Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of hepatic impairment.

AIM: This phase I study investigated talazoparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with advanced solid tumours and varying degrees of hepatic function. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function or varying degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe, based on National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group classification) received talazoparib 0.5 mg once daily for 22 calendar days. Plasma and urine samples after single and multiple doses were collected and analysed for talazoparib using validated assays. Plasma PK data from all patients were analysed using the population PK method. Plasma and urine PK parameters in PK-evaluable patients were calculated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA). Safety was monitored in all enrolled patients. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 37 had ≥1 PK concentration, among which 17 were evaluable for NCA. Population PK analysis (n = 37) indicated no significant impact of hepatic function on apparent clearance (CL/F) of talazoparib. Baseline creatinine clearance was the only significant covariate on CL/F (α = 0.05). NCA of data (n = 17) showed no clear trend for increase in exposure on day 22 with worsening hepatic function. Talazoparib protein binding was comparable in patients with varying hepatic function. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile observed in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic impairment (mild, moderate or severe) has no impact on the PK of talazoparib. No dose modification is recommended for patients with advanced solid tumours and various degrees of hepatic impairment, and this labelling language has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.

Palbociclib has no clinically relevant effect on the QTc interval in patients with advanced breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to assess the potential effects of palbociclib in combination with letrozole on QTc. PALOMA-2, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, compared palbociclib plus letrozole with placebo plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. The study included a QTc evaluation substudy carried out as a definitive QT interval prolongation assessment for palbociclib. Time-matched triplicate ECGs were performed at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h at baseline (Day 0) and on Cycle 1 Day 14. Additional ECGs were collected from all patients for safety monitoring. The QT interval was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's correction (QTcF), Bazett's correction (QTcB), and a study-specific correction factor (QTcS). In total, 666 patients were randomized 2 : 1 to palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. Of these, 125 patients were enrolled in the QTc evaluation substudy. No patients in the palbociclib plus letrozole arm of the substudy (N=77) had a maximum postbaseline QTcS or QTcF value of ≥ 480 ms, or a maximum increase from clock time-matched baseline for QTcS or QTcF values of ≥ 60 ms. The upper bounds of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean change from time-matched baseline for QTcS, QTcF, and QTcB at all time points and at steady-state Cmax following repeated administration of 125 mg palbociclib were less than 10 ms. Palbociclib, when administered with letrozole at the recommended therapeutic dosing regimen, did not prolong the QT interval to a clinically relevant extent.

An Investigation in the Comparability of the Exposure and Recommended Dose of Selected Pfizer Drugs in East Asian Countries: Is Mutual Usage of Clinical Data Among East Asian Countries Feasible?

The current regulatory path for new drug registration in East Asian countries has led to significant delay of the new medicines in these countries. A unified regulatory path and allowance of mutual usage of clinical data in East Asian countries would lead to cost saving in drug development and expedite the new drug registration in these countries. The objectives of the present analysis are to compare the approval dates of a selection of products developed by Pfizer in the United States and East Asian countries (China, Japan, Korea) and compare the pharmacokinetics and recommended doses of these products in East Asian countries. Eighteen products (20 drugs, 2 products with 2 combination drugs) with exposure data available in at least 2 of the 3 East Asian countries across different therapeutic areas were included in the analyses. The results showed that most products had delayed approval in East Asian countries (up to 8 years) after US or EU approval. No distinct differences were observed in the drug exposure and recommended doses for the selected products in East Asian countries. These results together with literature data of genetic similarity of the East Asian populations support the mutual usage of the clinical data in the East Asian countries for expedited regulatory submission and approval.

Optimizing benefit/risk in oncology: Review of post-marketing dose optimization and reflections on the road ahead.

