Vedolizumab quantitation using high-resolution accurate mass-mass spectrometry middle-up protein subunit: method validation.

Background While quantitation methods for small-molecule and tryptic peptide bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS) have been well defined, quantitation methods for top-down or middle-up MS approaches have not been as well defined. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (t-mAbs) are a group of proteins that can be used to both demonstrate the advantages of top-down or middle-up detection methods over classic tryptic peptide bottom-up along with the growing need for robust quantitation strategies/software for these top-down or middle-up methods. Bottom-up proteolytic digest methods for the t-mAbs tend to suffer from challenges such as limited peptide selection due to potential interference from the polyclonal immunoglobulin background, complicated workflows, and inadequate sensitivity and specificity without laborious purification steps, and therefore have prompted the search for new detection and quantitation methods. Time-of-flight along with Orbitrap MS have recently evolved from the research and/or pharmaceutical setting into the clinical laboratory. With their superior mass measurement accuracy, resolution and scanning speeds, these are ideal platforms for top-down or middle-up characterization and quantitation. Methods We demonstrate a validated, robust, middle-up protein subunit detection and quantitation method for the IgG1 t-mAb, vedolizumab (VEDO), which takes advantage of the high resolution of the Orbitrap MS detection and quantitation software to increase specificity. Results Validated performance characteristics met pre-defined acceptance criteria with simple workflows and rapid turnaround times: characteristics necessary for implementation into a high-volume clinical MS laboratory. Conclusions While the extraction method can easily be used with other IgG1 t-mAbs, the detection and quantitation method may become an option for measurement of other proteins.

Direct Detection of Monoclonal Free Light Chains in Serum by Use of Immunoenrichment-Coupled MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Free light chain (FLC) quantification is the most analytically sensitive blood-based method commercially available to diagnose and monitor patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs). However, instead of directly detecting monoclonal FLCs (mFLCs), FLC assays indirectly assess clonality based on quantifying κ and λ FLCs and determination of the к/λ FLC ratio. Often an abnormal FLC ratio is the only indication of a PCD, and confirmation by a direct method increases diagnostic confidence. The aim of this study was to develop an analytically sensitive method for direct detection of mFLCs. METHODS: Patient sera (n = 167) previously assessed by nephelometric FLC quantification and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) were affinity enriched for IgG, IgA, and total and free κ and λ light chains and subjected to MALDI-TOF MS. Relative analytical sensitivity of these methods was determined using serially diluted sera containing mFLCs. RESULTS: In sera with abnormal FLC ratios (n = 127), 43% of monoclonal proteins were confirmed by IFE, 57% by MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, and 87% with FLC enrichment MALDI-TOF MS. In sera with normal FLC ratios (n = 40), the FLC MALDI-TOF MS method identified 1 patient with an mFLC. Serial dilution and analysis of mFLC containing sera by IFE, nephelometry, and FLC MALDI-TOF MS demonstrated that FLC MALDI-TOF MS analysis had the highest analytical sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: FLC immunoenrichment coupled to MALDI-TOF MS enables direct detection of mFLCs and significantly increases the confirmation of abnormal serum FLC ratios over IFE and MALDI-TOF MS without FLC enrichment, thereby providing added confidence for diagnosing FLC PCDs.

Screening Method for M-Proteins in Serum Using Nanobody Enrichment Coupled to MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for screening for monoclonal gammopathies include serum protein electrophoresis (PEL), imunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), and free light chain (FLC) ratios to identify or rule out an M-protein. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of an assay based on immunoenrichment and MALDI-TOF-MS (MASS-SCREEN) to qualitatively screen for M-proteins. METHODS: Serum from 556 patients previously screened for M-proteins by PEL and IFE were immunopurified using a κ/λ-specific nanobody bead mixture. Following purification, light chains (LC) were released from their heavy chains by reduction. MALDI-TOF analysis was performed and the mass-to-charge LC distributions were visually examined for the presence of an M-protein by both unblinded and blinded analysts. RESULTS: In unblinded analysis, MASS-SCREEN detected 100% of the PEL-positive samples with an analytical sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 81% using IFE positivity as the standard. In a blinded analysis using 6 different laboratory personnel, consensus was reached in 92% of the samples. Overall analytical sensitivity and specificity were reduced to 92% and 80%, respectively. FLC ratios were found to be abnormal in 28% of MASS-SCREEN-negative samples, suggesting FLC measurements need to be considered in screening. CONCLUSIONS: MASS-SCREEN could replace PEL in a panel that would include FLC measurements. Further studies and method development should be performed to validate the clinical sensitivity and specificity and to determine if this panel will suffice as a general screen for monoclonal proteins.

