Practice patterns regarding combination treatments and laser and energy based devices: A survey of American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery Members.

OBJECTIVE: The use of laser and energy-based devices (LEBD) has grown exponentially in recent years, and variations in common practices exist. Our study sought to evaluate the current practice paradigms of leaders in the field of LEBD with regard to antimicrobial prophylaxis, adjuvant topical treatments, use of laser procedures in pregnancy, and combination of procedures. METHODS: Anonymous surveys were distributed to leading dermatologists in American Society for Laser Medicine & Surgery (ASLMS) via email. RESULTS: Surveys were distributed to 65 ASLMS members; 37 submitted responses. Routine antiviral prophylaxis is used by 76% for fractional ablative procedures of the face, but only 27% for fractional non-ablative procedures. Routine antifungal prophylaxis was used by a minority (16%) for ablative procedures, whereas antibacterial prophylaxis was used by 68%, with varying antibiotics. Wide variations exist in skin preparation and topicals used post-laser treatment. Most respondents feel comfortable combining same-day LEBD and botulinum toxin injections, specifically vascular or Q-switched/picosecond lasers. Most respondents avoid performing LEBD during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus in a rapidly growing field sheds light on common, reliable practices. However, even at the expert level, variations exist. Further high-quality research is needed to standardize and update guidelines.

Review of Lasers and Energy-Based Devices for Skin Rejuvenation and Scar Treatment With Histologic Correlations.

BACKGROUND: Lasers and energy-based devices (EBD) are popular treatments for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing. Achieving desired outcomes and avoiding complications require understanding the effects of these devices at a histologic level. Currently, no comprehensive review summarizing the histologic effects of laser and energy-based treatments exists. OBJECTIVE: To describe how lasers and EBD alter skin histology and improve the overall understanding of these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted for studies with histologic analysis of fractional picosecond laser, fractional radiofrequency microneedling, nonablative lasers, and ablative lasers. RESULTS: Fractional picosecond lasers induce intraepidermal and/or dermal vacuoles from laser-induced optical breakdown. Fractional radiofrequency microneedling delivers thermal energy to the dermis while sparing the epidermis, making it safer for patients with darker skin phototypes. Fractional nonablative lasers induce conical zones of coagulation of the epidermis and upper dermis. Ablative lasers vaporize the stratum corneum down to the dermis. Traditional ablative lasers cause diffuse vaporization while fractional ablative lasers generate columns of tissue ablation. CONCLUSION: Lasers and EBD are effective for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation and have different mechanisms with disparate targets in the skin. Safe and effective use of devices requires understanding the histologic laser-tissue interaction.

Cosmetic treatment in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases: Best practices for patients with lupus erythematosus.

The cutaneous manifestations of lupus, especially chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, are a source of significant morbidity and can negatively impact patient quality of life. While the active inflammatory component of the disease may be adequately treated, patients are frequently left with residual skin damage and disfiguring aesthetic deficits. Dermatologists lack guidelines regarding the use and safety of various reconstructive and cosmetic interventions in this patient population. Laser treatments are largely avoided in the lupus population because of the possible photodamaging effects of ultraviolet and visible light. Similarly, given the autoimmune nature of this disease, some physicians avoid injectable treatment and grafts because of the concern for disease reactivation via antigenic stimulation. In the second article in this continuing medical education series we compile available data on this topic with the goal of providing evidence-based guidance on the cosmetic treatment of patients with lupus erythematosus with a focus on chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Cosmetic treatment in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases: Best practices for patients with morphea/systemic sclerosis.

Morphea and systemic sclerosis are inflammatory, sclerosing disorders. Morphea primarily affects the dermis and subcutaneous fat, while systemic sclerosis typically involves the skin and internal organs. Functional impairment and cosmetic disfigurement are common in both diseases. Treatment options to mitigate disease progression remain limited. Both functional impairment and cosmetic deficits negatively impact quality of life and psychological well-being in this patient population. While the number of cosmetic procedures performed in the United States continues to rise each year, limited data exist regarding best practices for correcting aesthetic deficits caused by autoimmune conditions. There is scarce information to guide safety decisions regarding laser parameters, soft tissue augmentation, treatment intervals, and the concurrent use of immune-modifying or immune-suppressing medications. Given the fears of disease reactivation and exacerbation from postprocedural inflammation along with limited data, it is difficult for clinicians to provide evidence-based cosmetic treatment with realistic expectations with regard to short- and long-term outcomes. In the first article in this continuing medical education series, we attempt to address this practice gap.