Oncology therapies shifted from chemotherapy to molecularly targeted agents and finally to the era of immune-oncology agents. In contrast to cytotoxic agents, molecularly targeted agents are more selective, exhibit a wider therapeutic window, and may maximally modulate tumor growth at doses lower than the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). However, first-in-patient oncology studies for molecularly targeted agents continued to evaluate escalating doses using limited number of patients per dose cohort assessing dose-limiting toxicities to identify the MTD which is commonly selected for further development adopting a 'more is better' approach that led to several post-marketing requirement (PMR) studies to evaluate alternative, typically lower, doses or dosing frequencies to optimize the benefit-risk profile. In this review, post-marketing dose optimization efforts were reviewed including those required by a regulatory pathway or voluntarily conducted by the sponsor to improve efficacy, safety, or method of administration. Lessons learned and future implications from this deep dive review are discussed considering the evolving regulatory landscape on dose optimization for oncology compounds.

Case-control matching-guided exposure-efficacy relationship for avelumab in patients with urothelial carcinoma.

Exposure-response (E-R) analyses are an integral component of understanding the benefit/risk profile of novel oncology therapeutics. These analyses are typically conducted using data from the treatment arm to characterize the relationship between drug exposure (low vs. high) and efficacy or safety outcomes. For example, outcomes of patients with lower exposure in the treatment arm (e.g., Q1) might be compared to outcomes of those with higher drug exposure (Q2, Q3, and Q4). Outcomes from the lowest exposure quartile may be also compared to the control arm to evaluate whether the Q1 subgroup derived clinical benefit. However, the sample size and the distribution of patient baseline characteristics and disease risk factors are not balanced in such a comparison (Q1 vs. control), which may bias the analysis and causal interpretation of clinical benefit in the Q1 subgroup. Herein, we report the use of case-control matching to account for this bias and better understand the E-R relationship for avelumab in urothelial carcinoma, a PD-L1 inhibitor approved for the treatment of several cancers. Data from JAVELIN-100 was utilized which is a phase III study of avelumab in first-line maintenance treatment in patients with urothelial carcinoma; this clinical study demonstrated superiority of avelumab versus best-supportive care leading to approval in the United States, Europe, and other countries. A post hoc case-control matching method was implemented to compare the efficacy outcome between Q1 avelumab subgroup and matched patients extracted from the control arm with similar baseline characteristics, which showed a clinically relevant difference in overall survival in favor of the Q1 avelumab subgroup. This analysis demonstrates the importance of accounting for imbalance in important baseline covariates when comparing efficacy outcomes between subgroups within the treatment arm versus the control arm.

Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development.

Biologics, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and other therapeutic proteins such as cytokines and growth hormones, have unique characteristics compared to small molecules. This paper starts from an overview of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of biologics from a mechanistic perspective, the determination of a starting dose for first-in-human (FIH) studies, and dosing regimen optimisation for phase II/III clinical trials. Subsequently, typical clinical pharmacology issues along the corresponding pathways for biologics development are summarised, including drug-drug interactions, QTc prolongation, immunogenicity, and studies in specific populations. The relationships between the molecular structure of biologics, their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, and the corresponding clinical pharmacology strategies are summarised and depicted in a schematic diagram.

Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Approvals on the Characterization of Hepatic Impairment Effect and Dosing Recommendations.

Patients with cancer and advanced hepatic impairment (HI) (i.e., moderate and severe impairment) are often excluded from first-in-patient, phase II, and phase III studies. Thus, dose recommendations for this subgroup of patients are often derived using a combination of dedicated phase I studies conducted in participants without cancer and a population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling approach. A standardized risk-based approach to guide the evaluation of HI in patients with cancer is needed. In this review, we evaluated available oncology drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1999 to 2019, identified strategies utilized by sponsors to characterize the effect of HI on the PK of oncology drugs, and assessed regulatory expectations for each strategy. Finally, we constructed a decision tree that complements current FDA guidance to enable efficient evaluation of the effect of HI on PK and provide guidance for dose recommendations.

Real-World Data of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Men.