Comprehensive Assessment of M-Proteins Using Nanobody Enrichment Coupled to MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Electrophoretic separation of serum and urine proteins has played a central role in diagnosing and monitoring plasma cell disorders. Despite limitations in resolution and analytical sensitivity, plus the necessity for adjunct methods, protein gel electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) remain front-line tests. METHODS: We developed a MALDI mass spectrometry-based assay that was simple to perform, automatable, analytically sensitive, and applicable to analyzing the wide variety of monoclonal proteins (M-proteins) encountered clinically. This assay, called MASS-FIX, used the unique molecular mass signatures of the different Ig isotypes in combination with nanobody immunoenrichment to generate information-rich mass spectra from which M-proteins could be identified, isotyped, and quantified. The performance of MASS-FIX was compared to current gel-based electrophoresis assays. RESULTS: MASS-FIX detected all M-proteins that were detectable by urine or serum protein electrophoresis. In serial dilution studies, MASS-FIX was more analytically sensitive than IFE. For patient samples, MASS-FIX provided the same primary isotype information for 98% of serum M-proteins (n = 152) and 95% of urine M-proteins (n = 55). MASS-FIX accurately quantified M-protein to <1 g/dL, with reduced bias as compared to protein electrophoresis. Intraassay and interassay CVs were <20% across all samples having M-protein concentrations >0.045 g/dL, with the ability to detect M-proteins <0.01 g/dL. In addition, MASS-FIX could simultaneously measure κ:λ light chain ratios for IgG, IgA, and IgM. Retrospective serial monitoring of patients with myeloma posttreatment demonstrated that MASS-FIX provided equivalent quantitative information to either protein electrophoresis or the Hevylite(™) assay. CONCLUSIONS: MASS-FIX can advance how plasma cell disorders are screened, diagnosed, and monitored.

Laboratory testing requirements for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma and related plasma cell dyscrasias.

Monoclonal immunoglobulins are markers of plasma cell proliferative diseases and have been described as the first (and perhaps best) serological tumor marker. The unique structure of each monoclonal protein makes them highly specific for each plasma cell clone. The difficulties of using monoclonal proteins for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma, however, stem from the diverse disease presentations and broad range of serum protein concentrations and molecular weights. Because of these challenges, no single test can confidently diagnose or monitor all patients. Panels of tests have been recommended for sensitivity and efficiency. In this review we discuss the various disease presentations and the use of various tests such as protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis as well as immunoglobulin quantitation, free light chain quantitation, and heavy-light chain quantitation by immuno-nephelometry. The choice of tests for inclusion in diagnostic and monitoring panels may need to be tailored to each patient, and examples are provided. The panel currently recommended for diagnostic screening is serum protein electrophoresis, immunofixation electrophoresis, and free light chain quantitation.

Monitoring IgA multiple myeloma: immunoglobulin heavy/light chain assays.

