Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: European expert consensus for diagnosis and management.

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare, usually drug-induced, acute pustular rash. Despite the lack of strong data supporting the effectiveness of topical or systemic corticosteroids in this drug reaction, they are widely used. More generally, there is no consensus on the diagnostic modalities and the management of patients with AGEP. We aimed to provide European expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management or patients with AGEP. Members of the ToxiTEN group of the European Reference Network (ERN)-skin, all dermatologists and/or allergologists with expertise in drug reactions, elaborated these recommendations based on their own experience and on a review of the literature. Recommendations were separated into the following categories: professionals involved, assessment of the diagnosis of AGEP, management of the patient and allergological work-up after the acute phase. Consensus was obtained among experts for the list of professionals involved for the diagnosis and management of AGEP, including the minimum diagnostic work-up, the setting of management, the treatments, the modalities and the timing of allergological work-up and follow-up. European experts in drug allergies propose herein consensus on the diagnosis and management of patients with AGEP. A multidisciplinary approach is warranted, including dermatologists, allergologists and pharmacovigilance services.

Childhood epidermal necrolysis and erythema multiforme major: a multicentre French cohort study of 62 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The distinction between epidermal necrolysis [EN; including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and overlap syndrome] and erythema multiforme major (EMM) in children is confusing. We aimed to better describe and compare these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This French retrospective multicentre study included children ≤18 years old referred for EN or EMM between 1 January 2008 and 1 March 2019. According to pictures, children were reclassified into TEN/overlap, SJS or EMM/unclassified (SJS/EMM) groups and compared for epidemiological and clinical data, triggers, histology and follow-up. RESULTS: We included 62 children [43 boys, median age 10 years (range 3-18)]: 16 with TEN/overlap, 11 SJS and 35 EMM. The main aetiologies were drugs in EN and infections (especially Mycoplasma pneumoniae) in EMM (P < 0.001), but 35% of cases remained idiopathic (TEN/overlap, 47%; SJS, 24%; EMM, 34%). The typical target lesions predominated in EMM (P < 0.001), the trunk was more often affected in EN (P < 0.001), and the body surface area involved was more extensive in EN (P < 0.001). Mucosal involvement did not differ between the groups. Two patients with idiopathic TEN died. Histology of EMM and EN showed similar features. The recurrence rate was 42% with EMM, 7% with TEN/overlap and 0 with SJS (P < 0.001). Sequelae occurred in 75% of EN but involved 55% of EMM. CONCLUSION: Clinical features of EN and EMM appeared well demarcated, with few overlapping cases. Idiopathic forms were frequent, especially for EN, meaning that a wide and thorough infectious screening, repeated if needed, is indicated for all paediatric cases of EN/EMM without any trigger drug. We propose a comprehensive panel of investigations which could be a standard work-up in such situation. Sequelae affected both EN and EMM.

Long-term evolving profile of childhood autoimmune blistering diseases: Retrospective study on 38 children.

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBDs) in children are uncommon, and their long-term evolution remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to characterize the long-term prognosis of AIBDs that started during childhood. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study, in the French dermatology centre, by including all children affected by AIBDs. The long-term outcome was obtained through a phone call questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were included from January 1993 to December 2015, 34 female and 29 males: 27 Linear immunoglobulin A disease (LAD), 12 bullous pemphigoid (BP), 12 pemphigus, 8 herpetiform dermatitis (DH) and 4 epidermolysis bullosa aquisita (EBA). The mean age was 4.7 years old. Twenty-five patients were lost during the follow-up. For the 38 remaining patients, the mean follow-up duration for all pathologies was 6.6 years. Twenty-nine of them had at least one relapse. Late relapses were observed in two cases of DH and six cases of pemphigus (7-34 months). The mean treatment duration was 30.6 months with variability according to the AIBDs. Topical corticosteroids were used alone, effectively, for seven patients and in association with other treatment in 19 patients in complete remission. Complete remission was noted in 34/38 children with a follow-up of 4.4 years (0.08-19.5). The mean duration to complete remission was 30.5 months (6-114 months). Late nasal synechiae were reported in one EBA only. There was no significant associated comorbidity, but an association with a primary immune deficiency (PID) was observed in two cases. CONCLUSION: Childhood AIBDs appear to be of good overall prognosis but a long-term follow-up is mandatory, as relapses can be late, except for BP. The use of topical corticosteroids is frequently effective alone or in association. The association with PID leads to think about the possibility of a possible underlying dysimmunity in the child.

Management of ocular involvement in the acute phase of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: french national audit of practices, literature review, and consensus agreement.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) can lead to severe ophthalmologic sequelae. The main risk factor is the severity of the initial ocular involvement. There are no recommendations for ocular management during acute phase.We conducted a national audit of current practice in the 11 sites of the French reference center for toxic bullous dermatoses and a review of the literature to establish therapeutic consensus guidelines. We sent a questionnaire on ocular management practices in SJS/ TEN during acute phase to ophthalmologists and dermatologists. The survey focused on ophthalmologist opinion, pseudomembrane removal, topical ocular treatment (i.e. corticosteroids, antibiotics, antiseptics, artificial tear eye drops, vitamin A ointment application), amniotic membrane transplantation, symblepharon ring use, and systemic corticosteroid therapy for ophthalmologic indication. Nine of 11 centers responded. All requested prompt ophthalmologist consultation. The majority performed pseudomembrane removal, used artificial tears, and vitamin A ointment (8/9, 90%). Combined antibiotic-corticosteroid or corticosteroid eye drops were used in 6 centers (67%), antibiotics alone and antiseptics in 3 centers (33%). Symblepharon ring was used in 5 centers (55%) if necessary. Amniotic membrane transplantation was never performed systematically and only according to the clinical course. Systemic corticosteroid therapy was occasionally used (3/9, 33%) and discussed on a case-by-case basis.The literature about ocular management practice in SJS/ TEN during acute phase is relatively poor. The role of specific treatments such as local or systemic corticosteroid therapy is not consensual. The use of preservatives, often present in eye drops and deleterious to the ocular surface, is to be restricted. Early amniotic membrane transplantation seems to be promising.