This report examined the benefits and risks of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in men with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database. From medical and pharmacy records, 1,139 men with MBC were identified; in the first-line setting, median duration of treatment was longer with palbociclib plus ET (n = 37, 8.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.4-13.0) than ET alone (n = 214, 4.3 months, 95% CI, 3.0-5.7) and specifically, was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 26, 9.4 months, 95% CI, 4.4-14.0) than letrozole alone (n = 63, 3.0 months, 95% CI, 1.8-4.8). In the EHR-derived database, 59 men received treatment for MBC; real-world response across all lines of therapy in the metastatic setting was reported in 4 of 12 patients (33.3%) in the palbociclib plus ET group vs. 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients in the ET group. Review of the global safety database did not identify any new safety signals in palbociclib-treated men. Real-world data indicated that men with MBC benefit from palbociclib plus ET, with a safety profile consistent with previous observations in women with MBC. Collective data on palbociclib in women and men in this report, including clinical trial data, real-world data, and a well-established risk/benefit profile, led to US approval of an expansion of the palbociclib indication to include men with MBC.

Impact of Dose Reduction on Efficacy: Implications of Exposure-Response Analysis of Palbociclib.

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib is indicated for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). OBJECTIVE: Exposure-response analyses were conducted to evaluate efficacy in Asian versus non-Asian patients and in patients with versus without dose reduction in PALOMA-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PALOMA-2 compared palbociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in patients with ABC. Population pharmacokinetic analysis provided apparent palbociclib clearance (CL/F) for each patient. The time-varying exposure metric, Cavg,t, was calculated using average dose intensity and CL/F at the time of each progression-free survival (PFS) event. A Cox proportional model characterized PFS and palbociclib Cavg,t relationships. Significant prognostic factors for PFS were identified by univariate analysis, which were subsequently included in multivariate analyses, in addition to the Cavg,t effect on PFS. PFS profiles in Asian/non-Asian patients and patients with/without dose reduction were simulated and compared using observed palbociclib exposures and established exposure-response relationships. RESULTS: Patients (n = 421) received palbociclib plus letrozole (Asian = 64, non-Asian = 357; no dose reduction = 272, dose reduction = 149). Based on univariate analyses, significant prognostic factors were Ki67 score, age, and baseline aspartate aminotransferase (BAST), tumor size, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin levels. In multivariate analysis, only Ki67 and BAST remained significant. Palbociclib exposure did not significantly affect PFS in either univariate (P = 0.12) or multivariate (P = 0.44) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that palbociclib exposure has no impact on PFS when the dose reduction algorithm from palbociclib clinical trials is used. There is no difference in efficacy between Asians and non-Asians, despite the higher level of dose reductions in Asians. PFIZER: NCT01740427.

Discordance Between Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Classifications for Hepatic Dysfunction: Implications on Dosing Recommendations for Oncology Compounds.

Guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency recommends using Child-Pugh classification for pharmacokinetic evaluation in noncancer subjects with hepatic impairment (HI). Therefore, dosing recommendations for oncology compounds for patients with HI are commonly based on Child-Pugh classification. In oncology clinical practice, National Cancer Institute classification (NCIc), is commonly used for evaluating hepatic function and dosing decisions for oncology patients. This work evaluated the discordance between the 2 systems and the impact on dosing recommendations. The classification system in HI studies was reviewed for FDA-approved oncology compounds. Discordance between Child-Pugh and NCIc was evaluated for sunitinib, dacomitinib, palbociclib, bosutinib, and axitinib. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted based on Child-Pugh classification and NCIc. Review of 117 approved oncology compounds showed prevalent use of Child-Pugh classification for dedicated HI studies in noncancer subjects. NCIc is commonly used in cancer patient studies. NCIc tended to classify subjects as less impaired versus Child-Pugh (64.9%, 73.7%, and 61.5% of subjects with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, via Child-Pugh were classified as at least 1 category less impaired via NCIc). PK analyses by NCIc were consistent with Child-Pugh for sunitinib, dacomitinib, and palbociclib. For bosutinib, NCIc showed less impact of HI than Child-Pugh; an opposite trend was observed for axitinib. The impact of this considerable discordance between the 2 systems on dosing decisions bears consideration. When Child-Pugh is used for HI study enrollment, exploratory PK analyses based on NCIc should be conducted. Prescribers should attempt to use the same classification system in the product label for dosing decisions.

The Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies suggest that talazoparib is primarily eliminated unchanged via renal excretion. The current study investigated how varying degrees of renal impairment may affect the PK of talazoparib, and evaluated the safety and tolerability of talazoparib, in patients with advanced solid tumors with/without renal impairment. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and normal renal function or different degrees of renal impairment measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: mild = 60-89, moderate = 30-59, severe = 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) were enrolled in this open-label, non-randomized, phase I study. Talazoparib was administered orally at 0.5 mg/day for 22 days. Primary PK parameters included the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) at steady state (Day 22). Safety and tolerability were also investigated. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. At Day 22, compared with patients with normal renal function (n = 9), patients with mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 8) renal impairment had a 12.2%, 43.0%, and 163.3% increase in talazoparib AUC0-24, and a 11.1%, 31.6%, and 89.3% increase in talazoparib Cmax, respectively. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and overall there were no notable differences in the treatment-emergent adverse event profile across renal function groups. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to talazoparib increased with worsening renal impairment. Overall, this study confirms current dosing recommendations in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment (1 mg/day and 0.75 mg/day, respectively) and indicates that a lower starting dose of 0.5 mg/day should be considered for patients with severe renal impairment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02997163.

Effect of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) Inducers on Exposure of P-gp Substrates: Review of Clinical Drug-Drug Interaction Studies.

Understanding transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) for investigational agents is important during drug development to assess DDI liability, its clinical relevance, and to determine appropriate DDI management strategies. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux transporter that influences the pharmacokinetics (PK) of various compounds. Assessing transporter induction in vitro is challenging and is not always predictive of in vivo effects, and hence there is a need to consider clinical DDI studies; however, there is no clear guidance on when clinical evaluation of transporter induction is required. Furthermore, there is no proposed list of index transporter inducers to be used in clinical studies. This review evaluated DDI studies with known P-gp inducers to better understand the mechanism and site of P-gp induction, as well as the magnitude of induction effect on the exposure of P-gp substrates. Our review indicates that P-gp and cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes are co-regulated via the pregnane xenobiotic receptor (PXR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). The magnitude of the decrease in substrate drug exposure by P-gp induction is generally less than that of CYP3A. Most P-gp inducers reduced total bioavailability with a minor impact on renal clearance, despite known expression of P-gp at the apical membrane of the kidney proximal tubules. Rifampin is the most potent P-gp inducer, resulting in an average reduction in substrate exposure ranging between 20 and 67%. For other inducers, the reduction in P-gp substrate exposure ranged from 12 to 42%. A lower reduction in exposure of the P-gp substrate was observed with a lower dose of the inducer and/or if the administration of the inducer and substrate was simultaneous, i.e. not staggered. These findings suggest that clinical evaluation of the impact of P-gp inducers on the PK of investigational agents that are substrates for P-gp might be warranted only for compounds with a relatively steep exposure-efficacy relationship.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been developed to treat cancers associated with somatic BRCA mutations and germline genetic aberrations involved in the DNA damage response. The efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of talazoparib, a potent small-molecule PARP inhibitor, was established in 4 clinical studies in cancer patients (2 phase 1 studies PRP-001 and PRP-002, the phase 2 ABRAZO trial, and the phase 3 EMBRACA trial). The current study aimed to describe the population PK of talazoparib and identify covariates that affect talazoparib PK in patients with advanced cancers using pooled data from these 4 studies. Talazoparib PK was well characterized by a 2-compartment model with first-order absorption and absorption lag time. Based on covariate analysis, no dose adjustment for talazoparib is required based on a patient's age, sex, baseline body weight, Asian race, the presence of mild renal or hepatic impairment, or use of acid-reducing agents. A reduced 0.75-mg daily dose is recommended for patients taking a potent P-glycoprotein inhibitor and those with moderate renal impairment. Insufficient data were available to establish dosing recommendations for patients with severe renal and moderate or severe hepatic impairment. The PK of a single 1-mg talazoparib capsule is comparable with 4 0.25-mg capsules. Talazoparib can be taken with or without food. These data provide support for dosing recommendations and labeling information for talazoparib.

Talazoparib Exposure-Efficacy Analysis in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations in the EMBRACA Trial.