BACKGROUND: The use of electrophoresis to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins migrating in the ß fraction may be difficult because of their comigration with transferrin and complement proteins. METHODS: Immunoassays specific for IgGκ, IgGλ, IgAκ, IgAλ, IgMκ, and IgMλ heavy/light chain (HLC) were validated for use in the clinical laboratory. We assessed sample stability, inter- and intraassay variability, linearity, accuracy, and reference intervals for all 6 assays. We tested accuracy by verifying that the sum of the concentrations for the HLC-pairs accounted for the total immunoglobulins in each of 129 healthy sera, and that the HLC-pair ratios (rHLCs) were outside the reference interval in 97% of 518 diagnostic multiple myeloma (MM) samples. RESULTS: We assessed diagnostic samples and posttreatment sera in 32 IgG and 30 IgA patients for HLC concentrations, rHLC, and total immunoglobulins and compared these nephelometry results with serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). In sample sets from patients with IgG MM, the sensitivity of SPEP was almost the same as for rHLC, and no additional advantage was conferred by running HLC assays. In pre- and posttreatment samples from patients with IgA MM, the SPEP, rHLC, and IFE identified clonality in 28%, 56%, and 61%, respectively. In addition, when M-spikes were quantifiable, the concentration of the involved HLC was linearly related to that of the SPEP M-spike, with a slope near 1. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IgA HLC assays for monitoring ß-migrating IgA monoclonal proteins can substitute for the combination of SPEP, IFE, and total IgA quantification.

Phenotyping polyclonal kappa and lambda light chain molecular mass distributions in patient serum using mass spectrometry.

We previously described a microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS method for identifying monoclonal immunoglobulins in serum and then tracking them over time using their accurate molecular mass. Here we demonstrate how the same methodology can be used to identify and characterize polyclonal immunoglobulins in serum. We establish that two molecular mass distributions observed by microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS are from polyclonal kappa and lambda light chains using a combination of theoretical molecular masses from gene sequence data and the analysis of commercially available purified polyclonal IgG kappa and IgG lambda from normal human serum. A linear regression comparison of kappa/lambda ratios for 74 serum samples (25 hypergammaglobulinemia, 24 hypogammaglobulinemia, 25 normal) determined by microflowLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS and immunonephelometry had a slope of 1.37 and a correlation coefficient of 0.639. In addition to providing kappa/lambda ratios, the same microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS analysis can determine the molecular mass for oligoclonal light chains observed above the polyclonal background in patient samples. In 2 patients with immune disorders and hypergammaglobulinemia, we observed a skewed polyclonal molecular mass distribution which translated into biased kappa/lambda ratios. Mass spectrometry provides a rapid and simple way to combine the polyclonal kappa/lambda light chain abundance ratios with the identification of dominant monoclonal as well as oligoclonal light chain immunoglobulins. We anticipate that this approach to evaluating immunoglobulin light chains will lead to improved understanding of immune deficiencies, autoimmune diseases, and antibody responses.

Infliximab Therapeutic monitoring by tryptic peptide LC-MS/MS method improvements lead to improved accuracy with decreased imprecision and turnaround time.

Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab has become the standard of care for inflammatory bowel disease in the setting of loss of response to therapy, and occasionally in proactive therapy personalization. Measurement of infliximab by tryptic peptide HPLC-MS/MS has been available since 2015, mostly in reference laboratories. Objectives: Here, we present method improvements to our original published method leading to a more efficient, robust, and high throughput tryptic peptide HPLC-MS/MS assay for infliximab quantitation. Methods: Deidentified residual serum samples submitted for clinical testing were used for method comparison and infliximab was spiked into normal human serum for performance studies. Improvements included the addition of a stable isotope labeled full length infliximab internal standard (IS) replacing a surrogate IS, and immunoenrichment using Melon Gel for immunoglobulins replacing the saturated ammonium sulfate precipitation. Digestion and chromatography were optimized, and automation was added. The method improvements were validated to include precision, accuracy, reportable range, linearity, and analytical sensitivity. Results: The digestion time was reduced from overnight to 1 h. The assay analytical measuring range (AMR) remained the same throughout improvements, 1-100 µg/mL, with linearity of 0.98x + 0.50, R2 = 1.00. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision were less than 5 % CV at four different concentrations. Accuracy was assessed with 106 patients within the AMR; Passing-Bablok Regression yielded a slope of 1.00 and a y-intercept of 0.25. Turnaround time was reduced by 1 day, and imprecision of three levels of quality control trended down after new method implementation. Conclusions: Method improvements including automation have allowed for assay completion in half a day, improving robustness and turnaround time.

