WHO IV) and 6 had anaplastic glioma (WHO III). The median number of prior recurrences was 3. Patients treated with FSRS had significantly improved PFS (5.1 vs 1.8 months, P < .001) and improved LC at 2 months (82% [14/17] vs 27% [4/15], P = .002). The overall median survival was 6.6 months (7.2 months with FSRS vs 4.8 months with chemotherapy alone, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: FSRS combined with BEV-based chemotherapy in recurrent HGG patients progressing on BEV is feasible and improves LC and PFS when compared to treatment with BEV-based chemotherapy alone.

Effect of seizure timing on long-term survival in patients with brain tumor.

OBJECTIVE: Seizures often occur in patients with primary brain tumor (BT). The aim of this study was to determine if there is an association between the time of occurrence of seizures during the course of BT and survival of these patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at Henry Ford Hospital, an urban tertiary referral center, included all patients who were diagnosed with primary BTs at Henry Ford Health System between January 2006 and December 2014. Timing of seizure occurrence, if occurred at presentation or after the tumor diagnosis during follow-up period, in different grades of BTs, and survival of these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 901 identified patients, 662 (53% male; mean age: 56 years) were included in final analysis, and seizures occurred in 283 patients (43%). Patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III BT with seizures as a presenting symptom only had better survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.67; P = 0.004). Seizures that occurred after tumor diagnosis only (adjusted HR: 2.11; 95% CI, 1.59-2.81; P < 0.001) in patients with WHO grade II tumors (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI, 1.05-11.1; P = 0.041) and WHO grade IV tumors (adjusted HR: 2.14; 95% CI, 1.58-2.90; P < 0.001) had higher mortality. Seizures that occurred at presentation and after diagnosis also had higher mortality (adjusted HR: 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.80; P = 0.049), in patients with meningioma (adjusted HR: 6.19; 95% CI, 1.30-29.4; P = 0.021) and grade III tumors (adjusted HR: 6.19; 95% CI, 2.56-15.0; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Seizures occurred in almost half of the patients with BTs. The association between seizures in patients with BT and their survival depends on the time of occurrence of seizures, if occurring at presentation or after tumor diagnosis, and the type of tumor. Better survival was noted in patients with WHO grade III BTs who had seizures at presentation at the time of diagnosis, while higher mortality was noted in WHO grade II tumors who had seizure at presentation and after tumor diagnosis, and in grade IV tumors after tumor diagnosis.

Working plan for the use of patient-reported outcome measures in adults with brain tumours: a Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) initiative.

The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Patient-Reported Outcome (RANO-PRO) working group is an international multidisciplinary collaboration that provides guidance on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical trials and practice for adult patients with brain tumours. Findings from both PROs and traditional outcome measures, such as survival, and clinical or radiological response, are essential to inform the research community, policy makers, physicians, and patients in the treatment decision-making process. Previous initiatives in oncology have focused on guidelines concerning the collection, analysis, interpretation, and reporting of PRO data. However, we recommend the application of appropriate PRO instruments, with respect to its content and measurement properties (ie, research question, content validity, and other measurement properties), in brain tumour research. PROs should be well defined and reliable to generate high-quality evidence, and our recommendations on the use of specific PRO measures could help to improve the quality of PRO evidence derived from neuro-oncological studies, and might add a new dimension in how the value of therapeutics is assessed in patients with brain tumours. In this Policy Review, we present the RANO-PRO working plan for the use of PROs in adults with brain tumours.

Correction to: First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of one of the author names. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author names are indicated and the author name has been updated in the original publication. The authors also reported an error in the Methods section of the original article. In this Correction the incorrect and correct versions of the affected sentence are indicated. The original article has not been updated with regards to the error in the Methods section.

