Cytokine alterations during paraneoplastic neutrophilia and leukemoid reaction in patients with advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction (PLR) is a rare phenomenon in metastasized melanoma associated with poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Currently, no specific therapeutic options exist other than treating the underlying malignancy. METHODS: Five cases of paraneoplastic neutrophilia in patients with advanced-stage IV melanoma were enrolled in our study. Cytokine concentrations in patients' serum samples were analyzed before and during PLR using a multiplex cytokine array. Further, immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue biopsied during PLR was performed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We observed a strong correlation between worsening of tumor burden and aggravation of neutrophilia. Cytokine measurements revealed an increase of proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, IFNγ), proangiogenic cytokines (VEGF) and immune stem cell growth factors (G-CSF) during PLR. Immunohistochemistry confirmed neutrophil infiltration of tumor tissue. The presented cytokine alterations provide a basis for further functional analysis, which is necessary for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches against PLR.

Serum receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) levels predict biochemical recurrence in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: There is increasing evidence that the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) pathway not only contributes to the development of bone metastases, but also influences tumour biology in earlier stages of cancer. The study shows that preoperative serum levels of RANKL and its inhibitor osteoprotegerin (OPG) have a prognostic impact in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Both high levels of RANKL and a higher RANKL/OPG ratio are independent predictors of early biochemical recurrence in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic impact of proteins of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANKL) pathway in serum samples from patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively determined soluble RANKL (sRANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) by ELISA in serum samples of 178 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2004 and 2006. Clinical and patient follow-up data were analysed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, the Kaplan-Maier method, and single variable or multifactorial Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Higher serum sRANKL levels (P = 0.01), lower serum OPG levels (P = 0.01) and a higher sRANKL/OPG ratio (P = 0.004) were significant risk factors for biochemical recurrence (BCR). In multifactorial analysis, adjusted for the common risk factors for BCR, sRANKL and sRANKL/OPG ratio were confirmed as independent prognostic factors. Neither sRANKL nor OPG showed a clear association with histopathological factors such as pT stage, pN Gleason score or resection margin status, nor were they associated with prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSIONS: Greater activity of the RANKL pathway in the serum of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy is a risk factor for BCR. The RANKL pathway seems to contribute to the biological behaviour of prostate cancer even at the organ-confined stage of the disease.

Tolerability of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors for Metastasized Melanoma after Intra-Class Switch: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAFi, MEKi) is one of the mainstays of melanoma treatment. When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is observed, an option represents the intra-class switch to a different BRAFi+MEKi combination. Currently, there is scarce evidence for this procedure. This is a multicenter, retrospective analysis from six German skin cancer centers of patients who received two different combinations of BRAFi and MEKi. In total, 94 patients were included: 38 patients (40%) were re-exposed with a different combination because of previous unacceptable toxicity, 51 (54%) were re-exposed after progression, and 5 (5%) were included for other reasons. Of the 44 patients with a DLT during their first BRAFi+MEKi combination, only five (11%) experienced the same DLT during their second combination. A new DLT was experienced by 13 patients (30%). Six patients (14%) had to discontinue the second BRAFi treatment due to its toxicity. Compound-specific adverse events were avoided in the majority of patients by switching to a different combination. Efficacy data were similar to historical cohorts of BRAFi+MEKi rechallenge, with an overall response rate of 31% for patients who had previously progressed to treatment. We conclude that switching to a different BRAFi+MEKi combination if dose-limiting toxicity occurs is a feasible and rational approach in patients with metastatic melanoma.