Clinical Utility and Potential Cost Savings of Pharmacologic Monitoring of Eculizumab for Complement-Mediated Thrombotic Microangiopathy.

One of the treatment options for complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy (CM-TMA), also known as atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, is the administration of the C5 complement inhibitor eculizumab. In vivo studies have reported a complete complement blockade with eculizumab serum concentrations above 50 µg/mL in the case of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. The eculizumab trough levels and C5 functional activity were monitored in patients with CM-TMA being treated with eculizumab. For those with eculizumab trough concentrations of more than 100 µg/mL, the frequency of eculizumab 1200-mg doses was decreased. In this article, we describe the pharmacologic monitoring data with the use of C5 functional activity and mass spectrometric assessments of eculizumab to allow for a tailored eculizumab schedule for 10 patients with CM-TMA. In 9 out of 10 (90%) patients with a standard administration schedule, eculizumab trough concentrations were more than 100 µg/mL. At the time of the last eculizumab follow-up (median, 250 days; range, 85-898 days), the interval between eculizumab infusions was extended to every 3-6 weeks for 8 patients; no disease relapse was found with the modified dosing interval. Altering the administration of maintenance eculizumab from every 2-3 weeks to 3-6 weeks yields a savings of $78,185 per patient for a 6-month eculizumab treatment course. Although larger standardized cohorts are necessary to confirm these findings, our data suggest that monitoring eculizumab levels in conjunction with C5 assessment allows for safe modification of eculizumab dosing and results in considerable cost savings.

Detection of Plasma Cell Disorders by Mass Spectrometry: A Comprehensive Review of 19,523 Cases.

OBJECTIVES: To verify the analytical performance of a new mass spectrometry-based method, termed MASS-FIX, when screening for plasma cell disorders in a routine clinical laboratory. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Results from 19,523 unique patients tested for an M-protein between July 24, 2018, and March 6, 2020, by a combination serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and MASS-FIX were examined for consistency with pretest implementation performance. MASS-FIX's ability to verify abnormal results from SPEP and free light chain measurements was then compared with that of immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) using a separate cohort of 52,586 patients tested by SPEP/IFE during the same period. RESULTS: Overall, 62.4% of our cohort was negative for an M-protein. Importantly, 7.3% of all specimens had an M spike on SPEP (0.1 to 8.5 g/dL) and MASS-FIX detected an M-protein in all these samples. Of all samples, 30.3% had M-proteins that were detected by MASS-FIX but the SPEP finding was too small for quantification. Of the positive samples, 5.7% contained a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Of the positive samples, 4.1% had an N-glycosylated light chain (biomarker of high-risk plasma cell disorders). MASS-FIX confirmed a higher percentage of SPEP abnormalities than IFE. MASS-FIX was slightly more sensitive than IFE when confirming an M-protein in samples with an abnormal free light chain ratio. MASS-FIX had a very low sample repeat rate (1.5%). MASS-FIX was highly automatable resulting in a higher number of samples/technologist/day than IFE (∼30% more). CONCLUSION: Overall, MASS-FIX was successful in maintaining validation characteristics. MASS-FIX was more sensitive in confirming SPEP abnormalities when compared with IFE. Ability to detect therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and glycosylated light chains was distinctly advantageous.