First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This Phase 3 trial evaluates the addition of an autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax®-L) to standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: After surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive temozolomide plus DCVax-L (n = 232) or temozolomide and placebo (n = 99). Following recurrence, all patients were allowed to receive DCVax-L, without unblinding. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 331), median OS (mOS) was 23.1 months from surgery. Because of the cross-over trial design, nearly 90% of the ITT population received DCVax-L. For patients with methylated MGMT (n = 131), mOS was 34.7 months from surgery, with a 3-year survival of 46.4%. As of this analysis, 223 patients are ≥ 30 months past their surgery date; 67 of these (30.0%) have lived ≥ 30 months and have a Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived mOS of 46.5 months. 182 patients are ≥ 36 months past surgery; 44 of these (24.2%) have lived ≥ 36 months and have a KM-derived mOS of 88.2 months. A population of extended survivors (n = 100) with mOS of 40.5 months, not explained by known prognostic factors, will be analyzed further. Only 2.1% of ITT patients (n = 7) had a grade 3 or 4 adverse event that was deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. Overall adverse events with DCVax were comparable to standard therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of DCVax-L to standard therapy is feasible and safe in glioblastoma patients, and may extend survival. Trial registration Funded by Northwest Biotherapeutics; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00045968; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968?term=NCT00045968&rank=1 ; initially registered 19 September 2002.

The safety of magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for cerebral radiation necrosis.

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a known complication of radiation therapy. Treatment options are limited and include steroids, bevacizumab, and surgery. This study seeks to determine the safety of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for CRN and identify the pattern of post-ablation volume change over time. Patients undergoing LITT for tumor treatment at Henry Ford Hospital between November 2013 and January 2016 with biopsy-confirmed CRN were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed with attention to ablation volume, survival, demographic data, steroid dose, and complications. Imaging occurred at set intervals beginning pre-ablation. Ten patients with 11 ablations were evaluated. Four patients had a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma, while six had metastatic lesions. An average of 86% of CRN volume was ablated. Ablation volume increased to 430% of initial CRN volume at 1-2 weeks before decreasing to 69% after 6 months. No patient had a decline in baseline neurological examination while in the hospital. Four patients developed delayed neurological deficits likely due to post-operative edema, of which three improved back to baseline. The 6-month survival was 77.8% and the 1-year survival was 64.8% based on Kaplan-Meier curve estimates. In this study, LITT was a relatively safe treatment for CRN, providing both a diagnostic and therapeutic solution for refractory patients. Significant increase in ablation volume was noted at 1-2 months, gradually decreasing in size to less than the original volume by 6 months. Further studies are needed to better define the role of LITT in the treatment of CRN.

Cerebral edema induced by laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiotherapy in close succession in patients with brain tumor.

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an image-guided technique that uses high temperature to ablate pathological tissue. Brain tumor patients undergoing LITT may also undergo radiation therapy (RT) either before or after LITT. Both procedures have been reported to increase cerebral edema and thereby the two treatments in close succession may worsen existing edema that can be difficult to control. The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency of increased and/or symptomatic cerebral edema after combined LITT and RT, the radiographic and clinical signs of this cerebral edema, and the treatment required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LITT and RT less than 60 days apart. Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and clinical information were reviewed at three time points (pre-treatment, post-LITT, and post-RT). RESULTS: The study cohort comprised eight patients: six with glioblastoma, one with anaplastic astrocytoma, and one with metastasis. Pre-treatment MRI showed cerebral edema in seven patients. Post-LITT MRI showed worsening cerebral edema in three patients, of which one was symptomatic. Post-RT MRI showed worsening cerebral edema in one patient. One patient who received RT before LITT had asymptomatic cerebral edema post-RT that improved post-LITT. Three patients required prolonged steroid therapy (>65 days), while two patients required bevacizumab for steroid-refractory edema. CONCLUSIONS: LITT and RT treatment in close succession can induce cerebral edema, which can usually be managed successfully with steroids, although the treatment period may be prolonged. A minority of patients may require more aggressive treatment, such as bevacizumab. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:917-923, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The role of tumor board conferences in neuro-oncology: a nationwide provider survey.

