RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: It was hypothesized that use of proton beam therapy (PBT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation and consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated between October 2017 and December 2021 with concurrent chemoradiation with either IMRT or PBT ± consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition were retrospectively identified. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of radiation therapy technique with 90-day hospitalization and grade 3 (G3+) lymphopenia. Competing risk regression was used to compare G3+ pneumonitis, G3+ esophagitis, and G3+ cardiac events. Kaplan-Meier method was used for progression-free survival and overall survival. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to adjust for differences in PBT and IMRT groups. RESULTS: Of 316 patients, 117 (37%) received PBT and 199 (63%) received IMRT. The PBT group was older (p < .001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (p = .02). The PBT group received a lower mean heart dose (p < .0001), left anterior descending artery V15 Gy (p = .001), mean lung dose (p = .008), and effective dose to immune circulating cells (p < .001). On inverse probability treatment weighting analysis, PBT was associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; p = .002) and less G3+ lymphopenia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; p = .003). There was no difference in other G3+ toxicities, progression-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: PBT is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations, lower effective dose to immune circulating cells and less G3+ lymphopenia compared with IMRT. Minimizing dose to lymphocytes may be warranted, but prospective data are needed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Quimioradioterapia , Hospitalización , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Terapia de Protones , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Linfopenia/etiología , Anticuerpos MonoclonalesRESUMEN
Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy plays a critical role for patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB). We aim to determine the optimal time-window for appropriate antimicrobial therapy and evaluate the effects of delayed therapy on adverse clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, sepsis, and septic shock) in children with SAB by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Receiver-operating characteristic was used to determine the cut-off point of the time to appropriate therapy (TTAT), the patients were divided into timely and delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy (delayed therapy) groups accordingly. The PSM was used to balance the characteristics between the two groups, controlling the effects of potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to the matched groups to analyze the association between delayed therapy and clinical outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score covariate adjustment were also performed to investigate the sensitivity of the results under different propensity score-based approaches. In total, 247 patients were included in this study. The optimal cut-off point of TTAT was identified as 6.4 h, with 85.0% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity (AUC 0.803, 95% confidence interval 0.702-0.904). Eighty-seven (35.22%) of the 247 patients who received delayed therapy (TTAT ≥ 6.4 h) had higher in-hospital mortality (19.54% vs 1.88%, p < 0.001), higher incidences of sepsis (44.83% vs 15.00%, p < 0.001) and septic shock (32.18% vs 6.25%, p < 0.001) when compared to timely therapy (TTAT < 6.4 h) patients. After PSM analysis, a total of 134 episodes (67 in each of the two matched groups) were further analyzed. No statistically significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality between delayed and timely -therapy groups (log-rank test, P = 0.157). Patients with delayed therapy had a higher incidence of sepsis or septic shock than those with timely therapy (log-rank test, P = 0.009; P = 0.018, respectively). Compared to the timely-therapy group, the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval in delayed-therapy group were 2.512 (1.227-5.144, P = 0.012) for sepsis, 3.109 (1.166-8.290, P = 0.023) for septic shock. Conclusion: Appropriate therapy delayed 6.4 h may increase the incidence of sepsis and septic shock, with similar in-hospital mortality in patients with SAB. What is Known: ⢠Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of bloodstream infections in children. Undoubtedly, early antimicrobial application plays a critical role in the treatment of children with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SAB). ⢠However, rapid, and aggressive administration of antimicrobials may lead to the overuse of these drugs and the emergence of multidrug-resistant microorganisms. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the optimal time-window for appropriate antimicrobial administration in children with SAB. Unfortunately, the optimal time-window for appropriate antimicrobial administration in children with SAB remains unclear. What is New: ⢠Determining the optimal time-window for appropriate antimicrobial administration in patients with matched data variables is particularly important. The Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis effectively controls for confounding factors to a considerable extent when assessing the impact of treatment, thereby approximating the effects observed in randomized controlled trials. ⢠To our knowledge, this is the first study using PSM method to assess the effects of delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy on adverse outcomes in children with SAB. In low-risk populations with SAB, a delay of 6.4 h in appropriate therapy might increase the occurrence rate for sepsis and septic shock; however, no correlation has been found between this delay and an increased risk for hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Puntaje de Propensión , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Preescolar , Lactante , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Curva ROC , Factores de Tiempo , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
Persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection (PSBSI) increased the incidence of metastatic infection and mortality. We aimed to clarify its risk factors and correlation with metastatic infection and septic shock in children. This retrospective and observational study enrolled children with S. aureus bloodstream infection who admitted to Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2016 and December 2021. The logistic regression model was used for multivariable analyses to determine independent factors associated with PSBSI and clarify the effect of persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection and other factors on metastatic infection and septic shock. One hundred and twenty-seven children were included in this study retrospectively. There were thirty-two cases in the persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection group and ninety-five children in the non-persistent infection group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (OR, 7.26; 95%CI, 2.48-21.30; P<0.01) was an independent risk factor of persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection. Persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection (OR, 6.40; 95%CI, 2.08-19.70; P<0.01) and community-acquired S. aureus bloodstream infection (OR, 4.75; 95%CI, 1.34-16.89; P=0.02) were independent predictors of metastatic infection. Pittsburgh bacteremia scores ≥ 2 (OR, 28.81; 95%CI, 5.26-157.99; P<0.01), hypoalbuminemia (OR, 13.34; 95%CI, 2.43-73.28; P<0.01) and persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection (OR, 5.48; 95%CI, 1.13-26.54; P=0.04) were independent risk factors of septic shock. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was an independent risk factor of pediatric persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection. Pediatric persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection was associated with metastatic infection and septic shock. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠Pathogenic features such as Methicillin-resistant S. aureus and sources of infection such as central venous catheter related infection were risk factors of PSBSI in adults. ⢠PSBSI increased the incidence of metastatic infection and mortality in adults. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠Inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was an independent risk factor of pediatric persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection. ⢠Pediatric persistent S. aureus bloodstream infection was associated with metastatic infection and septic shock.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Staphylococcus aureus , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/etiología , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. As the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) heart allocation policy change elevated waitlist status for patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS), we aimed to determine if a center's annual heart transplant volume was associated with ECMO-support duration and posttransplant outcomes. METHODS: Adults heart transplant candidates between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, were isolated in the UNOS database. VA-ECMO use was identified at the time of listing for transplant. Average annual transplant volume was calculated by the center, with stratification as high (≥20 cardiac transplants, high volume center [HVC]) or low (<20 cardiac transplants, low volume center [LVC]) volume centers. Results are reported as mean (interquartile range) or n (%). RESULTS: In total, 543 patients at HVCs and 275 at LVCs were listed for transplant supported with VA-ECMO. Those listed at HVCs were more likely to be supported by intra-aortic balloon pump (103 [19%] vs. 32 [11.6%], p = .008) and inotropes (267 [49.2%] vs. 106 [38.5%], p = .004) at time of listing. Patients at HVCs received ECMO support for 6 [4-9] days, compared to 8 [4-15] days at low-volume centers (p = .030), and but were cannulated a similar time before listing (2 [1-5] vs. 3 [1-7] days, p = .517). There were no differences in rates of transplant (p = .2126), waitlist mortality (p = .8645), delisting due to clinical deterioration (p = .8419), or recovery (p = .1773) between groups. Among transplanted patients, there were no differences in support duration (6 [4-8] vs. 6 [4-10], p = .187), or time from registration to transplant (5 [2-20] vs. 7 [3-22] days, p = .560). Posttransplant survival did not vary (p = .293). CONCLUSIONS: LVCs can successfully bridge patients to transplant with VA-ECMO and achieve comparable outcomes to HVCs.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trasplante de Corazón , Adulto , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Contrapulsador IntraaórticoRESUMEN