Apolipoprotein E mRNA expression in mononuclear cells from normolipidemic and hypercholesterolemic individuals treated with atorvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is a key component of the lipid metabolism. Polymorphisms at the apoE gene (APOE) have been associated with cardiovascular disease, lipid levels and lipid-lowering response to statins. We evaluated the effects on APOE expression of hypercholesterolemia, APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 genotypes and atorvastatin treatment in Brazilian individuals. The relationship of APOE genotypes and plasma lipids and atorvastatin response was also tested in this population. METHODS: APOE ε2/ε3/ε4 and plasma lipids were evaluated in 181 normolipidemic (NL) and 181 hypercholesterolemic (HC) subjects. HC individuals with indication for lowering-cholesterol treatment (n = 141) were treated with atorvastatin (10 mg/day/4-weeks). APOE genotypes and APOE mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed by TaqMan real time PCR. RESULTS: HC had lower APOE expression than NL group (p < 0.05) and individuals with low APOE expression showed higher plasma total and LDL cholesterol and apoB, as well as higher apoAI (p < 0.05). Individuals carrying ε2 allele have reduced risk for hypercholesterolemia (OR: 0.27, 95% I.C.: 0.08-0.85, p < 0.05) and NL ε2 carriers had lower total and LDL cholesterol and apoB levels, and higher HDL cholesterol than non-carriers (p < 0.05). APOE genotypes did not affect APOE expression and atorvastatin response. Atorvastatin treatment do not modify APOE expression, however those individuals without LDL cholesterol goal achievement after atorvastatin treatment according to the IV Brazilian Guidelines for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Prevention had lower APOE expression than patients with desirable response after the treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: APOE expression in PBMC is modulated by hypercholesterolemia and the APOE mRNA level regulates the plasma lipid profile. Moreover the expression profile is not modulated neither by atorvastatin nor APOE genotypes. In our population, APOE ε2 allele confers protection against hypercholesterolemia and a less atherogenic lipid profile. Moreover, low APOE expression after treatment of patients with poor response suggests a possible role of APOE level in atorvastatin response.

Ravulizumab: Characterization and quantitation of a new C5 inhibitor using isotype specific affinity purification and high-resolution mass spectrometry.

INTRODUCTION: Ravulizumab (RAVUL) is a new complement inhibitor, with a difference of 4 amino acids in the heavy chain from a predecessor compound, eculizumab (ECUL). OBJECTIVES: First, to utilize mass spectrometry (MS) to characterize RAVUL and verify differences from its predecessor and, second, to validate and implement a lab developed test (LDT) for RAVUL that will allow for quantitative therapeutic monitoring. METHODS: A time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOF-MS) was used to characterize and differentiate the molecular weight differences between RAVUL and ECUL by both digest and reduction experiments. In parallel, an LDT for RAVUL was validated and implemented utilizing IgG4 enrichment with light chain detection and quantitation on a high throughput orbitrap MS platform. RESULTS: The TOF-MS platform allowed for the mass difference between RAVUL and ECUL to be verified along with providing a proof of concept for a new intact protein quantitation software. An LDT on an orbitrap MS was validated and implemented using intact light chain quantitation, with the limitation that it cannot differentiate between ECUL and RAVUL. The LDT has an analytical measuring range from 5 to 600 mcg/mL, inter-assay imprecision of ≤13% CV (n = 13) and accuracy with <4% error from expected values (n = 20). CONCLUSION: The TOF-MS is a versatile development platform that can be used to characterize and verify the molecular weight differences between the ECUL and RAVUL heavy chains. Routine laboratory testing for RAVUL was viable using an orbitrap-MS to quantitate using the mass of the intact light chain. These two platforms, combined, provide incomparable value in development of LDTs for the clinical laboratory.

Monitoring Ravulizumab effect on complement assays.

Ravulizumab is a new C5 inhibitor therapeutic monoclonal antibody with a longer half-life than eculizumab. Monitoring complete complement blockade by eculizumab has allowed personalized therapy in specific settings. Similar action is expected with ravulizumab. Ravulizumab has 4 different amino acids from eculizumab, which allow greater affinity for the FcRn immunoglobulin receptor and change the affinity of the molecule for C5. Here we investigate if clinical lab tests traditionally used to monitor complement blockade for eculizumab are appropriate for monitoring complement blockade caused by ravulizumab. De-identified serum samples with known normal complement activity were spiked with increasing amounts of ravulizumab, from zero to 1000 µg/mL. Measurement of classical pathway function (CH50) and C5 function using a liposome method (Wako Diagnostics) showed >50% complement inhibition starting with 50 µg/mL of ravulizumab, but inhibition >95% of complement activity was not achieved, with residual measurements of 11% at 700 µg/mL. In contrast, measurement of alternative pathway function using an ELISA (AH50, Wieslab) showed alternative pathway function inhibition of 80% at 50 µg/mL of ravulizumab and > 95% at 200 µg/mL, which is consistent with expected therapeutic concentrations of ravulizumab >175 µg/mL. If replicated in patient sera, AH50 could be a suitable therapeutic monitoring tool.