The tumor board or multidisciplinary cancer meeting (MCM) is the foundation of high value multidisciplinary oncology care, coordinating teams of specialists. Little is known on how these meetings are implemented in Neuro-oncology. Benefits of MCMs include coordination, direction for complicated cases, education, and a forum for communication, emerging technology, and clinical trials. This study identifies participation and utilization of neuro-oncology MCMs. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was dispersed through an internet questionnaire. The Society of Neuro-Oncology and the American Brain Tumor Association provided a list of dedicated neuro-oncology centers. All National Cancer Institute designated centers, and participants in the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium or the Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative were included, identifying 85 centers. Discussion included primary brain tumors (100%), challenging cases (98%), recurrent disease (96%), neoplastic spine disease (93%), metastatic brain lesions (89%), pre-surgical cases (82%), pathology (76%), and paraneoplastic disease (40%). MCMs were composed of neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, and radiation oncologists (100%), radiologists (98%), pathologists (96%), and clinical trial participants (64%). Individual preparation ranged from 15 to 300 min. MCMs were valued for clinical decision making (94%), education (89%), and access to clinical trials (69%). 13% documented MCMs in the medical record. 38% of centers used a molecular tumor board; however, many commented with uncertainty as to how this is defined. Neuro-oncology MCMs at leading U.S. institutions demonstrate congruity of core disciplines, cases discussed, and perceived value. We identified variability in preparation time and implementation of MCM recommendations. There is high uncertainty as to the definition and application of a molecular tumor board.

Managing Glioblastoma in the Elderly Patient: New Opportunities.

Managing elderly patients with glioblastoma presents a unique set of challenges, including a scarcity of available data, which limits evidence-based recommendations. Nearly half of patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma are over 65 years of age, a common cutoff point in the medical literature for identifying an elderly population. The current standard of care for glioblastoma patients younger than 70 years of age with satisfactory performance status is maximal safe resection, followed by radiation therapy of 60 Gy (delivered in 30 fractions over a 6-week period) with concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant temozolomide. There is no consensus recommendation regarding the best available treatment for patients over age 70 with glioblastoma; however, multiple studies have shown molecular characterization of glioblastoma in this group-particularly MGMT promoter methylation status-to be valuable in treatment decision making. Results of the phase III CE6 study by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group challenge the existing treatment paradigms for glioblastoma in the elderly. This review discusses best practices for the treatment of glioblastoma in patients older than 65 years, and highlights management concerns in caring for this particular patient population.

Recent Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Ependymomas.

OPINION STATEMENT: Ependymomas are a subgroup of ependymal glia-derived neoplasms that affect children as well as adults. Arising within any CNS compartment, symptoms at presentation can range from acute onset due to increased intracranial pressure to insidious myelopathy. The overall survival (OS) outcomes in adult patients across the subgroups is heterogeneous with subependymoma having an excellent prognosis often even in the absence of any treatment, whereas supratentorial ependymomas tend to be higher grade in nature and may have an OS of 5 years despite gross total resection and adjuvant radiation. The rarity of ependymal tumors, together still only representing 1.8% of all primary CNS tumors, has been a long-standing challenge in defining optimal treatment guidelines via prospective randomized trials. Retrospective studies have supported maximal safe resection, ideally gross total resection, as the optimal treatment with adjuvant radiation therapy proffering additional tumor control. The evidence for efficacy of chemotherapy and targeted agents in adult ependymomas is minimal. Recent investigations of the molecular, genetic, and DNA methylation profiles of ependymal tumors across all age groups and CNS compartments have identified distinct oncogenic gene products as well as nine molecular subgroups correlating with similar outcomes. The 2016 World Health Organization of Tumors of the Central Nervous System update addresses some of these findings, although their clinical significance has not yet been fully validated. There are inconsistent survival outcomes in retrospective studies for ependymomas graded as II versus III, bringing into question the validity of histologic grading which is subject to high interobserver variability in part due to inconsistent application of mitotic count parameters.

Impact of provider level, training and gender on the utilization of palliative care and hospice in neuro-oncology: a North-American survey.