Since the expensive annotation of high-quality signals obtained from passive sonars and the weak generalization ability of the single feature in the ocean, this paper proposes the self-supervised acoustic representation learning under acoustic-embedding memory unit modified space autoencoder (ASAE) and performs the underwater target recognition task. In the manner of the animal-like acoustic auditory system, the first step is to design a self-supervised representation learning method called space autoencoder (SAE) to merge Mel filter-bank (FBank) with the acoustic discrimination and gammatone filter-bank (GBank) with the anti-noise robustness into SAE spectrogram (SAE Spec). Meanwhile, due to poor high-level semantic information in SAE Spec, an acoustic-embedding memory unit (AEMU) is introduced as the strategy of adversarial enhancement. During the auxiliary task, more negative samples are joined in the improved contrastive loss function to obtain adversarial enhanced features called ASAE spectrogram (ASAE Spec). Ultimately, the comprehensive contrast experiments and ablation experiments on two underwater datasets show that ASAE Spec increases by more than 0.96% in accuracy, convergence rate, and anti-noise robustness of other mainstream acoustic features. The results prove the potential value of ASAE in practical applications.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is limited data to inform minimum case requirements for training in robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG). Current recommendations rely on nonclinical endpoints and expert opinion. OBJECTIVES: To determine the minimum number of RA-CABG procedures required to achieve stable clinical outcomes. METHODS: We included isolated RA-CABG in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) registry performed between 2014 and 2019 by surgeons without prior RA-CABG experience. Outcomes were approach conversion, reoperation, major morbidity or mortality, and procedural success. Case sequence number was used as a continuous variable in logistic regression with restricted cubic splines with fixed effects. Outcomes were compared between operations performed earlier versus later in case sequences using unadjusted and adjusted metrics. RESULTS: There were 1195 cases performed by 114 surgeons. A visual inflection point occurs by a surgeon's 10th procedure for approach conversion, major morbidity or mortality, and overall procedural success after which outcomes stabilize. There was a significant decrease in the rate of approach conversion (7.7% and 2.5%), reoperation (18.9% and 10.8%), and major morbidity or mortality (21.7% and 12.9%), as well as an increase in the rate of procedural success (72.9% and 85.3%) with increasing experience between groups. In a multivariable logistic regression model, case sequences of >10 were an independent predictor of decreased approach conversion (odds ratio [OR]: 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.84) and increased rate procedural success (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.00-3.84). CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve for RA-CABG is initially steep, but stable clinical outcomes are achieved after the 10th procedure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite increasing utilization of proton-beam therapy (PBT) in the postprostatectomy setting, no data exist regarding toxicity outcomes relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The authors compared acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received treatment with postprostatectomy IMRT versus PBT. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, patients with PC who received adjuvant or salvage IMRT or PBT (70.2 gray with an endorectal balloon) after prostatectomy from 2009 through 2017 were reviewed. Factors including combined IMRT and PBT and/or concurrent malignancies prompted exclusion. A case-matched cohort analysis was performed using nearest-neighbor 3-to-1 matching by age and GU/GI disorder history. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify univariate and multivariate associations between toxicities and cohort/dosimetric characteristics. Toxicity-free survival (TFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three hundred seven men (mean ± SD age, 59.7 ± 6.3 years; IMRT, n = 237; PBT, n = 70) were identified, generating 70 matched pairs. The median follow-up was 48.6 and 46.1 months for the IMRT and PBT groups, respectively. Although PBT was superior at reducing low-range (volumes receiving 10% to 40% of the dose, respectively) bladder and rectal doses (all P ≤ .01), treatment modality was not associated with differences in clinician-reported acute or late GU/GI toxicities (all P ≥ .05). Five-year grade ≥2 GU and grade ≥1 GI TFS was 61.1% and 73.7% for IMRT, respectively, and 70.7% and 75.3% for PBT, respectively; and 5-year grade ≥3 GU and GI TFS was >95% for both groups (all P ≥ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Postprostatectomy PBT minimized low-range bladder and rectal doses relative to IMRT; however, treatment modality was not associated with clinician-reported GU/GI toxicities. Future prospective investigation and ongoing follow-up will determine