Hemodynamic Response to Rapid Saline Infusion Compared with Exercise in Healthy Participants Aged 20-80 Years.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Rapid saline infusion and exercise has been proposed as methods to unmask cardiovascular disease. However, the normal hemodynamic response to rapid saline infusion has not been compared to exercise nor is it known whether the responses are age-dependent.We assessed the hemodynamic response to rapid saline infusion in healthy participants over a wide age-range and compared it to exercise in the same participants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty healthy participants (young <40 years, n = 16, middle-aged 40-59 years, n = 15, elderly 60-80 years, n = 19) underwent right heart catheterization at rest, during semisupine ergometer exercise at three exercise levels (25%, 50%, and 75% of peak VO2) and after rapid saline infusion (10 ml/kg at a rate of 150 ml/min). Rapid saline infusion significantly increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) similarly across all age groups (∆PCWP 6 ±â€¯2; 7 ±â€¯2; 6 ±â€¯4 mmHg for the young, middle-aged and elderly respectively) with no correlation between age and ∆PCWP (r = 0.05; p = 0.74). However, there was a negative correlation between age and ∆stroke volume (SV) as elderly participants had a lower increase in SV following rapid saline infusion (r = 0.44; p = 0.002). On the contrary, exercise-induced significantly larger and age-dependent increases in PCWP (r = 0.58; p < 0.0001). Exercise also caused a larger increase in SV compared with rapid fluid loading (p = 0.0003) CONCLUSION: Unlike exercise, rapid saline infusion caused an age-independent increase in PCWP in healthy adults. Suggesting that age-related impairments beyond passive stiffness have a greater impact on exercise-induced increase in PCWP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01974557.

Resting and exercise haemodynamic characteristics of patients with advanced heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: This study aimed to describe haemodynamic features of patients with advanced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as defined by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). METHODS AND RESULTS: We used pooled data from two dedicated HFpEF studies with invasive exercise haemodynamic protocols, the REDUCE LAP-HF (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients with Heart Failure) trial and the REDUCE LAP-HF I trial, and categorized patients according to advanced heart failure (AdHF) criteria. The well-characterized HFpEF patients were considered advanced if they had persistent New York Heart Association classification of III-IV and heart failure (HF) hospitalization < 12 months and a 6 min walk test distance < 300 m. Twenty-four (22%) out of 108 patients met the AdHF criteria. On evaluation, clinical characteristics and resting haemodynamics were not different in the two groups. Patients with AdHF had lower work capacity compared with non-advanced patients (35 ± 16 vs. 45 ± 18 W, P = 0.021). Workload-corrected pulmonary capillary wedge pressure normalized to body weight (PCWL) was higher in AdHF patients compared with non-advanced (112 ± 55 vs. 86 ± 49 mmHg/W/kg, P = 0.04). Further, AdHF patients had a smaller increase in cardiac index during exercise (1.1 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.9 L/min/m2 , P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: A significantly higher PCWL and lower cardiac index reserve during exercise were observed in AdHF patients compared with non-advanced. These differences were not apparent at rest. Therapies targeting the haemodynamic compromise associated with advanced HFpEF are needed.