Effectiveness of the combination of workshops and flipped classroom model to improve tube fixation training for nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Tube indwelling is a key procedure in modern medicine. Careful tube setup is necessary to prevent unplanned extubation. The training for tube fixation is time- and resource-consuming, and optimal modes of training are currently being sought. Previous studies have compared workshops and flipped classroom models separately using conventional teaching strategies, but no study has examined a combination of both teaching models in nursing training. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of workshops vs workshops combined with the flipped classroom model for improving tube fixation training for nursing students. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. In this study, 149 nurses who joined our hospital in 2019 underwent training using workshops combined with the flipped classroom model (experimental group), while 159 nurses who joined the hospital in 2018 received only workshop-based training (control group). The combination of workshops with the flipped classroom training model was divided into two modules: pre-class and in-class training. The participation of nurses in the training activities, on-site assessment of training, nurses' evaluation of their training, and related indicators of tube quality management were evaluated. RESULTS: The average age of nurses in the control group was 22.94 ± 0.94 years and that of nurses in the experimental group was 25.42 ± 3.23 years (P < 0.01). The qualified rate of after-class assessments for the experimental and control groups was 100.00% (average score: 94.01 ± 2.78 points) and 91.82% (average score: 84.24 ± 2.94 points), respectively (P < 0.01). Most nurses in the experimental group completely agreed that the combined training was helpful to cultivate clinical thinking and independent learning ability and to master knowledge of tube fixation. In addition, the training content within the pre-class teaching video, pre-class tube atlas, pre-class main instructor guidance, in-class demonstration, and in-class practice was very informative. The experimental group had higher evaluation scores than the control group (4.88 ± 0.38 vs 4.67 ± 0.64; P < 0.01). Comparison of tube quality management before and after training in 2018 to 2019 revealed that the unplanned ureteral tube removal rate dropped from 0.25‰ to 0.06‰, the unplanned chest tube removal rate dropped from 1.07‰ to 0.78‰, and the unplanned gastric tube removal rate dropped from 0.36‰ to 0.17‰. The incidence rate of pressure ulcers caused by the tube decreased from 0.78‰ to 0.45‰. CONCLUSION: The combination of workshop and flipped classroom training is effective in improving tube fixation training of nurses, cultivating nurses' active learning abilities and clinical thinking, and improving the safety of the procedure.

Home enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Not only has the placement rate of enteral feeding tubes during operations for esophageal cancer increased, but also has number of patients who choose to continue enteral feeding at home instead of removing the feeding tube at discharge. The impacts of home enteral nutrition (HEN) after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients are analyzed. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. English and Chinese databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, CBM, CNKI, and Wan Fang were searched from inception to December 7, 2019. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the short-term outcomes of HEN following esophagectomy in cancer patients were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was appraised according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The summary of relative risk/weighted mean difference (WMD) estimates and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials involving 757 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with oral diet, HEN was associated with significantly increased body weight (WMD 3 kg, 95% CI 2.36-3.63, P < .001), body mass index (WMD 0.97 kg/m, 95% CI 0.74-1.21, P < .001), albumin (WMD 3.43 g/L, 95% CI 2.35-4.52, P < .001), hemoglobin (WMD 7.23 g/L, 95% CI 5.87-8.59, P < .001), and total protein (WMD 5.13 g/L, 95% CI 3.7-6.56, P < .001). No significant differences were observed in prealbumin and gastrointestinal adverse reactions. Physical (WMD 8.82, 95% CI 6.69-10.95, P < .001) and role function (WMD 12.23, 95% CI 2.72-21.74, P = .01) were also significantly better in the HEN group. The nausea/vomiting (WMD -5.43, 95% CI -8.29 to -2.57, P = .002) and fatigue symptoms (WMD -11.76, 95% CI -16.21 to -7.32, P < .001) were significantly reduced. Appetite loss (WMD -8.48, 95% CI -14.27 to -4.88, P = .001), diarrhea (WMD -3.9, 95% CI -7.37 to -0.43, P = .03), and sleep disturbance (WMD -7.64, 95% CI -12.79 to -2.5, P = .004) in the HEN group were also significantly less than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: HEN improved nutrition status, physical and role function, and reduced nausea/vomiting, fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhea, and sleep disturbance compared with an oral diet in esophageal cancer patients postsurgery. HEN did not increase adverse reactions.