Antiphospholipid antibody positivity in early systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with subsequent vascular events.

OBJECTIVE: aPL are found in the blood of 20-30% of patients with SLE. Although aPL cause vascular thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome, it is not clear whether positive aPL levels in early SLE increase risk of subsequent vascular events (VE). In a previous analysis of 276 patients with SLE, we found that early positivity for ≥2 of IgG anti-cardiolipin (anti-CL), IgG anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) and anti-domain I of ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-DI) showed a possible association with VE. Here we have extended that analysis. METHODS: Serum samples taken from 501 patients with SLE early in their disease had been tested for IgG anti-CL, anti-ß2GPI and anti-DI by ELISA. Complete VE history was available for 423 patients of whom 23 were excluded because VE occurred before the diagnosis of SLE. For the remaining 400 patients we carried out Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to define groups at higher risk of VE. RESULTS: Of 400 patients, 154 (38.5%) were positive for one or more aPL, 27 (6.8%) were double/triple-positive and 127 (31.8%) were single-positive. There were 91 VE in 77 patients, of whom 42 were aPL-positive in early disease. VE were significantly increased in aPL-positive vs aPL-negative patients (P = 0.041) and in double/triple-positive vs single-positive vs aPL-negative patients (P = 0.0057). Omission of the IgG anti-DI assay would have missed 14 double/triple-positive patients of whom six had VE. CONCLUSION: Double/triple-positivity for IgG anti-CL, anti-ß2GPI and anti-DI in early SLE identifies a population at higher risk of subsequent VE.

Factors associated with cardiovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus in a monocentric cohort with up to 40 years of follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Several traditional and disease-specific risk factors have been shown to correlate with the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients with SLE. However, results of previous studies are diverse. The objectives of this study were to report number, type and those factors associated with CVE in patients with SLE in a large, single-center, ethnically diverse cohort with a long follow-up duration. METHODS: Medical records of patients treated at the Lupus Clinic at University College London Hospital (UCLH) between 1979 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Data about CVE, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, demographic and disease features, and treatment history were collected. Only patients with complete available information were included in the study. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with CVE. RESULTS: Four hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. Maximum follow-up length was 40 years. Seventy-one (17%) patients had at least one CVE. Multivariable analysis showed that only antiphospholipid antibody positivity (p-value<0.001) was associated with CVE. When analysing different types of CVE, antiphospholipid antibodies were specifically associated with both venous thromboembolic events (p-value<0.001) and cerebrovascular events (p-value=0.007). Dedicated subanalyses revealed that cumulative glucocorticoid dose (p-value=0.010) and a diagnosis of SLE before 2000 (p-value<0.001) were significantly associated with CVE. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular disease is highly prevalent among patients with SLE and is associated with antiphospholipid antibodies, glucocorticoid therapy, and diagnosis before 2000.

What you need to know about microbiology referrals.

Microbiologists are frequently consulted for guidance on the investigation and management of infection, including antimicrobial prescribing in hospital settings. There is a rising demand for timely microbiology advice in the context of increasing global travel and antibiotic resistance, which give rise to complex cases. However, junior doctors are seldom trained in making effective referrals. Improving confidence in this key skill saves time for both the referring clinician and the specialist, and results in more accurate advice being given. This benefits patients who are more likely to receive appropriate treatment. This article presents guidance, developed in consultation with specialists, to improve the quality of referrals to microbiologists. This includes the information required for a high-quality referral, and signposts referring clinicians to existing resources which are suitable for simpler cases not requiring specialist input.