Specialized palliative care (PC) services have emerged to address symptoms and provide end-of-life management for patients with brain tumors. The utilization patterns of PC in neuro-oncology are unknown. A 22-question survey was distributed to participants of the society for neuro-oncology annual meeting 2012 (n = 4487). Nonparametric methods including Wilcoxon two-sample and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess differences in responses. 239 (5.3 %) evaluable responses were received; 79 % of respondents were physicians, and 17 % were nurses or midlevel providers. Forty-seven percent were medical or neuro-oncologists, 31 % neurosurgeons and 11 % radiation oncologists. Forty percent had no formal training in PC, 57 % had some formal training and 3 % completed a PC fellowship. Seventy-nine percent practiced in an academic setting. Of the respondents, 57 % referred patients to PC when symptoms required treatment and 18 % at end of life. Only 51 % of all providers felt comfortable dealing with end-of-life issues and symptoms, while 33 % did not. Fifty-one percent preferred a service named "Supportive Care" rather than "Palliative Care" (MDs > midlevel providers, p < 0.001), and 32 % felt that patient expectations for ongoing therapy hindered their ability to make PC referrals. Female gender, formal training in neuro-oncology and PC, and medical versus surgical neuro-oncology training were significantly associated with hospice referral, comfort in dealing with end-of-life issues, and ease of access to PC services. Provider level, specialty, gender, training in PC and neuro-oncology have significant impact on the utilization of PC and hospice in neuro-oncology.

Symptoms and socio-economic impact of ependymoma on adult patients: results of the Adult Ependymoma Outcomes Project 2.

Ependymoma is a rare central nervous system tumor of adults. Reports of patient symptoms, interference patterns and costs encountered by patients and families are limited. Adult ependymoma patients completed the online Ependymoma Outcomes Questionnaire II. The survey assesses disease and functional status as well as socio-economic factors. Descriptive statistics were used to report disease characteristics as well as economic and social impact. Independent samples t test was used to test if differences exist between high- and low-income groups in terms of symptom severity. Correlations were calculated between symptoms and cost estimates. 86 international patients participated (male = 50 %). The economic analysis focused on 78 respondents from the US. 48 % were employed and 55 % earned ≥$60,000. Tumors were located in the brain (44 %), spine (44 %) or both (12 %). Spine patients compared to brain patients reported significantly worse pain (4.4 versus 2.2, p < .003), numbness (5.3 versus 2.2, p < .001), fatigue (5.1 versus 3.6, p < .03), changes in bowel patterns (3.8 versus 1.4, p < .003) and weakness (4.2 versus 2.1, p < .006). Brain patients compared with spine patients had increased lack of appetite (.4 versus 2, p < .014). Patients with lower income (≤$59,999) had more problems concentrating (p < .024) and worse cognitive module severity scores (p < .024). Estimated average monthly out-of-pocket spending was $168 for medical co-pays and $59 for prescription medication. Patients with ependymoma are highly affected by their symptoms. Spinal patients report higher severity of symptoms. Patients in the lower income group report significantly higher severity of cognitive symptoms independent of disease site.

Palliative and supportive care for glioma patients.

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and families. High-grade gliomas are incurable and long-term survival remains limited. While low-grade glioma patients have better outcomes, their quality of life is often affected by a variety of symptoms as well. Helping glioma patients improve quality of life at all stages of illness is an important goal for the interdisciplinary care team. There is evidence from advanced lung cancer patients that early involvement of a palliative care team can improve patient's quality of life, symptom burden, and even survival and a similar approach benefits glioma patients as well. Patients with high-grade and low-grade glioma often suffer from significant symptom burden. We discuss how validated global symptom assessments and symptom-specific screening tools are useful to identify distressing symptoms. Seizures, fatigue, depression, and anxiety are some of the more common symptoms throughout the disease course and should be managed actively. Patients with glioma also have high symptom burden at the end of life and the majority lose decision-making capacity. Advance care planning conversations early in the disease course are essential to elicit the patient's wishes for end of life care and effective communication with surrogate decision makers during all stages of the disease helps ensure that those wishes are respected.