In the phase 3 EMBRACA trial, treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, talazoparib, led to significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.71; P < .0001). We conducted an exposure-efficacy analysis using EMBRACA data from 285 patients who were treated with talazoparib and had available pharmacokinetic parameters to evaluate the effect of talazoparib exposure (time-varying average talazoparib concentration [Cavg,t ]) and other baseline variables on PFS. Graphical examination of the relationship between Cavg,t and PFS and a Cox proportional model were used. Exposure-response analyses showed that higher talazoparib exposure, absence of visceral disease, lower baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels, and disease-free interval >12 months were independent covariates associated with longer PFS. The association of talazoparib exposure with PFS (higher exposure, longer PFS) suggests the recommended starting dose of 1 mg once daily (the maximum tolerated dose) is appropriate.

Exposure-Safety Analyses of Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations in the EMBRACA and ABRAZO Trials.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, such as talazoparib, may affect hematopoiesis. This analysis characterized the relationship between talazoparib exposure and the most common grade ≥ 3 hematopoietic adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification in the phase 2 (ABRAZO) and phase 3 (EMBRACA) trials. The relationship between time-varying average talazoparib concentration (Cavg,t ), along with other baseline variables, and grade ≥ 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were evaluated both by graphical examination and using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The results indicated that higher Cavg,t was associated with a higher risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia. A trend toward an association between higher Cavg,t and neutropenia was observed, although not statistically significant. Higher risk of all tested safety end points was associated with lower baseline hemoglobin. Higher risk of neutropenia was associated with lower baseline absolute neutrophil count and lower body weight. These findings support the proposed management of AEs through talazoparib dosing modification.

Fixed dosing versus body size-based dosing of monoclonal antibodies in adult clinical trials.

Although without clear scientific rationale, body size-based dosing is often used for administering monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). This simulation study compared the performance of body size-based and fixed dosing in reducing pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) variability in adults for 12 mAbs with published population PK and/or PD models. At the population level, 95th percentile intervals of concentration-time profiles, distribution, and variability of exposure for 1000 subjects after both dosing approaches were examined. At the individual level, the difference between the exposures of patients with extreme body sizes from the typical exposure following both approaches was compared. The results show that the 2 dosing approaches perform similarly across the mAbs investigated with fixed dosing being better for some mAbs and body size-based dosing being better for the others. Based on this finding, we recommend using fixed dosing in first-in-human (FIH) adult studies because it offers other advantages. When sufficient data become available, a full assessment of body size effect on PK/PD should be conducted to determine the optimal dosing approach for phase 3 trials. Other factors that may affect the selection of dosing approach were also discussed. Dosing approach for mAbs in the pediatric population is out of the scope of this study.

A comparison of effects on reproduction and neonatal development in cynomolgus monkeys given human soluble IL-4R and mice given murine soluble IL-4R.

The effects of treatment with a soluble IL-4 receptor (sIL-4R) on reproduction and neonatal development were assessed in pregnant cynomolgus monkeys and mice. When pregnant cynomolgus monkeys were administered a human sIL-4R intravenously twice a week during organogenesis (GD 20-51) at 0, 0.2 or 2.0mg/kg, there was an increase in abortion/embryo-fetal death in the 0.2 (42.9%) and 2.0 (26.3%) mg/kg groups compared to controls (17.6%). All fetuses removed at cesarean sectioning on GD 100-102 were alive and no abnormalities were noted. There were three stillborn neonates (2.0mg/kg group), which were determined to have died before birth. No neonates died after birth and no abnormalities were noted. Due to the unanticipated results in the monkey study, a mouse developmental study with a murine surrogate molecule was conducted. When pregnant Crl:CD-1((R))(ICR)BR mice were administered murine sIL-4R intravenously once daily during the organogenesis period (GD 6-15) at 0, 25, 75, 250, or 625microg/mouse ( approximately 20mg/kg), there were no test-article-related abnormalities in any parameters. Antibody development to the drug did not influence toxicity in the monkey or mouse. In conclusion, evaluation of reproductive effects in mice administered murine soluble IL-4R was not predictive of reproductive effects noted in cynomolgus monkeys administered human soluble IL-4R.

Effect of food on the bioavailability of palbociclib.

