RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, numerous dosing studies have been conducted to optimize therapeutic antibiotic exposures in patients with serious infections. These studies have led to the inclusion of dose optimization recommendations in international clinical practice guidelines. The last international survey describing dosing, administration and monitoring of commonly prescribed antibiotics for critically ill patients was published in 2015 (ADMIN-ICU 2015). This study aimed to describe the evolution of practice since this time. METHODS: A cross-sectional international survey distributed through professional societies and networks was used to obtain information on practices used in the dosing, administration and monitoring of vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem and aminoglycosides. RESULTS: A total of 538 respondents (71% physicians and 29% pharmacists) from 409 hospitals in 45 countries completed the survey. Vancomycin was mostly administered as an intermittent infusion, and loading doses were used by 74% of respondents with 25 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg the most favoured doses for intermittent and continuous infusions, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem were most frequently administered as an extended infusion (42% and 51%, respectively). Therapeutic drug monitoring was undertaken by 90%, 82%, 43%, and 39% of respondents for vancomycin, aminoglycosides, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem, respectively, and was more frequently performed in high-income countries. Respondents rarely used dosing software to guide therapy in clinical practice and was most frequently used with vancomycin (11%). CONCLUSIONS: We observed numerous changes in practice since the ADMIN-ICU 2015 survey was conducted. Beta-lactams are more commonly administered as extended infusions, and therapeutic drug monitoring use has increased, which align with emerging evidence.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Vancomicina , Humanos , Adulto , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Meropenem , Estudios Transversales , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Aminoglicósidos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , PiperacilinaRESUMEN
Since the 1st World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) in 1973, pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been arbitrarily defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25â mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterisation. Recent data from normal subjects has shown that normal mPAP was 14.0±3.3â mmHg. Two standard deviations above this mean value would suggest mPAP >20â mmHg as above the upper limit of normal (above the 97.5th percentile). This definition is no longer arbitrary, but based on a scientific approach. However, this abnormal elevation of mPAP is not sufficient to define pulmonary vascular disease as it can be due to an increase in cardiac output or pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Thus, this 6th WSPH Task Force proposes to include pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3â Wood Units in the definition of all forms of pre-capillary PH associated with mPAP >20â mmHg. Prospective trials are required to determine whether this PH population might benefit from specific management.Regarding clinical classification, the main Task Force changes were the inclusion in group 1 of a subgroup "pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) long-term responders to calcium channel blockers", due to the specific prognostic and management of these patients, and a subgroup "PAH with overt features of venous/capillaries (pulmonary veno-occlusive disease/pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis) involvement", due to evidence suggesting a continuum between arterial, capillary and vein involvement in PAH.
Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica , Hipertensión Pulmonar/clasificación , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Cardiopatías/complicaciones , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD frequently develop pulmonary hypertension (PH-COPD). Severe PH-COPD, identified by a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >5 Wood Units (WU), is closely linked to impaired transplant-free survival. The impact of PH-targeting pharmacotherapy in this context remains unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is PH-targeted therapy associated with improved transplant-free survival in PH-COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included PVRI GoDeep meta-registry patients with PH-COPD and available right heart catheterization at diagnosis. We investigated PH-targeted therapy prevalence and its association with transplant-free survival using diverse statistical methods, including Cox regression and subgroup analyses based on PH severity, comorbidities, and pulmonary function tests. Immortal time bias was addressed through a landmark approach. RESULTS: As of December 2023, the GoDeep meta-registry included 26981 patients (28% PH-Group 1, 13% PH-Group 2, 12% PH-Group 3, 10% PH-Group 4, 2% PH-Group 5, 26% undefined and 9% control). Out of these, 836 patients were diagnosed as PH-COPD and included in this analysis, with median age 66 [59,73]years, FEV1 51 [34,69]%predicted, mPAP 35 [28,44]mmHg, PVR 5 [4,8]WU, cardiac index 2.5 [2.0,2.9]L/min.m2, and mostly WHO functional class III were included. 5-year transplant-free survival was 42%, significantly worse than group 1 PH. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model identified PVR, but not FEV1 as a major predictor of outcome. 418 patients (50%) received phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) therapy, which was associated with significantly reduced mortality: hazard ratio 0.65 [0.57,0.75] for the entire PH-COPD cohort and 0.83 [0.74,0.94] when performing landmark analysis. This PDE5i effect was robustly reproduced when performing subgroup analyses for patients with moderate/severe PH, various comorbidities, and supplemental oxygen requirement, and when assessing the impact of unobserved confounders. INTERPRETATION: PH-COPD patients exhibit poor transplant-free survival, with PVR being a predictor of mortality. In this meta-registry, PDE5i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mortality across all tested models.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. Accurate risk stratification is essential for guiding treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although various risk models have been developed for PAH, their comparative prognostic potential requires further exploration. Additionally, the applicability of risk scores in PH groups beyond group 1 remains to be investigated. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are risk scores originally developed for PAH predictive in PH groups 1 through 4? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of outcomes among patients with incident PH enrolled in the multicenter worldwide Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute GoDeep meta-registry. Analyses were performed across PH groups 1 through 4 and further subgroups to evaluate the predictive value of PAH risk scores, including Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH Disease Mangement (REVEAL) Lite 2, REVEAL 2.0, ESC/ERS 2022, Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA) 3-strata, and COMPERA 4-strata. RESULTS: Eight thousand five hundred sixty-five patients were included in the study, of whom 3,537 patients were assigned to group 1 PH, whereas 1,807 patients, 1,635 patients, and 1,586 patients were assigned to group 2 PH, group 3 PH, and group 4 PH, respectively. Pulmonary hemodynamics were impaired with median mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 42 mm Hg (interquartile range, 33-52 mm Hg) and pulmonary vascular resistance of 7 Wood units (WU) (interquartile range, 4-11 WU). All risk scores were prognostic in the entire PH population and in each of the PH groups 1 through 4. The REVEAL scores, when used as continuous prediction models, demonstrated the highest statistical prognostic power and granularity; the COMPERA 4-strata risk score provided subdifferentiation of the intermediate-risk group. Similar results were obtained when separately analyzing various subgroups (PH subgroups 1.1, 1.4.1, and 1.4.4; PH subgroups 3.1 and 3.2; group 2 with isolated postcapillary PH vs combined precapillary and postcapillary PH; patients of all groups with concomitant cardiac comorbidities; and severe [> 5 WU] vs nonsevere PH). INTERPRETATION: This comprehensive study with real-world data from 15 PH centers showed that PAH-designed risk scores possess predictive power in a large PH cohort, whether considered as common to the group or calculated separately for each PH group (1-4) and various subgroups. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05329714; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
RESUMEN
This manuscript on real-world evidence (RWE) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) incorporates the broad experience of members of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative Real-World Evidence Working Group. We aim to strengthen the research community's understanding of RWE in PH to facilitate clinical research advances and ultimately improve patient care. Herein, we review real-world data (RWD) sources, discuss challenges and opportunities when using RWD sources to study PH populations, and identify resources needed to support the generation of meaningful RWE for the global PH community.