whether dosimetric differences between IMRT and PBT confer clinically meaningful differences in long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infertility can be the result of some common cancer treatments and can significantly impact quality of life. Semen cryopreservation allows for fertility preservation. We analyzed the semen parameters of specimens collected from pubertal males from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) in order to expand current knowledge on the quality of these specimens and inform a standard clinical practice. PROCEDURE: Males who were at least Tanner stage III and newly diagnosed with cancer at CHOP were approached regarding sperm banking. The success and quality of the samples collected were analyzed and compared in relation to prior treatment, age, and diagnosis. RESULTS: From 399 patients approached for semen collection, 339 (85%) attempted to bank sperm, of which 265 (78%) were successful and 60 (15%) refused to participate. Therapy prior to sperm banking significantly impacted a successful collection (P < 0.01). Only 16.9% of the untreated patients were azoospermic, whereas 84.0% of the treated subjects were azoospermic. Older patients were less likely to be azoospermic and have a greater quality collection when compared with younger patients (P < 0.01). However, 65% of our youngest patients still were able to cryopreserve semen. There was no difference in azoospermia across diagnostic groups (P = 0.35), though there were differences in quality of semen parameters across diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Our data support that sperm banking pubertal males prior to the initiation of therapy is feasible. While there were differences in quality of semen parameters across age and diagnostic groups, most males, regardless of age or diagnosis, had adequate specimens for cryopreservation.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Infertilidad Masculina/prevención & control , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Preservación de Semen , Semen/química , Adolescente , Criopreservación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Infertilidad Masculina/etiología , Masculino , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Bancos de EspermaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Financial incentive designs to increase physical activity have not been well-examined. OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of 3 methods to frame financial incentives to increase physical activity among overweight and obese adults. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 02030119). SETTING: University of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: 281 adult employees (body mass index ≥27 kg/m2). INTERVENTION: 13-week intervention. Participants had a goal of 7000 steps per day and were randomly assigned to a control group with daily feedback or 1 of 3 financial incentive programs with daily feedback: a gain incentive ($1.40 given each day the goal was achieved), lottery incentive (daily eligibility [expected value approximately $1.40] if goal was achieved), or loss incentive ($42 allocated monthly upfront and $1.40 removed each day the goal was not achieved). Participants were followed for another 13 weeks with daily performance feedback but no incentives. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was the mean proportion of participant-days that the 7000-step goal was achieved during the intervention. Secondary outcomes included the mean proportion of participant-days achieving the goal during follow-up and the mean daily steps during intervention and follow-up. RESULTS: The mean proportion of participant-days achieving the goal was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37) in the control group, 0.35 (CI, 0.28 to 0.42) in the gain-incentive group, 0.36 (CI, 0.29 to 0.43) in the lottery-incentive group, and 0.45 (CI, 0.38 to 0.52) in the loss-incentive group. In adjusted analyses, only the loss-incentive group had a significantly greater mean proportion of participant-days achieving the goal than control (adjusted difference, 0.16 [CI, 0.06 to 0.26]; P = 0.001), but the adjusted difference in mean daily steps was not significant (861 [CI, 24 to 1746]; P = 0.056). During follow-up, daily steps decreased for all incentive groups and were not different from control. LIMITATION: Single employer. CONCLUSION: Financial incentives framed as a loss were most effective for achieving physical activity goals. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute on Aging.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Actividad Motora , Obesidad/terapia , Sobrepeso/terapia , Recompensa , Programas de Reducción de Peso/economía , Adulto , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Motivación , Obesidad/economía , Sobrepeso/economía , Pérdida de Peso , Programas de Reducción de Peso/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: More than half of adults in the United States do not attain the minimum recommended level of physical activity to achieve health benefits. The optimal design of financial incentives to promote physical activity is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of individual versus team-based financial incentives to increase physical activity. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial comparing three interventions to control. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and four adult employees from an organization in Philadelphia formed 76 four-member teams. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received daily feedback on performance towards achieving a daily 7000 step goal during the intervention (weeks 1- 13) and follow-up (weeks 14- 26) periods. The control arm received no other intervention. In the three financial incentive arms, drawings were held in which one team was selected as the winner every other day during the 13-week intervention. A participant on a winning team was eligible as follows: $50 if he or she met the goal (individual incentive), $50 only if all four team members met the goal (team incentive), or $20 if he or she met the goal individually and $10 more for each of three teammates that also met the goal (combined incentive). MAIN MEASURES: Mean proportion of participant-days achieving the 7000 step goal during the intervention. KEY RESULTS: Compared to the control group during the intervention period, the mean proportion achieving the 7000 step goal was significantly greater for the combined incentive (0.35 vs. 0.18, difference: 0.17, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.28, p <0.001) but not for the individual incentive (0.25 vs 0.18, difference: 0.08, 95 % CI: -0.02-0.18, p = 0.13) or the team incentive (0.17 vs 0.18, difference: -0.003, 95 % CI: -0.11-0.10, p = 0.96). The combined incentive arm participants also achieved the goal at significantly greater rates than the team incentive (0.35 vs. 0.17, difference: 0.18, 95 % CI: 0.08-0.28, p < 0.001), but not the individual incentive (0.35 vs. 0.25, difference: 0.10, 95 % CI: -0.001-0.19, p = 0.05). Only the combined incentive had greater mean daily steps than control (difference: 1446, 95 % CI: 448-2444, p ≤ 0.005). There were no significant differences between arms during the follow-up period (weeks 14- 26). CONCLUSIONS: Financial incentives rewarded for a combination of individual and team performance were most effective for increasing physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02001194.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/psicología , Promoción de la Salud , Motivación , Adulto , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recompensa , Caminata/psicología , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to quantify missing baseline laboratory results, assess predictors of missingness, and examine performance of missing data methods. METHODS: Using the Mini-Sentinel Distributed Database from three sites, we selected three exposure-outcome scenarios with laboratory results as baseline confounders. We compared hazard ratios (HRs) or risk differences (RDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from models that omitted laboratory results, included only available results (complete cases), and included results after applying missing data methods (multiple imputation [MI] regression, MI predictive mean matching [PMM] indicator). RESULTS: Scenario 1 considered glucose among second-generation antipsychotic users and diabetes. Across sites, glucose was available for 27.7-58.9%. Results differed between complete case and missing data models (e.g., olanzapine: HR 0.92 [CI 0.73, 1.12] vs 1.02 [0.90, 1.16]). Across-site models employing different MI approaches provided similar HR and CI; site-specific models provided differing estimates. Scenario 2 evaluated creatinine among individuals starting high versus low dose lisinopril and hyperkalemia. Creatinine availability: 44.5-79.0%. Results differed between complete case and missing data models (e.g., HR 0.84 [CI 0.77, 0.92] vs. 0.88 [0.83, 0.94]). HR and CI were identical across MI methods. Scenario 3 examined international normalized ratio (INR) among warfarin users starting interacting versus noninteracting antimicrobials and bleeding. INR availability: 20.0-92.9%. Results differed between ignoring INR versus including INR using missing data methods (e.g., RD 0.05 [CI -0.03, 0.13] vs 0.09 [0.00, 0.18]). Indicator and PMM methods gave similar estimates. CONCLUSION: Multi-site studies must consider site variability in missing data. Different missing data methods performed similarly. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Creatinina/análisis , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Femenino , Glucosa/análisis , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional/métodos , Lisinopril/administración & dosificación , Lisinopril/efectos adversos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Regresión , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Lung fibrosis is a dysregulated repair process caused by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix that can severely affect respiratory function. Macrophages are a group of immune cells that have multiple functions and can perform a variety of roles. Lung fibrosis develops with the involvement of pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic factors secreted by macrophages. The balance between M1 and M2 macrophages has been proposed to play a role in determining the trend and severity of lung fibrosis. New avenues and concepts for preventing and treating lung fibrosis have emerged in recent years through research on mitochondria, Gab proteins, and exosomes. The main topic of this essay is the impact that mitochondria, Gab proteins, and exosomes have on macrophage polarization. In addition, the potential of these factors as targets to enhance lung fibrosis is also explored. We have also collated the functions and mechanisms of signaling pathways associated with the regulation of macrophage polarization such as Notch, TGF-ß/Smad, JAK-STAT and cGAS-STING. The goal of this article is to explain the potential benefits of focusing on macrophage polarization as a way to relieve lung fibrosis. We aspire to provide valuable insights that could lead to enhancements in the treatment of this condition.