PURPOSE: This phase I study estimated the effect of food on bioavailability of palbociclib (IBRANCE®), and a selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 approved for oncology indications has pH-dependent solubility and high permeability. METHODS: In this randomized, four-sequence, four-period crossover study, 28 healthy volunteers received a single 125-mg dose of palbociclib (free-base capsule) following an overnight fast or (1) after a high-fat/-calorie meal, (2) after a low-fat/-calorie meal, and (3) between two moderate-fat/standard-calorie meals. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected predose and serially ≤144 h postdose; palbociclib concentrations were measured using validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using a noncompartmental approach based on a mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Median time to maximum concentration was 8 h for all conditions. Exposure (AUCinf and C max) increased slightly in the fed versus fasted conditions; ratios (90% CIs) of the adjusted geometric mean relative to the fasted condition ranged from 111.8 (104.3-119.9%) to 120.6% (112.6-129.1%) for AUCinf and from 124.0 (108.4-141.9%) to 137.8% (120.6-157.5%) for C max due mainly to three subjects with significantly lower exposure (low liers) in the fasted condition. Pharmacokinetic variability was reduced in the fed (AUCinf, 23-27%; C max, 21-24%) versus fasted (AUCinf, 39%; C max, 73%) conditions. In a supplemental analysis excluding the three low liers, food intake did not affect palbociclib exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Food intake modestly increased palbociclib exposure while greatly reducing pharmacokinetic variability. For subjects with normal absorption, food intake did not affect palbociclib exposure. Thus, palbociclib should be administered with food. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01904747.

The Utility of a Population Approach in Drug-Drug Interaction Assessments: A Simulation Evaluation.

This study aims at evaluating the utility of the population pharmacokinetics approach in therapeutic protein drug-drug-interaction (DDI) assessment. Simulations were conducted for 2 representative victim drugs, methotrexate and trastuzumab, using a parallel-group design with and without the interaction drug. The effect of a perpetrator on the exposure of the victim drug is described as the ratio of clearance/apparent clearance of the victim drug given with or without the perpetrator. The power of DDI assessment was calculated as the percentage of runs with 90% confidence interval of the estimated DDI effect within 80% to 125% for the scenarios of no DDI, benchmarked with the noncompartmental approach with intensive sampling. The impact of the number of subjects, the number of sampling points per subject, sampling time error, and model misspecification on the power of DDI determination were evaluated. Results showed that with equal numbers of subjects in each arm, the population pharmacokinetics approach with sparse sampling may need about the same or a higher number of subjects compared to a noncompartmental approach in order to achieve similar power. Increasing the number of subjects, even if only in the study drug alone arm, can increase the power. Sampling or dosing time error had notable impacts on the power for methotrexate but not for trastuzumab. Model misspecification had no notable impacts on the power for trastuzumab. Overall, the population pharmacokinetics approach with sparse sampling built in phase 2/3 studies allows appropriate DDI assessment with adequate study design and analysis and can be considered as an alternative to dedicated DDI studies.

PARP activity in peripheral blood lymphocytes as a predictive biomarker for PARP inhibition in tumor tissues - A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of rucaparib.

PURPOSE: Rucaparib is a potent Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitor currently under clinical development. The objectives of this analysis were to establish population PK and PK/PD models for rucaparib, and to evaluate the predictability of PARP activity in PBL for PARP activity in tumor tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Rucaparib concentrations and PARP activity in human PBLs and tumor issues were obtained from 32 patients with solid tumors in a Phase 1 First-in-Patient study. Simulations were conducted to evaluate different dosing regimens. RESULTS: A 3-compartment PK model best described the PK of rucaparib. An Emax model best described the exposure and PARP inhibition relationship. The maximum PARP inhibition (Imax) achieved in PBLs and in tumors were 90.9% and 90.0% of the baseline PARP activity, and the IC50 values were 1.05 ng/mL and 1.10 ng/mL, respectively. PAR polymer baseline value was found to be a covariate of Emin. CONCLUSION: Population PK and PK/PD models have been established to describe population PK of rucaparib and the relationship between rucaparib plasma concentration and PARP inhibition in both PBLs and tumor issues. Results from this trial indicated that PARP inhibition in PBLs can be used as a substitute for PARP inhibition in melanoma tumor tissues.