Clearing drug interferences in myeloma treatment using mass spectrometry.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the possibility of using a combination of a rapid MALDI-TOF-MS method (Mass-Fix) in conjunction with higher resolution LC-ESI-QTOF-MS (miRAMM) measurements to discriminate the IgG kappa M-protein from daratumumab, elotuzumab and isatuximab in myeloma patients. DESIGN & METHODS: 86 patients with an IgG kappa M-protein were spiked with therapeutic levels of the drugs and examined by Mass-Fix and miRAMM to establish the percent of cases that could be resolved by each method. The method was then applied to 21 samples from patients receiving one of the drugs. RESULTS: Mass-Fix was capable of resolving the t-mAb from M-protein for 87 percent of the spiked samples. For the cases unresolved by Mass-Fix, miRAMM was capable of resolving the remaining drug interferences. The 21 IgG kappa myeloma patients that were receiving the drugs were all resolved by Mass-Fix. CONCLUSION: This proposed algorithm allows use of a clinical available assay (Mass-Fix) while maximizing the number of cases that can accurately resolve the t-mAb from the M-protein.

A High-Level Overview of the Regulations Surrounding a Clinical Laboratory and Upcoming Regulatory Challenges for Laboratory Developed Tests.

OBJECTIVE: Regulations for clinical laboratories in the United States are complex. The goal of this review is to improve the clarity of laboratory-developed test (LDT) regulation to facilitate innovation. METHODS: A literature and regulation review of current legislation for compliance by U.S. clinical laboratories was performed, and examples of the steps to implement LDTs within compliance with the regulatory environment are shared. RESULTS: Many federal and state jurisdictions are critical to the functionality of a laboratory in addition to upcoming potential promulgation of the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge IVCT Development Act. Increased regulation, although imperative to maintain consistent, high-standard clinical care, could mean additional costs for developers and healthcare while also hindering innovation. CONCLUSION: An extensive discussion of proposed regulations for LDTs needs to occur. Laboratory testing requires the sustained use of innovative methods at a cost that will permit continued, timely, uninterrupted high-quality service.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry can distinguish immunofixation bands of the same isotype as monoclonal or biclonal proteins.

BACKGROUND: Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are typically characterized by excessive production of a single immunoglobulin, defined as a monoclonal protein (M-protein). Some patients have more than one identifiable M-protein, termed biclonal. Traditional immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) cannot distinguish if two bands of the same isotype represent biclonal proteins or M-proteins with some other feature. A novel assay using immunoenrichment coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (Mass-Fix) was applied to determine whether two bands of the same isotype represented (1) monomers and dimers of a single M-protein, (2) an M-protein plus a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb), (3) an M-protein with light chain glycosylation, or (4) two distinct biclonal M-proteins. METHODS: Patient samples with two bands of the same isotype identified by IFE were enriched using nanobodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, or κ and λ light chains then analyzed by Mass-Fix. Light chain masses were used to differentiate IgGκ M-proteins from t-mAbs. Mass differences between peaks were calculated to identify N-glycosylation or matrix adducts. High-resolution mass spectrometry was used as a comparator method in a subset of samples. RESULTS: Eighty-one residual samples were collected. For IgA, 93% (n = 25) were identified as monoclonal. For IgG, 67% (n = 24) were monoclonal, and 33% (n = 12) were truly biclonal. Among the monoclonal IgGs, the second band represented a glycosylated form for 21% (n = 5), while 33% (n = 8) had masses consistent with a t-mAb. 44% (n = 8) of IgM samples were biclonal, and 56% (n = 10) were monoclonal, of which one was glycosylated. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the utility of mass spectrometry in the characterization of multiple IFE bands of the same isotype. Improved reporting accuracy of M-proteins is useful for monitoring of patients with PCDs.