End-of-life symptoms and care in patients with primary malignant brain tumors: a systematic literature review.

The aim of this study was to review the literature on end-of-life symptoms and end-of-life care of adult patients with high-grade glioma (HGG). Despite aggressive treatment, the survival of HGG patients is limited. Symptom management is paramount to maintain maximum quality of life. The goal of this review is to identify the symptoms and the potential needs of brain tumor patients and their caretakers at the end of life. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed for the years 1946 through August 6th, 2013. A total of 6,196 article citations were identified. Based on predefined criteria, 32 articles were retained for detailed examination. Of these 32 articles, only 7 focused on end-of-life symptoms and interventions. All 7 studies were retrospective and focused on inpatients (3), outpatients (2) or both (2). All but one study involved formal hospice. Drowsiness and loss of consciousness was the most common symptom (1-90 %). Poor communication (64 and 90 %), focal neurological deficits (3-62 %), seizures (3-56 %), dysphagia (7-85 %) and headaches (4-62 %) were also frequent. Only 4 studies reported on palliative interventions. Our systematic review shows that HGG patients in the end-of-life phase have a consistently high symptom burden especially during the last days of life. There is no prospective or conclusive literature describing end-of-life symptom management in HGG patients. Prospective research will be needed to further define symptoms and management in the end-of-life phase.

Through the patient's eyes: the value of a comprehensive brain tumor center.

Since the founding of the Tumor Section of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) in 1984 much in neurosurgical oncology has changed. More than 40,000 papers have been published on glioma since the arrival of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section. Increasingly, research is focusing on more patient-centered care and quality of life. Preliminary work suggests that a greater emphasis on the patient and caregiver's experience of disease is crucial. Also, the provision of hope and appropriate information and communication with health care providers helps to lessen anxiety and promote improved quality of life. Lastly, our patients need a mechanism for continued symptom control and psychosocial support throughout their experience of this disease. An excellent venue for providing these facets of neurooncological patient care is the multidisciplinary brain tumor board and symptom management team. Herein, we present the philosophy and practice of the Hermelin Brain Tumor Center at the Henry Ford Health System as one type of approach to caring for the patient with a malignant glioma. The authors are aware of several brain tumor centers that share our philosophy and approach to patient care. Our comments are not meant to be exclusive to our experience and should be interpreted as representative of the growing movement in neurosurgery to provide comprehensive, multidisciplinary, patient-centered care.

Phase I and pharmacodynamic study of arsenic trioxide plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Background: When arsenic trioxide (ATO) was combined with radiation for treatment of transplanted murine gliomas in the brain, tumor response improved with disrupted tumor blood flow and survival was significantly prolonged. Methods: Total of 31 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were accrued to a multi-institutional, NCI-funded, phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ATO administered with radiation. Secondary objectives were survival and pharmacodynamic changes in perfusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients (unknown MGMT and IDH status) received ATO either once or twice weekly during radiation without concurrent or adjuvant temozolomide. Results: Median age: 54.9 years, male: 68%, KPS ≥ 90: 77%, debulking surgery: 77%. Treatments were well-tolerated: 81% of patients received all the planned ATO doses. Dose-limiting toxicities included elevated liver function tests, hypokalemia, and edema. The MTD on the weekly schedule was 0.4 mg/kg and on the biweekly was 0.3 mg/kg. The median survival (mOS) for all patients was 17.7 months. Survival on the biweekly schedule (22.8 months) was longer than on the weekly schedule (12.1 months) (P = .039) as was progression-free survival (P = .004). Similarly, cerebral blood flow was significantly reduced in patients treated on the biweekly schedule (P = .007). Conclusions: ATO with standard radiation is well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Even without temozolomide or adjuvant therapy, the overall survival of all patients (17.7 months) and especially patients who received biweekly ATO (22.8 months) is surprising and accompanied by pharmacodynamic changes on MRI. Further studies of this regimen are warranted.

Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors.

Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.