RESUMEN
Immunoassays have been the preferred method for steroid hormone analysis for more than 50 years. Automated immunoassays (AIAs) offer high-throughput, rapid data turnaround, and low cost for measuring steroid hormone concentrations. The application of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for steroid quantification provides greater specificity and selectivity for individual steroids, the ability to simultaneously analyze multiple steroids, and high-throughput and automation. We compared AIA and LC-MS/MS for analysis of 17ß-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) over the course of several menstrual cycles in 12 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Serum samples were collected every four days across four menstrual cycles from each monkey. AIAs were performed on a Roche cobas e411 analyzer. Analysis of E2 and P4 was performed by LC-MS/MS on a Shimadzu-Nexera-LCMS-8060 instrument. Scatter plots with Passing-Bablok regression showed excellent agreement between AIA and LC-MS/MS for both E2 and P4. Bland-Altman plots revealed no bias for either method; however, AIA overestimated E2 at concentrations >140 pg/ml and underestimated P4 at concentrations >4 ng/ml compared to LC-MS/MS. A comparison of testosterone (T) concentrations measured by AIA and LC-MS/MS in the same samples was also performed. In contrast to E2 and P4, AIA and LC-MS/MS yielded significantly different results for T concentrations, with AIA consistently underestimating concentrations relative to those obtained by LC-MS/MS. Well-characterized AIAs are an excellent tool for daily monitoring of monkey menstrual cycles or providing single data points requiring fast turnaround. In certain situations where AIA may provide inaccurate estimations of E2 and P4 concentrations, LC-MS/MS assays are preferable.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a method to simultaneously quantify five commonly used hormonal contraceptives (HCs) and two endogenous sex steroids by liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and apply this method to human serum samples. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a method to simultaneously analyze ethinyl estradiol (EE2), etonogestrel (ENG), levonorgestrel (LNG), medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone (NET), along with estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4), in human serum for a Shimadzu Nexera-LCMS-8050 LC-MS/MS platform. We analyzed serum collected from women self-reporting use of oral contraceptives, contraceptive implants or injectable contraceptives (n=14) and normally cycling women using no HC (n=15) as well as pooled samples from women administered various HCs (ENG, n=6; LNG, n=14; MPA, n=7; NET, n=5). RESULTS: Limits of quantitation were 0.010ng/mL for E2, EE2 and P4; 0.020ng/mL for ENG, LNG and MPA; and 0.040ng/mL for NET. Precisions for all assays, as indicated by coefficient of variation, were less than or equal to 12.1%. Accuracies for all assays were in the range of 95%-108%. Endogenous hormone values obtained from analysis of human serum samples are in agreement with levels previously reported in the literature for normally cycling women as well as for women taking the appropriate HC. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a robust, accurate and sensitive method for simultaneously analyzing commonly used contraceptive steroids and endogenous sex steroids in human serum. IMPLICATIONS: This analytical method can be used for quantitating contraceptive steroid levels in women for monitoring systemic exposure to determine drug interactions, nonadherence, misreporting and proper dosing.