The Unhappy Cosmetic Patient: Lessons From Unfavorable Online Reviews of Minimally and Noninvasive Cosmetic Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients receiving minimally and noninvasive cosmetic procedures is increasing. Often, patients turn to online review forums to gain and share advice regarding cosmetic procedures. Understanding and discussing patient-reported outcome data can help align physician and patient expectations and ultimately help improve the patient experience. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most common reasons patients are dissatisfied with a selection of minimally and noninvasive cosmetic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Negative patient reviews from the RealSelf.com website were analyzed, and the reason for patient discontent was recorded for the following treatments: tissue stabilized-guided subscision, cryolipolysis, electromagnetic therapy, deoxycholic acid injections, energy-induced thermolysis, radio thermoplasty, threadlifts, and ultrasound therapy. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred four reviews were included in analysis. For all treatments analyzed, the most common reason for patient dissatisfaction was ineffectiveness (n = 782, 65.0%), followed by complications (n = 301, 25.0%). The most common complications were as follows: lumps for tissue stabilized-guided subscision (n = 6, 50.0%), treated area enlargement for cryolipolysis (n = 23, 22.1%), swelling for deoxycholic acid injections (n = 9, 47.4%), numbness for energy-induced thermolysis (n = 6, 35.3%), fat loss for radio thermoplasty (n = 26, 53.1%) and ultrasound therapy (n = 32, 48.5%), and indentations for threadlifts (n = 10, 30.3%). CONCLUSION: Ineffectiveness and complications were the most common reasons for dissatisfaction among all treatments analyzed. Patient-reported outcome data may offer insight into how physicians can improve their patient's satisfaction with cosmetic procedures.

Bullous aplasia cutis congenita: A rare presentation of a rare disease.

Aplasia cutis congenita (ACC) is a congenital disorder characterized by localized or generalized absence of skin. Bullous aplasia cutis congenita (BACC) is a rare clinical subtype that has few documented reports in the literature. Herein, we present a new case of BACC in which the bulla was unruptured at birth.

Leprosy Diagnosed via Teledermatology in a U. S. Urban Academic Health Center Highlights Potential Benefits and a Pitfall of Existing Telemedicine Services.

Purpose: Teledermatology has emerged as an important tool to extend the reach of dermatologists. As utilization of teledermatology services increases, careful attention should be given to the design of the system for consulting dermatologists. Methodology: In this case study, we report how access to a patient's entire medical history in a teledermatology consultation was vital for an accurate diagnosis. Results: This case emphasizes the importance of full access to patients' medical records for improving diagnostic accuracy. We believe that full-access systems will lower the risk of misdiagnosis and will help to maximize the potential of teledermatology.

Interactive teaching and repeat exposure maximize medical student satisfaction but do not promote long-term retention of dermatologic knowledge.

BACKGROUND: Instructional methods for teaching medical students to recognize common skin lesions vary widely. There is little published data comparing various teaching methods and their impact on medical student retention of dermatologic knowledge. METHODS: Our prospective cohort study analyzed how teaching methods (interactive teaching versus. traditional didactic teaching versus. self-guided review alone) impacted second year medical students' ability to recognize common skin lesions one year after initial exposure to the material. Our study also looked at student satisfaction with different teaching methods. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in long-term retention of knowledge between different teaching methods. However, students preferred the interactive format over the traditional didactic format. Spaced review is important for long-term retention, but an in-class review session two months after content was initially taught provided no added benefit over spaced self-review alone. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are able to maintain long-term retention of dermatologic knowledge irrespective of in-class teaching method. Repeat exposure to material is important but self-review of dermatology alone is sufficient for long-term retention. Dermatology course directors should incorporate interactive teaching into medical school curricula to increase learner satisfaction.