Asunto(s)
Macrófagos , Fibrosis Pulmonar , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , Fibrosis Pulmonar/metabolismo , Fibrosis Pulmonar/patología , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Animales , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Mitocondrias/patología , Exosomas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Importance: Centralizing deceased organ donor management and organ recovery into donor care units (DCUs) may mitigate the critical organ shortage by positively impacting donation and recipient outcomes. Objective: To compare donation and lung transplant outcomes between 2 common DCU models: independent (outside of acute-care hospitals) and hospital-based. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network deceased donor registry and lung transplant recipient files from 21 US donor service areas with an operating DCU. Characteristics and lung donation rates among deceased donors cared for in independent vs hospital-based DCUs were compared. Eligible participants included deceased organ donors (aged 16 years and older) after brain death, who underwent organ recovery procedures between April 26, 2017, and June 30, 2022, and patients who received lung transplants from those donors. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Organ recovery in an independent DCU (vs hospital-based DCU). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of transplanted lung survival (through December 31, 2023) among recipients of lung(s) transplanted from cohort donors. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by transplant year and program, adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics was used to compare graft survival. Results: Of 10â¯856 donors in the starting sample (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [15.2] years; 6625 male [61.0%] and 4231 female [39.0%]), 5149 (primary comparison group) underwent recovery procedures in DCUs including 1466 (28.4%) in 11 hospital-based DCUs and 3683 (71.5%) in 10 independent DCUs. Unadjusted lung donation rates were higher in DCUs than local hospitals, but lower in hospital-based vs independent DCUs (418 donors [28.5%] vs 1233 donors [33.5%]; P < .001). Among 1657 transplant recipients, 1250 (74.5%) received lung(s) from independent DCUs. Median (range) duration of follow-up after transplant was 734 (0-2292) days. Grafts recovered from independent DCUs had shorter restricted mean (SE) survival times than grafts from hospital-based DCUs (1548 [27] days vs 1665 [50] days; P = .04). After adjustment, graft failure remained higher among lungs recovered from independent DCUs than hospital-based DCUs (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of national donor and transplant recipient data, although lung donation rates were higher from deceased organ donors after brain death cared for in independent DCUs, lungs recovered from donors in hospital-based DCUs survived longer. These findings suggest that further work is necessary to understand which factors (eg, donor transfer, management, or lung evaluation and acceptance practices) differ between DCU models and may contribute to these differences.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Sistema de Registros , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We assessed the association of cardiac radiation dose with cardiac events and survival post-chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after adoption of modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, stricter cardiac dose constraints, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This single-institution, multi-site retrospective study included 335 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive, concurrent CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. All patients were evaluated for ICI consolidation. Planning dose constraints included heart mean dose < 20 Gy (<10 Gy if feasible) and heart volume receiving ≥ 50 Gy (V50Gy) < 25 %. Twenty-one dosimetric parameters for three different cardiac structures (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], and left ventricle) were extracted. Primary endpoint was any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) post-CRT, defined as acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, coronary revascularization, or cardiac-related death. Secondary endpoints were: grade ≥ 3 cardiac events (per CTCAE v5.0), overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific mortality (LCSM), and other-cause mortality (OCM). RESULTS: Median age was 68 years, 139 (41 %) had baseline coronary heart disease, and 225 (67 %) received ICI consolidation. Proton therapy was used in 117 (35 %) and intensity-modulated RT in 199 (59 %). Median LAD V15Gy was 1.4 % (IQR 0-22) and median heart mean dose was 8.7 Gy (IQR 4.6-14.4). Median follow-up was 3.3 years. Two-year cumulative incidence of MACE was 9.5 % for all patients and 14.3 % for those with baseline coronary heart disease. Two-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 