Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium glycosides as an add-on treatment in adults with chronic urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Tripterygium glycosides (TG), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been used to treat chronic urticaria (CU) in China, and the evidence of TG for CU needs to be updated thoroughly. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TG combined with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) in adults with CU. METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials were searched in eight databases until May 31, 2022, including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The search terms included urticaria, Tripterygium, Lei Gong Teng, and Leigongteng. Rev Man 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies with 2788 patients were included. The pooled results showed that TG plus H1-AH was superior to H1-AH alone in cure rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.63, p = 0.0003), total efficacy rate (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.30 to 1.50, p < 0.00001), pruritus (MD = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.54 to -0.11, p = 0.003), wheal number (MD = -0.31, 95% CI = -0.55 to -0.07, p = 0.01), wheal size (MD = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.46 to -0.19, p < 0.00001), and the serum level of immunoglobulin E (SMD = -1.39, 95% CI = -2.42 to -0.36, p = 0.008). Moreover, adverse events between two groups were mild, and their incidences were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TG and H1-AH is a promising and safe treatment for adults with refractory CU. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the evidence.

Efficacy and safety of compound glycyrrhizin in the patients with vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Compound glycyrrhizin (CG) is widely used to treat vitiligo in China, and the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of CG for vitiligo need further analysis. This study aimed to systematically reevaluate the efficacy and safety of CG in the patients with vitiligo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Eight literature databases were searched up to 31 December 2022, and randomized controlled trials which compared CG plus conventional treatments with conventional treatments alone were included. RESULTS: 17 studies with 1492 patients were included. The pooled results showed that the combination of CG and conventional treatments was superior to conventional treatments alone in the total efficacy rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.40 to 1.69, P < 0.00001), cure rate (RR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.32 to 1.99, P < 0.00001), the levels of serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-17, and TGF-ß, and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cell in blood. Moreover, few patients suffered from the mild and tolerable AEs of CG. CONCLUSIONS: CG plus conventional treatments is an effective treatment for vitiligo with mild and tolerable AEs. More high-quality and large-sample studies are required in the future to provide more evidence of CG for vitiligo. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023401166.

Efficacy and safety of total glucosides of paeony as an add-on treatment in adolescents and adults with chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Total glycosides of paeony (TGP), an active compound extracted from the dried roots of Paenoia lactiflora Pall., has been widely used to treat chronic urticaria (CU) in China. This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TGP as an add-on treatment for the treatment of CU in adolescents and adults. Methods: Eight literature databases and two clinical trial registries were searched from their inception to 31 May 2022. Randomized controlled trials on TGP as an add-on treatment for CU in adolescents and adults were included. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used for the methodological quality assessment, and RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software were used for data analyses. Results: A total of 30 studies with 2,973 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The methodological qualities of all included studies were suboptimal. The pooled results showed that TGP combined with H1-antihistamine was superior to H1-antihistamine alone in the cure rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39 to 1.71, p < 0.00001), total efficacy rate (RR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.26 to 1.40, p < 0.00001), urticaria activity score 7 (mean difference (MD) = -4.03, 95%CI = -6.62 to -1.44, p = 0.002), recurrence rate (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.20 to 0.46, p < 0.00001), and the level of IgE in serum (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.96, 95%CI = -3.02 to -0.90, p = 0.0003). In terms of safety, the incidence of diarrhea (RR = 6.19, 95%CI = 3.39 to 11.29, p < 0.00001) was significantly increased in the TGP plus H1-antihistamine groups, and no abnormal results of laboratory tests and electrocardiogram were reported in two groups. The qualities of evidences were evaluated as moderate to low. Conclusions: TGP as an add-on treatment could provide a good effect for CU in adolescents and adults with mild and tolerable adverse events. However, in view of poor methodological quality, high-quality and long-term clinical trials are needed in the future to confirm and update the evidence.

Efficacy and Safety of Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream for Non-Exudative Eczema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Mucopolysaccharide polysulfate (MPS) cream as a moisturizer is widely applied to treat eczema, and a lot of clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy and safety. However, there is no further research to collect and analyze these studies. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MPS cream as monotherapy or add-on therapy for non-exudative eczema. Methods: Ten databases were searched to identify the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to July 31, 2021. Revman 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. Results: A total of eligible 20 studies were included. Among the 20 studies, 2 studies compared MPS cream with other moisturizers, 14 compared MPS cream plus topical corticosteroids (TCS) with TCS alone, and 4 compared with MPS cream plus tacrolimus ointment with tacrolimus ointment alone. The pooled results demonstrated that MPS cream had a higher total efficacy rate [Risk ratio (RR) 1.21, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.30, P < 0.00001], a lower recurrence rate (RR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.74, P = 0.002) and a lower pruritus score [mean difference (MD) -1.78, 95% CI: -2.16 to -1.40, P < 0.00001] than urea cream or vaseline ointment. Moreover, in comparison with TCS or tacrolimus ointment alone, the combination treatment performed better in terms of total efficacy rate, total symptom score, recurrence rate, and pruritus score. For safety, the skin adverse events were mild, and MPS cream as monotherapy or add-on therapy did not increase the risk of skin adverse events. Conclusions: MPS cream as monotherapy or add-on therapy could provide a good effect for treating non-exudative eczema with mild and tolerable skin adverse events. However, due to the suboptimal quality of the included studies, high-quality and large-sample RCTs are needed in the future for update or validation. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/), identifier: CRD42021265735.