cardiac events was 20.4 %. No cardiac dosimetric parameter was associated with an increased risk of MACE or grade ≥ 3 cardiac events. On multivariable analysis, cardiac dose (LAD V15Gy and heart mean dose) was associated with worse OS, driven by an association with LCSM but not OCM. CONCLUSIONS: With modern RT techniques, stricter cardiac dose constraints, and ICI consolidation, cardiac dose was associated with LCSM but not OCM or cardiac events in patients with LA-NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad Coronaria , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Anciano , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dosis de RadiaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We hypothesized that after adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT), rates of symptomatic pneumonitis would increase, thereby supporting efforts to reduce lung radiation dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This single institution, multisite retrospective study included 783 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT either before introduction of ICI consolidation (pre-ICI era cohort [January 2011-September 2017]; N = 448) or afterward (ICI era cohort [October 2017-December 2021]; N = 335). Primary endpoint was grade ≥2 pneumonitis (G2P) and secondary endpoint was grade ≥3 pneumonitis (G3P), per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Pneumonitis was compared between pre-ICI era and ICI era cohorts using the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Fine-Gray models were generated. Logistic models were developed to predict the 1-year probability of G2P as a function of lung dosimetry. RESULTS: G2P was higher in the ICI era than in the pre-ICI era (1-year cumulative incidence 31.4% vs 20.1%; P < .001; IPTW-adjusted multivariable subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.70; P < .001). There was no significant interaction between ICI era treatment and either lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20) or mean lung dose in Fine-Gray regression for G2P; however, the predicted probability of G2P was higher in the ICI era at clinically relevant values of lung V20 (≥24%) and mean lung dose (≥14 Gy). Cut-point analysis revealed a lung V20 threshold of 28% in the ICI era (1-year G2P rate 46.0% above vs 19.8% below; P < .001). Among patients receiving ICI consolidation, lung V5 was not associated with G2P. G3P was not higher in the ICI era (1-year cumulative incidence 7.5% vs 6.0%; P = .39; IPTW-adjusted multivariable subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.01; P = .70). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT, the adoption of ICI consolidation was associated with an increase in G2P but not G3P. With ICI consolidation, stricter lung dose constraints may be warranted.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Neumonitis por Radiación , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neumonitis por Radiación/etiología , Neumonitis por Radiación/epidemiología , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer a chance of cure while minimizing toxicity for patients with isolated intrathoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, distant failure remains common, necessitating strategies to integrate more effective systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial (NCT03087760) of consolidation pembrolizumab after PBT reRT for locoregional recurrences of NSCLC. Four to 12 weeks after completion of 60 to 70 Gy PBT reRT, patients without progressive disease received pembrolizumab for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), measured from the start of reRT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 toxicity. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2021, 22 patients received PBT reRT. Median interval from prior radiation end to reRT start was 20 months. Most recurrences (91%) were centrally located. Most patients received concurrent chemotherapy (95%) and pencil beam scanning PBT (77%), and 36% had received prior durvalumab. Fifteen patients (68%) initiated consolidation pembrolizumab on trial and received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-17). Pembrolizumab was discontinued most commonly due to toxicity (n = 5; 2 were pembrolizumab-related), disease progression (n = 4), and completion of 1 year (n = 3). Median follow-up was 38.7 months. Median PFS and OS were 8.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-23.7) and 22.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-not reached), respectively. There was only one isolated in-field failure after reRT. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 10 patients (45%); 2 were pembrolizumab-related. There were 2 grade 5 toxicities, an aorto-esophageal fistula at 6.9 months and hemoptysis at 46.8 months, both probably from reRT. The trial closed early due to widespread adoption of immunotherapy off-protocol. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-ever prospective trial combining PBT reRT with consolidation immunotherapy, PFS was acceptable and OS favorable. Late grade 5 toxicity occurred in 2 of 22 patients. This approach may be considered in selected patients with isolated thoracic recurrences of NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Reirradiación , Humanos , Protones , Reirradiación/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Examine feasibility of a new strategy to perform Electronic Medical Record database valid Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER), using determination of whether rosiglitazone (ROS) treatment increases Acute myocardial infarction (MI) in comparison to pioglitazone (PIO) as a model question. METHODS: Using the UK The Health Improvement Network Database, a retrospective cohort design replicated the proactive RCT of diabetics with ischemic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Replication studies using PIO or ROS, as well as expanded studies of subjects not requiring CVD, were performed. MI assessment used multiple analytics comparing ROS and PIO exposed patients including: unexposed subjects, the proactive RCT, and directly between ROS to PIO exposed cohorts. RESULTS: PIO replication studies did not affect MI [HR 0.88 (0.49 to 1.42)], but ROS increased MI, with prior event rate ratio (PERR) adjusted HR (which overcomes unmeasured confounding) results of: [HR 1.31 (0.94 to 1.74)] versus proactive RCT [HR 0.83 (0.65 to 1.06)] (p = 0.02). Direct ROS to PIO exposed cohort comparisons yielded PERR adj HR of 1.55 (0.98 to 2.65). By contrast, expanded studies showed no differences between ROS and PIO exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new insight regarding the effects of ROS and PIO on MI. In a population with established ischemic CVD, ROS increased MI in contrast to PIO; whereas in an unselected population, ROS and PIO have reasonably comparable effects. Most importantly, this study demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of a new strategy to perform reliable "CER" using an EMR database.
Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/inducido químicamente , Tiazolidinedionas/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Pioglitazona , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rosiglitazona , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of baseline anxiety levels on drug placebo separation and drug and placebo response in acutely psychotic schizophrenic subjects. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, modified intent-to-treat Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale data were obtained from a phase 2, multi-center, 5 week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of KarXT in hospitalized adults with DSM-5 schizophrenia experiencing an acute exacerbation or relapse of symptoms. We investigated the impact of anxiety on drug placebo separation and drug and placebo response in 2 ways. In the first set of analyses, we dichotomized the data based on the absence or presence of anxiety symptoms. In the second set of analyses, we categorized subjects by levels of anxiety. All analyses were conducted using generalized linear models with normal distribution and identity link function. Results: On average, subjects entering the trial were suffering from a moderate level of anxiety. Subjects with no baseline anxiety had a significant increase in placebo response, a decrease in drug response and did not separate drugs from placebo. With increasing levels of baseline anxiety, a larger drug placebo difference was observed. Discussion: Our analyses identified that absence of anxiety at baseline was associated with a loss of signal at end of treatment between drug and placebo driven by a differential effect on placebo and treatment response. The effect observed was not related to the overall baseline symptom severity and was not mediated by improvement in anxiety itself. Interpretation of the results is caveated by the retrospective nature of the analyses.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2018, a United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy change increased prioritization of patients bridged with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices, such as venoarterial ECMO, for cardiac transplantation. Considering increased waitlist acuity, we sought to characterize whether this was associated with an increased risk for development of postoperative acute renal failure requiring dialysis (AKI-D) and risk of death after transplantation. METHODS: Dialysis-naive adults receiving single-organ heart transplant between November 2009 and February 2020 were stratified by receipt of AKI-D. Era 1 and era 2 were defined by the periods of UNOS allocation before and after policy change, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for AKI-D. Rates of AKI-D were compared by propensity score-matched cohorts. Survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: A total of 20 698 patients were included. Venoarterial ECMO use significantly increased in era 2 (5.6% vs 0.58%; P < .01). Overall prevalence of AKI-D was greater in era 2 (13.5% vs 10.2%; P < .01). Use of preoperative ECMO, intra-aortic balloon pump, and ventilators and longer ischemia times were identified as independent risk factors for development of AKI-D. Five- and 10-year survival rates were significantly decreased for patients with AKI-D. There was no short-term survival difference of patients with AKI-D between era 2 and the more contemporary era 1. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom AKI-D develops after transplantation have significantly worse short- and long-term outcomes. Preoperative use of ECMO, preoperative ventilator support, and longer ischemia times are risk factors for development of AKI-D, and their prevalence has increased since the allocation policy change.